May 2003doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/366r0
IEEE P802.11
Wireless LANs
Meeting Minutes for 802.11j May
Date:May 13, 2003
Authors:Peter Ecclesine
Cisco Systems
170 West Tasman, MS 10/5, San Jose, CA95134-1706
Phone: +1-408-527-0815
Fax: +1-408-526-7864
e-Mail:
Bruce Kraemer
Intersil
2401 Palm Bay Road, Palm Bay, FL, 32905
Mail Stop – 62-024
Phone: 321-724-7000
Fax: 321-724-7886
e-Mail:
Mark Webster
Intersil
2401 Palm Bay Road, Palm Bay, FL, 32905
Phone: 321-724-7000
Fax: 321-724-7094
e-Mail:
Abstract
Minutes of Task Group J meetings held during the IEEE 802 Interim meeting in Dallas, TX from May 12 through 15, 2003.
Executive Summary:
- Draft specification letter ballot passed with 66% return rate, 79% approval from ballot pool of 394 members (11-03/336r0)
- 279 Comments reported in 11-03/337r1
- xxx Comments resolved during week
- xx
- xx
Tuesday, March 13, 8AM session
Peter Ecclesine appointed Secretary for the May Interim.
Minutes of the IEEE 802.11 TGj, Tuesday 14 May 2003, 08:00-10:00.
Chair: Sheung Li (Atheros)
Chair called meeting to order by the chair at 08:10 22 members present at this time.
Temporary Secretary appointed for first session: Bruce Kraemer (Intersil)
Agenda presented and approved by unanimous consent.
Letter ballot 56 requesting approval of the TGj draft specification closed at midnight Monday May 12. Results were announced as: Letter ballot passed with 66% return rate, 79% approval from ballot pool of 394 members.
- results are contained in document 11-03/336r0
- 279 Comments reported in 11-03/337r1
- After comment resolution the revised draft will move to recirculation.
Presentation by Yasuhiko Inuoe (NTT) on activities from ARIB/MMAC T-71 ad hoc (11-03/323r0)
Key points:
- Chair of ad hoc is Matsumoto-san (Speednet). Purpose was to revise T-71 and generate T-71 Version 2.
- Meetings were held Jan 23, Feb 25 & Mar 19 at which point work was complete.
- The final version was available May 9 and is expected to be ratified on June 5.
- There was extended discussion on the channelization content and plans for T-71. It was noted that 10 MHz channels are not included in T-71 Ver 2 but the ad hoc would continue to meet. Expectation is that Version 3 would address alternate channelization but there is no firm schedule for its release.
- Preparation of TGj specification text should continue without waiting for further T-71 versions.
Comment Resolution
There was discussion about how to proceed with the comment resolution and approval of new text.
Motion: “Comment resolution motions on LB56 will be deferred until 3:30pm Thursday”
Move: Ecclesine, Second: Hansen Passed (16/0/1)
Comments were then reviwed in numerical order as recorded in 11-03/337r1.
Comments 1-60 were discussed and dispositioned.
Minutes of the IEEE 802.11 TGj, Tuesday 14 May 2003, 10:00-12:00.
Session called back to order at 10:30 am.
Mark Webster is the acting secretary for this time slot (10:30 - 12:00).
Voting results have been updated. There is now a revision 1.
Back on LB56 Comment Resolution.
Picking-up with comment 61.
The vote results for LB56 are not official until announced by
the working group. So, the early vote results will be deleted from
the 11j minutes taken earlier this morning.
Orders of the day called at 12:09 PM.
This time slot is recessed.
Meet again at 1 PM.
Minutes of the IEEE 802.11 TGj, Tuesday 14 May 2003, 13:00-15:00.
Meeting called back to order at 1:05 Pm.
Mark Webster is the acting secretary for this time slot (13:00 - 15:00).
Re-starting at comment 204.
Finished first pass of comment resolution at 2:04 Pm.
Several issues identified that will need to be resolved:
Issue A:
10 MHz channelization as provided by MPHPT 49.20 and 49.21.
39 comments
Issue B:
1 comment
Support of arbitrary center frequencies with basis other than 5 GHz
Issue C:
1 comment
Do regulators specify table 95 of 50 mV or 15.625mW/MHz EIRP
Issue D:
4 comments
Timing and air propagation changes for FWA.
Issue E:
2 comments
RF and Multipath changes for FWA.
Updated comments will be posted To Doc Keeper as 337r2
PRESENTATION:
Spurious and Transmission Power Regulations 348r1
by Kasuhiro Okanoue
Document describes different rules for licensed and
unlicensed operations and power levels.
Issues A and E will be discussed at 1 PM on Thursday.
Discussion on Issue C:
Peter Eccelsine will talk to Denis Kuwahara. This has
been resolved.
Discussion on Issue B:
Brainstorm on channel number schemes. Mostly by Peter.
Key off country code? Add new information element?
Use 201 as a 1st channel number (currently not used)?
This would act as an escape key.
Peter will prepare text on this idea.
Voting will take place on Thursday.
Will entertain presentations on Issues A, D and E Thursday.
Will resume Thursday, 1 pm - 9:30 pm.
People can review our current comments in 337r2.
Bob Neilsen and Kasuhiro move to recess.
Recess at 3 PM for the day.
Thursday, 16 May
Chair calls meeting to order at 1:05 pmThursday May 15, 2003.
Peter moves to modify item 2 on the agenda to allow for presentations
related to ballot comment during this session.
Bob Nielsen seconds, accepted by unanimous assent.
Discussion by Peter:
Peter proposes regulatory annex. Also the current beacon system
is not adequate.
Presentation by Peter:
Peter presents document 418r0, 11j Regulatory Classes. Proposes
country information element, using 201 as an escape code. Peter
has identified 11 regulatory class values for 4.9/5 GHz.
Comment by Bruce: this is a version of location-based services.
Presentation by Yasuhiko Inoue, document 322r2: "The 4 ms
Carrier Sense Rule in Japan" Fragmentation involves no carrier
sensing between fragments. Therefore a sequence of fragments
more than 4 ms is illegal. This is a problem in existing draft.
Problem is more severe at 10 M?Hz channelization.
Comment by Peter: references to Japan rules should be informative,
stating reference to rules as of the present time, because
rules may change.
Mark has a presentation.
Peter proposse a straw poll: If there are more than 24
people in the room at 3:40 PM, we agree to re-present any presentations
made in the 1 pm session.
No discussion. 13-0-0 straw poll passes.
Mark Webster's presentation: "10 MHz Chanelization Suggestion"
Document 431r0.
Comment from Chair: The font used in this document may be illegal.
Submissionpage 1Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems