AROUSAL AND PHALLOMETRIC TESTING
Annon, J. S. (1993). Misuse of psychophysiological arousal measurement data. Issues in Child Abuse Accusations, 5(1), 39-43.
Barbaree, H. E., Peacock, E. J. (1995). Assessment of sexual preferences in cases of alleged child sexual abuse.In T. Ney (Ed.), True and false allegations of child sexual abuse: Assessment and case management (pp. 242Â259). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Barker, J. G. & Howell, R. J. (1992). The plethysmograph: A review of recent literature. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20(1), 13-25.
Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001).Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in non-admitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118–126.
Day, D. M., Miner, M. H., Sturgeon, V.H., & Murphy, J. (1989). Assessment of sexual arousal by means of psysiological and self-report measures. In D. R. Laws (Ed.), Relapse Prevention with Sex Offenders (pp. 115-123). New York: The Guilford Press.
Farrall, W. (1992).Instrumentation and methodological issues in the assessment of sexual arousal. In W. O¹Donohue, & J. H. Geer (Eds.), Thesexual abuse of children: Theory and research, Vol 2 (pp. 188Â231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Hall, G. C. N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L. L. Sexual arousal andarousability to pedophilic stimuli in a community sample of normal men. Behavior Therapy, 26, 681-694.
Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (1996).The science in phallometricmeasurement of male sexual interest.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(5), 156Â160.
Howes, R. J. (1998). Plethysmographic assessment of incarcerated nonsexual offenders: A comparison with rapists. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10(3), 183-194.
Howes, R. J. (1995). A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7(1), 9Â24.
Konopasky, R. J., & Konopasky, A. W., B. (2000). Remaking penile plethysmography. In Laws, D. L., Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. Remaking Relapse Prevention with Sex Offenders: A Sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, Inc. pp. 257-284.
Lalumiere, M.L., Quinsey, V.L., Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Trautrimas, C. (2003). Are rapists differentially aroused by coercive sex in phallometricassessments? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 211-224.
Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994).The discriminability of rapists from non-sex offenders using phallometric measures: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21(1), 150-175.
Laws, D. R. (1989). Direct monitoring by penile plethysmography. In D. R. Laws (Ed.), Relapse Prevention with Sex Offenders (pp. 105-114). New York: The Guilford Press.
Laws, D. R. (2009). Penile plethysmography: Strength, limitations, innovations. In D. Thornton and D. R. Laws, Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offender (pp. 7-29). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Looman, J., & Marshall, W. L. (2005).Sexual arousal in rapists. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(4), 367-389.
Marshall, W. L. (2006). Clinical and research limitations in the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders.Sexual Offender Treatment, 1(1). Found at
Marshall, W. L., & Fernandez, Y. M. (2000).Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: Limits to its value. Clinical Psychology Review, 20(7), 807-822.
McConaghy, N. (1989). Validity and ethics of penile circumference measures of sexual arousal: A critical review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18(4), 357-369.
Merdian, H. L., Jones, D. T., Morphett, N. A. C., & Boer, D. P. Phallometric Assessment of Sexual Arousal: A Review of Validity and Diagnostic Issues. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 1(1), 38-43.
Murphy, W. D., & Barbaree, H. E. (not indicated). Assessments of sexual offenders by measures of erectile response: Psychometric properties and decision making (Contract No. 86M050650050ID). Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health.
Schouten, P. G. W., & Simon, W. T. (1992). Validity of phallometricmeasures with sex offenders: Comments on the Quinsey, Laws, and Hall debate. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 812-814.
Simon, W. T., & Schouten, P. G. W. (1991).Plethysmography in the assessment and treatment of sexual deviance: An overview. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20(1), 75-91.
Simon, W. T., & Schouten, G. W. (1993). The plethysmograph reconsidered: Comment on Barker and Howell. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 21(4), 505-521.
Travin, S., Cullen, K., & Melella, J. T. (1988). The use and abuse of erection measurements: A forensic perspective. The Bulletin of theAmerican Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16(3), 235-250.
Wheeler, D., & Rubin, H. B. (1987).A comparison of volumetric and circumferential measures of penile erection.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16(4), 289Â299.