ASSESSMENT APPEALSPROCEDURE
for
FURTHER EDUCATION (FE)
and
HIGHER EDUCATION(HE)
2017 /2018
ACADEMICASSESSMENTAPPEALS PROCEDURE
1.Introduction
Aim
The aim of the procedure is to enable students who believe they have a grievanceconcerninganassessment(includingadecisionwheretheresultof theassessmentmayrequirethestudent’swithdrawalfromtheprogramme)to requestareviewofthatdecision. Thisproceduredoesnotdealwithdisciplinary mattersforwhichthereisaseparatedisciplinaryprocedure.
ThisprocedureappliesonlytothosestudentswhoseAssessment/Examinations areconstitutedundertheinternalauthority ofSandwellCollege. Where examinationsaresetandassessedexternally,the Collegehasno powersto reconsiderassessmentdecisionsbutwilladvisestudentshowtomakeanappeal totheexternal bodiesconcerned.
Theterms“examination”and“assessment”aresynonymousand refertoallformsofstudentassessmentincludingassessmentsofcompetency requiredbyNational Vocational Qualifications.
Thisprocedureapplieswherethereisnoapprovedappealsprocedurecontained withinanapprovedsubmissiontoanexternalbodyorwheretheCollegehas,a condition ofapproval,to adheretotheprocedures ofan external body.
AcademicJudgement
Thereisnoformalappealagainsttheacademicjudgementofassessors/verifiers
i.e.inrelationto marksorgradesawarded. disappointedwithan assessment grade/mark Programme Tutor concerned, to request an
However, astudent who is awarded may approach the independent re-assessment.
RefusalbytheCollegetoundertakere-assessmentbyasecondexaminerwould constitutegroundsforanappeal.
2.Groundsofwhich anAppealcan bemade
Thereareonlytwosetsofcircumstancesinwhichthedecisionofaconstituted ProgrammeTeammaybechangedbyahigherauthority withintheCollege. Namely:-
Material errororirregularity:
There hasbeenan administrative error,or
Thattheassessmentwasnotconductedinaccordancewiththeprogramme regulations,or
The College failed or refused to undertake re-assessment by a second examiner,or
Thatsomeothermaterialirregularityhasoccurred.
Personalcircumstancesnot knowntothe assessors/programme team:
If astudentestablishestothesatisfactionoftheProgrammeTeamthathis/her performanceintheexaminationorotherformofassessmentwasadverselyaffected byillness,orotherfactors,whichhe/shewasunableorforvalidreasonsunwillingto divulgepriortoassessment. Thestudent’srequestmustbesupportedbymedical certificatesorotherappropriate documentary evidence.
3.Procedure
Inthefirstinstance,anystudentwith agrievanceshould:-
DiscussthiswiththeProgrammeTutorandTeamLeader.
Ifthestudentisnotsatisfiedhe/sheshouldbeadvisedoftheAcademic
Appeals Procedure.
If the student decides to appeal, he/she should write to the Assistant Directorof thedepartmentstatingthegroundsforappeal. Thisshouldbedoneassoonas possibleandnormallywithinfourweeksofthenotificationoftheassessmentresults tothestudent.
The Assistant Directorof theDepartment will investigate the grievance and determine whetherthestudenthasvalidgroundsforanappeal. Ifhe/sherulesthatvalidgroundsforanappealexist,he/shewillattempttoresolvethecaseto the student’ssatisfactionwithoutre-programmeto anappeal hearing.
Details of action taken will be communicated to all parties concerned, includingthePrincipal.
Ifthegrievanceisnotresolvedwithin one calendarmonthoftheappeal being lodged, the Assistant Director of the Department shall convene an Assessment Appeals Committee and where appropriate for HE Provision, a member of the Universityand prepareareportaboutthecase.
4.AssessmentAppeals CommitteeComposition
Whereitisnecessaryformallytohearanappeal,anAssessmentAppeals
Committeeshall be convened. The Committee shall consistofthefollowing:
Chair -TheVice-Principal (TeachingLearning)
Curriculum Assistant Director
Atleastone othermemberofCollege/Universitystaff
Atleastonestudent
Secretary
No members of the Assessment Appeals Committee shall be from the Section directlyinvolvedintheappeal. Aquorumfora meeting of the AcademicAppealsCommitteeshouldbefour.
5.AssessmentAppeals Committee:TermsofReference and Procedures
AnAssessmentAppealsCommitteeactingonbehalfoftheAcademicBoard shall consider and determine requests for a review of a decision of a
Programme Team.An Assessment Appeals Committee shall not powers to deal with appeals arising from disciplinary matters or
allegationsofcheatingorplagiarism.
havefrom
Unlesshe/sheagreestoashorterperiod,theappellantmustbegivenwritten notice,atleastfiveCollegeworkingdayspriortothe hearing,thatthe hearing will take place,and ofhis/herrightsunderthisprocedure.
NormallyatleastfiveCollegeworkingdaysbeforethehearing,membersof an Assessment Appeals Committee shall be provided with the following documents,togetherwithanyadditionaldocumentsthoughtrelevantbythe ChairmanoftheAssessmentAppeals Committee:-
A copyofthe programme’sassessmentprocedure
Acopyoftheappellant’sletterofapplicationforahearing,togetherwith supportingdocumentaryevidence.
A copyofthe currentAssessmentAppealsProcedure.
AcopyoftheAssessmentAppealsProcedureshallbesenttotheappellant withthe notice ofahearing.
Thestudentandanyotherperson(s)citedintheappeal,each accompaniedif sodesiredbyafriend,hastherighttoappearbeforeandbeheardbythe AssessmentAppeals Committee.
Whiletheappealremainsunresolved,thestudentshallhavetherightto proceedtothe nextpartorstageofthe programme,provided the programme regulationspermitit.
TherelevantProgrammeTeamsshallhavetherighttoberepresentedatthe hearingofanAssessmentAppealsCommittee.
The procedure to be followed at a hearing shall be determined by the Chairmaninconsultationwithothermembers oftheAssessmentAppeals Committeeatthecommencementofthe hearing. Accordingtothe circumstances,thepartiestotheappeal maybeseen separately(inwhatever orderisdeemedappropriate)ortogether.
An Assessment Appeals Committee shall have thepower torequirethe attendanceofanymemberofstaffandshallbe givenaccesstoanyrecords and documentswhich itregardsasrelevant.
In cases of withdrawal from the programme of study, the Assessment AppealsCommitteeshallhavetheauthoritytorevokeorconfirmthedecision towithdrawthestudentfromaprogramme. Sucharevocationshallentitle the studenteither:-
toproceedonthe programmeforthe remainderofthe session,or
to repeatthefailedpartoftheprogrammeatthe earliestopportunity whichever the Assessment Appeals Committee judgesto be in the best
interestsofthe student.
In cases of appeals against an assessment decision, if theAssessment AppealsCommitteedecidesinfavouroftheappellant,theProgrammeTeam responsiblefortheoriginaldecisionmustmeetattheearliestopportunityto reconsiderthestudent’sresultsi.e.reassessthestudent’sworkandregrade theworkorrepeattheassessmentprocessforthestudent. TheProgramme Team,inundertakingsuchreconsideration,shouldtakeaccountofthereportoftheAssessmentAppealsCommitteeandtherecommendationscontained therein.
WheretheAssessmentAppealsCommitteeupholdsanappealagainstan assessmentdecision,thestudentwillbepermittedre-assessmentonthe first practicableoccasion.
Ifafterreconsideration,incasesofappealsagainstanassessmentdecision, theProgrammeTeamconfirmsitsoriginaldecision,theAssessmentAppeals Committee may be re-convened at the request of the student or the Chairman of the Assessment Appeals Committee to consider further the positionoftheappellant. ThefinaldecisionshallrestwiththeAssessmentAppeals Committee;therewill be nofurtherappeal.
ThedecisionoftheAssessmentAppealsCommitteewillbecommunicatedto the student and the Programme Leader/Curriculum Team Leader,Assistant Director, Vice Principal ofTeaching & Learning and the University,inwriting,withinfive Collegeworkingdaysofthe Appeal.
The Assessment Appeals Committee shall have the right to make recommendationsandobservationstotheQuality andCurriculumReview Board concerninganymattersofdetail orprinciple arisingfroma hearing.
AreportofthedecisionshallbecommunicatedtotheQualityandCurriculum
ReviewBoard.
TheSecretaryshallprepareareportofthehearingwhichshallbemade availabletothe membersoftheAssessmentAppealsCommittee.
RecordsofthedecisionsoftheCommitteeshall bekeptforaminimumofsix yearsfollowingthedateoftheappeal.