Expanding ACCESS to International Students
Tuesday,November1, 2011
11:00am-12:30pm
21st Annual Strategic Enrollment Management Conference: The Origin and Future of SEM
San Diego, California
Presenters:
- Daniel Robb, Assistant Vice President for Enrollment Development/Associate Dean of Admissions, George Mason University
- Nicole Sealey, Director for the Center for International Student Access, George Mason University
Abstract:Internationalization and student access rarely come together in one sentence, but one institution has found a method to expand opportunities to internationalstudents for admission. This session describes the year-long foundation program and its development with tips for institutions interested in creating their own similar programs.
Presentation Outline:
- Context
- Internationalization
Defined “... as the process of integrating an international perspective into a college or university system. It is an ongoing, future-oriented, multidimensional, interdisciplinary, leadership-driven vision that involves many stakeholders working to change the internal dynamics of an institution to respond and adapt appropriately to an increasingly diverse, globally focused, ever-changing external environment” (Ellingboe, 1998, p. 199).
- Overview of Mason
- Institutional Profile
- Young public institution located close to Washington, DC Metro area
- Enrollments upwards of 32,000
- International enrollment averaging 6%
- Institutional Culture
- Students enrolled from over 136 nations
- Active engagement in internationalization-related efforts
- Student academic and social environment ripe for efforts
- Institutional Prioritization: Institution-specific goal(s) must be articulated from the top for success
- Why Grow International Enrollments?
- Increase campus diversity
- Moral: Feeling that “it’s the right thing to do”
- Increase tuition revenues
- Increase international profile
- Considerations:
- What kind of issues do international students have at your institution(s)?
- What are the barriers to admission, retention, and graduation for international students?
- Can these be mitigated?
- Options Explored
- Possible Approaches:
- External: Outsourcing
- Internal: Utilizing internal resources
- Internal – New: Creation of New Structure
- Selected Approach:
- Internal – New
- Reasons: Retain high level of control and work with our students directly; utilize plentiful existing resources without overtaxing them
- Conceptualization of Project
- ACCESS Program Pilot
- International Freshmen
- Alternative Admission Requirements
- Meets academic qualifications
- Lower English Proficiency threshold
- Provisional admission
- Goal: One year comprehensive first-year experience
- Established “Center for International Student Access” in Fall 2010; located in Office of Provost
- Collaborative “coalition”
- English Language Institute (IEP)
- Enrollment Management Offices (e.g., Admissions, Registrar)
- Academic units
- University Life (e.g., Student Involvement, Immigration Services)
- Special Programs (e.g., Honors College, MSU)
- Resource Sharing
- Special Programs (e.g., Honors College, MSU)
- Resource Sharing
- Pilot uses “Initiative-based” budget model
- Set aside funding
- Some of net revenues were reallocated to support specific internationalization efforts
- Self-sustaining
- Enrollment Strategies: Vision for Enrollment
- Attracting: From where, at what cost, how many?
- Enrolling:Alliances, embassies, differences in yield
- Retaining: What services and at what cost?
- Programmatic Structure
- Research Informed approach
- Thoughtful academic sequencing and custom courses
- Co- & Extra-Curricular components
- Lessons Learned
- Program Needs
- Achieving appropriate balance of human resources
- Securing needed space/housing requirements
- Obtaining uninhibited access to qualified faculty resources
- Fully developed enrollment funnel model for recruitment, retention, and graduation through program assessment & environmental analyses
- Institutional Prioritization
- Consensus building
- Structural Adjustments (Work In-Progress)
- Internal buy-in/marketing
- Adjusting Revenue model
- Marketing & recruitment strategies
- Personnel
- Qualified faculty
- Qualified staff
- Results
- Assessment
- Enrollment
- Momentum
- Future Implications
- How big does this program need to be?
- How do we work with potential partners?
- How do we effectively share the model?
- How nimble are we in adjusting each year?
- Do we need to control costs and max revenues?
- How do we develop metrics to best “tell the story”?
- How can we leverage lessons increase benefits to more members at the institution?
References
ACCESS Program website. George Mason University’s Center for International Student Access -
Davis, R., Mallett, K., Sealey, N. & Zgheib, G. 2011. “Expanding ACCESS to International Students.” Presentation at 3rd Annual Colonial Academic Alliance Global Education Conference. Fairfax, VA.
Ellingboe, B.J. (1998). 'Divisional strategies to internationalize a campus portrait: Results, resistance, and recommendations from a case study at a U.S. university, in Mestenhauser, J.A. and Elllingboe, B.J (eds.), Reforming the Higher Education Curriculum: Internationalizing the Campus. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx Press, pp. 198-228.
Fischer, K. (May 29, 2011). Colleges Adapt to New Kinds of Students From Abroad: Younger, sometimes less-experienced students require more academic and social support. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from
Fischer, K. (August 7, 2011). College 101 for Non-Native Speakers: Pathways programs blend English and academics to help foreign students succeed. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from
Habib, A. S. and Mallett, K. E. (eds.). 2011. “Diversity at Mason: The pursuit of transformative education.” Fairfax, VA: Diversity Research Group, George Mason University.
Hill, B. A. (2008). A Guide To Internationalization For Chief Academic Officers. American Council on Education.
International Association of Universities. 2010. Internationalization of Higher Education: Global Trends, Regional Perspectives. IAU 3rd Global Survey. Paris: UNESCO House.