January 2018 Waiver Item W-11 - Meeting Agendas (CA State Board of Education)

January 2018 Waiver Item W-11 - Meeting Agendas (CA State Board of Education)

General Waiver

Page 1 of 3

California Department of Education

Executive Office

SBE-005 (REV. 11/2017)

General Waiver

General Waiver

Page 1 of 3

California State Board of Education January 2018AgendaItem #W-11

Subject

Request by twolocal educational agencies to waive California Education Code Section 5020, and portions of sections 5019, 5021, and 5030, that require a districtwide election to establish a by-trustee-area method of election.

Waiver Numbers

  • Dublin Unified School District 11-10-2017
  • San Marcos Unified School District 4-10-2017

Type of Action

Action, Consent

Summary of the Issue(s)

School districts that elect board members at-large face existing or potential litigation under the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (CVRA). Pursuant to the California Education Code (EC), a district can change from at-large elections to by-trustee-area elections only if the change is approved by both the County Committee on School District Organization (County Committee) and voters at a districtwide election.

To reduce the potential for litigation and to establish by-trustee-area elections as expeditiously as possible, the Dublin Unified School District (USD) and the San Marcos USD request that the California State Board of Education (SBE) waive the requirement that by-trustee-area election methods be approved at a districtwide election—allowing by-trustee-area elections to be adopted upon review and approval of the County Committee.

Authority for Waiver

EC Section 33050

Recommendation

  • Approval: Yes
  • Approval with conditions: No
  • Denial: No

Summary of Key Issues

Approval of the waiver requests would eliminate the election requirement for approval of trustee areas and a by-trustee-area method of election for future governing board elections in the Dublin USD and the San Marcos USD. The voters in the districts will continue to elect all board members—however, if the waiver requests are approved, all board members will be elected by trustee areas beginning with the next governing board elections.

County Committees have the authority to approve or disapprove the adoption of trustee areas and methods of election for school district governing board elections. Pursuant to EC Section 5020, County Committee approval of trustee areas and election methods constitutes an order of election; thus, voters in the districts have final approval.

Many districts in California are facing existing or potential litigation under the CVRA because of their at-large election methods. To help avoid potential litigation, the Dublin USD and the San Marcos USD are taking actions to establish trustee areas and adopt by-trustee-area election methods. In order to establish the trustee areas and the methods of election as expeditiously as possible, the districts are requesting that theSBE waive the requirement that the trustee areas and the election methods be approved at districtwide elections. If the SBE approves the waiver requests, by-trustee-area election methods can be adopted in the districts upon review and approval of the appropriate County Committeewithout subsequent local elections to approve the changes.

Only the elections to establish trustee areas and the election methods will be eliminated by approval of the waiver requests—voters in the school districts will continue to elect all governing board members. Moreover, approval of the waivers will not eliminate any existing legal rights of currently seated board members.

The waiver requestshave been reviewed by the CDE and it has been determined that there was no significant public opposition to the waivers at the public hearings held by the governing boards of the districts. The CDE has further determined that none of the grounds specified in EC Section 33051, which authorize denial of a waiver, exist. The CDE recommends the SBE approve the requests by the Dublin USD and the San Marcos USD to waive ECSection 5020, and portions of sections 5019, 5021, and 5030, which require a districtwide election to approve a by-trustee-area method of election.

Demographic Information:The Dublin USD has a student population of 11,200 and is located in an urban area of Alameda County.

San Marcos USDhas a student population of 20,972 and is located in an urban area of San Diego County.

Because this is a general waiver, if the SBE decides to deny the waiver, it must cite one of the seven reasons in EC 33051(a), available at

Summary of Previous State Board of Education Discussion and Action

The SBE has approved over 135 similar waivers—most recently for the Antelope Valley Union High School District, the Ontario-Montclair USD, and the Tustin USD at the November 2017SBE meeting.

Fiscal Analysis (as appropriate)

Approval of the waiver requests will not have negative fiscal effects on any local or state agency. Failure to approve the requests will result in additional costs to Dublin USD and the San Marcos USD for districtwide elections.

Attachment(s)

  • Attachment 1: Summary Table (1 page)
  • Attachment 2: Dublin Unified School District General Waiver Request
    11-10-2017 (2 pages). (Original waiver request is signed and on file in the Waiver Office.)
  • Attachment 3: San Marcos Unified School DistrictGeneral Waiver Request 4-10-2017 (2 pages). (Original waiver request is signed and on file in the Waiver Office.)
  • Attachment 4: California Education Code Proposed for Waiver (5 pages)

General Waiver

Page 1 of 3

Attachment 1

Page 1 of 1

Attachment 1: Summary Table

Waiver Number / District / Period of Request / Bargaining Unit Representatives Consulted, Date and Position / Public Hearing and Board Approval Date / Public Hearing Advertisement / SSC/Advisory Committee Position
11-10-2017 / Dublin Unified School District / Requested
October 10, 2017
to
October 9, 2019
Recommended
October 10, 2017
to
October 8, 2019 / Dublin Teachers Association,
Roberta Krietz
President
9/28/2017
Support
California School Employees Association,
Keoki Yee
President
9/28/2017
Support / 10/10/2017 / The public hearing notice was posted in a newspaper, on the Internet, and at all school sites and the district office. / Site councils for the 11 schools and the District English Learner Committees (10/4/2017).
No objections
4-10-2017 / San Marcos Unified School District / Requested
July 18, 2017
to
July 16, 2019
Recommended
July 18, 2017
to
July 16, 2019 / San Marcos Educators Association,
Michael DeVries
President
6/15/2017
Support
California School Employees Association,
Yvonne Brett
President
6/15/2017
Support / 7/18/2017 / The public hearing notice was posted in a newspaper, on the Internet, and at all school sites and the district office. / San Marcos English Learner Advisory Committee and San Marcos President's Council (7/18/2017).
No objections

Created by California Department of Education
November 2017

Attachment 2

Page 1 of 2

Attachment 2: Dublin Unified School District General Waiver Request11-10-2017

California Department of Education
WAIVER SUBMISSION - General

CD Code: 0175093

Waiver Number: 11-10-2017

Active Year: 2017

Date In: 10/16/2017 5:49:42 PM

Local Education Agency: Dublin Unified School District

Address: 7471 Larkdale Ave.

Dublin, CA94568

Start: 10/10/2017

End: 10/9/2019

Waiver Renewal: No

Previous Waiver Number:NA

Previous SBE Approval Date:NA

Waiver Topic: School District Reorganization

Ed Code Title: Elimination of Election Requirement

Ed Code Section: 5020 and portions of 5019, 5021, and 5030

Ed Code Authority: 33050-33053

Ed Code or CCR to Waive: Please see Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Outcome Rationale: This waiver is requested to expedite the efforts of the Dublin Unified School District (“District”) to ensure compliance with the California Voting Rights Act (Elections Code section 14025 et seq.)(“CVRA”). By granting this waiver, the District will be able to implement its new “by-trustee area” election system for its November 2018 elections to reduce any potential liability under the CVRA. Due to the fact that the CVRA grants a prevailing plaintiff the right to reasonable attorneys’ and expert witness fees, the District seeks to reduce the risk of costly litigation under the CVRA. By reducing the risk of such costly litigation in an expeditious and cost-efficient manner, the District will be able to ensure that cuts to necessary and valuable District student programs are not needed because of claims being brought under the CVRA.

Student Population: 11200

City Type: Urban

Public Hearing Date: 10/10/2017

Public Hearing Advertised: Newspaper, internet, school sites, and District Office

Local Board Approval Date: 10/10/2017

Community Council Reviewed By: School site councils for the 11 schools and the District English Learner Committees

Community Council Reviewed Date: 10/4/2017

Community Council Objection: No

Community Council Objection Explanation: NA

Audit Penalty YN: No

Categorical Program Monitoring: No

Submitted by: Dr.LeslieBoozer

Position: Superintendent

E-mail:

Telephone: 925-828-2551 x8001

Fax: NA

Bargaining Unit Date: 09/28/2017

Name: CA School Employees Association

Representative: Keoki Yee

Title: President

Position: Support

Comments: NA

Bargaining Unit Date: 09/28/2017

Name: Dublin Teachers Association

Representative: Roberta Krietz

Title: President

Position: Support

Comments: NA

Attachment 3

Page 1 of 2

Attachment 3: San Marcos Unified School District General Waiver Request 4-10-2017

California Department of Education
WAIVER SUBMISSION – General

CD Code: 3773791

Waiver Number: 4-10-2017

Active Year: 2017

Date In: 10/6/2017 10:27:54 AM

Local Education Agency: San Marcos Unified School District

Address: 255 Pico Ave., Ste. 250

San Marcos, CA92069

Start: 7/18/2017

End: 7/16/2019

Waiver Renewal: No

Previous Waiver Number: NA

Previous SBE Approval Date: NA

Waiver Topic: School District Reorganization

Ed Code Title: Elimination of Election Requirement

Ed Code Section: 5020 and portions of 5019, 5021 and 5030

Ed Code Authority: 33050 - 33053

Ed Code or CCR to Waive: Please see Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Outcome Rationale: This waiver is requested to expedite the efforts of the San Marcos Unified School District (“District”) to ensure compliance with the California Voting Rights Act (Elections Code section 14025 et seq.)(“CVRA”). By granting this waiver, the District will be able to implement its new “by-trustee area” election system for its November 2018 elections to reduce any potential liability under the CVRA. Due to the fact that the CVRA grants a prevailing plaintiff the right to reasonable attorneys’ and expert witness fees, the District seeks to reduce the risk of costly litigation under the CVRA. By reducing the risk of such costly litigation in an expeditious and cost-efficient manner, the District will be able to ensure that cuts to necessary and valuable District student programs are not needed because of claims being brought under the CVRA.

Student Population: 20972

City Type: Urban

Public Hearing Date: 7/18/2017

Public Hearing Advertised: Newspaper, internet, school sites, and District Office

Local Board Approval Date: 7/18/2017

Community Council Reviewed By: San Marcos ELAC and San Marcos President's Council

Community Council Reviewed Date: 7/18/2017

Community Council Objection: No

Community Council Objection Explanation: N/A

Audit Penalty YN: No

Categorical Program Monitoring: No

Submitted by: Mr.MarkSchiel

Position: Assistant Superintendent, Business Services

E-mail:

Telephone: 760-752-1210

Fax: NA

Bargaining Unit Date: 06/15/2017

Name: CSEA Chapter 413

Representative: Yvonne Brett

Title: President

Position: Support

Comments:NA

Bargaining Unit Date: 06/15/2017

Name: San Marcos Educator's Association

Representative: Michael DeVries

Title: President

Position: Support

Comments: NA

Attachment 4
Page 1 of 5

Attachment 4: California Education Code Proposed for Waiver

Request to waive California Education Code Section 5020, and portions of sections 5019, 5021, and 5030, that require a districtwide election to establish a by-trustee-area method of election. Language proposed to be waived is bracketed and in italics below:

§ 5019. Trustee areas and size of school district governing boards; powers of county committee; proposal and hearing

(a) Except in a school district governed by a board of education provided for in the charter of a city or city and county, in any school district or community college district, the county committee on school district organization may establish trustee areas, rearrange the boundaries of trustee areas, abolish trustee areas, and increase to seven or decrease to five the number of members of the governing board, or adopt one of the alternative methods of electing governing board members specified in Section 5030.

(b) The county committee on school district organization may establish or abolish a common governing board for a high school district and an elementary school district within the boundaries of the high school district. The resolution of the county committee on school district organization approving the establishment or abolition of a common governing board shall be presented to the electors of the school districts as specified in Section 5020.

(c) (1) A proposal to make the changes described in subdivision (a) or (b) may be initiated by the county committee on school district organization or made to the county committee on school district organization either by a petition signed by 5 percent or 50, whichever is less, of the qualified registered voters residing in a district in which there are 2,500 or fewer qualified registered voters, by 3 percent or 100, whichever is less, of the qualified registered voters residing in a district in which there are 2,501 to 10,000 qualified registered voters, by 1 percent or 250, whichever is less, of the qualified registered voters residing in a district in which there are 10,001 to 50,000 qualified registered voters, by 500 or more of the qualified registered voters residing in a district in which there are 50,001 to 100,000 qualified registered voters, by 750 or more of the qualified registered voters residing in a district in which there are 100,001 to 250,000 qualified registered voters, or by 1,000 or more of the qualified registered voters residing in a district in which there are 250,001 or more qualified registered voters or by resolution of the governing board of the district. For this purpose, the necessary signatures for a petition shall be obtained within a period of 180 days before the submission of the petition to the county committee on school district organization and the number of qualified registered voters in the district shall be determined pursuant to the most recent report submitted by the county elections official to the Secretary of State under Section 2187 of the Elections Code.

(2) When a proposal is made pursuant to paragraph (1), the county committee on school district organization shall call and conduct at least one hearing in the district on the matter. At the conclusion of the hearing, the county committee on school district organization shall approve or disapprove the proposal.

(d) If the county committee on school district organization approves pursuant to subdivision (a) [the rearrangement of ]the boundaries of trustee areas for a particular district, then the [rearrangement of the ]trustee areas shall be effectuated for the next district election occurring at least 120 days after [its ]approval[, unless at least 5 percent of the registered voters of the district sign a petition requesting an election on the proposed rearrangement of trustee area boundaries. The petition for an election shall be submitted to the county elections official within 60 days of the proposal's adoption by the county committee on school district organization. If the qualified registered voters approve pursuant to subdivision (b) or (c) the rearrangement of the boundaries to the trustee areas for a particular district, the rearrangement of the trustee areas shall be effective for the next district election occurring at least 120 days after its approval by the voters].

[§ 5020. Presentation of proposal to electors

(a) The resolution of the county committee approving a proposal to establish or abolish trustee areas, to adopt one of the alternative methods of electing governing board members specified in Section 5030, or to increase or decrease the number of members of the governing board shall constitute an order of election, and the proposal shall be presented to the electors of the district not later than the next succeeding election for members of the governing board.

(b) If a petition requesting an election on a proposal to rearrange trustee area boundaries is filed, containing at least 5 percent of the signatures of the district's registered voters as determined by the elections official, the proposal shall be presented to the electors of the district, at the next succeeding election for the members of the governing board, at the next succeeding statewide primary or general election, or at the next succeeding regularly scheduled election at which the electors of the district are otherwise entitled to vote, provided that there is sufficient time to place the issue on the ballot.

(c) If a petition requesting an election on a proposal to establish or abolish trustee areas, to increase or decrease the number of members of the board, or to adopt one of the alternative methods of electing governing board members specified in Section 5030 is filed, containing at least 10 percent of the signatures of the district's registered voters as determined by the elections official, the proposal shall be presented to the electors of the district, at the next succeeding election for the members of the governing board, at the next succeeding statewide primary or general election, or at the next succeeding regularly scheduled election at which the electors of the district are otherwise entitled to vote, provided that there is sufficient time to place the issue on the ballot. Before the proposal is presented to the electors, the county committee on school district organization may call and conduct one or more public hearings on the proposal.

(d) The resolution of the county committee approving a proposal to establish or abolish a common governing board for a high school and an elementary school district within the boundaries of the high school district shall constitute an order of election. The proposal shall be presented to the electors of the district at the next succeeding statewide primary or general election, or at the next succeeding regularly scheduled election at which the electors of the district are otherwise entitled to vote, provided that there is sufficient time to place the issue on the ballot.

(e) For each proposal there shall be a separate proposition on the ballot. The ballot shall contain the following words:

"For the establishment (or abolition or rearrangement) of trustee areas in (insert name) School District --Yes" and "For the establishment (or abolition or rearrangement) of trustee areas in (insert name) School District--No."

"For increasing the number of members of the governing board of (insert name) School District from five to seven--Yes" and "For increasing the number of members of the governing board of (insert name) School District from five to seven--No."

"For decreasing the number of members of the governing board of (insert name) School District from seven to five--Yes" and "For decreasing the number of members of the governing board of (insert name) School District from seven to five--No."

"For the election of each member of the governing board of the (insert name) School District by the registered voters of the entire (insert name) School District--Yes" and "For the election of each member of the governing board of the (insert name) School District by the registered voters of the entire (insert name) School District--No."