English 1310

Grading Criteria for Paper 2

AThe A paper is outstanding work. The writer demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic and communicates this understanding by

  • Offering a clear, insightful, and interesting description of the situation/place/event
  • Suggesting why the stereotype/idea discussed might seem rational to the people who hold it
  • Using specific, precise detailed language
  • Using a structure that suggests some change (correcting a wrong idea, portraying an internal change or a change from the beginning to the end of the situation) or suggests why not change at all occurs
  • Having no more than one comma error in the use of compound and complex sentences
  • Demonstrating a fluency of grammar and usage that does not distract the reader
  • The style of the writing is consistently polished and distinctive.

BThe B paper is good work. The writer demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and communicates this by

  • Offering a mostly clear, insightful, and interesting description of the situation/place/event
  • Suggesting why the stereotype/idea discussed might seem rational to the people who hold it
  • Using specific, precise detailed language with only a few instances of vague or imprecise language
  • Using a structure that mostly suggests some change (correcting a wrong idea, portraying an internal change or a change from the beginning to the end of the situation) or suggests why not change at all occurs
  • Having no more than one or two comma errors in the use of compound and complex sentences
  • Demonstrating a fluency of grammar and usage that mostly does not distract the reader
  • The style of the writing is mostly polished and distinctive.

CThe C paper indicates a satisfactory performance. The writer demonstrates a cursory understanding of the topic and communicates this by

  • Offering a description of the situation/place/event that is confusing or unclear or dull
  • Not suggesting why the stereotype/idea discussed might seem rational to the people who hold it
  • Using vague or imprecise language; a lack of specific details
  • Using a structure that does not suggest some change (correcting a wrong idea, portraying an internal change or a change from the beginning to the end of the situation) or does not suggest why not change at all occurs
  • Having more than three comma errors in the use of compound and complex sentences
  • Demonstrating a lack of fluency of grammar and usage, distracting the reader
  • The style of the writing is not polished and not distinctive.

D/FThe D or failing paper fails

  • To address the prompt
  • To make any attempt to use specific details
  • To structure the paper in any way