NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY

GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

IMPROVING PUBLIC SPEAKING COMPETENCE OF LOW-ACHIEVING STUDENTS USING SEVERAL NLP TECHNIQUES: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH

A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction

of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Educational Sciences

Oksana Nazarova

Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Çise Çavuşoğlu

Nicosia

July 2013

Committee in charge:

Assist. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Kurt, Chair

Assist. Prof. Dr. Çise Çavuşoğlu

Assist. Prof. Dr. Doina Popescu

NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY

GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

IMPROVING PUBLIC SPEAKING COMPETENCE OF LOW-ACHIEVING STUDENTS USING SEVERAL NLP TECHNIQUES: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH

MASTER THESIS

OKSANA NAZAROVA

NICOSIA

July 2013

NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY

GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

IMPROVING PUBLIC SPEAKING COMPETENCE OF LOW-ACHIEVING STUDENTS USING SEVERAL NLP TECHNIQUES: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH

MASTER THESIS

OKSANA NAZAROVA

SUPERVISOR: ASSIST. PROF. DR. ÇISE ÇAVUŞOĞLU

NICOSIA

July 2013

We certify that we have read the thesis submitted by Oksana Nazarova titled “Improving public speaking competence of low-achieving students using several NLP techniques: A mixed-methods approach” and that in our combined opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts.

Assist. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Kurt

Head of the Committee

Assist. Prof. Dr. Çise Çavuşoğlu

Supervisor

Assist. Prof. Dr. Doina Popescu

Committee Member

Approved for the

Graduate School of Educational Sciences

Prof. Dr. Cem Birol

Director of Graduate School of Educational Sciences

DECLARATION

I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all materials and results that are not original to this study.

Name, last name: Oksana Nazarova

Signature: ......


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to express the great appreciation to my supervisor Assist. Prof. Dr. Çise Çavuşoğlu for teaching me everything I know about scientific research. She continually and convincingly shared her ideas about this research project and patiently helped me to write the thesis. Her doctoral dissertation called The Trouble with Turkishness”?: (Invisible) Turkish Cypriots in a Turkish School in London showed me a great example of an academic research study and helped not to stop in my progress and never say that what has been done is good enough to leave it in that form. Assist. Prof. Dr. Çise Çavuşoğlu, thank you for your support and excellent feedback!

I would like to express my deep gratitude to the Head of the English Language Teaching Department Assist. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Kurt, due to whom I gained most of the knowledge I have about the teaching process. I am grateful to Assist. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Kurt for always keeping the door open for all students to walk in with any questions and for creating a supportive atmosphere in the department. Thank you for helping me with the SPSS program.

I would like to thank Dr. Asliye Dağman who challenged me to rethink my inaccurate models of world in her courses. Each of your lectures gave me the feeling of flying thoughts. Thank you for this opportunity to be taught by an outstanding teacher.

I would like to thank Dr. Doina Popescu who was caring and supportive all these years of my studying in the department. Thank you for the course of Linguistics.

I wish to acknowledge the help provided by the course instructor, and I also thank all the students who participated in this study for giving me a chance to see their deep fears, for sharing with me personal information that constitutes this thesis.

My special thanks to my mother Zeynab Nazarova, my husband Timur and his parents Nadejda and Albert Rakhmatullins, my good friends Alime Churlu and Arzy Emirova for all their support and love.

Finally, I would like to thank Allah for giving me the ability to complete the graduate program and for helping me to find support of all these people.

To Zeynab Nazarova

ABSTRACT

IMPROVING PUBLIC SPEAKING COMPETENCE OF LOW-ACHIEVING STUDENTS USING SEVERAL NLP TECHNIQUES: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH

Nazarova, Oksana

MA, Program English Language Teaching

Supervisor, Assist. Prof. Dr. Çise Çavuşoğlu

July 2013, 166 pages

Public speaking competence is essential to acquire for all teachers. At the same time, we know little about what factors affect the process of mastering public speaking competence and what are the tools that can help EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students to overcome difficulties they face in speech courses (De Grez, Valcke, & Roozen, 2009). This study attempted to extend the knowledge on students’ public speaking competence development by analysing the factors that influence it and examining the effectiveness of some interventions (i.e., Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) techniques of well-formed outcomes, modeling, and ‘as-if’ frame) in supporting students to gain proficiency in that field. Thus, a mixed methods approach was adopted to effectively answer all of the research questions posed. The level of language proficiency, foreign language anxiety, self-reported public speaking anxiety, general communication apprehension, prior experience with public speaking, and motivational factors were found to a certain extent affect the students’ development of public speaking competence. It was found that NLP techniques could influence the ‘motivation’ dimension of the concept of competence for low-achieving students.

Keywords: public speaking competence, NLP techniques, English as a foreign language, pre-service teachers

ÖZ

BAZI NÖRO-DİLBİLİMSEL PROGRAMLAMA YÖNTEMLERİ KULLANILARAK DÜŞÜK BAŞARI GÖSTEREN ÖĞRENCİLERİN KAMUYA YÖNELİK KONUŞMA BECERİLERİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: BİR KARMAYÖNTEM YAKLAŞIMI

Nazarova, Oksana

Yüksek Lisans, İngilizce Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalı

Danışman, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Çise Çavuşoğlu

Temmuz 2013, 166 sayfa

Kamuya yönelik konuşma yeterliği bütün öğretmenlerin edinmesi gereken temel bir olgudur. Buna karşılık, kamuya yönelik konuşma yeterliğini edinme sürecini etkileyen faktörler ve İngilizce’yi yabancı bir dil olarak öğrenen öğrencilerin karşılastıkları zorlukların üstesinden gelmelerine yardımcı olabilecek araçlar konusunda da çok az bilgi bulunmaktadır (De Grez, Valcke, & Roozen, 2009). Bu çalışma öğrencilerin kamuya yönelik konuşma yeterliklerinin gelişimi olgusunu etkileyen faktörleri analiz ederek ve bazı nöro-dilbilimsel programlama (NDP) araçlarının (‘iyi biçimlenmiş sonuçlar,’ ‘modelleme’ ve ‘mış gibi çerçevesi’) öğrencilerin yetkinliğini arttırmaya ne derecede yardımcı olabileceğini inceleyerek bu alandaki bilgi dağarcığına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Dolayısıyla, belirlenen araştırma sorularını etkili bir şekilde cevaplayabilmek için araştırma deseni olarak bir karma yöntem yaklaşımı izlenmiştir. Dil yeterlilik seviyesi, yabancı dil kaygısı, kendi rapor edilen kamuya yönelik konuşma kaygısı, genel iletişim korkusu, önceki kamuya yönelik konuşma deneyimi ve güdüsel faktörlerin öğrencilerin kamuya yönelik konuşma yeterliklerinin gelişimini belli açılardan etkilediği araştırmanın bulguları arasındadır. Kullanılan NDP araclarının düşük başarı gösteren öğrencilerin yeterliklerinin ‘güdüleme’ boyutunu olumlu yönde etkileyebileceği de araştırma sonunda ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar kelimeler: kamuya yönelik konuşma yeterliği, nöro-dilbilimsel programlama yöntemleri, yabancı dil olarak İngilizce, öğretmen adayları

TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPROVAL OF THE THESIS III

DECLARATION IV

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS V

ABSTRACT VII

ÖZ VIII

LIST OF APPENDICES XIII

LIST OF TABLES XIV

LIST OF FIGURES XV

ABBREVIATIONS XVI

CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1

Background of the Study 1

Problem of the Study 6

Aim of the Study 7

Limitations 7

Conclusion 8

CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW 10

Public Speaking Competence 10

Knowledge on the art of speaking 12

Public speaking skills 12

Motivation to learn and to perform competently 13

Factors Affecting the Public Speaking Competence Development in an EFL Context 14

Low language proficiency 14

Anxiety related to the speaking publicly in a foreign language classroom 15

NLP in Education 17

Criticism of NLP 20

The Use of NLP to Enhance Public Speaking Competence 23

Well-formed goal conditions 25

Modeling 26

‘As-if’ frame 28

NLP and Motivational Interviewing 28

Conclusion 30

CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY 31

Description of the Context 32

Research Design 34

Experimental component of the study 36

Qualitative component of the study 38

Interviews 39

Observations 40

Reflective essays 40

Artefacts 41

Role of the Researcher 41

Participants 42

Non-treatment group participants’ profiles 43

Treatment group participants’ profiles 45

Profiles of the non-attending students excluded from the statistical analysis 47

Data Collection Procedures 48

Materials 52

Data Analysis 54

Conclusion 55

CHAPTER IV. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 56

Findings 56

Effects of introducing the NLP techniques on treatment group students’ achievement levels 56

The relationship between the quality of students’ public speaking performances and variables related to their backgrounds, total preparation time, and communication apprehension 63

Age, gender, years of learning English, previous experience with public speaking, and preparation time 64

Communication apprehension and public speaking anxiety.. 70

Problems behind low achievement and suggestions for overcoming them: Qualitative data analysis 72

Non-motivational factors 73

Low oral and academic language proficiency 73

Foreign language anxiety 77

Age 78

Communication apprehension 80

Public speaking anxiety 81

Motivational factors 86

Lack of attention leads to inadequate preparation and practice 86

Perceived irrelevance of the course as an explanation for poor attendance 90

Sufficient preparation and practice together with confidence results in good performance 91

Being intrinsically and extrinsically motivated leads to satisfaction with a course 93

The participants’ suggestions on how to make a public speaking course more beneficial 94

Influence of participants’ relationships on their speaking performance 96

Discussion 99

Factors affecting the public speaking performances of the students.. 99

Changes in students’ public speaking performances after the treatment 103

The effect of the introduction of several NLP techniques on general communication apprehension and public speaking anxiety 104

The factors behind low achievement in a public speaking course: The sources of students’ motivational problems 106

Conclusion 110

CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 111

Summary of the Findings 111

Effect of some NLP techniques on treatment group students’ public speaking competence 111

Factors affecting the performances of the treatment and non-attending group students 112

The sources of students’ lack of motivation in a public speaking course 115

Practical Implications 116

Recommendations for Further Research 117

Conclusion 118

REFERENCES 119

APPENDICES 136

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A. Public Speaking Competence Rubric (PSCR), PSCR Individual Student Score Sheet, and Proficiency Rating Scale 136

Appendix B. Listening Quiz 141

Appendix C. Course Outline 146

Appendix D. Direct Observation Assessment Form Used in addition to the PSCR to Assess Final Exam Speeches 147

Appendix E. Requirements for the Final Speech (Cards) 148

Appendix F. Personal Report of Public Speaking Anxiety (PRPSA) (McCroskey, 1970) 154

Appendix G. Behavioural Assessment of Speech Anxiety (BASA) (Mulac & Sherman, 1974) 157

Appendix H. List of Interview Questions 159

Appendix I. Personal Report of Communication Apprehension-24 (PRCA-24) (McCroskey, 1982) 160

Appendix J. Students’ Speech Topics 162

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Assigning students to the specific predefined groups based on the PSCR scores and attendance 37

Table 2. Descriptive statistics for within-group differences in PSCR scores 61

Table 3. Correlations among the pre- and post-test scores and the PRPSA1, PRPSA2, PRCA-24 scores 71

Table 4. Factors leading to the treatment group students’ low performance 73

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Regression-discontinuity design with approximately 0.4-point treatment effect 61

Figure 2. Correlation of students’ performance scores with the years of learning English (statistically non-significant) 64

Figure 3. The relationship between students’ performance scores and previous experience with public speaking (statistically significant only for the post-test scores) 65

Figure 4. Negative correlation between students’ overall preparation time and years of learning English (statistically significant) 66

ABBREVIATIONS

ARCS: Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction (Keller’s ARCS model (1987))

BASA: Behavioural Assessment of Speech Anxiety (Mulac & Sherman, 1974)

CA: Communication Apprehension

EFL: English as a Foreign Language

ELT: English Language Teaching

FLA: Foreign Language Anxiety

GPA: Grade Point Average

NLP: Neuro-Linguistic Programming

POWER: Positive, “Own role,” “What specifically,” Evidence, Relationship (a framework for goal setting (Day & Tosey, 2011))

PRCA-24: Personal Report of Communication Apprehension-24 (McCroskey, 1982)

PRPSA: Personal Report of Public Speaking Anxiety (McCroskey, 1970)

PSA: Public Speaking Anxiety

PSCR: Public Speaking Competence Rubric (Schreiber et al., 2012)

SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable/Agreed-upon, Realistic, Time-based (a framework for goal setting (Doran, 1981))

SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

VAKOG: Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic, Olfactory, Gustatory

XVI

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

This study was initiated based on my own experience of lack of presentation skills training as a student. Moreover, I observed the difficulties other prospective teachers faced from the position of a teacher in this respect. Thus, I became interested in public speaking competence and factors affecting it. This chapter provides a description of the topic of the thesis and outlines the reasons for conducting such a study. In this introductory thesis to the study, first, my previous experiences of public speaking (in)competence will be explained. Then, public speaking competence as being the main concept of this study will be discussed, followed by presentation of some Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) techniques to enhance it. This chapter also provides information about the aim and limitations of the study conducted in order to investigate the effectiveness of several NLP techniques for overcoming the problems students have in relation to public speaking.

Background of the Study

Before coming to study in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), I did not give any academic speeches, nor did I make presentations using PowerPoint slides. I even do not remember whether we had any speaking activities when attending a Basic English Language Course in the Department of Print Journalism in my alma mater. Of course, there were opportunities to practise public speaking or to speak instead of reading from the paper in front of my classmates in the seminars, but there were no requirements for such practices to develop public speaking competence (especially in a foreign language) in that particular environment, where I received my specialist degree. However, my mother, who is a school psychologist, noticed that in the past five years, there has been an increase in the demand for all students to develop

1

9

public speaking skills in my hometown system of education. When I came to the TRNC, the first thing that I was asked to do at the English Preparatory School was to give a speech about myself in front of my classmates. Proceeding to the English Language Teaching Department, I was required to prepare presentational aids and give academic speeches for each of the courses I was enrolled in. Then I thought that performing in front of others is so challenging and difficult because of my low English language proficiency and lack of previous experience with public speaking. However, I noticed that most of the local students, despite continuous learning and practising public speaking skills and some of them being highly proficient in English, still experienced difficulties in such performances. Even after training in preparing visual aids in a course called Language Teaching Materials Adaptation and Development, and constant emphasis in almost all undergraduate and graduate courses on developing students’ communication competence, most of my classmates seemed not to show advanced public speaking competence. I am making this judgement based on my own experience. One and a half years earlier, I experienced excessive anxiety while giving an important speech. This was despite the fact that I considered public speaking skills as one of the primary skills for prospective teachers to acquire, that I gave extended speeches whenever possible, and that I had a quite good knowledge on speaking skills after studying at the Department of English Language Teaching. Unfortunately, poor performance affected my final grade for that course. I still remember my hands trembling, voice going up and down, and my thoughts becoming so confused that I was forced to read text from the paper in my hands.