Student Learning Objectives

Monday, October 13, 2014

SLOs are a process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.

Simply log-in to your PA-ETEP account and click on the My Observations tab. From your My Observations tab, you can click on a link to start their SLO template.

SLOs are divided into 5 major sections:

1.  Classroom Context

2.  Goals

3.  Performance Measures

4.  Performance Indicators

5.  Teacher Expectations

The blue question mark icons at the end of each section give a description of the related fields.

The example icons give examples at various levels to help teachers complete their SLOs.

Section 1: Classroom Context

1a. Name Educator’s full name

Jennifer Mangold

1b. School Name Name of school(s) to which the educator is assigned

during the current year.

Wyomissing Area Junior/Senior High School

1c. District Name of district to which the educator is assigned

during the current year.

Wyomissing Area School District

1d. Class/Course Name of the class/course/content area upon which the

SLO is based.

Advanced World History

1e. Grade Level(s) Grade level(s) for those students included within

class/course identified in Element 1d.

Grade 7 (Single Grade)

1f. Total # of Students Aggregate number of students (estimated, across

multiple sections) for which data will be collected and

applied to this SLO.

37 (Multiple Classes)=2 Advanced World History classes

1g. Typical Class Size The “average” number of students in a single session of

class/course identified in Element 1d.

20

1h. Class Frequency The frequency and time frame in which the class/course

identified in Element 1d is delivered.

5 sessions per week for one year equaling a total of 180 sessions

1i. Typical Class Duration The average number of minutes allocated to deliver a

“session” of the class/course identified in Element 1d.

41 minutes (typical secondary course delivery model)

Section 2: Goal

2a. Goal Statement Narrative articulating the “Big Idea” upon which the

SLO is based

Students will demonstrate their understanding of the

characteristics of ancient civilizations (Mesopotamia,

Egypt, India and China) by citing specific textual evidence

to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.

2b. PA Standards Reference the PA Standards that align with the Goal

Statement. Numeric references to PA Standards are

found at http://www.pdesas.org/Standard/Views.

PA State Standards: 8.1.A, 8.1.B, 8.1.C, 8.1.D,

8.4. World History A., and 8.4. World History B.

Common Core State Standards:

ELA Literacy.RH.6-8.1

2c. Rationale Narrative providing reasons why the Goal Statement

and the Aligned Standards address important learning

for this class/course/content area

The PA Academic Standards for History identify the

concepts of historical analysis and skills development,

which include describing and explaining historical

research (primary and secondary sources).

The content of ancient civilizations is important

because it identifies and explains how individuals and

groups made significant political and cultural

contributions to world history.

Section 3: Performance Measures

3a. Name List the name of each Performance Measure for which a

Performance Indicator is established in Section 4a.

January semester exam and May/June final exam

3b. Type Identify the type(s) of Performance Measure(s) listed in

3a. From the given list of check boxes, select all types that are applicable.

3c. Purpose The purpose statement for each Performance Measure

that addresses who, what and why

To measure student understanding of the basic

characteristics of an ancient civilization by citing

specific examples to support analysis of primary

and secondary sources

3d. Metric Growth (change in student performance across two or

more points in time)

Mastery (attainment of a defined level of achievement)

Growth and Mastery

We are choosing the category of Mastery as a building.

3e. Administration The timeframe during the school year that the

Frequency Performance Measures are administered to students

For Performance Measures administered more than one

time, the frequency (e.g. quarterly) is annotated.

At the end of the second quarter and the fourth quarter

3f. Adaptions/ Identifies and lists any unique adaptations or special

Accommodations accommodations needed for IEP, ELL, Gifted IEP, or

others to complete the tasks within each Performance

Measure

Check all boxes that apply to your target group of students.

3g. Resources/ Identify any unique resources, including equipment

Equipment and personnel, associated with each Performance

Measure.

A variety of primary and secondary resources will be used

to address specific content information for each ancient

civilization.

3h. Scoring Tools Identifies the scoring “tools” for each performance

measure

For objective measures, use scoring key. For the text-dependent analysis question, use the PSSA Grade 7 ELA Text-dependent Analysis Question Scoring Guideline.

Midterm and final exam scoring keys.

3i. Administration Identifies two key individuals: the person administering

and Scoring Personnel the performance measure(s) and the person scoring

This is particularly important for subject measures in

which the subject matter expert is both administrator

and scorer.

Can be administered and scored by a certified social

studies teacher

3j. Performance Identifies the manner by which student performance on

Reporting the Performance Measures will be communicated to

others (as appropriate)

Summary list of students who achieve the performance indicator

Summary report of students who met the performance indicator

Section 4: Performance Indicators

4a. PI Targets All A description of the expected level of achievement Student Group for each student in the SLO population (as defined in

Element 1F) based on the scoring tool(s) used for each

#1 World History Midterm Exam: Students will achieve a 80% or higher on the text-dependent analysis portion of the midterm exam.

#2 World History Midterm Exam: Students will achieve a

85% or higher on the text-dependent analysis portion of the final exam.

4b. PI Targets: A description of the expected level of achievement for

Focused Student Group students in a subset of the SLO population (as defined in

(optional) Element 1f) based on the scoring tool(s) used for each

performance measure (as listed in Element 4a)

Subset populations can be identified through prior

student-achievement data or through content-specific

pre-test data.

IEP students and students who have a Basic or Below

Basic reading ability as evidenced by PSSA scores in ELA

will score a 75% or higher on text-dependent analysis portion of the midterm and final exams.

4c. PI Linked: If you would like to link the outcome of this

(optional) Performance Indicator to another Performance

Indicator, please select a linking indicator from the

dropdown box.

4d. PI Weight %: An assignment of proportional values among PIs prior

(optional) to aggregation and application to Section 5: Weighting

can be applied when there is more than one Performance Indicator.

Section 5: Teacher Expectations

5a. Level Four levels of projected performance regarding the PI,

reflecting a continuum established by the educator

prior to the evaluation period: Each performance level

(i.e., Failing, Needs Improvement, Proficient, and

Distinguished) is populated with a percentage range

such that 0% to 100% meeting expectations is

distributed among the levels.

Distinguished: 90-100%

Proficient: 70-89%

Needs Improvement: 60-69%

Failing: 59-0%

Additional Notes:

What do these % mean?

For example: Given the example, if 85% of the students in my SLO met the target (4a) on my second assessment (final exam), I would earn Proficient as my SLO rating.

Using Midterm and Final Exams

For our building we will be using the Midterm Exam in January as our Base indicator and our Final Exam given in May/June as our Mastery indicator.

Use Collaboration

Collaborate with colleagues to make course/grade level SLOs, e.g., all teachers that teach 7th grade World History would create and use the same SLO.

Consistency:

Use the same assessment format on both the midterm and final. In the example, I would no longer be assessing ancient civilizations in May/June, but I would still use a text-dependent analysis portion of the final exam for my SLO.

7