Property, Howell, Fall 2000 & Spring 2001

Howell’s office: room 214

1)  Exams: closed book, but will be given clean copy of syllabus, use full sentences except in last 10 minutes or so when can use point format

2)  Final exam: covers whole year, about 75% spring term material, 25% from fall (tenures, estates, trusts, uses most likely, possibly support – may examine same thing twice, so look at Christmas exam). A clean copy of the Perpetuity Act will be provided.

3)  Dictionary:

a)  Disposition = both a bequest of personalty and a devise of realty

i)  Bequeath/legacy = a gift of personalty by will

ii)  Devise = a gift of realty by will

b)  Devolve = passing property from one to another, not be a positive act but rather by operation of the law

c)  Deed = instrument that conveys an interest in land inter vivos (i.e. while living)

Contents

Page 118 of 118

Contents 1

Cases / Statutes 4

Proprietary interests and classification of property 8

Proprietary interests against the world, protected by torts, possession (bailee) v. ownership 8

Realty (corporeal, incorporeal hereditaments) and Personalty (chattels real, chattels personal) 8

How high and how deep does land ownership go? 9

Maxim – Cujus est solum ejus est usque ad coelum et ad inferos 9

Literal meaning of maxim – acceptance of “up to heavens” for overhanging sign, trespass 9

Limit on maxim – necessary for ordinary use/enjoyment of land – so aircraft do not trespass 9

Reiterates up to use/enjoyment; and can prevent others gaining rights to space above land 10

Nuisance – own airspace for useful tower, though causes concern for airport (prior warning) 10

Nuisance – up to “necessary for ordinary use” – useless structure blocking aircraft has to go 10

Can protect airspace over land even if poor motives: low, fixed over-swinging crane trespasses 11

Over-swinging crane does trespass, but poor motives of plaintiff, so postponed injunction 11

Maxim applies underground – people in cave trespass (no access) – now mostly statutes 11

Property only if under dominion – gas underground, water, wild animals (feræ naturæ) 11

Fixtures 12

Fixtures in personalty: greater absorbs smaller (separate existence, separated no damage) 12

Fixture? Consider degree (how well fixed) & object of annexation (for sake of chattel or land) 12

Leading BC case: prima facie fixture if attached, but objective degree & object tests to refute 12

Since no restrictive covenant, sign is fixture (dissent: sign should speak for itself) 13

Machinery attached to steady it is fixtures, and so are constructive fixtures (e.g. forklift truck) 13

Non LaSalle/Stack approach in Ontario – consideration of subjective intention 14

Use and flow (quantity and quality) of water 14

Three categories of water: surface water, water in watercourse, percolating water 14

Common law riparian rights: ordinary use, extraordinary use, flow and access in watercourse 15

B.C. Water Act: title/use all “stream” water to Gov, unless license, unrecorded water/domestic 15

Opinion 1) – riparian rights still exist except as against party with Water Act license 16

Opinion 2) – although judge said didn’t need to decide matter, riparian rights extinguished 16

Opinion 2) – in B.C.S.C. judgement, obiter dictum = riparian rights extinguished 17

Conflicting opinions in BC – must discuss both in any case, but 2) probably more persuasive 17

Percolating water can be extracted by landowner for any purpose (including wasting it) 17

1989: groundwater not yet in Water Act, nuisance to pollute ground or watercourse water 18

1995: Water Protection Act vests all groundwater in government, hence Water Act applies 18

Ownership of bed of water areas 18

Foreshore, tidal or navigable Prov, non-tidal & non-navigable ad medium applied in the past 18

1886: ad medium applies, even if bed not coloured or area included, unless known intention 19

Even Torrens system ad medium still applies to “bounded” by non-tidal/non-navigable stream 19

Land Act, S.B.C. 1961 following Rotter phases out ad medium rule 20

Does ad medium rule apply to Indian reserves – probably, but not decided since navigable 20

Access, Navigation 20

Riparian rights include access, right to cross foreshore, mooring, not construct on foreshore 20

Navigable rights if in natural state useful as public highway: commerce/predictability 20

Support 21

Right of support (lateral and subjacent) of land in its natural state (i.e. without additions) 21

Support includes indirect i.e. not to facilitate wind/rain by excavations on adjoining land 21

But if wind naturally blows sand off land (and neighbor then prevents its return) no action 21

Lateral support only for natural land not weight of buildings, but was liable for vertical 22

Not entitled to lateral support for increased pressure by building, but generally with vertical 22

“Fill” on land is not natural part of land, so no right of lateral support for it 22

No absolute right to support by or extract percolating water – negligence & nuisance available 23

Accretion 24

Accretion = gradual and imperceptible growth (or erosion) of land, or receding water 24

Time accretion begins relevant, can’t be foreshore, policy issues (e.g. “manurable”) irrelevant 25

Accreted land must go out, not come up – deposits should attach to adjoining land, not bed 25

Accretion includes windblown sand, imperceptible = can’t see consolidation / stable advance 25

Upland border of Crown “strip” is not mobile “snake” unless explicitly described as such 26

Tenures (pyramid), estates (legal title), trusts (equitable holding for another’s benefit) 26

Tenures = pyramid of relationships, King-tenants in chief-mesne-demesne (now unimportant) 26

Estates: “unGodly jumble” but flexible: fee simple/tail, life, reversion, remainder, autre vie 27

Equity – “use” on the “use” became modern trusts (holding title for use/benefit of another) 28

Trust used to create flexible estate-like succession for personalty (splits legal title from use) 30

Successive legal interests in personalty with wills: title in ultimate holder + other life interest 31

Common law: marital unity, life estates curtesy & dower, “use” for separate equitable interest 32

Alienability, Torrens land title system, Indefeasibility 33

Alienability – source in 1290 Quia Emptores, completed in 1660 Abolition of Tenures Act 33

Mechanics of transfer: from historical livery of seisin to modern documentation 33

Conveyancing: Common law, Deeds registration, Torrens Title registration 34

General Principle of Indefeasibility: curtain drawn over previous errors, mirrors situation 35

Exceptions to Indefeasibility: lease (up to 3 years) with occupation, builder’s/mechanic’s lien 35

Exceptions: fraud/forgery without knowledge – from deferred to immediate indefeasibility 35

S.29 notice of unregistered interest no effect, but actual/constr knowledge+dishonesty = fraud 38

Indefeasibility is to protect bona fide purchasers for value, not just registered owners 39

The Fee Simple 40

Creation: words of purchase v. limitation, no longer strict need for “and his heirs” 40

Repugnancy: if give absolutely cannot control it’s destiny – intention in wills, formal in deeds 41

The Life estate 43

Creation by express words “for life”, by statute, pur autre vie and devolution on death 43

Family Relations Act (community property regime on breakdown) & Wills Variation Act 44

Common law: resulting trust, constructive trust (equitable remedy avoids unjust enrichment) 45

Waste and Life Estates (and other relationships) 46

Legal waste: permissive (passive), voluntary (active), includes ameliorating 46

Equitable waste: no unconscionable waste (even if unimpeachable) and to other relationships 47

Obligation/cannot benefit by not paying taxes, can’t sell against remainderman’s wishes 48

Aboriginal property 49

History of aboriginal land title claims in B.C. 49

Delgamuukw: reconciliation, content, inherent limits, spectrum, proof, justified infringement 49

Aboriginal cultural artefacts/chattels, held in museums, seeking return 52

Co-ownership – concurrent estates 53

Co-ownership (unity of poss), TIC (shares), JT (each owns whole + 3 unities + survivorship) 53

Creation: old CL preferred JT, but now lack of unity/words of severance/statute Þ TIC 56

Relations between co-owners: can ask to account if unfairly sharing profits, but not for labour 59

Expenses: common obligation & at request & option adopted v. no option/equity on partition 59

Severance overview: destroy unity, mutual agreement (express or implied), other unilateral? 61

Destroy unity: transfer/trust yes, mortgage/lease/divorce?, agree to sell/will/uni declaration no 63

Severance by mutual agreement – express or implied by course of dealings/actions as if TIC 67

Severance by unilateral act that falls short of breaking a unity – likely in UK, unlikely in B.C. 68

Partition and sale: history and the B.C. Partition of Property Act 69

Only those with right of possession may seek partition (e.g. not creditors, remainderman, etc) 70

Court discretion: may focus on equitable “clean hands” maxim or on statutory discretion 70

Future Interests 72

Conditions precedent (contingent) v. conditions subsequent (vested) v. absolute vesting 72

Common Law future interests: reversions, remainders, rights of entry, possibility of reverter 77

Rules restricting remainders, avoided by legal executory interests & equitable future interests 80

Attributes of future interests: protection from equitable waste, alienability, registration 84

Validity of conditions/events, restraints on alienation 85

The rule against perpetuities, the Perpetuity Act 87

CL rule against perpetuities: contingent interest must vest, if at all, within perpetuity period 87

Statute law: the Perpetuities Act – common law rule still applies, but adds a safety net 89

Examples showing common law rule against perpetuties 91

Examples also showing use of safety net in Perpetuity Act 93

Incorporeal interests 99

Introduction: distinguish contracts (don’t bind future owner) from incorporeal hereditaments 99

Easements 99

Profits a Prendre: to take part of land, has implied right of entry, can be in “gross” 102

Leases: exclusive occupation (not for licensee), privity of estate “touch and concern” land 103

Covenants intro: contract-like, if privity of contract or estate (touch/concern) binds 3rd parties 103

Covenants & Common Law 103

Covenants & Equity: will bind burden if negative, benefits dominant tenement, and notice 105

Creation of Covenants: need to register them, but being registered doesn’t prove them 107

Licence: permission for licensee to do otherwise illegal thing on licensor’s land, differs lease 107

Licenses: Bare, coupled with land interest (e.g. profit), and new irrevocable contractual 107

3rd party successor bound by license unless bona fide purchaser for value without notice 109

Personal property 110

Finders: rights + obligation to true owner, who exerted most control 110

Bailment: taking of possession/control, returning same object, obligation to take care 113

Sub-bailment: if sub-bailee knows bailee not owner, then liable to owner, limits not applicable 115

Gifts 116

Gifts: capacity to give & receive, inter vivos requires intent and delivery (cohabiting tricky) 116

Cases / Statutes

A.G. B.C. v. Neilson (1956) (S.C.C.) 25

A.G. of Manitoba v. Campbell (Man. Q.B.) (1983) 10, 17

Administration Act Amendment Act 32

Andrews v. Partington 89, 98

Austerberry v. Oldham Corporation, (1885) (Ch. Div.) 104

Bata v. City Parking (1974) (Ont.C.A.) 115

Bernard v. Bernard, (1987) B.C.S.C. 61

Bernstein of Leigh v. Sky Views and General Ltd. (1977) (English Q.B.) 9, 10, 11

Blackburn and Cox v. McCallum, (1903) S.C.C. 85

Bradford v. Pickles (1895) (English H.L) 17

Bremner v. Bleakley (1924) (Ont.App.Div.) 21

Brown v. Moody, (1936) P.C. 73

Bull v. Bull, (1955) C.A. 58

Canadian Commercial Bank v. Island Realty (1986) (B.C.) 37

Canadian Exploration Ltd. v. Rotter (1960) (S.C.C.) 19

Carr v. Rayward (1955) (B.C. Co.C.) 35

Central Station v. Shangri-La (1979) (B.C.S.C.) 38

Chasemore v. Richards 17

City of New Westminster v. Kennedy (1918) (B.C. Co. Ct.) 47, 85

Clarke v. Clarke, (1890) S.C.C. 57

Cleland v. Berberick (1915) (Ont H.C.) 21

Cook v. City of Vancouver (1912) (J.C.P.C.) 16

Crawford v. Kingston 114

Creelman v. Hudson Bay Insurance (1920) (J.C.P.C.) 35

Delgamuukw v. British Columbia (1997) (S.C.C.) 49

Diamond Neon (Manufacturing) Ltd. V. Toronto Dominion Realty Co. Ltd. (1976) (B.C.C.A.) 13

District of North Saanich v. Murray (1975) (B.C.C.A.) 20

Dukart v. Surrey, (1978) (S.C.C.) 101

Duke of Norfolk 88

Edwards v. Sims, Judge (1929) (Kentucky C.A.) 11

Errington v. Errington & Woods (1952) (C.A.) 109

Festing v. Allen, (1843) Exch 76

Flannigan v. Witherspoon, (1953) B.C.S.C. 67

Foort v. Chapman, (1973) B.C.S.C. 65

Frazer v. Walker (1967) (J.C.P.C.) 36

Gibbs v. Messer (1891) (J.C.P.C.) 36

Gillies v. Bortolullzi (1953) (Man. Q.B.) 22

Ginn v. Armstrong, (1969) B.C.S.C. 68

Grafstein v. Holme & Freeman (1958) (Ont. C.A.) 111

Halsall v. Brisell, (1957) (Ch. Div.) 105

Hammonds v. Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co. (1934) (Kentucky C.A.) 11, 17

Harmeling v. Harmeling, (1978) B.C.C.A. 70

Hashem v. Nova Scotia Power Corp. (1980) (N.S.S.C.) 10

Haywood (1881) (C.A.) 106

Heffron v. Imperial Parking (1974) (Ont. C.A.) 115

Hermanson v. Martin (1983) (Sask. Q.B.) 37

Hiltz v. Langille (1959) (N.S.S.C.) 46

Hounslow London Borough Council v. Twickenham Garden Dev. (1971) (English Ch. Div) 107

Johnson v. Anderson (1937) (B.C.S.C.) 16, 17

Kelson v. Imperial Tobacco (1957) (English Q.B.) 9

Kowal v. Ellis (1977) (Man. C.A.) 112

L&R Canadian Enterprises Ltd. V. Nuform Industries Ltd. (1984) (B.C.S.C.) 13

Land Act 20

Land Registry Act 35

Land Title Act 35

LaSalle Recreations Ltd v. Canadian Camdex Investment Ltd. (1969) (B.C.C.A.) 12, 14

Leigh v. Dickeson (1884) (C.A.) 60

Lesson v. Jones (1920) (N.B.C.A.) 114

Lewvest Ltd. V. Scotia Towers Ltd. (1981) (Nfld. S.C.) 11

Lichty v. Voigt (1977) (Ont. Co. Ct.) 14

London County Council (LCC) v. Allen, (1914) (C.A.) 106

Lyons v. Lyons, (1967) (S.C. Vict. Australia) 64

M v. H (1999) (S.C.C.) 44

Mastron v. Cotton (1926) (Ont. App. Div.) 60

Mayo v. Leitovski (1928) (Man. K.B.) 48

Me-N-Ed’s Pizza v. Franterra (1975) (B.C.C.A.) 38

Mickelthwaite v. Newlay Bridge Co. (1886) (English C.A.) 19

Morris v. C.W. Martin (1965) (English) 114, 115

Morris v. Howe (1982) (Ont. H.C.) 48

Morrow v. Eakin and Eakin, (1953) B.C.S.C. 70

Munroe v. Carlson, (1976) B.C.S.C. 68

Murdoch v. Murdoch (1975) (S.C.C.) 45

National Provincial Bank v. Ainsworth (1965) (English H.L.) 110

Nicholson v. Riach (1997) (B.C.S.C.) 39

North Vancouver v. Carlisle, (1922) B.C.C.A. 64

Pacific Savings v. Can-Corp (1982) (B.C.C.A.) 39

Parker v. British Airways Board (1982) (English) 112

Parkinson v. Reid, (1966) (S.C.C.) 105