Faculty Scholarship Development Grants

Faculty Scholarship Development Grants

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA

FACULTY SCHOLARSHIP DEVELOPMENT GRANTS

2018

Faculty Scholarship Development Grants are provided by the Office of Academic Affairs to support research, scholarship, and creativeactivities. Academic Affairs regards it as important for the wellbeing of the university that these grants be widely distributed across the university’s disciplines, and that their use benefits the reputation of the university as well as the individual scholar or artist. As the program name suggests, Academic Affairs regards these grants as seed funding for developing new lines of inquiry, whether for collecting and analyzing pilot data, writing and publishing original scholarship, experimenting with innovative forms of creative expression, and/or preparing proposals for external funding. Academic Affairs is additionally interested in recognizing the value of faculty working with colleagues outside of their discipline or college. To encourage that collaborative desire, additional funding is available for interdisciplinary projects.

The grant program will provide support in the amount of $7,500 per funded individual project, or $10,000 each for up to three faculty members working together on selected interdisciplinary projects. Funds can be used to pay summer salary or course buyoutsforfaculty member(s) or can be used for travel, materials, student assistance, or other expenses related to project activities (see budget form for restrictions). To provide grant recipients with the greatest flexibility to achieve their goals,funds may be used any time from July 1, 2018through the 2018–2019academic year.

ELIGIBILITY

While applications are encouraged from junior faculty and faculty beginning new projects, all tenured faculty and tenure-earning faculty are eligible, subject to the restrictions below:

  • Only tenured/tenure-track faculty are eligible for Faculty Development Grants. Grants may be held while on sabbatical; they may not be held while on leave of absence without pay. Twelve-month tenured/tenure-track faculty may apply if research is included as part of their annual assignment, but they may not receive salary from the grant.
  • In April 2015, the Faculty Association approved the following restriction on eligibility: Faculty DevelopmentGrants are limited for faculty who already have received a previous award. Assistant Professors are allowed to receive a grant once every 2 years, Associate Professors once every 3 years, and Full Professors once every 4 years.
  • Applicants must bein-unitfaculty at time of application, and not otherwise already receiving guaranteed/endowedstipends/salary supplementstosupport their scholarly activities.
  • Faculty (lecturers/instructors, out-of-unit, or non-UNF)otherwise ineligible due to any of the preceding requirements are welcome to collaborate on interdisciplinary projects and may be listed as participants, but can not be included in the calculation of the funding for the grant. Ineligible faculty on interdisciplinary projects are not allowed to receive salary from the grant funds, but may be involved in other grant expenditures (e.g., supplies, travel).
  • Faculty who have previously received a Faculty Development Grant and who have not submitted a final or interimreport satisfying the reporting requirements are ineligible.
  • Faculty who intend to terminate employment or leave UNF, or faculty who are on administrative leave or terminal notice and will not receive a contract during the next academic year, are ineligible. Except in extenuating circumstances, failure to remain at UNF for at least one academic year following the award will require grant repayment.
  • Faculty who intend to use the funds for salary support may not use it to supplement their salary or support overload assignments that would increase salary beyond 1.0 FTE during any semester, including the summer.
  • Faculty can only participate in one application for a Faculty Development Grant.
  • Interdisciplinary projects are expected tocross two or more departments. While inter-collegiate projects are favored, projects that cross departments within a college or disciplines within a multidisciplinary department are also eligible, but the applicants must make a strong case for the interdisciplinarity of the proposed project.
  • Research Council members are not eligible for a Faculty Development Grant during their term on the committee.
  • All award recipients must agree to serve as proposal reviewers during the following year’s competition.

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Applications must be received by Academic Affairs no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 20, 2017. Late or incomplete submissions will not be considered.

Each application must include the following sections formatted using 1-inch margins and 12-point Times New Roman font. All sections, unless otherwise noted,must be double-spaced. All sections of the application must have a footer that includes the title, the name of the applicant, and the page number. It is imperative that all sections are submitted as instructed, and that all formatting instructions and page and word limits be followed. The submitted application will not be reviewed if the applicant fails to follow the specified submission procedures and/or fails to complete all sections of the application form.

Please note that faculty included in interdisciplinary projects will submit only one application, but additional material will be needed as indicated below.

Section 1: Cover Page (include additional Section 1(b) for collaborators on interdisciplinary grant). Be sure to include word counts as requested.

Section 2: Summary Page (maximum of 200 words, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins). Provide a summary of the proposed project.)

Section 3: Proposal Narrative (maximum of 4 pages, double-spaced). It is recommended that applicants follow the outline provided on the Proposal Narrative template below.

Section 4: Budget ($7,500 for individual grant; $10,000 pereligible PI for interdisciplinary grant)

Section 5: Personal Statement (maximum of 200 words; one is required for each collaborating faculty member)

Section 6: Curriculum Vita (maximum 2 pages, single spaced; one is required for each collaborating faculty member)

Appendix A: If previous awards have been received, a summary of the outcomes of the past two awards must be provided for eachapplicant (maximum 200 awards).

Applicants are reminded that their proposals may be reviewed by faculty outside their immediate discipline and that a summary of the proposal may be published in an annual report. Thus, when preparing the application, it is essential that the applicant use language that can be understood by reviewers outside the applicant’s discipline.

Application Submission Instructions:

Each application must be submitted both electronically and in hard-copy forms. The electronic version of the application must be submitted in a searchable format (Word document or searchable PDF).

  1. ONE copy of the Acknowledgement Formmust be on top of the submission.
  2. The original and one additional hard-copy of the ENTIRE applicationmust be submitted to Marianne Jaffee in the Academic Affairs office by the 5:00 pm 10/20/17 deadline.
  3. Staple (no paper clips please) all of the sections together for each copy of the application.
  4. Secure the entire package (Acknowledgement form, original, and one copy) with a clip or rubberband.
  5. Do not put the documents in report covers.
  6. If previous awards have been received, a summary of the outcomes of these awards must be provided (Appendix A) for each applicant.
  7. Cover letters or other supporting attachments should NOT be included as they will not be reviewed or considered in the review process.
  8. A searchable electronic copy (Word document or searchable PDF) of the application must also be emailed to by the stated deadline.

REVIEW PROCEDURES

Each application is reviewed by a multi-disciplinary group of faculty selected by the Research Council.Once the reviews are completed, the Research Councilmeetsto evaluate the applications and formulate recommendations for funding.The Councilthen sends their final recommendations to the Provost/Vice President of Academic Affairs, who makes the final selections. Notification of grant awards will be sent by letter by the end of fall term. In the event that applicationsof equal merit are submitted, preference may be given to junior faculty, faculty launching new projects, and those who have not previously been awarded Faculty Development Grants.

Evaluation Criteria:

The specific criteria each reviewer will be asked to address on a scale of 1–5 (where 1 is low and 5 is high) when reviewing an application are as follows:

Review Item / Score of 1 / Score of 2 / Score of 3 / Score of 4 / Score of 5
  1. The applicant uses language that can be understood by the reviewers (i.e., persons from another discipline).
/ The application does not follow the narrative outline and uses jargon and/or technical language that is not understood by the reviewers. / The application is loosely organized and uses language that is only understood by reviewers in similar and/or related disciplines. / The application only vaguely follows the narrative outline and is written in a manner that is somewhat understood by reviewers from any discipline. / The application follows the narrative outline and is written in a manner that is adequately understood by reviewers from any discipline. / The application is well organized, follows the narrative outline, and is written in a manner that is explicitly understood by reviewers from any discipline.
  1. The applicant commun-icates the significance of the proposed study to the discipline and to society.
/ The author does not communicate the significance of the proposed study to the discipline and/ or to society. / Do not use this score / The author somewhat effectively communicates the significance of the proposed study to the discipline and to society. / Do not use this score / The author effectively communicates the significance of the proposed study to the discipline and to society.
  1. The research method/approach is clearly articulated and is appropriate for the stated purpose.
/ The research method/ approach is not articulated nor appropriate for the stated purpose. / The research method/approach is vaguely articulated and appropriate for the stated purpose. / The research method/approach is somewhat articulated and appropriate for the stated purpose. / The research method/ approach is adequately articulated and appropriate for the stated purpose. / The research method/approach is explicitly articulated and appropriate for the stated purpose.
  1. There are reasons to believe the project will be successfully completed on budget in the time frame.
/ The applicant does not provide reasons to believe the project will be successfully completed on budget and in the time frame. / Do not use this score / The applicant provides weakreason(s) to believe that the project will be successfully completed on budget in the time frame. / Do not use this score / The applicant provides explicit and compelling reasons to believe the project will be successfully completed on budget in the time frame.
  1. The proposed project aligns with institutional goals and objectives and/or has potential to attract future external funding.
/ The proposal does notalign with institutional goals and objectives, does not explain how the project aligns with institutional goals and objectives, and/or has no potentialfor external funding. / The applicant vaguelydescribes a connection between the project and institutional goals and objectives and/or has very little chance of external funding. / The applicant somewhatdescribes a connection between the project and institutional goals and objectives and/or has a moderate chance of external funding. / The applicant adequatelydescribes how it aligns with institutional goals and objectives and/or has an above-average chance of external funding. / The applicant explicitly describes how it aligns with institutional goals and objectives and/or the project has great potential for external funding.
  1. The applicant explains how this project relates to and is distinct from previous research projects (i.e., how is this new?)
/ The project appears to be the continuation of an old, funded project. / Do not use this score / The project is an extension of an existing project. / Do not use this score / The project is clearly distinct from older projects.

FINAL REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS

Grant recipients must submit a final report (or interim report in those cases where scholarship is still ongoing) with Academic Affairs by September 1, 2019. Future Faculty Development Grant applications in ANY category will not be considered if a final or interim report is not submitted prior to any future application.The final report should be submitted electronically to l reports will be published through "UNF Digital Commons."

Guidelines for the Final Report

  1. Approximately 1–3 pages total (double-spaced)
  2. Current State/Progress of Scholarship Project
  3. Impact of Scholarship Project—such as:
  4. Department/College/University (e.g., department goals, faculty collaboration, national and/or international recognition)
  5. Publications/Presentations/Exhibitions
  6. Other Grant Development/Funding
  7. Student involvement
  8. Future Scholarship Plans

To facilitate sharing of information and to promote collaborative work, grant recipients must present the project on UNF campus during the 2018–2019academic year. Presentations may be given in any generally accepted form, including posters, brown-bag lunch venues, oral presentation venues, etc. Grant recipients must provide evidence to Academic Affairs by May 15, 2019that this requirement has been fulfilled. Evidence may include advertisement materials, agendas, program materials, etc.

1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT GRANTS

2018APPLICATION

Applicant’s name and rank:______

For interdisciplinary project, names and ranks of up to 2 additional collaborators:

______

______

Proposal title:______

______

Department/campus address:______

Campus telephone number/email:______

A complete application package must be delivered to the Office of Academic Affairs, JJ Daniel Hall, Room 2500 no later than 5:00 PM on Friday, October 20, 2017.

A searchable electronic copy must be emailed to

A copy of this form will be returned to you acknowledging receipt of a complete application.

Academic Affairs will complete the section below:

Received By:

Date Proposal Received:

Application Checklist:

Original and one copy submitted

Electronic copy emailed ______

Application guidelines adhered to

Applicant eligible for funding

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT GRANTS

2018APPLICATION

Section 1. Cover Page

APPLICANT’S NAME:

APPLICANT’S RANK:

COLLEGE/DEPARTMENT:

PROPOSAL TITLE:

Is this a new project? Yes No

Check here if this isan interdisciplinary project?

Does your research/scholarly project involve human subjects (e.g., interviews, surveys, focus groups, oral history) or animal subjects (i.e., vertebrate animals)? Yes No

If yes, have you applied for and received approval from the Institutional Review Board (for human subjects or radioactive material) or the IACUC (for animal subjects)?

Yes, the letter of approval is attached.

The application has been submitted, but we have not yet received approval.

We have not yet applied for approval, but will submit request and obtain approval prior to beginning the project.

My project in no way involves human subjects or animal subjects.

WORD COUNTS

Section 2: Section 5: Appendix A:

SIGNATURES:

______

APPLICANT DATE

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION CHAIRDATE

COLLEGE DEAN DATE

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT GRANTS

2018 APPLICATION

Section 1(b). Cover Page for Additional Interdisciplinary Collaborators

APPLICANT’S NAME:

APPLICANT’S RANK:

COLLEGE/DEPARTMENT:

PROPOSAL TITLE:

SIGNATURES:

______

APPLICANT DATE

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION CHAIRDATE

COLLEGE DEAN DATE

Section 2.Proposal Summary

Maximum 200 words, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Romanfont, 1-inch margins

Provide a summary of the proposed project. The summary should be clear and concise and should be written in language that is understood by reviewers from other disciplines.It should “sell” your proposal to the reviewers, and should address, briefly, the University initiative targeted (if any).

Section 3.Proposal Narrative

Maximum 4 pages (excluding references), double-spaced, 12-point Times New Romanfont, 1-inch margins.

Proposal Title

Please write your proposal in a manner such that colleagues who are not in your field will be able to understand and appreciate the significance of your proposed project.

Applicants should follow the outline provided below when preparing the proposal narrative.

  1. Plan of Work
  1. Introduction, which should include a statement of purpose, goals and objectives, and hypotheses (where appropriate)
  2. Background and/or Literature Review
  3. Methodology/approach/plan of work (which should include a research or creative design that is adequate for the stated purpose of the proposal)
  4. Description of the anticipated product(s) and outcome(s) of thegrant. (Publications or presentations arising out of a Faculty DevelopmentGrant should acknowledge UNF as the funding source. Please include a statement to that effect in this section.)

II.Significance

  1. Description of significance to field and society
  2. Timeliness with respect to current directions in the academic discipline
  3. Potential of the project to contribute to the knowledge domain
  4. Likelihood that the project will lead to future external funding, if appropriate

III.References (not part of 4 page limit)

Section 4. Budget Form

Applicant(s):

Budget Approved
Proposed Budget / Provost Office Only
A. Salary and Wages (a)
  1. Faculty (PI) Salary
  2. Graduate Student Support & Benefits*
  3. Undergraduate or OPS Support & Benefits*
*Addbenefitrates to salary line item as per the instructions in (a) below.
TOTAL PERSONNEL
B. Equipment (b)
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
C. Travel (c)
1.Specify Trips
2.Transportation Costs
3.Other Travel Costs
TOTAL TRAVEL
D. Other Costs (c)
(postage, photocopying, supplies, fees, etc.)
TOTAL OTHER COSTS
TOTAL BUDGET

(a)Fringe benefits are calculated at a rate of 7.65% for part-time OPS staff, undergraduates, and graduate students; faculty need not include fringe costs. For interdisciplinary grants, list each collaborating PI on a separate line. If salary is budgeted for an academic year course buyout, be sure to consult with your chair in advance of application. Funding can NOT be used in any way to support overload assignments or supplemental salary.

(b)Equipment that cost more than $5,000 and a life expectancy of more than two years must be listed. This equipment will remain the property of UNF under the jurisdiction of the awardee’s department. All shipping and installation costs should be included in these figures.