Globalization, conservation, and green development
Geography 6402
Spring 2007
Instructor: Emily Yeh
Guggenheim 103A, x2-5438
Meeting: Mondays 12-2:50pm
Guggenheim 201E
Office hours: Tuesday, Thursday 2:00-3:30 pm
and by appointment
course description:
This seminar explores questions about the increasingly globalized practices and politics of conservation and development from the perspective of political ecology, an interdisciplinary field with contributions from geography, anthropology, sociology, and other disciplines. Political ecology emerged out of Marxian political economy and cultural ecology, as a reaction to over-simplified, neo-Malthusian analyses of environmental problems. Today, the field is both increasingly popular, and also sprawling and complex, with topics traveling under the name of political ecology ranging from struggles over property rights to the social construction of nature to vulnerability to famine, to discursive analyses of scientific narratives. We will start the semester with a general overview of political ecology but the course by no means tries to comprehensively cover the field.
Instead, the seminar will investigate a smaller set of themes in depth, through the reading of recent monographs, articles, and book chapters. These overlapping themes include: community-based/participatory conservation and development, environmental NGOs and movements, environmental identities, nature and nation, the politics of conservation science, and neoliberal governance of nature. The following, then, are some of the kinds of questions we will be asking. How should we understand different scalar trends in conservation - toward community-based natural resource management and decentralization on the one hand, and ecoregions and transboundary management on the other? How and why do people become environmentalists, ie. what are the processes of translation and subject formation through which differently placed people come to identify with the environment? How do ideas of nature or environmental protection get mobilized in the service of religion and nationalism, or vice versa?How should we analyze different kinds of environmental actors - environmental NGOs, transnational development institutions, elite domestic scientists, etc. - in relation to national and transnational histories and processes? What do participatory development and ideas of community mean for changing forms of governmentality? What are the implications of neoliberalization for the management of nature?
The class will be run as a reading-intensive, advanced seminar in which students are responsible for careful reading of the assigned pieces; weekly commentary; and brief presentations. Most of each class period will be devoted to discussion.
This class can be taken to fulfill a DART core requirement
Course texts
Required
Roderick Neumann. 2005 Making Political Ecology. Hodder Arnold.
Christine Walley. 2004. Rough Waters: Nature and Development in an east African Marine
Park. Princeton University Press.
Celia Lowe. 2006. Wild Profusion: Biodiversity conservation in an Indonesian archipelago.
Princeton University press.
Paige West. 2006. Conservation is our government now: The Politics of Ecology in
Papua New Guinea. Duke University Press.
Raymond Bryant, 2005. Nongovernmental organizations in Environmental Struggles: Politics
and the making of moral capital in the Philippines. Yale University Press.
Cori Hayden. 2003. When nature goes public: the making and unmaking of bioprospecting in
Mexico. Princeton University Press.
Michael Goldman. 2005 Imperial Nature: The world bank and struggles for social justice in
the age of globalization. Yale University Press.
Karl Zimmerer, ed. 2006 Globalization and new geographies of conservation. University
of Chicago Press.
Katrina Schwartz. 2006. Nature and national identity after Communism: Globalizing the
Ethnoscape. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Recommended
Brosius, Peter, Anna Tsing, and Charles Zerner. 2005. Communities and Conservation: Histories and politics of community-based natural resource management. Boulder: AltaMira.
The other required course readings (in addition to the required textbooks, which are available at the CU bookstore) will be available on e-reserve and/or CU Learn.
Course requirements
(1) Seminar participation:
To make this seminar work, everyone must complete assigned readings prior to class meetings, and actively participate in the discussion. (25% of grade)
(2) Critical reading commentaries
Written commentaries in the form of a roughly 1-page critical reflections on at least 8of the weekly readings are due. These should be analytical rather than descriptive, critically engaging the week’s reading rather than simply summarizing them. They are assigned both as an opportunity for you to carefully reflect upon the readings before we meet as a group, and as a way of generating class discussion.
These commentaries will be due on CU Learn on Sundays at 4pm (time subject to discussion on first day of class). You should read all contributions before coming to class on Monday. (25% of grade)
(3) Class presentations:
Every student will be responsible for one(maybe two, depending on enrollment) 10 minute class presentation of weekly readings at the beginning of class. Rather than provide an exhaustive summary, the presentations should be concise, covering key theoretical and conceptual issues in the readings of the week. They should clarify key arguments and pose provocative statements and questions that open up, rather than close down, discussion. In addition, the person responsible for the class presentation will help guide the discussion and help summarize or synthesize the discussion at the end. (10% of grade)
(4) Seminar paper:
A final seminar paper is due at the end of the semester. A half page paper description of the proposed paper topic is due during Week 8 (March 12). The paper, in the range of 15 pages, may take one of several forms: (a) a paper or thesis chapter that links your research with course themes; (b) a grant application or dissertation proposal that has been substantially shaped by engagements with course readings and themes; or (c) a paper that critically engages with a cluster of course themes or readings.
It is fine to turn in a grant proposal, prospectus or a part of your thesis/dissertation. The only requirement is that it must engage critically and substantively with at least a subset of the readings, themes, and discussions from this class.
(40% of grade)
Feedback on seminar paper
The first draft of your paper will be due April 23. On April 23 everyone will distribute a copy of their papers to the rest of the class. Then on April 30 (and depending on class size, one additional meeting outside of regularly scheduled class time) we will devote about ½ hour to each student’s paper. In addition to participating actively in the discussion of every other class member’s paper, you will also provide a written commentary (roughly one page) for your pre-assigned paper partner.
All comments should be done by April 30. You will then have one full week to revise.
Final papers are due Monday May 7 at noon
Schedule
Week 1IntroductionsJanuary 22
No reading
Week 2 What is political ecology? – Definitions and genealogiesJanuary 29
1. Neumann, Roderick 2005 Making Political Ecology. Hodder Arnold.
2. Robbins, Paul, 2004 Political Ecology: A critical introduction. Blackwell. Ch. 1, pp 3-16.
3. Paulson, Susan, Lisa Gezon, and Michael Watts. 2005 "Politics, Ecologies, Genealogies"
Political ecology across spaces, scales, and social groups .
Rutgers University Press, pp 17-40.
4.Political Economy: Marx. Capital Volume 1, Chapters 26 and 27, The Secret of Primitive Accumulation and the Expropriation of the Agricultural population, pp. 873-895.
Related Readings
Introductions and edited volumes on political ecology
Biersack, Aletta, ed. 2006. Reimagining Political Ecology. Duke University Press.
Forsyth, Timothy. 2003. Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.
Heynen, Nik, Maria Kaika and Erik Swyngedouw eds. 2006. In the nature of cities: urban political ecology andthe politics of urban metabolism Routledge.
Paulson, Susan, and Lisa Gezon, 2004 eds. Political ecology across spaces, scales, and social groups. Rutgers
University Press.
Peet, Richard and Michael Watts. 1996. Liberation Ecologies: Environment, development, social movements.
Routledge. (First Edition)
______2004. Liberation Ecologies: Environment, development, social movements. Routledge (Second Edition – not the same as first edition)
Robbins, Paul. 2004. Political Ecology: A critical introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
Zimmerer, Karl and T. J. Bassett, eds. 2003. Political ecology: an integrative approach to geography and
environment-development studies. New York: Guilford Press.
Definitions and Early works in political ecology
Blaikie, Piers. 1985. Political Economy of Soil erosion in developing countries. New York: John Wiley & ons.
______1999. “A review of political ecology: issues, epistemology, and analytical narratives.”
Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgoegraphie. 131-147.
Blaikie, Piers and Harold Brookfield 1987. Land Degradation and Society. London: Methuen.
Bryant, Raymond L. 1992. “Political ecology: An emerging research agenda in Third-World studies.” Political
geography 11(1):12-36.
______1999. “A political ecology for developing countries?: Progress and paradox in the evolution of a research field.” Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie. 148-157
______. 2001. “Political Ecology: A critical agenda for change?” in Castree and Braun, ed., Social Nature
: theory, practice and politics. 151-169.
Bryant, Raymond and Sinead Bailey. 1997. Third world political ecology. New York: Routledge.
Neumann, R.P. 1992 “Political ecology of wildlife conservation in the Mt. Meru area of northeast Tanzania.”
Land Degradation and Rehabilitation Vol. 3 85-98.
Schmink, M. and H. Wood. 1987. "The 'Political Ecology' of Amazonia" in Lands at Risk in the Third World
Local-level Perspectives. (eds) Peter D. Little and M.M. Horowitz. Boulder: Westview:38-57.
Vayda, Andrew and Bradley B. Walters. 1999. “Against Political ecology.” Human Ecology
27(1): 167-179.
Cultural ecology
Carney, Judith. 2001. Black rice: the African origins of rice cultivation in the Americas. Cambridge: Harvard
UP
Conklin, Harold C. 1969 “An ethnoecological approach to shifting agriculture.” in Andrew P
Vayda, ed. Environment and Cultural Behavior. Natural History Press.
Durham, William. 1976. “The adaptive significance of cultural behavior.” Human Ecology 4(2):89-121
Ellen, Roy. 1982. Environment, subsistence and system: the ecology of small-scale social formations.
NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
Nietschmann, Bernard. 1973. Between land and water: the subsistence ecology of the Miskito Indians,
Eastern Nicaragua. New York: Seminar Press.
Nietschmann, Bernard. 1979. “Ecological change, inflation and migration in the Far Western Caribbean.”
Geographical Review. 69/1. 1979.
Padoch, Christine. "The woodlands of Tae: traditional forest management in Kalimantan." in Forest resources
and Wood-based biomass energy as rural development assets.
Posey, Darrell. 1985. "Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapo
Indians of the Brazilian Amazon." Agroforestry systems. 3:139-158
Rambo, Terry and Percy Sajise. 1984. An introduction to human ecology research in South Asia. Laguna,
Phillipines.
Rappaport, Roy. Ecology, meaning and religion. Chapter 2 North Atlantic Books
______1984 [ 1968]. Pigs for the Ancestors: ritual in the ecology of a new guinea people. New
Haven: Yale University Press.
Steward, Julian. 1977 Evolution and Ecology: essays on social transformation. University of Illinois Press.
Vayda, Andrew. 1983. "Progressive Contextualization: Methods for Research in Human Ecology."
Human Ecology 11(3):265-281
Wilden, Anthony. 1972. System and Structure. London, Routledge. pp. 202-230/
Political economy of natural resources, agrarian studies
Bernstein H. and P. Woodhouse.2001. “Telling Environmental change like it is.” Journal of Agrarian Change.
Barham, Bradford, Stephen Bunker and Denis O’Hearn. 1994 “Raw Materials industries in resource-rich regions.” States, firms and raw materials: the world economy and the ecology of aluminum. Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press.
Friedman, Jonathan. 1974. “Marxism, structuralism and vulgar materialism” Man. 9(3):444-469.
Hecht, Susanna. 1985. “Environment, Development, and Politics: Capital Accumulation
and the Livestock Sector in Eastern Amazonia.” World Development 13(6):663- 684.
Thompson, EP. 1975. Whigs and Hunters: the origins of the Black Act.
Watts, Michael. 1987. “Drought, environment, and food security: some reflections on peasants, pastoralists
and commoditization in dryland West Africa.” in Michael H.Glantz, ed., drought and hunger in Africa: denying famine a future. Cambridge UP,pp. 171-211.
Wilmsen, Edwin. 1989, Land filled with flies: a political economy of the Kalahari U Chicago Press.
Wolf, Eric. 1982. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Property and access
Berry, Sara. 1997. "Tomatoes, land and hearsay: property and history in Asante in the time of structural
adjustment." World Development 25(8): 1225-1241.
Buck, Susan J. “No Tragedy on the commons” Environmental Ethics. Spring 1985:49-61.
Cronon, William. 1983. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the ecology of New England. New
York: Hill and Wang.
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science. 163: 1243-1248.
Feeny, D., F. Berkses. B.J. McCay & J. Acheson. 1988. “The Tragedy of the commons: 22 years later”
Fortmann, Louise. 1995. “Talking claims: discursive strategies in contesting property.” World Development.
23(6):1053-1063.
Macpherson, C.B. (ed) 1978. Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions. Buffalo, NY: University of
Toronto Press
McCay, Bonnie J. and James M. Acheson. 1987. The Question of the Commons: The Culture and
Ecology of Communal Resources. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.
McKean, Margaret A. 2000. “Common Property: What is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work?” In
Clark C. Gibson, Margaret A. McKean and Elinor Ostrom, eds., People and Forests: Communities,
Institutions and Governance. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 27-56.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1991. Governing the Commons: the evolution of institutions for collective Action. Cambridge UP
Peluso, Nancy. Peluso, N.L. 1996. "Fruit trees and family trees in an Anthropogenic rainforest: Property rights, ethics of access, and environmental change in Indonesia." Comparative Studies in Society and History 38 (3):510-548.
Ribot, Jesse C. "Theorizing Access: Forest Profits along Senegal's Charcoal Commodity Chain,"
Development and Change Vol 29 (1998): 307-341.
Ribot, Jesse and Nancy Lee Peluso. 2003. “ A Theory of access.” Rural sociology pp. 153-181.
Schroder, Richard 1997. “ Reclaiming’ land in the Gambia: Gendered property rights and environmental
intervention.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87(3):487-508.
Week 3 Conservation, Community and its discontentsFebruary 5
1. Tsing, Anna, Peter Brosius and Charles Zerner. 2005. Communities and Conservation:
Histories and Politics of Community-based natural resource management. Alta Mira
Press. Chapters.:
- Introduction, pp1-36.
- Chapter 1 “Dances around the Fire: Conservation organizations and community-based natural resource management. Janis Alcorn, pp. 37-68
- Chapter 2, “Participatory democracy in natural resource management." Borrini- Feyerabend with Christopher Tarnowsky, pp. 69-90;
- Chapter 4, "Congruent objectives, competing interests, and strategic compromise." Marshall Murphree, pp 105-148
- Chapter 6, “Model, panacea, or exception? Contextualizing CAMPFIRE and related programs in Africa”, Neumann, pp. 177-194;
- Chapter 8 “Community, forestry and conditionality in the Gambia” ,Schroeder, pp. 207-230.
The neoliberal question
2. McCarthy, James. 2005. "Devolution in the woods: Community-based forestry as hybrid neoliberalism." Environment and Planning A 37 (6): 995-1014.
3. Li, Tania. “Neo-liberal strategies of government through community: the social development program of the World Bank in Indonesia.” Li-final-web.pdf (on CU Learn )
Related readings
Agrawal, Arun. 2001. “State formation in community spaces?: Decentralization of control over forests in
the Kumaon Himalaya, India.” Journal of Asian Studies. 60(1):9-41.
Agrawal, Arun and C. Gibson. 1999. “Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation.” World Development, 27:629-649
Agrawal, Arun and Clark Gibson. 2001. Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, gender and the
state in Community-based conservation. Rutgers University Press.
Agrawal, Arun and Jesse Ribot. 1999. “Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian
and West African cases.” Journal of Development Areas. 33:473-502.
Belsky, Jill M. “Misrepresenting communities: the politics of community-based rural ecotourism in Gales
Point Manatee, Belize.” Rural Sociology 64:641-666.
Brechin, Steven R. ed 2003. Contested nature: promoting international biodiversity conservation with social
justice in the twenty-first century. Albany: SUNY Press.
____, et al. 2002. “Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensiveunderstanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process.” Societyand natural resources. 15:41-64.
Brosius, Peter, Anna Tsing and Charles Zerner 1998. “Representing communities: histories and politics of
community-based resource management.” Society and Natural Resources 11(20:157-168.
Li, Tania M. 1996. “Images of Community: discourse and strategy in property relations.” Development and
Change. 27(3):501-27.
McCarthy, J. 2006. Neoliberalism and the politics of alternatives: community forestry in British Columbia and the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers
Neumann, Roderick. 2004. “Nature-state-territory: toward a critical theorization of conservation
enclosures” in Peet and Watts. ed., Liberation ecologies, pp. 195-217.
Nightingale, Andrea J. 2005. ‘The experts taught us all we know”: Professionalization and knowledge in
Nepalese Community Forestry. Antipode.
Oates, John. 1999. Myth and reality in the rain forest: How conservation strategies are
failing in West Africa. UC Press. pp. xi-xx; pp. 43-58; 229-254
Orlove, Ben. and Brush, S. 1996 “Anthropology and the conservation of biodiversity”. Annual Review of
Anthropology 25:329-352
Peluso, Nancy L. 1993. “Coercing conservation? The politics of state resource control.” Global Environmental
Change p. 199-217
Sundar, Nandini. 2001. “Beyond the bounds? Violence at the margins of new legal geographies.” in Peluso
and Watts, Violent Environments. pp. 328-353.
Walker, Peter A. and Patrick T. Hurley. Collaboration derailed: the politics of'community-based' resource
management in Nevada County. Society & Natural Resources.
Wilshusen, Peter, et al. 2002. “Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent ‘protection
paradigm’ in international biodiversity conservation.” Society and natural resources.15:17-40.
Zerner, Charles. 2000. Peoples, plants and justice: the politics of nature conservation. Columbia UP.
Week 4 Globalization, conservation, and the politics of scale February 12
1. Zimmerer, Karl, ed. 2006. Globalization & New Geographies of Conservation,
- "Introduction", Zimmerer, Karl, pp. 1-44
- "Conclusion", Zimmerer, Karl, pp. 315-346.
- Chapter 7. Turner, Matthew. ”Shifting scales, lines and lives: The politics of conservation science and development in the Sahel,” 166-185.
- Chapter 8 Snedden, Chris. “Conservation initiatives and ‘transnationalization’ in the Mekong River Basin.” 191-211. .
- Chapter 9, Sierra, Rodrigo. “A transnational perspective on national protected areas and ecoregions in the tropical Andean countries” pp. 212-228.
- Chapter 10, Kenneth Young and Lily Rodriguez. "Development of Peru 's Protected-area system: historical continuity of conservation goals" pp229-254.
- Chapter 12. Leslie Gray, "Decentralization, land policy and the politics of scale in Burkino Faso." pp 277-296.
2. Brosius, J. P. and Russell, D. 2003. "Conservation from above: an anthropological perspective on transboundary protected areas and ecoregional planning."Journal of Sustainable Forestry 17 (1/2): 35-58.