SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
CAMPUS CLIMATE TASK FORCE
Friday, June 3, 2005
12:30 – 2:00 p.m.
Members Present: Dorothy Cirelli, Holly Moore, Donna Walther, Tony Costa, Cindy Mix, Steve Gibler, Chris Melton, Paulette Graham, Bonnie Frunz, , Sean Keller, Paul Duernberger, Megan Ballock, Christine Landon, Becky Collord, Peggy Lytle, Lee Lambert, Susan Hoyne, Susana Villamarin.
Observers Present: Edie Loyer Nelson
- Recorder It was announce that Susana Villamarin will be taking the permanent recorder assigned. Holly has made this assignment to be consistent and also to be fair with the other confidential assistants.
- Review of minutes from May 20 – no changes. The minutes for the 5/27 all campus meeting will be distributed next week for review.
- Agenda review/changes: No additions or changes
- Summer quarter schedule: We will meet Friday, June 10 from 1:00 to 2:00 pm. There will be no meeting on June 17th. After that we will meet every Wednesday 2:30 pm to 4:00 pm in the Board room with the exception of Wednesday, June 22nd that the meeting will be from 2:30 pm to 2:30 pm. August 10 will be our last meeting since we need to present the plan by 8/1/05.
Students will not appoint new members; they are committed to participate until we are done.
The concern is that we want to get feedback from the campus community but will not be possible due to schedules.
Ideally, we will give an update to campus during opening week all campus meeting on Tuesday.
- Review All-Campus Meeting: It was brought up that Tim Payne was upset by the categories created. The sub-committee clarified that they did not leave out any comments and it was not made with bad intentions. There are concerns that his addressing the issue to a lot of members of the task force is to undermine the job of the climate task force. A comment was made that the purpose was not to single out anybody out but we can in the future try to be more tactful and careful with what we show.
It was said that the data should have been received by the committee before it was presented to campus. We can still undo the damage.
It was suggested to put a public apology in our minutes for any damage that presenting the data have caused to any individual working in campus.
Lee Lambert asked us to look at things from the lens of public record (community interest & private interest). If it is something that is personally identifiable to one individual we can omit names and inform individuals what it going to be released before it goes public. He also suggested that if any changes are done to the raw data we need to note what the changes are and publish the comments with the data.
Concerns of retaliation were brought up but the sub-committee explained that most of the comments written were anonymous.
It was suggested to put a disclaimer that the data are comments and personal point of views before we use it for planning purposes.
A suggestion was made that we talk to the people named in the raw data so they are aware that their names will be published.
Another suggestion was made to present the raw data with the results of the plan to address the issues in August 1.
It was suggested that if we are going to wait until August we should put a campus wide notification about the intentions of the CTF in regards of publishing the draft of the plan with supporting data. People are expecting to get it a lot sooner than that since it was announce on 5/27 and also they are expecting unedited data.
A decision on how to handle this will be done by the CTF on 06/10/05.
- How to proceed from here: CTF will re-read the documents received in prior emails and bring ideas to next meeting. Dorothy will send email with homework assignment. Dorothy will write an article for Net News about CTF.