Appendix C: Summary Tables
Table C.1.Summary of Results with Dyslexia as a Between-Subjects Factor on Pre-test Data.
Component / Effects / F / p / η
P1 / Dyslexia / 0.22 / .644 / 0.01
(50 – 180 ms) / Type1 / 77.55 / .000 / 0.68
Length / 0.65 / .426 / .018
Hemisphere / 3.55 / .067 / 0.09
Type*Length / 7.12 / .011 / 0.16
Type*Hemisphere / 0.90 / .349 / 0.02
Length*Hemisphere2 / 4.63 / .000 / 0.11
Dyslexia*Type / 2.41 / .129 / 0.06
Dyslexia*Length / 0.39 / .537 / 0.01
Dyslexia*Hemisphere / 0.21 / .651 / 0.01
Dyslexia*Type*Length / 1.98 / .168 / 0.05
Dyslexia*Type*Hemisphere / 0.07 / .792 / 0.00
Dyslexia*Length*Hemisphere / 0.01 / .916 / 0.00
Type*Length*Hemisphere / 1.88 / .179 / 0.05
Dyslexia*Type*Length*Hemisphere / 0.32 / .578 / 0.01
N1 / Dyslexia / 2.17 / .149 / 0.06
(175 – 300 ms) / Type1 / 80.02 / .000 / 0.69
Length2 / 3.39 / .031 / 0.09
Hemisphere1 / 2.25 / .142 / 0.06
Type*Length / 1.15 / .291 / 0.03
Type*Hemisphere / 0.01 / .907 / 0.00
Length*Hemisphere / 1.39 / .246 / 0.04
Dyslexia*Type / 0.00 / .988 / 0.00
Dyslexia*Length / 0.09 / .769 / 0.00
Dyslexia*Hemisphere / 0.03 / .860 / 0.00
Dyslexia*Type*Length / 4.25 / .046 / 0.11
Dyslexia*Type*Hemisphere / 5.76 / .022 / 1.38
Dyslexia*Length*Hemisphere / 7.68 / .009 / 0.18
Type*Length*Hemisphere / 0.00 / .958 / 0.00
Dyslexia*Type*Length*Hemisphere / 2.24 / .143 / 0.06
P2 / Dyslexia / 0.03 / .869 / 0.00
(250 – 400 ms) / Type1 / 8.30 / .007 / 0.19
Length / 0.03 / .865 / 0.00
Hemisphere1 / 9.40 / .004 / 0.21
Type*Length2 / 3.17 / .026 / 0.08
Type*Hemisphere1 / 9.18 / .005 / 0.20
Length*Hemisphere / 1.01 / .323 / 0.03
Dyslexia*Type / 0.09 / .771 / 0.00
Dyslexia*Length / 0.08 / .781 / 0.00
Dyslexia*Hemisphere / 0.46 / .501 / 0.01
Dyslexia*Type*Length / 0.58 / .452 / 0.02
Dyslexia*Type*Hemisphere / 0.59 / .448 / 0.02
Dyslexia*Length*Hemisphere / 0.48 / .494 / 0.01
Type*Length*Hemisphere / 0.17 / .686 / 0.01
Dyslexia*Type*Length*Hemisphere / 0.33 / .568 / 0.01
Note: bold indicates significant at p.05.
1 The effect was also found significant in interaction with the factor electrode. 2 The effect was only found significant when qualified by Electrode.
Table C.2.
Summary of Results with Training as a Within-Subjects Factor
Component / Effects / F / p / η
P1 / Training / 3.40 / .083 / 0.17
(50 – 180 ms) / Type1 / 84.05 / .000 / 0.83
Length / 4.67 / .045 / 0.22
Hemisphere / 2.17 / .159 / 0.11
Type*Length / 2.45 / .136 / 0.13
Type*Hemisphere / 0.48 / .495 / 0.03
Length*Hemisphere / 0.52 / .482 / 0.03
Training*Type3 / 3.11 / .052 / 0.16
Training*Length / 1.16 / .297 / 0.06
Training*Hemisphere / 0.30 / .590 / 0.02
Training*Type*Length / 0.13 / .726 / 0.01
Training*Type*Hemisphere / 0.02 / .879 / 0.00
Training*Length*Hemisphere / 0.21 / .651 / 0.01
Type*Length*Hemisphere2 / 2.73 / .045 / 0.14
Training*Type*Length*Hemisphere / 0.00 / .963 / 0.00
N1 / Training / 3.55 / .077 / 0.17
(175 – 300 ms) / Type1 / 36.90 / .000 / 0.68
Length2 / 5.58 / .002 / 0.25
Hemisphere / 1.29 / .272 / 0.07
Type*Length / 5.69 / .029 / 0.25
Type*Hemisphere / 2.70 / .119 / 0.14
Length*Hemisphere / 0.19 / .669 / 0.01
Training*Type / 0.23 / .636 / 0.01
Training*Length / 0.23 / .638 / 0.01
Training*Hemisphere / 0.39 / .540 / 0.02
Training*Type*Length / 0.21 / .656 / 0.01
Training*Type*Hemisphere / 0.00 / .958 / 0.00
Training*Length*Hemisphere / 1.13 / .303 / 0.06
Type*Length*Hemisphere / 0.05 / .825 / 0.00
Training*Type*Length*Hemisphere / 2.09 / .166 / 0.11
P2 / Training / 0.47 / .502 / 0.03
(250 – 400 ms) / Type / 5.71 / .029 / 0.25
Length / 1.53 / .233 / 0.08
Hemisphere2 / 4.40 / .012 / 0.20
Type*Length2 / 3.58 / .013 / 0.17
Type*Hemisphere / 2.88 / .108 / 0.14
Length*Hemisphere / 2.06 / .169 / 0.11
Training*Type / 0.22 / .644 / 0.01
Training*Length / 0.82 / .378 / 0.05
Training*Hemisphere / 10.88 / .004 / 0.39
Training*Type*Length / 0.52 / .479 / 0.03
Training*Type*Hemisphere / 0.05 / .833 / 0.00
Training*Length*Hemisphere / 0.01 / .913 / 0.00
Type*Length*Hemisphere / 1.45 / .245 / 0.08
Training*Type*Length*Hemisphere2 / 2.74 / .036 / 0.14
Note: bold indicates significant at p.05.
1 The effect was also found significant in interaction with the factor electrode. 2 The effect was only found significant when qualified by Electrode. 3 The effect was only found at a trend level in interaction with Electrode.