Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA)
What is it?
Jonathan A Smith
School of Psychology
Birkbeck University of London
What is it?
How do you do it?
What does it look like?
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA)
Focus on lived experience of participant
Try to make sense of the meanings of events/ experiences/ states to participants themselves
Naturalistic (qualitative methodology)
small n
Dual components:
Phenomenological,
Interpretative plus
Idiographic not nomothetic
Phenomenology
‘Going back to the things themselves’ (Edmund Husserl)
Reflexive turn inwards
away from the objects in the world and
towards our perception of those objects
however intentionality links perceiver with perceived
Different phenomenologies
1. Idiographic
Detailed analysis of elements of the reflected personal experience- the subjective experience of the social world. IPA does this (or at least attempts to)
2. Eidetic
Establish essential features/general structure of that experience across people.
Giorgi’s empirical phenomenology tries to do this
3. Transcendental
Put to one side the content of the subjective process in order to attend to pure consciousness itself.
Interpretative
Hermeneutics of identity/empathy
Hermeneutics of questioning/being critical
Understanding combines these
Double hermeneutic:
Researcher is trying to make sense of the participant trying to make sense of….
The hermeneutic circle
Part and whole
Heidegger and Gadamer on how fore-understanding important in interpretation but sometimes may only be discovered in confrontation with new
Methodology of IPA
Data collection
Purposive homogeneous sampling
Interview schedule used flexibly- contrast to structured interview
Verbatim transcript
Analysis
Systematic search for themes in first case
Forge connections between themes,
Then move across case
Usual aim: establishment of superordinate themes
However IPA is approach not ‘methodolatory’
Method can be adapted
Try capture rich account-lived experience for individual
Write Up
Narrative account presents elicited themes supported by verbatim extracts from participants
GENETIC TEST FOR HUNTINGTON'S DISEASE:
THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS
Co-researchers
Susan Michie (UCL)
Oliver Quarrel (University of Sheffield)
Mike Stephenson
Huntington's Disease (HD)
progressive, neuro-degenerative disorder, usually of adult onset
serious motor disability, affective disturbance, and cognitive impairment
no treatment
Predictive testing since 1986
before testing, candidate knows risk status is 50%
testing almost definitive
time of onset is unclear
positive result will also change the risk status of their children from 25% to 50%
how does an individual make such a decision and what are the psychological consequences of it?
Existing work
primarily quantitative
1. Some studies on factors influencing the decision of whether to test or not.
Tibben et al. (1993b), Codori et al. (1994)
Typical factors pro testing:
assistance with reproductive decisions
planning for the future
anti testing:
searching for symptoms
being unable to live with the knowledge
2. most work is on psychological effects of knowing the test result. (Tibben et al. 1993a, Bloch et al. 1992)
positive test result can cause psychological distress but usually not major psychiatric problems
This study
concerned with how does individual make decision?
Procedure
Semi-structured interview, early in counsel protocol:
HD, the test, decision-making
taped and transcribed verbatim
analysed with IPA
for results see
Smith JA, Michie S, Stephenson M. Quarrell O, (2002) Risk perception & decision-making processes in candidates for the genetic test for Huntington’s Disease: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 131-144
Conclusion
IPA concerned with actual instances of life not actuarial incidence.
This work useful as real-world example of DM
And to help inform genetic counselling
Useful reading on IPA
Theoretical background
Smith, JA (1996) Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology Psychology & Health, 11, 261-71
Practicalities
Smith, J.A. and Osborn, M. (2003) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In JA Smith (ed) Qualitative Psychology. London: Sage.
Empirical papers
See website
Website http://www.psyc.bbk.ac.uk/ipa/
4