Appendix 1 Zooxanthellae clades of A. cervicornis and M.faveolata by zone. Knowing the collection zone reduces the error rate of predicting zooxanthellae clades in A. cervicornis samples by about 37% compared to chance alone (Goodman and Kruskal Tau test, p < 0.001). Knowing the collection zone reduces the error rate of predicting zooxanthellae clades in M.faveolata samples by about 3% compared to chance alone (Goodman and Kruskal Tau test, p < 0.05). Knowing the region (lower keys versus upper keys, not shown) did not have predictive power in either species. Percent of colonies that harbor a certain clade is given, maximum values are in bold. N = number of samples analyzed. * Notice small sample size. For the raw data, refer to Appendices 2 and 3.
A / A/B / A/B/C / A/C/D / B / B/C / B/C/D / B/C/D+ / B/D / B/D+ / C / C/D / C/D+ / D / Total (N)A.cerv / 0.86 / 0.01 / 0.03 / 0.01 / 0.09 / 94
Offshore / 0.98 / 0.02 / 43
Forereef / 1.00 / 21
Mid-Channel / 0.77 / 0.05 / 0.18 / 22
Inshore / 0.13 / 0.38 / 0.50 / 8
M. fav / 0.05 / 0.02 / 0.18 / 0.05 / 0.21 / 0.11 / 0.15 / 0.05 / 0.11 / 0.02 / 0.02 / 0.03 / 123
Offshore / 0.03 / 0.05 / 0.13 / 0.26 / 0.08 / 0.21 / 0.05 / 0.13 / 0.03 / 0.03 / 38
Forereef / 0.08 / 0.02 / 0.19 / 0.09 / 0.21 / 0.19 / 0.08 / 0.04 / 0.08 / 0.04 / 53
Mid-Channel / 0.14 / 0.04 / 0.18 / 0.04 / 0.25 / 0.07 / 0.14 / 0.04 / 0.11 / 28
Inshore* / 0.25 / 0.75 / 4