EE3032 Mark Sheet for Prototyping & Coding (25%) and Design Excellence (10%)

EE3032 Mark Sheet for Prototyping & Coding (25%) and Design Excellence (10%)

EE3032 Mark Sheet for Prototyping & Coding (25%) and Design Excellence (10%)

INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS / Prototyping
[50 Marks] / CODE
[10 Marks] / PODE
[10 Marks]
Fill in the shaded fields using a word processor and provide your identification picture.
The identification picture can be from IVLE, or a recent picture that easily identifies you.
A completed copy of this form must be uploaded to wiki, and printed for your examiner.
Team Number: / Click here to enter text. / Academic Year: / Choose an item. / Semester: / Choose an item. / /
Student Name: / Click here to enter text. /
Project Title: / Click here to enter text. /
Feature Name: / Click here to enter text. /
Criteria / Description / Maximum Score / Awarded Score
Planning and Organisation
Upload the system flowcharts, LPC1769 pin allocations table, and circuit schematics,as images on wiki for direct reading
Upload commented program codes as a text file (Notepad readable) or PDF on wiki. Attachment will be opened for reading
All the above should be representing your feature only, and not the whole project / System flowchartsare finely detailed and neatly drawn through software / 3
Pin allocationsare well optimised with minimal resource wastage / 3
Circuit schematics arecorrect and well presented / 3
Program codes,with concise comments, are easy to read / 3
Hardware and Software Integration
The overall effort in implementing the feature is assessed / Breadboard circuit is well-planned, properly labelled and neatly wired / 3
Feature is effective in solving related problems identified by the project / 3
Feature is robust, and is able to function correctly whenever required / 3
Student is able to present all items in this mark sheet without delays / 2
Feature Detail
Award of scores will be based on relevance (R), implementation (I) and complexity (C) of the feature. Creativity or innovativeness has an impact on the three criteria formerly mentioned. The three criteria are described in non-exhaustive details below:
Relevance:Is the feature, hardware, middleware and algorithms reasonably useful for project? Will the feature be implementable or can it be up-scaled in real life considering the current technological limitations, possible budget constraints or environmental concerns? Are the hardware used justified? Is the majority of the processing done on the ARM processor (MATLAB processing, webcam connected to laptop have lower grade impact as compared to LPC interfacing and programming)? How much realistic considerations were placed into such feature?
Implementation: Was the demonstration successful without much issue? How impressive was the demonstration? Did the demonstration involve too many assumptions or manual manipulations? Was responsiveness and processing resources considered, such as avoiding delays and inefficient loops, while considering proper usage of interrupts and polling? Does the feature completely avoids the use of the IDE debugger and instead focuses on protocols like UART, I2C, Ethernet, SSP to transfer data and display information? Are batteries used for standalone projects? Was the feature optimised in terms of LPC1769 pins usage? How much hours of efficient work would be required for such feature?
Complexity: Did the student consider advanced algorithms? If database is involved, did the student consider the use of advanced database methods instead of IF/CASE statements? Did the student use HTTP web pages, Java or Visual Basic GUI to aid in the displaying of information? How much changes/amendments are involved for downloadable libraries before the student is able to meet the specification of the feature? Are advanced mathematical formulas, computational intelligence algorithms, controllers, filters involved? How complex is it to program and use the chosen hardware and/or supporting GUI interfaces? How much general and specialised knowledge or skills would be required for such feature? / NOTE:The description must not exceed 150 words.
You must be able to give a lot of information clearly in a minimal amount of words, that is, lesser words with concise descriptions and appropriate paragraphs are required
Where applicable, it must include details on sensors, noteworthy hardware, advanced algorithms, actuators and other useful information
Click here to enter text. /
/ Relevance:
9
Implementation:
9
Complexity:
9
Concept of Design Excellence (CODE) / Based ondiscussion in class and described on the wiki pages / 10
Proof of Design Excellence (PODE) / Based on discussion in class and described on the wiki pages / 10
Examiner’s Remarks Regarding the Student Being Assessed
Including essential changes expected to be implemented by the final demonstration of the project
If applicable, did the student complete any required introductory tasks?

.© 。◕‿◕。Revision: A.02