Carlson, Fall ‘08
Essay #2: Stasis
You’ll remember from our discussion in class that most problems are difficult to solve because people argue from many different positions. As a result, arguments seem to shift from one notion to the next. Stasis theory is based upon the idea that an argument that “doesn’t move” can be solved. In order to do this, we must first ask four questions:
o Fact: Did/does it happen?
o Definition: What happened? How do we define it?
o Value: Is it good/bad?
o Policy: What should we do?
As you ask these questions, the point at which individuals disagree will become clear: Are they arguing over occurrence, definitions, values, or policies? This essay is your chance to apply stasis theory. Although there will be no rough draft for this assignment, I highly suggest talking to me during my office hours.
This assignment has several steps:
1. Select a controversial topic that has many conflicting positions (you may not use our example in class or your topic from essay 1; find something new).
2. In the introduction, provide a synthesis of the argument that walks the reader through the stasis questions. Your intro will conclude with the primary question of stasis (the point where people begin to disagree).
3. Craft a thesis which divides the point of stasis into several categories.
4. Argue your points using specific evidence citing exterior facts and resources.
5. Conclude with the impact(s) of your argument. Answer the question: so what?
Essays will be graded upon three categories:
Clarity: Is there anything in your writing that prevents the reader from understanding you?
Cogency: Are your arguments rational? Are your reasons appropriate to the topic? Are they fully developed?
Construction: Are the quotations properly introduced and cited? Did you follow the directions?
Your response should be well-crafted, thought-provoking, carefully proofread for grammatical and structural errors, and approx. 750 words (12pt Times font with 1-inch margins). Due: 11/14/08