The Path on Earth of the Son of God

I. Jesus’ consciousness of Himself and his mission

A. Introduction

1. Jesus’ imminent expectation: Jesus proclaimed the Kingdom of God to

be close at hand, but them it seemed not to appear.

a. The assertion is that Jesus was mistaken confronts theology

with difficult questions.

2. There are two attempts to address the question that must be avoided:

a. The Fathers of the Church suggest Jesus’ ignorance is for a

pedagogical purpose. Jesus does know, but he does not wish to

reveal it.

b. It is inadequate to assert what appears to be a prophetic

consciousness as the imminent end of the world and time is

explained by the overpowering shock at the absoluteness of the

will of God.

B. Imminent Expectation: Was Jesus Mistaken?

1. Weiss and Schweitzer believe that Jesus shared the Jewish

apocalyptic view of the world, where the end times will be seen in a

kind of cosmic catastrophe. Three elements were tied to this:

a. People assumed the imminent arrival of the Kingdom of God.

b. The kingdom of God is an eschatological/apocalyptic concept.

c. People were expecting the end of the world.

2. These theologians were responding against Harnack who turns Jesus

simply into a teacher of moral behavior.

a. Jesus shared the view that the end of the world was imminent,

but instead there was the cross. Even after Easter, Jesus’

disciples were hoping for the coming of the Kingdom, but the

Parousia was delayed.

b. Instead of the Kingdom of God, there was the Church.

3. But did Jesus really believe this way?

a. The Qumran texts question whether the people really did

expect the end of the world.

b. Exegetes wonder if Jesus had the kingdom as an eschatological

image. This is because Jesus talks about the Kingdom as being

present now.

c. Jesus gives no definite information about time in regard to the

future.

4. It is wrong to apply to Jesus a preconceived notion of the Kingdom of

God.

a. No where in Jesus’ preaching is there an indication that Jesus

himself believed his failure to be a sign that God’s kingdom has

not come.

b. The Kingdom fares as Jesus did. It is not recognized and it even

suffers violence.

c. Jesus imminent expectation is that the will of the Father is

done, that his Kingdom come.

C. The Decisive Will of God: Jesus’ moral message

1. The time is fulfilled because Jesus himself is the fullness of time,

because the boundless fullness of the love of God has come in Jesus.

a. The coming of Jesus is the coming of the end time. Jesus knows

that he has been sent to fulfill the eschatological gathering

together of Israel.

b. That fact can only mean that Jesus is conscious of being sent to

renew God’s covenant in its unconditionality to led all Israel to

what comes forth as the constant call of the covenant that

Israel is perfect and holy as God is perfect and holy.

c. Just as the call of the prophets brought about a separation

between those who accepted and rejected the Lord, so Jesus

himself is the sign of the times.

d. The band of those who follow Jesus are the eschatological

Israel. The discourses of Jesus on judgment see the judgment

with the reference to himself.

2. This separation does not lead Jesus to carry out a separation between

believers and non-believers. The WEEDS and WHEAT are left to grow

together. The judgment takes place in his self-offering on the cross.

a. Jesus knows he has been sent to save, not to judge. It is in his

healing and saving ministry that rejection and hatred are

ignited, right up to bring about the plan for his death.

b. The very fact that he is doing good brings him enmity.

3. A unique feature of Jesus’ mission is that the growing enmity against

him does not alter the aim of his mission.

a. He is always concerned to save, not to judge. Love your

enemies.

b. how can his saving mission be sustained if enmity prevails over

acceptance? It can only be accomplished by forgiving and

serving.

4. Jesus knows he has been sent to sinners and he grants forgiveness of

Sins in acts and images.

a. Jesus knows himself to be the one who carries out and

proclaims God’s own will, forgiving and in so doing this he is

bringing the kingdom of God.

b. In his acts of pardon it becomes manifest who the God who

sent him is and what his Kingdom looks like.

5. Jesus’ mission finds its expression in the trait of service.

a. Jesus overturns the rabbinic idea of service because his

demand for discipleship is more radical than that of the

rabbis, but he is among them as one who serves.

b. Because Jesus as the Master is one who serves, the disciples

must serve. Jesus himself understood his mission as service to

the poor and little ones.

c. Jesus uses his authority not to make people feel his power, but

to heal and save.

d. This action is more than an appeal for humility. It is an

essential part of the mission of Jesus and is essentially a

proclamation of the Kingdom of God.

6. Jesus prepares his disciples for such service and also promises them

hardships, persecution and maltreatment. We can only conclude that

suffering is a part of his mission.

a. His power to effect conversion stems from the fact that he is

ready to endure the hatred of those he loves. He can conquer

this hatred only by a love that is all the greater.

b. Jesus opens the door for them so that they can get out of their

hatred if they accept this love. Christ’s death becomes a

gesture of his love, his last word of Love.

7. Two things have to be held together:

a. The authority of Jesus which empowers him to serve, in an

understanding of his mission as God’s final mission to Israel and

the eschatological call of Israel to return to God.

b. How can we reconcile the fact that Jesus expects the Kingdom

of God and at the same time walks toward self-sacrifice by way

of service and forgiveness of sins?

c. Jesus did not merely preach the Kingdom of God; he risked his

life for the sake of its coming. That is the heart of his

proclamation of the Kingdom of God. It reveals that God is

willing to pay much for it- indeed everything.

d. The key to the Kingdom is the cross. There is NO other way

that the Kingdom will ever come about but through the cross

and the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

D. Jesus’ Knowledge in the History of Theology

1. The question of Jesus’ omniscience and his awareness of himself as

divine is a soteriological question. It is not irrelevant whether Jesus

knew why he was dying.

a. When Jesus was dying, he must have known in a mysterious but

real way for whom he was giving his life; otherwise he does not

save us and his death has no meaning for us.

b. What is unique about the revelation of Jesus is that he is not

only the one who receives revelation, but is himself the

REVEALER and REVELATION in one.

E. Integration and Perfection in Patristic Literature

1. The Early church was interested in two questions:

a. The question of the complete humanity of Christ.

b. The question of Jesus’ ignorance.

2. In the battles against Docetism, it Is clear that the Church proclaim

and defend the real corporeality of Jesus.

a. With the rise of Apollinarism, there also began to be the

concern of Jesus’ human will, intellect and soul.

b. Thus the human intelligence of Jesus could not be seen as that

of a man enlightened by God, but the human intelligence of

the LOGOS of God.

c. With the Hypostatic Union, it is possible for Jesus’ divine

knowledge to be communicated to his humanity. This

communication occurred with respect to Jesus’ human

constitution and for the salvation entrusted ot the Incarnate

Word.

3. With Chalcedon, Jesus is seen as perfect in humanity and perfect in

divinity.

a. That Jesus increased in wisdom and stature and favor with God,

that he assumed a true human process of growth is part of the

principle of Integrity. Does this imply ignorance on Jesus’ part?

b. There is also present in Jesus the principle of perfection,

whereby Jesus’ human existence is perfect and sinless. This is

why the early Church practically any ignorance on the part of

Christ.

c. St. Ambrose would state that Jesus knows the hour only for

himself. He does not know it for me.

F. Christ’s Vision of God in the Middle Ages

1. The question revolved around how could a human soul and a human

intelligence contain all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.

a. Gregory the Great believed that Jesus’ knowledge was human

in application and divine in origin.

2. In the 13th Century, Scholasticism developed the triplex scientia

humana.

a. Scientia Acquisita: acquired human knowledge.

b. Scientia Infusa: A prophetic knowledge coming from

supernatural communication.

c. Scientia Visionis: The vision of God that other people will have

in everlasting life.

3. There are three respects in which the knowledge of the beatific vision

is misunderstood:

a. Visio does not mean the same as comprehension

(understanding). The soul of Christ was by no means able to

fully comprehend the nature of God. It s a contemplation, not a

comprehension.

b. The visio is immediate. It is not mediated through the senses or

mental concepts or ideas. It is a knowledge which God himself

grants directly to our mind.

c. Christ has in his human soul a relative omniscience.

4. The visio means that the soul of Christ sees everything in the Father,

receives everything from the Father and knows everything in the

Father.

5. How can divine knowledge and perception be present in the human

knowledge and perception and be mediated by it?

a. In the Bible there is only one way to know God, and that is by

looking at him. In the NT, man cannot look at God until he does

so in the perfection of the Kingdom of God.

b. Looking upon God can only mean endless happiness. Christ is

looking upon God because he has the direct relation to God

without which human perception can only ever grasp what is

finite.

c. Christ is the way that can lead all men to the goal (beatific

vision). In order to lead us there, Jesus must not only be

VIATOR (on the way to the goal), but already be there himself

(COMPREHENSOR).

6. If Christ enjoys the Beatific vision, then can he still be walking an

historical path?

a. The visio doctrine does not really contravene his true

humanity; but it ascribes the greatest importance to the

significance for salvation of Jesus’ life and its mysteries.

b. It is based on a particular evaluation of Jesus’ earthly life. In

the actions and suffering of Jesus, the whole of salvation came

about once and for all. It was realized by the incarnate Word

through his human will and human mind.

c. It was therefore requisite that Christ should know in his human

soul the entire revelation to be born and the whole salvation to

be effected.

7. Christ receives everything from the Father, who knows everything

from him and teaches on the basis of him.

a. Even if Jesus’ time period and environment left their mark on

him, it is still more true that he has left his mark on every age

in the whole world.

G. Christ’s self-awareness as a modern problem

1. Pope Pius X and Benedict XV write that it is wrong to maintain that it

must be taught with certainty that Jesus was mistaken in the

imminent expectation question or that he was not always conscious of

being the Messiah.

a. Pius XII points out the loving knowledge with which Jesus

comprehends everyone.

b. The question of Christ’s consciousness is posed quite differently

depending on the starting point.

2. One either starts with Faith in the God-man, The Incarnate Word, or

whether Jesus is regarded from the standpoint of an ordinary man

who had a strong relationship to God.

II. Contemporary Answers to the Question

A. Rahner’s Basic distinction

1. The doctrine of the Hypostatic Union is the basis of the dogmatic

statement about the self-knowledge and self-awareness of Jesus.

a. Knowledge is a multi-tiered structure, that at ay given point

man will consciously know some facts but unconsciously not

others.

b. Besides the subconscious, there is also the super conscious- the

constantly active spiritual dimension of the human soul, the

life-giving source of any of its intellectual activity, artistic

inspiration and great moral choices.

c. There is by analogy the simultaneous existence of two levels of

consciousness in which the upper level does not abolish the

activity proper to the lower, but strengthens and guides it.

d. There exists the form of knowledge of an a-priori non-objective

knowledge of oneself, the basic mode of being. The basic mode

of being is not objective knowledge; reflection never basically

catches up with this basic mode of being.

2. Thus there is

a. An objective perceiving of oneself (cogitare)

b. A knowing of oneself as a whole, even if this is never

objectively conscious (nosse)

3. Augustine is convinced that every mind knows of itself and about

which it is certain.

a. One may have any possible opinion on any possible matter, but

even if it doubts, he lives. If these processes were not, he

could not doubt at all (CF.185)

b. This ultimate certainty, which can never become objective

knowledge, is the basis of all perception.

c. BUT, is the concept of omniscience a meaningful concept at

all? And what might represent its corresponding human analogy

in human consciousness?

d. One CANNOT become omniscient. One cannot arrive at an

infinite knowledge from a finite starting point. It is not mere

addition.

e. BUT, with “NOSSE”, that self-knowledge and self-awareness of

the finite conscious subject (mens) which never becomes

categorical knowledge is the unity that renders possible all the

separate individual perceptions; this comprehending presence

that accompanies all the activities of our intelligence.

9. In the ultimate unity of the conscious subject in which I know myself,

is the closest analogy to the divine omniscience which must surely be

thought of as a unity, but not an infinite sum of perceptions. Thus

Christ cannot be omniscient on the level of cogitare.

a. Rahner attributes ot Jesus from the beginning a basic mode of

being that is immediate to God of an absolute kind.

b. He interprets the growth of Jesus’ self-consciousness as a

history of the self interpretation of Jesus’ own basic mode of

being.

c. Jesus more and more grasps what he already is and what he

basically already knew.

B. Von Balthasar’s Trinitarian Overview

1. He sees the mission of the Son in the extension of the eternal

procession of the Son from the Father.

a. Jesus’ entire earthly existence is a kind of translation in terms

of history and the economy of salvation of his eternal

existence, his manner of being God.

b. His manner of being man is the form of the translation of his

manner of being God. Thus if as God he is entirely from the

Father, so when he became man he is entirely from the Father.

2. Mission and Person is localized in Jesus. No split exits between his

person and his task. Jesus is in his entire existence the envoy of the

Father.

a. Jesus’ self awareness is the awareness of his mission. Jesus’

human consciousness is the consciousness of his mission.

b. Jesus has always been fully aware of his mission; it is a non-

thematic immemorial knowledge of the conscious subject itself

(NOSSE) which always knows of being one with the Father.

c. The process of becoming conscious of his mission thematically

can certainly take place in the manner of a historical process

of becoming.

3. What does the self-awareness of Jesus mean? He is the Son of God.

This self-awareness is therefore inseparably the awareness of the

unity with the one who he calls ABBA.

a. His human consciousness is the human translation of his eternal

divine Sonship.

b. Jesus’ knowledge is not at all from himself, but from his

relationship with his Father. Jesus knows himself purely in the

loving gaze at his Father, since he exists only in through and for

the Father.

c. When Jesus prays, then the mystery of the Son who wholly lives

through the Father appears in the most personal manner.

4. Human self-awareness is inconceivable without relationships with

others.

a. There is no such thing as an isolated self-awareness. Openness

to and dependence on others are an essential part of human

awareness.

b. Only in knowing other things and people do we know

ourselves.

5. In that sense, we may assume that Jesus came to know himself

through others, and especially through his mother.

a. However much human knowledge was certainly part of it,

everything seen on the other hand, to indicate that there was

one thing that Jesus did not learn, his connection to the

Father. (NOSSE)

b. Anyone who does not presuppose an absolute immediacy to

God on Jesus’ part necessarily have to support a kind of

adoptionism.

c. Everything that Jesus does and says always comes from his

immemorial unity with the Father.

C. Basic Mode of Being and thematic knowledge

1. The unity between divine and human consciousness in Christ consists

primarily in the awareness of mission.

a. Jesus understands himself as the One who comes from the

Father and who makes the Father known.

b. The particular shape of the mission can contain a wealth of

content, successively revealed, but its source remains the

mission itself.

c. From the Gospels, it is clear that Jesus not only knows about

his mission in a basic mode of being, but also knows in the

concrete about the path, his task and the word he is to speak