Check list for review of deliverable[1]

DELIVERABLE TITLE:
WORK PACKAGE:
AUTHOR:
CQA or EC REVIEWER:
Project acronym: / DBBT
Project full title: / DIGITAL BROADCASTING AND BROADBAND TECHNOLOGIES
Project No: / 561688-EPP-1-2015-1-XK-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP
Grant Agreement number: / 2015-3763
Coordinator institution: /
University in Kosovska Mitrovica
Coordinator:
Beneficiaries: / Prof. Dr. Sinisa Ilic, UNIVERSITY OF MITROVICA
Faculty of Technical Sciences
Higher Technical Professional School In Zvečan
Univerzitet U Banjoj Luci
Univerzitet U Bihaću
School Of Electrical Engineering And Computer Science
Univerzitet Singidunum
VSB-Technical University Of Ostrava
Univerza V Ljubljani
Universidad Politécnica De Madrid
Tartu Ulikool
TV Mreza
Jp Emisiona tehnika i veze
Alternativna Televizija
ASSURANCE POINT / ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED / ASSESSMENT / COMMENTS / RECCOMENDATIONS
Compiliance with DBBT objectives / Does the deliverable comply with the overall objectives of the project? / ▶ yes
▶ no
▶ partially
Compiliance with the specfic objectives of the WP / Does the deliverable comply with the WP Objectives as specified in the WP description? / ▶ yes
▶ no
▶ partially
Correspondence with the description of work of the relevant activity / Does the deliverable correspond with the activity description as specified in the Application Form? / ▶ yes
▶ no
▶ partially
Compliance with the deliverables format / Is the deliverable presented using the Project’s deliverable format – Annex B? / ▶ yes
▶ no
▶ partially
Adequacy of complementary information / Examples of complementary info:
- Sources used,
- Bibliography,
- List of contacts,
- Methodology used. / ▶ yes
▶ no
▶ partially
Adequacy of written language / Level of written English / ▶ excellent
▶ adeguate
▶ poor
Overall assessment and suggestions for improvement
Date of Quality Assurance performed by CQA or EC reviewer
Deadline for submission of amended version of the Deliverable

Reviewer signement:______

[1] to be returned to author of deliverableand WP leader