Western Washington University Faculty Evaluation Results
Western Washington University Faculty Evaluation Results
Instructor: / Stangl, Paul Alfred / Term: / Fall 2015Class: / ENVS 361 Introduction to Planning (42275)
Mailstop: / WWU MS9085
/ Form: / B
Number Enrolled: / 51
Number Responding: / 43
ITEM / DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES*
E / VG / G / F / P / VP / NS / MEAN
1 Clarity of student responsibilities and requirements was: / 10 / 20 / 9 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 3.86
2 Organization of the course was: / 6 / 19 / 15 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.65
3 Challenge level of assigned work was: / 5 / 21 / 15 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.67
4 Fairness of evaluation procedure was: / 18 / 15 / 5 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 2 / 4.17
5 Intellectual challenge offered by course was: / 6 / 15 / 20 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 3.62
6 Instructor's classroom presentation was: / 4 / 15 / 13 / 9 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 3.29
7 Instructor's answers to student questions were: / 8 / 18 / 12 / 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.65
8 Instructor's ability to provide alternate explanations if needed was: / 11 / 11 / 16 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.65
9 Instructor's use of examples and illustrations was: / 18 / 12 / 9 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.02
10 Instructor's availability for extra help was: / 6 / 19 / 14 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 3.67
11 Instructor's enthusiasm for the subject was: / 19 / 15 / 9 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.23
12 Instructor's record for coming to class on time was: / 14 / 19 / 7 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.02
13 Instructor's record for meeting with the class as scheduled was: / 22 / 14 / 4 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 4.33
14 Instructor's use of class time was: / 10 / 17 / 13 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.79
15 Instructor's lecture pace was: / 5 / 9 / 16 / 6 / 4 / 0 / 3 / 3.13
16 Instructor's awareness of student comprehension was: / 7 / 19 / 13 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.67
17 Instructor's choice of exam questions relative to lectures was: / 11 / 15 / 11 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 2 / 3.78
18 The course overall was: / 7 / 17 / 13 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 3.62
19 Instructor's effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was: / 9 / 23 / 8 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.88
20 Instructor's contribution overall to the course was: / 9 / 20 / 12 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.84
25 Form B - Option 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 43 / NA
26 Form B - Option 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 43 / NA
27 Form B - Option 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 43 / NA
28 Form B - Option 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 43 / NA
29 Form B - Option 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 43 / NA
When you registered, was this a class you wanted to take?
27 / Yes
5 / No
11 / Neutral
/ This course is: (Choose only one)
30 / in my MAJOR
11 / in my MINOR or PROGRAM REQUIREMENT
0 / a GUR (General University Requirement)
1 / an ELECTIVE
1 / other
/ My class standing is:
0 / Freshman
4 / Sophomore
14 / Junior
24 / Senior
0 / Graduate
1 / Other
/ Grade I expect to receive
17 / A
24 / B
2 / C
0 / D
0 / F
0 / Pass or Satisfactory
0 / No Pass or Unsatisfactory
*Key: E= Excellent 5; VG = Very Good 4; G = Good 3; F = Fair 2; P = Poor 1; VP = Very Poor 0; NS = No Selection
Western Washington University Faculty Evaluation Results
Instructor: / Stangl, Paul Alfred / Term: / Fall 2015Class: / ENVS 470 Planning Methods (41755)
Mailstop: / WWU MS9085
/ Form: / D
Number Enrolled: / 18
Number Responding: / 12
ITEM / DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES*
E / VG / G / F / P / VP / NS / MEAN
1 Use of class time was: / 3 / 5 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.92
2 Organization of course was: / 1 / 5 / 4 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.42
3 Contribution of assignments to understanding course content was: / 3 / 7 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.08
4 Clarity of student responsibilities and requirements was: / 1 / 4 / 3 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.08
5 Challenge level of assigned work was: / 4 / 5 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 4.18
6 Fairness of evaluation procedures was: / 5 / 6 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.33
7 Intellectual challenge offered by the course was: / 6 / 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.42
8 Instructor's explanations were: / 6 / 3 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 4.08
9 Instructor's ability to provide alternate explanations if needed was: / 5 / 5 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.25
10 Instructor's use of examples and illustrations was: / 6 / 4 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.33
11 Instructor's ability to deal with student difficulties was: / 5 / 4 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 4.18
12 Instructor's answers to student questions were: / 5 / 6 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.33
13 Instructor's availability for extra help was: / 5 / 4 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.08
14 Instructor's enthusiasm for the subject was: / 6 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.50
15 Instructor's record for coming to class on time was: / 4 / 3 / 3 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.67
16 Instructor's record for meeting with the class as scheduled was: / 6 / 3 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.25
17 Instructor's prompt response to homework was: / 5 / 4 / 0 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.83
18 The course overall was: / 6 / 3 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 4.36
19 Instructor's effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was: / 7 / 3 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.42
20 Instructor's contribution overall to the course was: / 8 / 2 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.50
25 Form D - Option 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 12 / NA
26 Form D - Option 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 12 / NA
27 Form D - Option 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 12 / NA
28 Form D - Option 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 12 / NA
29 Form D - Option 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 12 / NA
When you registered, was this a class you wanted to take?
9 / Yes
1 / No
2 / Neutral
/ This course is: (Choose only one)
11 / in my MAJOR
1 / in my MINOR or PROGRAM REQUIREMENT
0 / a GUR (General University Requirement)
0 / an ELECTIVE
0 / other
/ My class standing is:
0 / Freshman
0 / Sophomore
0 / Junior
12 / Senior
0 / Graduate
0 / Other
/ Grade I expect to receive
9 / A
3 / B
0 / C
0 / D
0 / F
0 / Pass or Satisfactory
0 / No Pass or Unsatisfactory
*Key: E= Excellent 5; VG = Very Good 4; G = Good 3; F = Fair 2; P = Poor 1; VP = Very Poor 0; NS = No Selection
Western Washington University Faculty Evaluation Results
Instructor: / Stangl, Paul Alfred / Term: / Winter 2016Class: / ENVS 361 Introduction to Planning (11744)
Mailstop: / WWU MS9085
/ Form: / A
Number Enrolled: / 52
Number Responding: / 26
ITEM / DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES*
E / VG / G / F / P / VP / NS / MEAN
1 Clarity of course goals and objectives was: / 7 / 14 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.08
2 Challenge level of assigned work was: / 8 / 7 / 9 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.81
3 Fairness of evaluation procedures was: / 11 / 7 / 5 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 4.08
4 Intellectual challenge offered by the course was: / 8 / 10 / 7 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.96
5 Organization of the course was: / 10 / 8 / 6 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.00
6 Instructor's classroom presentation was: / 10 / 10 / 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.12
7 Instructor's use of classroom time was: / 13 / 9 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.35
8 Instructor's answers to student's questions were: / 10 / 11 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.19
9 Instructor's explanations were: / 13 / 7 / 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.23
10 Instructor's use of examples and illustrations was: / 14 / 8 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.35
11 Instructor's availability for extra help was: / 10 / 8 / 8 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.08
12 Instructor's enthusiasm for the subject was: / 16 / 7 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.50
13 Instructor's prompt response to homework/tests was: / 20 / 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.73
14 Instructor's record for coming to class on time was: / 18 / 7 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.65
15 Instructor's record for meeting with the class as scheduled was: / 18 / 7 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.65
16 Instructor's lecture pace was: / 9 / 9 / 3 / 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.81
17 Instructor's awareness of student comprehension was: / 10 / 6 / 9 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.96
18 The overall course was: / 11 / 6 / 8 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 4.12
19 Instructor's effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was: / 14 / 7 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.35
20 Instructor's contribution overall to the course was: / 16 / 6 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.42
25 Form A - Option 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 26 / NA
26 Form A - Option 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 26 / NA
27 Form A - Option 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 26 / NA
28 Form A - Option 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 25 / 5.00
29 Form A - Option 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 26 / NA
When you registered, was this a class you wanted to take?
21 / Yes
1 / No
3 / Neutral
/ This course is: (Choose only one)
21 / in my MAJOR
1 / in my MINOR or PROGRAM REQUIREMENT
0 / a GUR (General University Requirement)
1 / an ELECTIVE
1 / other
/ My class standing is:
0 / Freshman
6 / Sophomore
18 / Junior
2 / Senior
0 / Graduate
0 / Other
/ Grade I expect to receive
9 / A
12 / B
5 / C
0 / D
0 / F
0 / Pass or Satisfactory
0 / No Pass or Unsatisfactory
*Key: E= Excellent 5; VG = Very Good 4; G = Good 3; F = Fair 2; P = Poor 1; VP = Very Poor 0; NS = No Selection
Western Washington University Faculty Evaluation Results
Instructor: / Stangl, Paul Alfred / Term: / Winter 2016Class: / ENVS 373 Transportation Systems Plan (11743)
Mailstop: / WWU MS9085
/ Form: / B
Number Enrolled: / 28
Number Responding: / 19
ITEM / DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES*
E / VG / G / F / P / VP / NS / MEAN
1 Clarity of student responsibilities and requirements was: / 4 / 9 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.89
2 Organization of the course was: / 4 / 9 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.89
3 Challenge level of assigned work was: / 4 / 8 / 7 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.84
4 Fairness of evaluation procedure was: / 6 / 11 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.21
5 Intellectual challenge offered by course was: / 5 / 6 / 7 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.79
6 Instructor's classroom presentation was: / 5 / 6 / 8 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.84
7 Instructor's answers to student questions were: / 9 / 7 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.26
8 Instructor's ability to provide alternate explanations if needed was: / 7 / 8 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.16
9 Instructor's use of examples and illustrations was: / 6 / 10 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.16
10 Instructor's availability for extra help was: / 9 / 5 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.21
11 Instructor's enthusiasm for the subject was: / 8 / 8 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.26
12 Instructor's record for coming to class on time was: / 8 / 9 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.32
13 Instructor's record for meeting with the class as scheduled was: / 11 / 5 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.42
14 Instructor's use of class time was: / 8 / 6 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.16
15 Instructor's lecture pace was: / 4 / 7 / 6 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 3.78
16 Instructor's awareness of student comprehension was: / 4 / 8 / 6 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.79
17 Instructor's choice of exam questions relative to lectures was: / 3 / 8 / 7 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.68
18 The course overall was: / 4 / 8 / 7 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.84
19 Instructor's effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was: / 7 / 7 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.11
20 Instructor's contribution overall to the course was: / 9 / 5 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.21
25 Form B - Option 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 19 / NA
26 Form B - Option 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 19 / NA
27 Form B - Option 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 19 / NA
28 Form B - Option 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 19 / NA
29 Form B - Option 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 19 / NA
When you registered, was this a class you wanted to take?
14 / Yes
1 / No
3 / Neutral
/ This course is: (Choose only one)
16 / in my MAJOR
2 / in my MINOR or PROGRAM REQUIREMENT
0 / a GUR (General University Requirement)
0 / an ELECTIVE
1 / other
/ My class standing is:
0 / Freshman
0 / Sophomore
8 / Junior
11 / Senior
0 / Graduate
0 / Other
/ Grade I expect to receive
10 / A
8 / B
0 / C
0 / D
0 / F
1 / Pass or Satisfactory
0 / No Pass or Unsatisfactory
*Key: E= Excellent 5; VG = Very Good 4; G = Good 3; F = Fair 2; P = Poor 1; VP = Very Poor 0; NS = No Selection
Western Washington University Faculty Evaluation Results
Instructor: / Stangl, Paul Alfred / Term: / Spring 2016Class: / ENVS 361 Introduction to Planning (21463)
Mailstop: / WWU MS9085
/ Form: / B
Number Enrolled: / 58
Number Responding: / 38
ITEM / DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES*
E / VG / G / F / P / VP / NS / MEAN
1 Clarity of student responsibilities and requirements was: / 20 / 10 / 6 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 4.32
2 Organization of the course was: / 17 / 11 / 9 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.16
3 Challenge level of assigned work was: / 12 / 14 / 11 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.97
4 Fairness of evaluation procedure was: / 17 / 15 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.29
5 Intellectual challenge offered by course was: / 13 / 14 / 11 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.05
6 Instructor's classroom presentation was: / 17 / 15 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.29
7 Instructor's answers to student questions were: / 18 / 14 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.32
8 Instructor's ability to provide alternate explanations if needed was: / 25 / 7 / 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.47
9 Instructor's use of examples and illustrations was: / 23 / 13 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 4.59
10 Instructor's availability for extra help was: / 14 / 19 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.24
11 Instructor's enthusiasm for the subject was: / 27 / 9 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.66
12 Instructor's record for coming to class on time was: / 20 / 14 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.42
13 Instructor's record for meeting with the class as scheduled was: / 24 / 11 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.55
14 Instructor's use of class time was: / 21 / 13 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.45
15 Instructor's lecture pace was: / 17 / 12 / 8 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.18
16 Instructor's awareness of student comprehension was: / 12 / 16 / 8 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.00
17 Instructor's choice of exam questions relative to lectures was: / 15 / 14 / 7 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.11
18 The course overall was: / 14 / 19 / 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.21
19 Instructor's effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was: / 18 / 14 / 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.29
20 Instructor's contribution overall to the course was: / 21 / 12 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.42
25 Form B - Option 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 37 / 5.00
26 Form B - Option 2 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 37 / 4.00
27 Form B - Option 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 37 / 5.00
28 Form B - Option 4 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 37 / 4.00
29 Form B - Option 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 37 / 5.00
When you registered, was this a class you wanted to take?
28 / Yes
1 / No
9 / Neutral
/ This course is: (Choose only one)
28 / in my MAJOR
6 / in my MINOR or PROGRAM REQUIREMENT
0 / a GUR (General University Requirement)
4 / an ELECTIVE
0 / other
/ My class standing is:
0 / Freshman
15 / Sophomore
17 / Junior
6 / Senior
0 / Graduate
0 / Other
/ Grade I expect to receive
16 / A
20 / B
2 / C
0 / D
0 / F
0 / Pass or Satisfactory
0 / No Pass or Unsatisfactory
*Key: E= Excellent 5; VG = Very Good 4; G = Good 3; F = Fair 2; P = Poor 1; VP = Very Poor 0; NS = No Selection
Western Washington University Faculty Evaluation Results
Instructor: / Stangl, Paul Alfred / Term: / Spring 2016Class: / ENVS 370 History of Planning (23060)
Mailstop: / WWU MS9085
/ Form: / A
Number Enrolled: / 48
Number Responding: / 26
ITEM / DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES*
E / VG / G / F / P / VP / NS / MEAN
1 Clarity of course goals and objectives was: / 3 / 14 / 6 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.62
2 Challenge level of assigned work was: / 4 / 13 / 5 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.65
3 Fairness of evaluation procedures was: / 6 / 11 / 5 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.69
4 Intellectual challenge offered by the course was: / 3 / 15 / 3 / 4 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.58
5 Organization of the course was: / 3 / 9 / 6 / 5 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 3.24
6 Instructor's classroom presentation was: / 5 / 10 / 9 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.69
7 Instructor's use of classroom time was: / 7 / 5 / 10 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.58
8 Instructor's answers to student's questions were: / 12 / 8 / 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.19
9 Instructor's explanations were: / 9 / 13 / 2 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.12
10 Instructor's use of examples and illustrations was: / 13 / 10 / 1 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.31
11 Instructor's availability for extra help was: / 8 / 7 / 6 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 3.72
12 Instructor's enthusiasm for the subject was: / 14 / 8 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.38
13 Instructor's prompt response to homework/tests was: / 8 / 9 / 6 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.81
14 Instructor's record for coming to class on time was: / 12 / 5 / 7 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.04
15 Instructor's record for meeting with the class as scheduled was: / 12 / 8 / 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4.19
16 Instructor's lecture pace was: / 6 / 8 / 10 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.69
17 Instructor's awareness of student comprehension was: / 5 / 11 / 4 / 5 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 3.54
18 The overall course was: / 4 / 11 / 5 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.50
19 Instructor's effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was: / 6 / 10 / 7 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.73
20 Instructor's contribution overall to the course was: / 7 / 12 / 5 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3.92
25 Form A - Option 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 26 / NA
26 Form A - Option 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 26 / NA
27 Form A - Option 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 26 / NA
28 Form A - Option 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 26 / NA
29 Form A - Option 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 26 / NA
When you registered, was this a class you wanted to take?
17 / Yes
0 / No
9 / Neutral
/ This course is: (Choose only one)
23 / in my MAJOR
0 / in my MINOR or PROGRAM REQUIREMENT
0 / a GUR (General University Requirement)
2 / an ELECTIVE
1 / other
/ My class standing is:
0 / Freshman
1 / Sophomore
10 / Junior
15 / Senior
0 / Graduate
0 / Other
/ Grade I expect to receive
5 / A
20 / B
1 / C
0 / D
0 / F
0 / Pass or Satisfactory
0 / No Pass or Unsatisfactory
*Key: E= Excellent 5; VG = Very Good 4; G = Good 3; F = Fair 2; P = Poor 1; VP = Very Poor 0; NS = No Selection