Appellate Cases Citing the Procurement Code Or Regs

Appellate Cases Citing the Procurement Code or Regs.

1. Ex parte South Carolina Div. of General Services, 283S.C.555, 325S.E.2d319 (1984)

2. Gary Concrete Products, Inc. v. Riley, 285S.C.498, 331S.E.2d335 (1985)

3. Paddock Equipment Co. v. University of South Carolina, 289S.C.219, 345S.E.2d749 (Ct. App. 1986)

4. William C. Logan & Associates v. Leatherman, 290S.C.400, 351S.E.2d146 (1986)

5. Tall Tower, Inc. v. South Carolina Procurement Review Panel, 294S.C.225, 363S.E.2d683 (1987)

6. Charleston County School Dist. v. Leatherman, 295S.C.264, 368S.E.2d76, (Ct. App. 1988)

7. Charleston Television, Inc. v. South Carolina Budget and Control Bd., 296S.C.444, 373S.E.2d892 (Ct. App. 1988)

8. Charleston Television, Inc. v. South Carolina Budget and Control Bd., 301S.C.468, 392S.E.2d671 (1990)

9. Citizens for Lee County, Inc. v. Lee County, 308S.C.23, 416S.E.2d641 (1992)

10. Quality Lightning Protection, Inc. v. H.C. Brown Const. Co., Inc., 311S.C.62, 427S.E.2d676 (1992)

11. Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. Leatherman, 309S.C.174, 420S.E.2d843 (1992)

12. Chambers of South Carolina, Inc. v. County Council for Lee County, 315S.C.418, 434S.E.2d279 (1993)

13. Smith Setzer & Sons, Inc. v. South Carolina Procurement Review Panel, 20F.3d1311 (4thCir. 1994)

14. Southern Contracting, Inc. v. H.C. Brown Const. Co., Inc., 317S.C.95, 450S.E.2d602 (1994)

15. Cameron & Barkley Co. v. South Carolina Procurement Review Panel, 317S.C.437, 454S.E.2d892 (1995)

16. O'Hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of Northlake, 518 U.S. 712 (1996). (unhelpful)

17. Board of County Com'rs v. Umbehr, 116S.Ct.2361 (U.S. 1996) (unhelpful)

18. Ray Bell Const. Co., Inc. v. School Dist. of Greenville County, 324S.C.320, 478S.E.2d67 (Ct. App. 1996)

19. D.W. Flowe & Sons, Inc. v. Christopher Const. Co., 326S.C.17, 482S.E.2d558 (1997)

20. Ray Bell Const. Co., Inc. v. School Dist. of Greenville County, 331S.C.19, 501S.E.2d725 (1998)

21. Sloan v. School Dist. of Greenville County, 342 S.C. 515, 537 S.E.2d 299 (Ct. App. 2000)

22. Unisys Corp. v. South Carolina Budget and Control Bd, 346 S.C. 158, 551 S.E.2d 263 (2001)

23. Hass Const. Co. v. Thomas, 183 F.Supp.2d 800 (D.S.C. 2001)

24. Companion Property and Casualty Ins. Co. v. South Carolina Procurement Review Panel, Unpublished Op. No. 2003-UP-174 (S.C. Ct. App. filed March 4, 2003).

25. Masterclean, Inc. v. Star Ins. Co., 347 S.C. 405, 556 S.E.2d 371 (2001)

26. Glasscock Co. v. Sumter County, --- S.E.2d ---, 2004 WL 2439469 (SC Ct. App. 2004)

Other Key Procurement Related Cases

Quirk v. Palms, C/A No. 3:02-1238-22 (D.S.C. July 3, 2003) (Court order ruling that Rule 4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct requires that a lawyer representing a private party in a controversy with the government must - at a minimum - give government counsel advance notice before communicating with represented government officials.) (available at www.procurementlaw.sc.gov – procurement news)

Sloan v. Greenville County, Op. No. 3704 (S.C. Ct. App. dated Dec. 8, 2003) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 43, at 73) (Taxpayer Standing, Mootness, Sufficiency of a Written Determination, Admission of testimony regarding a Written Determination, Liberal Construction provided procurement laws, Role of Code Policy in construing procurement laws.)

United Waste Services, Inc. v. Florence County, C.A. No. 4-96-0979-23 (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 1996) (Unpublished U.S. District Court opinion addressing the legal effect of a county procurement code, resolving a "protest" of a county contract award, and providing an equitable remedy.) (available at www.procurementlaw.sc.gov – procurement news)