Improving Schools: Performance and Potential. John Gray; David Hopkins, David Reynolds; Brian Wilcox; Shaun Farrell; David Jesson. Open University Press 1999

The main conclusion of the book, which is very highly regarded and written by leaders in the field is that schools that have improved have focussed on learning and teaching. Teachers having three to four times the effect on achievement than any whole school factor.

There are two very large research movements: school improvement and school effectiveness. They have both worked for decades on different questions.

School Improvement Movement: ‘How do schools improve?’

Joyce 1991 (p24 in Gray) summarised the findings as:

Collegiality : the development of collaborative and professional relations within a school staff and among their surrounding communities.

Research: where a school staff studies research findings about, for example, effective schools and teaching practices or the processes of change.

Action Research: where teachers collect and analyse information and data about their classrooms and schools and (sometimes and more recently) their student’s progress.

Curriculum Initiatives: the introduction of changes within subject areas or, as in the case of ILT/ICT across curriculum areas.

Teaching Strategies: when teachers discuss, observe and acquire a range of new teaching skills and strategies.

The school improvement movement has been criticised for not testing its hypotheses sufficiently.

School Effectiveness Movement: ‘What are the characteristics of effective schools?’

Main findings of this research movement are that effective schools exhibit:

Leadership: provides focus on mission, but involves staff in planning to meet it. Democratic and participative.

Academic push: high expectations, increase of learning time

Strategies for parental involvement

Strategies to secure pupil involvement in the classroom and outside in clubs and societies

Fostering organisational cohesion. Through planning and coordination establishing staff ownership and involvement, and effective flow of information. Cohesion is reflected in a high degree of consistency in lessons across the school. Part of this approach is the use of expert staff to develop other staff.

The school effectiveness movement has been criticised for not showing how a failing school can become effective.

Studying Improving schools

“A ‘rapidly improving’ school seems to have been increasing its exam scores by an average of around one grade in one subject per pupil per year.”

Many improving schools do not change their ‘label’ from say an ‘average’ to a ‘good’ school. The difference between schools is much larger than the steps in improvement achieved by individual improving schools.

Even in improving schools there is a large variation in effectiveness between departments.

The most rapidly improving schools had found ways to focus simultaneously and directly on learning and teaching:

  • aspects of pupils’ achievement
  • organizational policies supporting teaching and
  • aspects of classroom culture and practice

Other improving schools had focussed on

  • giving pupils more responsibilities for their learning
  • structured approaches to literacy

There is no panacea within learning and teaching, schools focus on what they think will work. They had:

Tactics: obvious things they needed to do to improve pupil performance like enter more students for more exams, better monitoring of student’s performance etc

Strategy: This was characteristic of ‘rapidly improving’ schools. “While attempting to develop whole school policies, they focussed more systematically on particular areas of weakness, encouraging and working with certain departments to help them get ‘back on track’; sometimes they would set them specific ‘targets’. At the same time they were reviewing the various approaches which might help to raise achievement levels across the institution. Their agendas had also begun to include some of the links between classroom practise and pupils’ learning.”

Capacity building: This was a characteristic only of the very fastest improving schools. It is continuous school improvement by institutionalizing their capacity to improve. For example working towards the notion of the ‘learning organization’. Learning quality was their institutional focus, and they had set themselves clear objectives about how to improve learning. They had formulated strategies to help colleagues to evaluate and learn from their own and other teachers’ classroom experiences. They took advice on how to improve learning. They created staff development opportunities focussed on learning. It’s about building the capacity of staff and departments to improve themselves.

Focus on learning and teaching. (This is the main message)

Improving learning and teaching is not easy, it’s a leading edge problem. All the rapidly improving schools focussed on learning and teaching. Strategies mentioned are not fully evaluated but include:

  • observation and feedback from line managers
  • Mutual observation
  • Buddying and mentoring,
  • Using expert teachers as role models, advisors etc
  • Staff development and advisory teachers
  • Emphasising that teaching matters

Talking about teaching and interest in improvement

“If there is a common theme running across the schools which were improving more rapidly, it was that they had found ways of facilitating more discussion among colleagues about classroom issues than hitherto. Such changes were subtle and influential.”

The last sentence in the book is:

“But what the more ‘rapidly improving’ schools had, by one means or another, fumbled their ways towards was probably the most important resource of all – the unlocking of teachers’ interest in changing their performance.”

Effective Schools and Effective Teachers: An International Perspective Bert Creemers

Creemer is a highly respected academic focussing on factors which affect the performance of educational institutions. He has an international reputation in this field and the book focuses on the factors that affect educational effectiveness. This handout is a very brief summary.

Classrooms

Classroom effectiveness factors (Creemers 1994) (International research in schools)

The factors which affect classroom effectiveness are:

Quality of Instruction

  • Explicitness and ordering of goals and contents
  • Structure and clarity of content
  • Advance organisers
  • Evaluation, feedback and corrective instruction
  • Mastery learning

Grouping procedures

  • Ability grouping
  • Cooperative learning (dependent on differentiated material, evaluation, feedback and corrective instruction)

Teaching Behaviour

  • Classroom management
  • Homework
  • Clear goal setting (restricted set of goals, emphasis on basic skills, emphasis on cognitive learning and transfer)
  • Structuring the content (ordering of goals and content, advance organisers, prior knowledge)
  • Clarity of presentation
  • Questioning
  • Immediate exercises
  • Evaluation, feedback and corrective instruction

Time for learning

Opportunity to learn

(The latter two are self explanatory.)

Schools

Only about 10 to 18% of the total variance of school performance is due to the school and classroom, the rest is due to intelligence, social and socio-economic factors, environmental factors, ethnicity, and other issues beyond the school’s control. In some countries such as Taiwan and the Netherlands the school influence drops to as little as 1%! Presumably this is due to a high degree of uniformity in the effectiveness of the schools in these countries. In the USA it is thought to be about 12%.

‘Assertive Leadership’ in the USA is positively associated with student achievement. You will find material on this on the internet.

Across all effective schools independent of country or Social or Economic factors, there exist the following characteristics:

  • A strong commitment to academic goals
  • A controlled environment exhibiting cohesion, consistency, constancy and stability
  • A strongly proactive kind of schooling where the effective school does not really appear to do anything special in a reactive sense because it has already generated effectiveness in its day –to-day functioning
  • Effective management of time with high time on task, and with the transitions between lessons and between lessons and break-times being well organised.
  • Good teacher/teacher relationships, and high level of curriculum knowledge.
  • Highly interactive classroom teaching in which there is a balance of control and autonomy for pupils

Educational Leadership and Student Achievement: The Elusive Search for an Association

Bob Witziers

University of Twente

Roel J. Bosker

University of Groningen

Meta L. Krüger

University of Amsterdam

This study revisits the existing scholarly debate on the possible impact of the principal's leadership on student achievement. Both `direct effect' and `indirect effect' models are discussed. A quantitative meta-analysis examines to what extent principals directly affect student outcomes. The small positive effects found in this meta-analysis confirm earlier research findings on the limitations of the direct effects approach to linking leadership with student achievement. Finally, lines of future research inquiry are discussed.