PCS PEER REVIEW PROCESS- ROUND 2

Each Review will have a Chair, Course/Module Director, Faculty Member and Student (if available)

Review Chair:

  • Contact Christopher Vaughan() to collect OME 2014-2015 Course Student Evaluations, USMLE results, Graduate Medical School Questionnaire, NBME Exam results, Student Ratings and Comments.
  • Obtain previous Peer Review from PCS Coordinator, Athena Gomez-Hipolito
  • Set time and place for committee to meet and review collected data including the Blackboard site
  • Review materials as a group and decide how to divide up the review
  • Collect or meet to completepowerpoint slides from group
  • Create a PP presentation to present at PCS
  • Confirm Peer Review on PCS Agenda with PCS Chair and Coordinator and send slides to both prior to meeting
  • Ten Minute max presentation to PCS concentrating on strengths and concerns
  • Turn in Peer Review Report AND powerpoints to PCS Chair and Coordinator

Course Director: Provide Review Group with a short description of the course/module and the following info:

  • Name of course and Year in curriculum/ Length of course/module
  • # and break down of teaching faculty, residents, fellows, graduate students, 3rd/4th year students, PA faculty etc
  • Educational Methods: # Lectures, small group, labs, OTHER
  • Current and/or possible places for Integration with other courses/modules/clerkships
  • Assessment Methods: formative/summative, internal exams: MCQ’s, T/F, matching, fill in, essay, PBL, NBME Shelf, OSCE, lab exam, oral presentations narrative
  • Remediation Opportunity
  • Course/ Module Self assessment: Most proud of and Would like to change…
  • NEW 10-1-15: How does course incorporate clinical correlations? What opportunities are there for them? What support do you need to enhance these?

Group: From the review answer the following questions and complete the table below:

  • Does the OME evaluation and other data show the course is meeting individual performance expectations? Consider target goals for performance.
  • Review adequacy of Blackboard site for content and ease of navigation
  • Follow up on prior action items from past Peer Review(s)
  • List Course/Modules Strengths and Concerns
  • Group creates Action Plan and timeline to address concerns

Area of Concern / Source / Action Plan with person responsible for the action / Timeline to Complete.