Kertas Kerja Cadangan Bagi Melaksanakan Bengkel Pembinaan Prosedur Iso Serta Visi, Misi

4th INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH MANAGEMENT & INNOVATION CONFERENCE (4thIRMIC 2017)

Institut Latihan Islam Malaysia (ILIM) Bangi, 7September 2017

TITLE (SIMPLE & CATHCY)

First author1, Second author2, Third author3,

1First author affiliation and mailing address (firstauthor_id@domain_name)

2Second author affiliation and mailing address (secondauthor_id@domain_name)

3Third author affiliation and mailing address (thirdauthor_id@domain_name)

International Islamic University College Selangor (KUIS)

ABSTRACT

The abstract inside the paper should summarize the context, content and conclusions of the paper in no more than 350 words and followed by not more than five keywords. It should not contain any reference citations or displayed equations. Typeset the abstract in 12pt roman with 1.5 spacing.

The content of abstract:

-Introduction

-Problem Statement

-Methodology

-Result

-Conclusion.

Keywords: Keyword1; keyword2; keyword3; keyword4; keyword5.

1.0INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the introduction is to stimulate the reader’s interest and to provide background information which is pertinent to the study. The statement of the research question is the most important part of the introduction. The review of the literature needs to be short and concise. The content of the introduction is outlined in Table 2.

Table 1: Introduction

References are almost exclusively used in the introduction and the discussion. The references cited should be those which are the most valid and the most available. Articles in peer-reviewed journals satisfy both these criteria. Books, Master’s and PhD theses and some conference proceedings, those for which papers are rigorously reviewed, are also valid sources, but usually take longer to find.

Journal articles which have been accepted for publication are a valid source but those which have been submitted (but not yet accepted) are not, as they are unavailable. Avoid citing perusal communications and unpublished reports or observations. These are not strong evidence because they are unable to be accessed and evaluated.

2.0METHODS

This section is descriptive. The main consideration is to ensure that enough detail is provided to verify the findings and to enable replication of the study by an appropriately trained person. Information should be presented, using the past verb tense, in chronological order. Sub-headings should be used, where appropriate. Reference may be made to a published paper as an alternative to describing a lengthy procedure. Many journals require mention of relevant ethics committee(s) approval for the study and that subjects gave informed consent. Table 3 provides an outline for the content of the methods section.

Table 2: Methods

3.0RESULTS

The two functions of this section are to report the results (past verb tense) of the procedures described in the methods and to present the evidence that is the data (in the form of text, tables or figures), that supports the results. Tables and figures must be mentioned within the text and should be placed after the related text.

The order of presentation of the results should be either chronological to correspond with the methods or from the most to the least important. The order of most to least important should be followed within each paragraph. For every result there must be a method in the methods. Careful planning of the tables and figures is important to ensure that the sequencing of these tells a story.

The results must not include a discussion of the findings, methods of data analyses and citations of references, except on rare occasions when a comparison is made of the raw data with the findings of a published study. This applies only when this comparison would not fit well within the discussion.

4.0DISCUSSION

In order to make the message clear, the discussion should be kept as short as possible whilst still clearly and fully stating, supporting, explaining and defending the answers to the questions as well as discussing other important and directly relevant issues.The recommended content of the discussion is given inTable 4.

Table 4: Discussion

5.0CONCLUSION

This section should comprise a brief statement of the major findings andimplications of the study.

REFERENCES

Bishop, W. & Reichert, N. (n.d.). Conferencing. Retrieved April 14, 2008, from

Granitz, N. & Loewy, D. (2007). Applying ethical theories: Interpreting and responding to student plagiarism.Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 293-306.

Ho Chui Chui. (2006a). Are undergraduates able to identify instances of plagiarism? Journal of Language Studies, 2(1), 55-62.

Ho Chui Chui (2006b). English Prime: A pedagogical tool in teaching writing to law matriculation students in Kedah, Malaysia. Refelections on English LanguageTeaching, 5(2), 123-127.

Lester, J.D. & Lester, J., Jr. (2005). Writing research papers: A complete guide (11th ed.). New York: Pearson/Longman.

Lim, V. & See, S. (2001). Attitudes toward, and intentions to report, academic cheatingamong students in Singapore. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 261-274.

McCabe, D.L. (2001). Cheating: Why students do it and how we can help them stop.American Educator, 25(4), 38-43.

McCabe, D.L. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1). Retrieved June 12, 2008, from article/viewFile/14/9

1