Rubric for Science Process Skills (Revised)
Score / Hypothesis /Prediction / Procedures / Observations / Collecting /
Recording Data
4
High achievement at grade level, consistently uses skills independently / · Complete thought
· Based on prior knowledge and/or observation
· Specifically related to the problem or question
· Adds reason to show thinking behind prediction / hypothesis
· Reasons should reflect scientific thought with appropriate vocabulary
· Independent-written by student without teacher help / · Complete listing of all steps to be followed
· Specifies all measured amounts with numbers (5 minutes, 1 cup water, etc.)
· Order of steps is logical
· Anticipates steps that will be necessary before performing experiment.
· Conducts multiple trials
· Identifies all variables to be controlled and experimental variable. / · Chooses and properly uses necessary tools / instruments (i.e., hand lens) when appropriate
· Does not state opinions or use anthropomorphic descriptions (give human qualities to non-human objects/concepts)
· Records observations through words or drawings / · Data is recorded correctly
· Measurements/labels are specified correctly
· Data collected has uniform labels (i.e., all in mL)
· Logical order
· Information can be easily read
· Student organizes data in appropriate format (chart, graph, etc.) without help from teacher
3
Demonstrates grade level skills / · Complete thought
· Based on prior knowledge and/or observation
· Specifically related to the problem or question / · Lists most of the steps to be followed
· Specifies most measured amounts with numbers (5 minutes, 1 cup water, etc.)
· Order of steps is logical
· Identifies experimental variable and some variables to be controlled. / · Properly uses necessary tools / instruments (i.e., hand lens) when appropriate
· Does not state opinions or use anthropomorphic descriptions (give human qualities to non-human objects/concepts)
· Records observations through words or drawings / · Data is recorded correctly
· Measurements/labels are specified correctly
· Data collected has uniform labels (i.e., all in mL)
· Logical order
· Information can be easily read
2
Developing grade level skills / · Incomplete thought
· Not based on prior knowledge and/or observation
· Only somewhat related to problem or question / · Lists some of the steps to be followed
· Order of steps is logical
· Lists experimental variable, but does not list variables to be controlled. / · Improperly uses necessary tools / instruments when tools are appropriate
· States opinions or uses anthropomorphic descriptions (give human qualities to non-human objects/concepts)
· Does not record observations / · Data is recorded with some mistakes
· Data not completely labeled
· No logical order
· Information may be difficult to read
1
Performing below grade level, needs to improve / · Blank, does not verbalize or record prediction / hypothesis
· Not based on prior knowledge and/or observation
· Does not relate to problem/ question / · Lists some of the steps to be followed / · Does not use necessary tools / instruments when tools are appropriate
· Does not record observations / · Data not recorded
· Data recorded incorrectly (not labeled, no logical order, etc.)
· Incomplete information
Score / Analyze Data / Conclusions
4
High achievement at grade level, consistently uses skills independently / · Independent-written by student without teacher help
· Checks data to see if information recorded is reasonable/logical. Can explain why some pieces of data may not fit (explains sources of error).
· Can generate simple questions about data collected
· Complete sentence (when applicable); complete thought
· Can explain verbally or in writing how data is organized (understands organization of charts/graphs, etc.)
· Can accurately state/write results of experiment based on data
· Can determine if data was collected/recorded accurately
· Evaluates relevance of data collected to original question
· Clearly understands reliability of data increases with increased repetition of experiment) / · Complete sentences or thought
· Explains how data supported (or didn’t support) the original hypothesis
· States results of experiment (after examining accuracy of data)
· Clearly reflects original question
· Interprets meaning of results by applying it correctly to a bigger “science concept”
· Independent-written by student without teacher help
· With teacher help may develop new questions based on conclusion
3
Demonstrates grade level skills / · Checks data to see if information recorded is reasonable/logical
· Complete sentence (when applicable); complete thought
· Can explain verbally or in writing how data is organized
· Can accurately state/write results of experiment based on data
· Can determine if data was collected/recorded accurately
· Evaluates relevance of data collected with original question
· Understand reliability of data increases with repetition / · Complete sentence or thought
· States results of experiment
· Clearly reflects original question
· Interprets meaning of the results by applying it correctly to a bigger “science concept”
2
Developing grade level skills / · Overlooks data collected that is not logical or reasonable
· Incomplete sentence or thought
· Cannot clearly explain how data is organized (difficulty understanding charts/graphs)
· Cannot accurately state/write results of experiment based on data
· Cannot specify relevance of data collected to original question and/or explanation is only somewhat reasonable / · Sentence is not complete and/or thoughts are fragmented
· States results of experiment
· Attempts to apply results to the bigger picture “science concept” (on the right track)
1
Performing below grade level, needs to improve / · Evaluation of information is not related to actual data collected and/or is not a reasonable explanation of results
· Incomplete sentence or thought
· No or little attempt to determine results
· Blank / · Blank
· Indecipherable
· Incomplete-little attempt to develop conclusion
· Doesn’t relate to experiment
*Draws conclusions: Decides how data supported or didn’t support the original hypothesis; determines the relevance of data in comparison with the key question and hypothesis; examines accuracy of data and outcome of experiment; possibly reevaluates/changes hypothesis and redesigns experiments as a result; suggests new questions related to the experiment that could be investigated.