Review form
REVIEW OF THE MANUSCRIPT
______
(author(s) and the title of the manuscript)
______,
submitted to the journal “Vestnik Moskovskogo Aviatsionnogo Instituta”
1. Matching of the manuscript theme to the established subject headings of the journal “Vestnik Moskovskogo aviatsionnogo instituta”
Match □ does not match □
If marked “does not match”, the article is not the subject to further review.
______
(reviewer comments – if necessary)
______
2. Matching of the title of the manuscript to the content the manuscript
Match □ Несоответствует □
If marked “Does not match”, then a meaningful comment is obligatory.
______
______
3. The relevance of the subject matter of the article
Yes □ No □
If marked “No”, then a meaningful comment is obligatory.
______
______
4. Correctness of the used research methodology
Yes □ No □
If marked “No”, then a meaningful comment is obligatory.
______
______
5. Novelty / originality of scientific results submitted
Yes □ No □
The presence of a meaningful commentary (what is the novelty / originality of the stated scientific results or for what reason the stated scientific results do not have novelty / originality is obligatory.
______
______
6. The substantiation of the presented scientific results
Yes □ No □
If marked “No”, then a meaningful comment is obligatory.
______
______
7. The illustrative material reflects the stated scientific results
Yes □ No □
If marked “No”, then a meaningful comment is obligatory.
______
______
8. Scientific significance of the presented scientific results
A meaningful commentary (what does the scientific significance of the scientific results consist in) is obligatory
______
______
9. Practical significance of the presented scientific results
For a manuscript of an article of the applied character, a meaningful commentary (what is the practical significance of the stated scientific results) is obligatory.
______
______
10. Compliance of the manuscript content with the requirements of the “Declaration on the Ethics of Publications” in the journal “Vestnik Moskovskogo Aviatsionnogo Instituta”, including:
10.1. Completeness and objectivity of reflection of the current state of the issues in the manuscript
Yes □ No □
If marked “No”, then a meaningful comment is obligatory.
______
______
10.2. The presence of bibliographic references to meaningful publications in characteristic sources of information
Yes □ No □
If marked “No”, then a meaningful comment is obligatory.
______
______
10.3. The presence of bibliographic references to articles previously published in the journal “Vestnik Moskovskogo Aviatsionnogo Instituta”
Yes □ No □
10.4. Other in connection with the requirements of the "Declaration on the Ethics of Publications" in the journal “Vestnik Moskovskogo Aviatsionnogo Instituta”
______
(if necessary)
______
11. Special remarks
______
(if necessary)
______
12. Reviewer's conclusion
The manuscript of the article is recommended for printing Yes □ No □
The manuscript of the article may be recommended for publishing after the remarks elimination
Yes □ No □
Significant revision of the manuscript of the article and re-reviewing is required
Yes □ No □
Manuscript is not recommended for publishingYes □ No □
Reviewer ______
(signature) (Full name)
place of work, official capacity, academic degree
Date ______
1