Cover Page Company Logo

COVER PAGE COMPANY LOGO

SMALL COMPANYLOGO HERE / Project: Part 7 – Fuel and Gas
Base Engineering Assessment Report – INTERIM / FINAL
(delete as applicable) / Reference: . ......
Prepared for: Base Planning, Estate Planning Branch – Defence Estate and Infrastructure Group
Revision: .....
Date: ......
Project No. | …………….., 2015 | Revision ......

Document Control Record

Document prepared by:

Company Name

ABN

Address:

Australia

T
F
E
W / ......
......
......
......

A person using [Company Name] documents or data accepts the risk of:

·  Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version.

·  Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Company Name].

DOCUMENT CONTROL
Report Title
Document ID / Project Number
Client / Client Contact
Rev / Date / Revision Details/Status / Prepared by / Author / Verifier / Approver
0
1
Current Revision / 0
Project …………. | AF22558693.doc | Date:……………. | Revision
Part 7 Fuel and Gas
Date
Reference
Revision
Company Name
ABN:
Address:
Australia
T
F
E
W
Project …. | ….2015 | Revision
Project …. | ….2015 | Revision

Contents

1 Description of Services 1

1.1 Overview 1

1.2 Overall Fuel Assessment Outcomes 6

1.2.1 Capacity 6

1.2.2 Condition 6

1.2.3 Compliance 6

1.3 Overall Gas Assessment Outcomes 6

1.3.1 Capacity 6

1.3.2 Condition 6

1.3.3 Compliance 6

1.4 Proposed Redevelopment Scope 7

1.5 Recommendations for Maintenance and Changes to Practice 7

3. Fuel 7

3.1 Description 7

1.5 Required Data 7

3.2 Capacity Assessment 7

3.3 Condition Assessment 7

3.4 Compliance Assessment 7

4. Gas 7

4.1 Description 7

1.6 Required Data 7

4.2 Capacity Assessment 7

4.3 Condition Assessment 7

4.4 Compliance Assessment 7

Index of Tables

Table 1 | Fuel and Gas Networks GRV 1

Table 2 | Fuel and Gas Assessment Outcomes 2

Table 6 | Proposed redevelopment scope 7

Table x | Required Fuel Network assessment data 7

Abbreviations

Abbreviation / Description /
API / American Petroleum Institute
ANSI / American National Standards Institute
AS/NZS / Australian Standard/New Zealand Standard
AST / Aboveground Storage Tank
AVTUR / Aviation Turbine Fuel (NATO F-34)
BEAP / Base Engineering Assessment Program
BFI / Bulk Fuel Installation
BFIMI / Bulk Fuel Installation – Maintenance Instruction
BFQCM / Base Fuel Quality Control Manager
CCC / Capacity, Condition and Compliance
CEPS / Central Emergency Power Station
CF / Contribution Factor
CSIR / Corporate Services & Infrastructure Requirement
DEMS / Defence Estate Management System
DFI (M) / Defence Fuel Installation – Maritime (or A - Aviation; G- Ground; P - Power)
DN / Nominal Diameter (e.g. DN200 indicates a nominal diameter of 200mm)
DoD / Department of Defence
DSRG / Defence Support and Reform Group
EMOS / Estate Maintenance and Operation Services
ERAT / Estate Risk Assessment Tool
F-76 / Naval Distillate (NATO F-76)
GFIS / Geographical Facilities Information System
GIS / Geographic Information System
LEG / Local Emergency Generator
LIA / Living-In Accommodation
MHS / Military Hardstand
MEIBFI-D / Manual of Infrastructure Engineering - Bulk fuel installations - Design
POL / Petrol, Oils and Lubricants
RIM / Regional Information Manager
SFL / Safe Fill Level
UST / Underground Storage Tank
WHS / Work Health and Safety
Project No. | …………….., 2014 | Revision ......

1  Description of Services

1.1  Overview

This Part 7 of the report addresses the assessment of the capacity, condition and compliance of the fuel and gas systems at <site>, incorporating <list sub-sites>. The assessments are based on a combination of existing information made available to the assessment team and site inspections and investigations to obtain any missing data necessary to complete the analysis.

1.1.1  Summary of Fuel

Outline the extent of service, what comprises this service on this site, its breakup and how it works

PHASE 1 Guidance: If parts of this table cannot be completed, or this section is partially incomplete, discuss the incomplete issues and explain why here:

1.1.2  Summary of Gas

Outline the extent of service, what comprises this service on this site, its breakup and how it works

PHASE 1 Guidance: If parts of this table cannot be completed, or this section is partially incomplete, discuss the incomplete issues and explain why here:

· 

1.1.3  Network Gross Replacement Value

The estimated Gross Replacement Value (GRV) provides an indication of the cost liability for the existing fuel and gas networks at <site>, should the entire systems be replaced in a ‘like for like’ arrangement and to current standards. The GRV is based on current infrastructure cost rates, with an efficiency factor applied to represent the likely reductions in cost that could be achieved by replacing each entire network at once, as opposed to repairing or upgrading localised areas of the networks (as per the individual BEAP recommendations).

Table 1 summarises the estimated Gross Replacement Value for the fuel and gas networks by sub-service.

Table 1 | Fuel and Gas Networks GRV

Sub service / Description / Estimated GRV ($) 1
Fuel Network / $ xxxxxx
Gas Network / $ xxxxxx
Total / $ xxxxxx

Notes:

1.  The Gross Replacement value is a capital investment cost current as of 2015, with a level of confidence of P50. The cost estimates exclude, preliminaries (design, project management, etc.), contingency, escalation, inflation for future CPI increases, as well as provision for base support activities, periodic maintenance, latent conditions and site contamination.

2.  The cost estimates exclude potential efficiencies that could be achieved by rationalising or extending the systems and are based on a ‘like for like’ replacement.

1.1.4  Fuel and Gas Assessment Outcomes

The table below outlines the assessment outcome for each of the services main components.

Table 2 | Fuel and Gas Assessment Outcomes

Sub service / Assessment / Spare Capacity Indicator1 / Resultant No. of Issues / Remedial Work Cost Estimate2 / % of GRV
Capacity / Condition / Compliance
Fuel / Refer table 2 below / Refer table 2 below / Refer table 2 below / % of assets ‘within limits’ / Cost of remediation
TOTAL
Sub service / Assessment / Spare Capacity Indicator1 / Resultant No. of Issues / Remedial Work Cost Estimate2 / % of GRV
Capacity / Condition / Compliance
Gas / Refer table 2 below / Refer table 2 below / Refer table 2 below / % of assets ‘within limits’ / Cost of remediation
TOTAL

To complete table 2 above refer to table 5 for results and Input the cost and resultant number of issues from Appendix A.1 data for each fuel and gas system component

PHASE 1 Guidance: If parts of this table cannot be completed, or this section is partially incomplete, discuss the incomplete issues and explain why here:

Notes for Table 2

1.  The spare capacity indicator represents the percentage of network assets which have a capacity rating of ‘within limits’.

2.  Costs estimates are capital investment costs current as of 2015, with a level of confidence of P50. The cost estimates exclude, preliminaries (design, project management etc), contingency, escalation, inflation for future CPI increases, as well as provision for base support activities, periodic maintenance, latent conditions and site contamination. These costs comprise Work, Health and Safety (WHS) immediate works (P1), urgent repairs or upgrades works within 1 year (P2), short term repair or upgrade works due within the next 1-5 year period (P3), medium term repairs or upgrade works due before 10 years (P4), and long term replacement costs as assets reach the end of their useful life >10 year period (P5).

3.  The percentage of GRV figure compares the value of the required remediation works with the replacement value of the entire subservice.

A full breakdown of issues, risk, priority, recommended remedial actions and cost is provided at Appendix A.1.

1.1.5  Fuel and Gas Assessment Outcomes by Risk

The table below summarises the level of risk for each sub service element resulting from the risk assessment of each issue using the ERAT method.

Table 3 | Risk assessment by sub service

Risk and Cost / Service / Grand Total
Fuel Network / Gas Network
Very High
No.
Est Cost
High
No.
Est Cost
Medium
No.
Est Cost
Low
No.
Est Cost
Total No.
Total Est Cost

Notes for table 3

1.  Costs estimates are capital investment costs current as of 2015, with a level of confidence of P50. The cost estimates exclude, preliminaries (design, project management etc), contingency, escalation, inflation for future CPI increases, as well as provision for base support activities, periodic maintenance, latent conditions and site contamination. These costs comprise WHS immediate works (P1), urgent repairs or upgrades works within 1 year (P2), short term repair or upgrade works due within the next 1-5 year period (P3), medium term repairs or upgrade works due before 10 years (P4), and long term replacement costs as assets reach the end of their useful life >10 year period (P5).

Discuss any Very High risks in the above table and their key issues, actions, remediation.

PHASE 1 Guidance: If parts of this table cannot be completed, or this section is partially incomplete, discuss the incomplete issues and explain why here:

1.1.6  Fuel and Gas Assessment Outcomes by Priority

The table below summarises the number of issues in each priority category along with the estimated cost of completing the recommended remedial actions. The assessment has been carried out using the prioritised work request (WR) categorisation system These include WHS immediate works (P1), urgent repairs or upgrades works required within a year (P2), short term repairs or upgrades within the next 1-5 year period (P3), medium term repairs or upgrade works (P4) due before 10 years, and long term replacement costs as assets reach the end of their useful life (P5), >10 year period.

Table 4 | Priority assessment by sub service

Priority and Cost / Service / Grand Total
Sewerage Network / Sewerage Pump Stations & Rising Mains / Trade Waste / Sewage Treatment Plant
P1
No.
Est Cost
P2
No.
Est Cost
P3
No.
Est Cost
P4
No.
Est Cost
P5
No.
Est Cost
Total No.
Total Est Cost

Notes for table 4

1.  Costs estimates are capital investment costs current as of 2015, with a level of confidence of P50. The cost estimates exclude, preliminaries (design, project management etc), contingency, escalation, inflation for future CPI increases, as well as provision for base support activities, periodic maintenance, latent conditions and site contamination.

PHASE 1 Guidance: If parts of this table cannot be completed, or this section is partially incomplete, discuss the incomplete issues and explain why here:

Table 5 | Service Assessment parameters

Criteria Used for Assessments
Capacity / Condition / Compliance
Exceeded / Unserviceable / Non-Compliant
100% of service capacity has been used
Or
Tanks and pumps are not meeting current operational objectives or the minimum outlined in the MIEBFI-D policy / Not capable of functioning as intended, obsolete equipment / components, unable to be maintained – requiring full replacement / upgrade. / Design does not comply with applicable design guidelines, Australian Standards and/or Defence Policies requirements.
Poor
Deterioration is severe and is limiting the serviceability of the asset. Maintenance cost would be high.
Marginal / Fair
75%>x<100% of service capacity has been used. Likely to be non-compliant with requirements for spare capacity. / Deterioration is obvious and there is some serviceability loss.
Within Limits / Good / Compliant
<75% of service capacity has been used
or / Signs of deterioration evident, serviceability would be impaired very slightly. / Design complies with applicable design guidelines, Australian Standards and/or Defence Policies requirements.
As new
Tanks and pumps are meeting current operational objectives or the minimum outlined in the MIEBFI-D policy / No visible sign of deterioration recently constructed / installed or recently rehabilitated back to new condition.

1.1.7  Standards and Guidelines

The Relevant Standards, guidelines and legislative requirements used in this assessment include:

·  Relevant State and Territory Environment Protection Policies;

·  AS1657: Fixed platforms, walkways, stairways and ladders-Design construction and installation (if applicable);

·  AS 1596-2008: The storage and handling of LP Gas

·  AS 1692-2006 Steel tanks for flammable and combustible liquids;

·  AS 1940-2004 The storage and handling of flammable and combustible liquids;

·  AS 2832.1-2004 Cathodic Protection of metals – Pipes and cables;

·  AS/NZS 3788-2006:Pressure Equipment - In-service inspection;

·  AS 4041-2006 Pressure piping;

·  AS 4897-2008 The design, installation and operation of underground petroleum storage systems;

·  AS 4977-2008: Petroleum products – Pipeline, road tanker compartment and underground tank identification

·  AS/NZS 5601.1-2012 Gas installations – General installations;

·  AS/NZS 60079.0 Explosive atmospheres – Part 0: Equipment – General requirements

·  AS/NZS 60079.10.1-2009 Explosive atmospheres- Part 10.1 - Classification of areas - Explosive gas atmospheres;

·  Bulk Fuel Installation – Maintenance Instruction (BFIMI V2.0)(Current – Issued 2012);

·  Internal Painting of ADF Bulk Military Fuel Storage Tank Policy (Current – Issued June 2008) (if applicable); and

·  United States Department of Defence – UFC Design: Petroleum Fuel Facilities (UFC 3-460-01)(Current – Issued 2010), formally MIL-HDBK-1022A.(if applicable)

1.2  Overall Fuel Assessment Outcomes

(as per results of the particular services assessment) This section will be included in the overview.

1.2.1  Capacity

PHASE 1 Guidance: If parts of this table cannot be completed, or this section is partially incomplete, discuss the incomplete issues and explain why here:

1.2.2  Condition

PHASE 1 Guidance: If parts of this table cannot be completed, or this section is partially incomplete, discuss the incomplete issues and explain why here:

1.2.3  Compliance

PHASE 1 Guidance: If parts of this table cannot be completed, or this section is partially incomplete, discuss the incomplete issues and explain why here: