Hang the Queen, Tories Order

Hang the Queen, Tories order Part 1 of 2 parts

Toronto Star article Sep. 08, 2011 updated Sep. 26, 2011

Portraits of Elizabeth II must grace all foreign embassies by week’s end, by Allan Woods Ottawa.

This response to the Toronto Star news article posted Sep. 12, 2011

Opinions of fact observed are By Anna-Marie Goralczyk

Am I ever glad I DID NOT vote for Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Article For foreign monarchists: Ron Cochrane, Rick Roth, John Baird, Stephen Harper, Ray Novak, Jason Kenney, James Moore, Paul Dewar

From the article: Hang the Queen, Tories order

1. The Conservative government is ordering all foreign missions to ensure they have hung portraits of Queen Elizabeth II by the end of this week.

2. Rick Roth who is spokesperson for Foreign Minister John Baird refused to provide reasons. He said the instructions are intended to ensure that Canada’s head of state is properly displayed and recognized at embassies, consulates and high commissions around the world.

3. “We expect all Canadian missions abroad to display pictures of Canada’s head of state, the Queen, along with the Governor General, the Prime Minister and relevant Ministers”

4. Roth wouldn’t say whether the absence of the Queen’s portrait was an isolated incident – perhaps noticed during one of Prime Minister Harper’s recent tours of Latin America with stops to Brazil, Costa Rica, Colombia & Honduras – or if the problem was widespread.

5. The government’s refusal to explain the move left some to assume that the edict was yet another example of the Conservatives’ embrace of the monarchy. The Tories rolled out the red carpet for this summers visit of Prince William and his wife, Catherine, duchess of Cambridge.

6. Then in recent weeks followed by a decision to have the navy and air force revert back to their original names: The Royal Canadian Air Force & The Royal Canadian Navy.

7. The government’s most recent platform also promised a blowout bash next year for Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee, marking 60 years since her coronation Jun. 02, 1953.

8. In addition the Tories will bankroll a series of celebrations and re-enactments to mark the British success in repelling the Americans in the War if 1812.

9. Two historical paintings by a Quebec artist will be removed from the entrance of the Pearson Building – the foreign ministers headquarters in Ottawa and replaced with a framed photo of (a very big lie calling Queen) Canada’s sovereign.

10. “I’m surprised it’s an issue” Ron Cochrane, president of the Professional Association of Foreign Service Officers, said of the instructions sent out to all foreign missions. “She is the head of state. You can’t go around denying that”.

This story is written from a foreign monarchist point of view.

What this means to a “True Canadian”

With a “Special Thanks” to Quebec for having guts and a back bone to speak out when the foreigners William & Catherine visited Canada !!

A response to the news article by a true Canadian, Point by point:

1. The Conservative government is ordering all foreign missions to ensure they have hung portraits of Queen Elizabeth II by the end of this week.

a) Stephen Harper is using the Queen of Britain’s portrait as “a form of signature” of authorization that this foreign Queen somehow owns Canada. This portrait would portray falsely to foreigners and impressionable children as such. Canada is an independent nation from the monarchies of Britain. That is what the public agreement was in 1982 when Trudeau produced and illegally enacted the Charter of Right and Freedoms. The monarchy is now, 29 years later, failing to adhere to the known public agreement made then, of independence, and are being allowed this disrespect with Stephen Harpers open assistance. The thinking behind it is that if her picture is on it she owns it. Her picture is illegally on our money and stamps. If she visits there she owns there too etc. as a toddler would think. If I see it or touch it’s mine kind of non-sovereign attitude. It is a huge conflict of interest for Stephen Harper to be a representative of the foreign monarchy, Prime Minister of Canada and in the personal business of natural resources at the same time. This violation is described in “High Treason sec. 46. (1) (b) (2) (b)(d) of the Canadian Criminal Code”.

b) The following is the way High Treason reads at present time:

46. ccc.HIGH TREASON / Canadian Citizen / Overt act. (1) - Every one, commits high treason who, in Canada, a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;

b) levies war against Canada, or does any act preparatory thereto; or

c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.

(2) - Every one commits treason who, in Canada,

(a) uses force or violence for the purposes of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;

(b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other then Canada,military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety of defence of Canada,

(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or

(e) conspires with any person, to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.

(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian Citizen or a person who owes alliance to Her Majesty in right of Canada,

a) commits high treason if, while in or out of

Canada, he does anything mentioned in

b) subsection (1); or

c) commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2).

(4) Where it is treason to conspire with any person, the act of conspiring is an overt act of treason. R.S., c. C-34, s. 46; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 2.

c) In 1982 the words Her Majesty were supposed to be removed, but no one removed it and no one pointed it out that it wasn’t removed. Canadians are not taught law in regular public & high schools and would not have noticed what’s written down incorrectly.

d) Also it is a form of war crime strategy to falsely appear as a mission of peace to infiltrate with war crime. If that is the case and intention of the monarchy internationally under the Canadian name by her portrait attached and the word “Royal” added to the Canadian Armed Forces, as Harper has just done recently. It will likely bring terrible undeserved rath against Canada for the damages left behind by the monarchies under the guise of Canadian.

e) In violation of sec. 46. (2)(b) ccc. Stephen Harper makes available to the foreign monarchy the might of our military & scientific information. Although Harper may not be handing that information directly over to the foreign monarchy he is making available to the foreign monarchy use of the Canadian armed forces existance and power of military & scientific information to enable access to potential seizable victims under the Canadian name.

f) If a monarchy infiltrates a country under false guises and uses the tactics of to separate families and molest a large volume of the children as a form of intimidation for future compliance that is using force in the separation and violence in the allowances of the molestations as in 46. (2)(a) ccc. See the omisssions in family law that allows the monarchy representatives to abduct true Canadian Children posted separately on facebook under Marie Goralczyk at .

g) The following is a more reasonably protective wording for true Canadians:

A model like this or similar should have been implemented in 1982 at the time of the promise of independance and it needs to be challenged in court by a good lawyer in Canada today.

CORRECTION: 46. ccc.HIGH TREASON / Canadian Citizen / Overt act. 46. (1) - Every one, organization, public servant, secret or separate society, entity, or foreign monarchy, empire or their descendants, group however associated differently then in unity with the will of the whole equal true legal inhabitants of the nationcommits high treason who, in Canada,

a) kills or attempts to kill the true Aboriginal leaders or their descendants of Canada or true legal subject citizens & or their descendants of Canada, or does them any bodily, reproductive or emotional harm tending to death or destruction, separation, rights removals, genealogical manipulation, maims or wounds them, or imprisons or restrains them physically or by unfairly imposed or mischief circumstances;

b) Levies war or alternate allegiances against true Canadian citizens in Canada, it's legal multicultural and migrated subject citizens or it's true Aboriginal leaders or their descendants of Canada, overtly or in an identifiable or concealed strategy, or does any act entirely or in part with otherspreparatory theretoany part of this section; or

c) assists an enemy at war or an alternate allegiance with intent of unfair, inhumane or immoral violation, losses, inequality, damages, lack of legal or police protections there ought to commonly be or otherwise crime against true legal citizens of Canada, it's multicultural and migrated subject citizens or it's true Aboriginal leaders or their descendants of Canada, or assists any armed forces against whom Canadian true Forces are engaged in hostilities, declared or undeclared, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.

d) assists an enemy or an alternate allegiance to seize by name or undertaking of influential control of true Canadian armed forces,whether or not a state of peace exists between Canada and the organization, country or monarchy who poses to assume influential direction.

(2) - Every one, organization, monarchy, secret or separate society or entity, commits treason who, in Canada,

(a) uses force, violence, libel, mischief, black male, threat, intimidation, *stalkholm syndrome, manipulation of education or heritage beliefs, unlawful imprisonment or removal of rights, freedoms and protections there ought to be, or any unjust, supressive or immobilizing hindrance to equality,for the purposes of overthrowing thetrue lawful Aboriginal Chiefs and lawful contractedgovernment who is representativeof the will of the true legal citizens of Canada, of a Canadianprovince, or region;(*See definition of stalkholm syndrome in the Defence Dictionary posted on facebook Anna Goralczyk at )

(b) without lawful right, communicates or makes available toan agent of a state other then Canada, an organization, secret or separate society, entity, foreign monarchy or their descendants, who may be in conflict of interest to Canada and true Canadians or the true legal Aboriginal leaders, military or scientific information, ownership or commanding direction of Canadian armed forces, any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that entity orstate for a purpose prejudicial to the safety of defence of true Native Canada, it's multicultural or migrated citizens or it's true Aboriginal leaders or their descendants,

(c) conspires with any person, family,organization, entity, secret or separate society, foreign monarchy or their descendants, to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);

(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt actor lack of action that there ought to be; or

(e) conspires with any person, family, organization, entity, secret or separate society, foreign monarchies or their descendants, to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that by an overt act or lack of action that there ought to be.

(f) places a ballot, vote or runs in an election for a contracted official position of duty in Canada who has sworn allegiances with any foreign, alternate, substitute, separate, phantom, monarch or criminal entity other then the true Aboriginal leaders of Canada.

(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian Citizen who has sworn to an alternate alliance or a person who owes alliance to aHer Majesty, a king, monarch, empire or leaders of another nation, foreign or criminal organization, secret or separate society, is in conflict of interest to hold position of governing contracted duty over public service for true equal Canadians, their communities or natural resources, finances, education, families and their children or in any other governing contracted duty in right of Canada,

a) commits high treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in

b) subsection (1); or

c) commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2).

(4) Where it is treason to conspire in any partwith any person, organization, entity, monarchy or foreign state against Canada and true Canadians, the act of conspiring, agreeing, aiding, allowing or colluding or by lack of actions or enforcement there ought to be, or misdirection of publicly contracted purpose of service positions, court judgments, political positions and decisions, through media or social attitudes of influenceis an overt act of criminally organizedtreasonwhen a pattern or sequence of events of evidence is apparent that when all parts played out are brought together in a particular order or timing that an act of High Treason would result in a manner that proves not possible to be co-incidental between two or more parties and that would lead to an unnatural foreign despotic control or dominance over the nation or a redirection of the benefit of the systems and protections of the legal citizens, natural resources, land, air or water that ought not to be.

(5) In a case where High Treason is shown to be progressed to contamination and the contracted protective public services are refusing to function for the people or committing crime by misdirection of the purpose of vital service or information or in breach of trust and contract, the witnesses shall record evidence, volentarily investigate and report that evidence to general citizens equally as to the authorities within a region, of the nation and to any international protection available and the true legal citizens that can swear truthfully upon an affidavit that they have not sworn to any foreign or alternate allegiance to Canada shall retain, maintain and make available records of evidence openly in unity as self appointed voluntary public officers.R.S., c. C-34, s. 46; 1974-76, c. 105, s. 2.

Complimentary Law:

413. ccc. FALSELY CLAIMING ROYAL WARRANT 413. Every one who

a) falsely represents that goods are made by a person holding a royal warrant, or for the service of Her Majesty, a member of the Royal family or a public department; or

b) represents Her Majesty, a member of the royal family or the associated organizations of such holding a royal warrant claims unjust ownership or control of real or personal property, children, resources or public service, of the common people in a country or region where they legally have no jurisdiction,

is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. R.S. c. C-34. S. 371.

a) Rick Roth is likley a monarchist and doesn’t have legal right to speak for a representative of Canada. Possibly Rothchilds.

b) John Baird cannot provide reasons because those reasons would be evidence of prepratory to High Treason and show himself to be a violating monarchist. A news article of John Baird’s quotes would be evidence.

c) Queen Elizabeth, nor any monarchy is the head of state of Canada and it is a serious offence to protray such falsivity in the Canadian news media. The true Aboriginal leaders are the many Aboriginal chiefs and we elect a head of state in our Prime Minister by contract. That Prime Minister is suppose to answer to and protect the Aboriginal leaders, not the foreign monarchy as Harper is doing.

3. “We expect all Canadian missions abroad to display pictures of Canada’s head of state, the Queen, along with the Governor General, the Prime Minister and relevant Ministers”

a) This is a mis-representation that a mission with the picture of the foreign Queen on it is Canadian. It would not be a Canadian mission but the foreign monarchy would be ursurping the Canadian name and might to gain trust and access.

b) True Canadians disagree with the portrait of the Queen being attached to what is called a Canadian mission but Canadians were not asked and the decision is being made unilaterally by a monarchist of foreign allegiances.

c) True Canadians disagree that the word Royal should be on the Canadian Armed Forces and again the true Canadians were not asked. This is definitely a misuse of the purpose that Canadians elected a head of state in the Prime Minister.

d) A second time the misrepresentation is reinstated wrongly about who is the head of state of Canada.

a) Roth didn’t say, so the media is creating a space filler of what the public should think.

b) The media is alluding to a misrepresentation that the Queen’s Portrait was always supposed to be there but some how by error was missing or just got lost.

c) After 29 years, it is a whole generation later and the monarchies appear to be hoping that Canadians forget that they are a separate and independant nation and especially due to the monarchy influence into the school materials learned by the children growing up.

d) After 29 years the monarchies want to blatantly void and disregard their previous agreements. Monarchies never seem to respect reasonable agreements over time and therefore need to be governed accordingly.

5. The government’s refusal to explain the move left some to assume that the edict was yet another example of the Conservatives’ embrace of the monarchy. The Tories rolled out the red carpet for this summers visit of Prince William and his wife, Catherine, duchess of Cambridge.

a) An example of the Conservative’s embrace of the monarchy is a gross understatement. It is High Treason in process. It is clear that Stephen Harper ran for Prime Minister and at that time did not make it known that he was in allegiance to British monarchy against and to seize Canada.