© Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority 2017
ISSN: 1443–1335 (electronic)
ISBN: 978-1-925390-71-1 (electronic)
Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication
Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).
Creative Commons licence
With the exception of the Coat of Arms and other elements specifically identified, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. This is a standard form agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work.
A summary of the licence terms is available from www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode.
The APVMA’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any approved material sourced from it) using the following wording:
Source: Licensed from the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence.
In referencing this document the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority should be cited as the author, publisher and copyright owner.
Use of the Coat of Arms
The terms under which the Coat of Arms can be used are set out on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet website (see www.dpmc.gov.au/pmc/publication/commonwealth-coat-arms-information-and-guidelines).
Disclaimer
The material in or linking from this report may contain the views or recommendations of third parties. Third party material does not necessarily reflect the views of the APVMA, or indicate a commitment to a particular course of action. There may be links in this document that will transfer you to external websites. The APVMA does not have responsibility for these websites, nor does linking to or from this document constitute any form of endorsement. The APVMA is not responsible for any errors, omissions or matters of interpretation in any third-party information contained within this document.
Comments and enquiries regarding copyright:
Director Public Affairs and Communication
Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority
PO Box 6182
KINGSTON ACT 2604 Australia
Telephone: +61 2 6210 4988
Email:
This publication is available from the APVMA website: www.apvma.gov.au.
Contents 1
Contents
1 Introduction 2
1.1 Previous toxicological assessment of chlorpyrifos 2
1.2 Mechanism of mammalian toxicity 2
1.3 Current health based guidance values 3
ADI 3
ARfD 3
2 Supplementary Toxicology report 4
2.1 Scope 4
2.2 Neurotoxicity studies in laboratory animals 5
Mice 5
Rats 10
Guinea pigs 34
2.3 Epidemiological studies 35
CHAMACOS Cohort 36
Mount Sinai Cohort 40
Columbia (CCCEH) Cohort 46
2.4 Appraisal of literature reviews (non-meta analytical) 65
2.5 Other epidemiological studies 82
2.6 Occupational exposure studies 84
3 Discussion 90
3.1 Evaluation methodology 90
3.2 Laboratory animal studies 91
3.3 Epidemiological studies 93
3.4 Summary of main epidemiology study findings 93
3.5 Conclusion 98
4 Supplementary documents 99
4.1 Studies scrutinised but not evaluated 99
Abbreviations 106
References 113
Contents 1
List of tables
Table 1: Summary of online literature search strategy 4
Table 2: Incremental Dose (oral gavage) regimen by treatment group 17
Table 3: Study authors recommended Benchmark Doses of chlorpyrifos for regulatory purposes 25
Table 4: Key data relevant to the study ie adjusted mean ± SD of fetal growth indices, maternal PON activity and TCP level (reproduction of Table 4 from Berkowitz et al, 2004) 41
Table 5: Demographic characteristics of the study (reproduced from Whyatt et al, 2002) 46
Table 6: Demographic and exposure characteristics of the populationa (reproduced from Perera et al, 2003) 49
Table 7: Demographics and key data relevant to the study, reproduced from Rauh et al (2006) 51
Table 8: BSID-II Means and Proportion delayed at 12, 24 and 36 months according to chlorpyrifos exposure level (n = 254), reproduction of Table 2 from Rauh et al (2006) 52
Table 9: Summary of results from Rauh et al (2006) 53
Table 10: Summary of basic characteristics of the three epidemiology studies reviewed by Zhao et al, 2005 66
Table 11: Summary of results, postnatal endpoints and age of assessment 68
Table 12: Summary of causal assessment of epidemiological evidence by Prueitt et al (2011) 69
Table 13: Summary by neurodevelopmental endpoint of key Prueitt et al (2011) findings from review of animal studies 71
Table 14: Summary of mechanistic data evaluated by Prueitt et al (2011) 73
Table 15: Summary of chlorpyrifos EDSP Tier 1 assay results (Juberg et al, 2013) 81
Table 16: Age and educational year for applicators and non-applicators 87
Table 17: Urine and blood analyses of applicators and non-applicators 88
Contents 1
Executive Summary
Chlorpyrifos is a broad spectrum, non-systemic organophosphorous insecticide with contact, stomach and respiratory action. It acts by inhibiting the enzyme, acetyl cholinesterase (AChE), which is important for the transmission of nerve signals. Chlorpyrifos was first introduced for use in Australia in the mid-1960s.
The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) commenced a reconsideration of chlorpyrifos due to concerns about toxicology, occupational health and safety (OHS), residues, trade, environment, efficacy and crop safety. These issues were assessed and an interim review report released in 2000, along with the implementation of various regulatory measures.
The scope of this supplementary toxicological assessment included a consideration of new studies published between 2000 and 2016, with a focus on the potential for chlorpyrifos to cause developmental or behavioural neurotoxicity. Following a comprehensive assessment of these new studies, it was concluded that there is no evidence to indicate potential neurodevelopment effects reported in some studies to occur at or below doses that inhibit AChE activity. Further, animal studies consistently indicated that there is no age-related differential sensitivity to chlorpyrifos. On this basis, cholinesterase inhibition remains the most sensitive and relevant adverse effect caused by chlorpyrifos and is therefore the most appropriate endpoint for the establishment of health based guidance values used to protect the entire population including pregnant women, infants and children.
The current acceptable daily intake (ADI) for chlorpyrifos is 0.003 mg/kg bw/d, based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 0.03 mg/kg bw/d for the inhibition of plasma cholinesterase activity in a 28 day study in humans, and applying a 10-fold safety factor to account for potential variability in sensitivity. The current acute reference dose (ARfD) for chlorpyrifos is 0.1 mg/kg bw, based on the NOAEL of 1 mg/kg bw for the inhibiton of erythrocyte AChE activity in a single dose human study, and applying a 10-fold safety factor to account for potential variability in sensitivity. Based on an assessment of the new published studies, the current ADI and ARfD for chlorpyrifos remain appropriate.
Chlorpyrifos is currently in Schedule 6 of the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons (SUSMP), except when included in Schedule 5 or in prepared potting or soil mixtures containing 100 g or less of chlorpyrifos per cubic metre. The Schedule 5 entry includes chlorpyrifos in aqueous preparations containing 20% or less of microencapsulated chlorpyrifos, when in controlled release granular preparations containing 10% or less of chlorpyrifos and when in other preparations containing 5% or less of chlorpyrifos except in prepared potting or soil mixtures containing 100 g or less of chlorpyrifos per cubic metre. Based on an assessment of the new published studies, the poison schedule remains appropriate.
Introduction 3
1 Introduction
1.1 Previous toxicological assessment of chlorpyrifos
The toxicology of chlorpyrifos has been extensively reviewed by international agencies and the Australian Department of Health. This supplementary report focuses on new neurotoxicity studies, including epidemiological studies, published since the APVMA’s 2000 toxicological evaluation of chlorpyrifos. Further information regarding the toxicology of chlorpyrifos can be found at www.apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication/14746-chlorpyrifos-irr-toxicology.pdf.
1.2 Mechanism of mammalian toxicity
Chlorpyrifos is an organophosphorus insecticide or ‘OP’, and like all chemicals belonging to this group, it kills insects by interfering with the nervous system. It also has the potential to kill humans (and other mammals) by the same mechanism of interference with the brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves. Following absorption, chlorpyrifos is bioactivated by the microsomal cytochrome P450 system(s) within the bodies of vertebrates and insects to the active oxon (phosphate ester) metabolite, which is approximately three orders of magnitude more potent than parent chlorpyrifos. The majority of bioactivation takes place in the liver.
The types of adverse effects that can occur in humans depend entirely on the level of exposure, with a spectrum of increasingly more severe effects occurring as the level of exposure increases. This spectrum ranges from effects on biochemical parameters in the blood and brain, clinical signs (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, dizziness, confusion, salivation, muscle twitching, laboured breathing, lethargy and coma) to death. These same adverse effects also occur in laboratory animal species exposed to organophosphates (e.g. fenthion), and on this basis, studies conducted using laboratory animals provide information relevant to effects on humans.
The inhibition of an enzyme critical for transmitting nerve signals is accepted by toxicologists, chemical regulators and the World Health Organisation (WHO) as the most sensitive adverse effect resulting from exposure to OPs, including chlorpyrifos. This enzyme, called acetylcholinesterase (AChE), is found in both the brain and blood and is specifically involved in maintaining normal nerve function. The statistically significant inhibition of this enzyme by greater than 20% below baseline is considered adverse and forms the basis of the health standards set for most OPs around the world. If the level of inhibition of AChE gets too high, people will begin displaying overt signs of poisoning.
For Australian workers using OPs, Safe Work Australia and WorkSafe WA recommend that health monitoring be undertaken before starting, during and after working with OPs. This analysis includes the measurement of AChE in blood in addition to urine for the presence of metabolites (breakdown products). If the level of AChE activity drops too low then workers may no longer be able to continue using these types of pesticides until their blood AChE level has normalised.
Introduction 3
For the general public that may be exposed to chlorpyrifos residues in food, dietary health standards are set based on the same adverse effect on AChE in blood used to protect workers. Two health standards can be set: a) the dose that is safe to consume in a single meal (Acute Reference Dose—ARfD) and b) the dose that is safe to consume on a daily basis over a lifetime (Acceptable Daily Intake—ADI). In Australia, a different form of the cholinesterase enzyme, plasma non-specific butyryl cholinesterase (BChe), has historically been used as a more conservative endpoint on which to base the ADI.
1.3 Current health based guidance values
ADI
The current Australian ADI for chlorpyrifos is 0.003 mg/kg/d, based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 0.03 mg/kg/d for the inhibition of plasma cholinesterase activity in a human volunteer study
(Coulston et al, 1972) and using a 10–fold safety factor.
ARfD
The current Australian ARfD for chlorpyrifos is 0.1 mg/kg bw/d, based on the NOAEL of 1 mg/kg/d for the inhibition of erythrocyte AChE activity in a human volunteer study (Coulston et al, 1972) and using a 10–fold safety factor.
Poison schedule
Chlorpyrifos is in Schedule 6 of the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons (SUSMP),
except a) when included in Schedule 5; or b) in prepared potting or soil mixtures containing 100 g or less of chlorpyrifos per cubic metre.
Chlorpyrifos is in Schedule 5 when in a) aqueous preparations containing 20% or less of microencapsulated chlorpyrifos; b) controlled release granular preparations containing 10% or less of chlorpyrifos; or c) other preparations containing 5% or less of chlorpyrifos, except in prepared potting or soil mixes containing 100 g or less of chlorpyrifos per cubic metre.
Introduction 3
2 Supplementary Toxicology report
2.1 Scope
Since the publication of the APVMA’s 2000 toxicological review of chlorpyrifos, new studies were published in the scientific literature suggesting that chlorpyrifos is associated with developmental neurotoxicity. These include studies conducted in laboratory animals and epidemiological studies, which have examined statistical associations between the use of chlorpyrifos and adverse outcomes at the population level. Developmental neurotoxicity is the adverse effect on the structure or function of the nervous system during development in utero or in early life, which persists throughout life—this may manifest as changes in biochemical parameters, behaviour or structures in the brain or nervous tissue.
Chlorpyrifos, like all OPs, is neurotoxic, and therefore it is possible that direct exposure of the fetus at a sufficiently high enough level could have adverse effects on the nervous system. From a human risk assessment perspective, the critical consideration is that if chlorpyrifos does cause developmental neurotoxicity, whether it occurs at doses lower than that inhibiting cholinesterase activity, which is known to be the most sensitive adverse effect (see below).
New published scientific literature relevant to the scope of the toxicological review of chlorpyrifos was identified using the search strategy described in Table 1.
Table 1: Summary of online literature search strategy
Tool / Search characteristics /Combined search criteria (search field) / Date / Result /
PubMed * / ‘Chlorpyrifos’ (all) AND ‘2012 to present’ (date of addition in PubMed) AND ‘neuro*’ (all) / 3 November 2015 / 35 references
‘TCP’ (all) / 20 November 2015 / 71 references
Google Scholar # / ‘Chlorpyrifos and developmental neurotoxicity’ AND ‘2013 to 2015’ (custom date range) / 3 November 2015 / N/A
* PubMed; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed; # Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com.au/, TCP = 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol, N/A: Not applicable
Supplementary toxicology report 17
2.2 Neurotoxicity studies in laboratory animals
Mice
Study 1: Venerosi et al, 2009
Reference: Venerosi A, Ricceri L, Scattoni ML, Calamandrei G (2009). Prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure alters motor behaviour and ultrasonic vocalisation in CD-1 mouse pups. Environ Health 8:12
Forty pregnant CD-1 female mice were administered a gavage dose of chlorpyrifos at 6 mg/kg bw/d from
GD14–17. The use of a single dose prevents the establishment of a dose-response relationship and therefore limits the power of this study to detect biologically meaningful effects. This dose when previously tested in the same laboratory induced 75% serum and 60% brain AChE inhibition in pregnant females and 20% inhibition in serum AChE activity in offspring at birth. Assessment of early development was completed using a reflex-battery on postnatal (PN) days (PND), viz. PND3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 for assessment of somatic sensorimotor maturation. Ultrasonic emissions (USV) were tested on PND4, 7 and 10, and pups motor skills were assessed in a spontaneous activity test on PND12.