E-Mails S-100 through S-149
S-100. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding reported Soviet "plasma stealth" technology
S-101. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a Lens Construction Proposal to industry
S-102. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding web sources on quantum "fiber bundles"
S-103. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding potentially GOOD NEWS concerning funding
S-104. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Jack Saratti's refusing to challenge Einstein on other topics
S-105. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding ideas for improving the UNITEL newsletter
S-106. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding geometric "cones" with monopole interactions
S-107. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding accidental divulging of confidential information
S-108. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's ranking in the Aerospace Top-100
S-109. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a quantum strings rule
S-110. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding uses of supercomputers
S-111. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding uses of compact power-plants
S-112. from Ken Myers regarding information on ORMES room-temperature superconductors
S-114. from Bob King regarding the Great Pyramid & strange happenings in Antarctica
S-115. from Bob King regarding ORMES
S-116. from Bob King regarding an article about the Eldridge motor generators and stuff on the Pyramid mysteries
S-117. from Bob King regarding useful references on Pyramid-related issues
S-118. from Ken Myers regarding his comments on an ORMEs document
S-119. from Bob King on finding related web-sites
S-120. from Dr. Arkadiusz Jadczyk on his opinion of a site that proposes an additional universal "repulsive" force
S-121. from Dr. Arkadiusz Jadczyk on saying I shouldn't have e-mailed Jack Saratti with the same question
S-122. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti with his opinion on the site that suggested a universal "repulsive" force
S-123. from Dr. Arkadiusz Jadczyk regarding Tom Bearden
S-124. from Matt ("Madtz" at 'The Black Vault') regarding Dr. Sarfatti's response to me
S-125. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding UNITEL's physics expert Mike Miller
S-126. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding Black Hole physics
S-127. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding selling more stock and proposed book sales
S-128. from Jack Sarfatti regarding personal religious beliefs and quantum theory & human consciousness
S-129. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding adapting the UNITEL prototype for mass transit
S-130. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL / forward a message from Joe Firmage and MotionSciences.org
S-131. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the personal trials encountered when you're out-of-money
S-132. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an Israeli "pseudo- quantum computer"
S-133. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding past communications with experts in various fields
S-134. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more info about the Israeli "QC" project
S-135. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the search for the Higgs particle
S-136. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a camping encounter with a "Big Foot" type creature
S-137. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding physics and meta-physics
S-138. from Bryan Willoughby regarding UNITEL and TAP-TEN
S-139. from Tom Mahood requesting to receive no more e-mails from me
S-140. from Ken Myers regarding more references to ORMEs and ORMUS substances
S-141. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contacting members of the Senate and Congress
S-142. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding preparing for questions by funding committees
S-143. from Bryan Willoughby regarding his personal goals and how they relate to UNITEL
S-144. from Bryan Willoughby regarding funding research into advanced physics projects
S-145. from Larry Maurer regarding list of Senators & Congressmen contacted
S-146. from Bob King regarding "lost science"
S-147. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a recent response from Jack Sarfatti
S-148. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an upcoming T.A.P.-T.E.N. conference in Las Vegas
S-149. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding recruiting Dr. Fred Wolf as a UNITEL consultant
S-100. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding reported Soviet "plasma stealth" technology
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Re: plasma "stealth"
Date : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:17:23 -0800
At 02:29 PM 11/27/01 -0500, you wrote:
> I went to that fighter-board to dig up some past articles. But they are gone now. The moderators appear to only keep 3-month's worth of posts (or 20 "pages", whichever is greater). So all I could find was:
> Plasma Stealth =>
>
> New SOVIET SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS
> (a) =>
>
> (b) =>
>
> (c) =>
>
> -- Mark
Mark:
Not proven yet?! I wonder what made those vehicles (that we designed our craft after with an exterior charge) that flew over the skies of Eugene night after night for 2 weeks running, radar-invisible?
Of course, we need to construct a working prototype. And that is all we are asking. I feel that we have way far more than enough information to reduce the risk enough to construct our prototype. That is without even breathing the word "sighting". I will personally bet my life on the fact that our ships will be radar-invisible!
Larry Maurer
S-101. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a Lens Construction Proposal to industry
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Fwd: RE: UNITEL, Inc.- Lens Construction Proposal
Date : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:14:06 -0800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Maurer [mailto:
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:59 PM
> To:
> Subject: UNITEL, Inc.- Lens Construction Proposal
> Dear Mitch:
> We are wondering if you had any success with obtaining a quote for the construction of our crystallite lens. Our investor's are ready to discuss any agreement conditions, etc. so that we may get started as soon as possible. We are also working with Applied Sciences, Rolls Royce Deutschland and UIC MP Labs on similar projects. It is possible that if your firm could construct our crystallite lens, then perhaps UIC MP Labs could perform the final step of growing the surface layer via MBE vaporization to ensure emission of monochromaticity or lased light from the RF-activated lens. The size and thickness are, of course, variable so that we may start out with a smaller prototype for our initial device for testing purposes. We just need to determine the cost of producing our lens so that we can present a feasible project to be funded by our investors. I hope to hear from you at your earliest convenience. Thank you,
> Sincerely,
> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
> & Director, Engineering
> UNITEL, Inc.
> (503) 232-2740
>
> At 04:29 PM 11/27/01 -0800, you wrote:
> Dear Larry,
> I spoke with a number of our chemists and engineers as well as our management about this. As I mentioned on the phone, we are very focused on biological applications of quantum dots and do not have any products on the market yet. It would be too far outside of our current focus to bid on this project while we are working hard to get our first products out the door in Biology.
> Let me know if you have any questions.
> Best Regards,
> Mitch Gaver
> Marketing Manager
> Quantum Dot Corporation
> 26118 Research Road
> Hayward, CA 94545
> 510-887-8775 x4141 (phone)
> 510-783-9729 (FAX)
>
> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:04:22 -0800
> To:
> From: Larry Maurer <>
> Subject: RE: UNITEL, Inc.- Lens Construction Proposal
>Dear Mitch:
> Thanks for responding to our request for a bid on constructing the crystallite version of our patented laser lens. I understand that our proposal is a bit "outside the box" and not in line with your firm's bio projects and that it is hard to get in focus on something other than what you have been working so hard at. I do have some questions that perhaps you can help me with as we want to find somebody or organization that can assist us in constructing our II-VI compound crystallite lens. Perhaps someone there at Quantum Dot Corp. can suggest where we can find a firm that can provide us with the information to construct our lens in a consulting capacity.
> We are prepared to pay for this consulting service who would be working with our lab workers at UIC Microphysics Labs, Chicago, IL or Applied Sciences, Inc., Cedarville, OH as I may have previously mentioned. I also realize, Mitch, that it might take time to familiarize your fellow research associates there at Quantum Dot Corp. if they are willing to take the time to evaluate what we are proposing. Our lens and related technology represents literally $billions of potential profit to your firm. So I sincerely hope that your firm does evaluate our proposal in depth before they decide to not want to be involved in producing our crystallite lens. I hope that we can find a firm that is equally capable of constructing our lens.
It took us several years to find UIC Microphysics Labs with the assistance from EPI, the MBE equipment manufacturers. There were few MBE labs set up to run II-VI compounds and dopants required for our patented superlattice lens. I hope we don't have the same problem of finding another lab capable of constructing our lens or at least consult UIC or Applied Sciences in our attempts to construct the lens there. I know that the Alivisatos Group research group at UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory are capable of constructing our lens. Do you or somebody else at Quantum Dot Corp. know who we could contact there?
> We appreciate your efforts to assistance us, Mitch. We are currently negotiating for major funding and we hope we can include a laboratory capable of constructing our lens. Good luck with your bio projects, Mitch. Hopefully we can resolve our quest here in the near future. Please let me know if you can provide us with any information concerning our request. Thank you,
> Sincerely,
> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
> & Director, Engineering
> UNITEL, Inc.
> (503) 232-2740
>
> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:07:22 -0800
> To: "B.G."@Rolls-Royce.com
> From: Larry Maurer <>
> Subject: Fwd: RE: UNITEL, Inc.- Lens Construction Proposal
"B.G.":
> FYI-- We are on the lookout for a lab that would be capable of producing our lens made of the II-VI compound/glass crystallite with cadmium sulfide effects.
> Larry
S-102. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding web sources on quantum "fiber bundles"
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Re: fiber bundles
Date : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:30:55 -0800
At 11:11 AM 11/27/01 -0500, you wrote:
> In the interim before I make it up to our main public library, I found a web document which referenced that B & P Scientific American article at =>
> .
> Also doing a "Google" search on the Internet produced :
> (1) Fractal Strings Fiber Bundles Fractal Gauge Invariant Solitons ...
> =>
> (2) RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY,FIBER BUNDLES,KALUZA-KLEIN THEORIES AND ALL THAT.....
> =>
(3) Reduction in principal fiber bundles: covariant Euler-Poincaré equations
> =>
> (4) FAILURE OF HIERARCHICAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF FIBER BUNDLES. II, USSR Academy of Sciences =>
> (5) [time 1085] John Baez on Fibre Bundles... =>
> (6) Re: fibre bundles - what are they and why are they important =>
> =>
> (7) Dr. Jack & ISSO =>
> (8) Natural operations in differential geometry by Ivan Kolar, Jan Slovak and Peter W. Michor
> =>
> (9) Guide to math needed to study physics =>
> (10) Steenrod's book on fiber bundles is a good reference and contains explicit calculations in low dimension
> =>
> (11) Reduction of the Hermitian-Einstein Equation on Kahlerian Fiber Bundles
> =>
> (12) Steenrod also developed the theory of fiber bundles, and introduced the "Steenrod algebra" of cohomology operations
> =>
> (13) Is there a general relation between fiber bundles regarded as manifolds and >compactified dimensions?
> =>
> (14) Topology I and II =>
> (15) Homotopy, Covering Spaces, Manifolds. De Rham theory, Fiber Bundles. Integration of forms on Manifolds: Stoke's Theorem
> =>
> (16) Vector Bundles and Introduction to Gauge Theory =>
> (17) homotopy groups; 66. Fibrations the homotopy lifting property; 67. Fiber bundles; 68. Path fibrations and loopspaces; 69. Postnikov towers; 70. Obstruction ...
> =>
> (18) [I don't know what this is: building suits-of-armor with fiber bundles that become rigid on impact
> => ]
> (19) 55R05 Fiber spaces; 55R10 Fiber bundles; 55R12 Transfer; 55R15 Classification; 55R20 Spectral sequences and homology of fiber spaces =>
> (20) A ``Multi-Argus'' Facility at CFHT... The positionner necessary to place the fiber bundles already exists and is called FIFI. =>
> (21) Algebraic theory of linear differential operators and introduction to geometry of jet spaces / A program of the course at the 1st Italian Diffiety School and at the 1st Russian Diffiety School
> =>
> (22) Uni- versidad de Sonora. Hamiltonian structures for dynamical systems on fiber bundles.
> =>
> (23) Hamiltonian structures for dynamical systems on fiber bundles
> =>
> (24) CERN: Robert's Home Page - ... Livre HyperTexte - HyperText Book: ESPACES FIBRES ET CONNEXIONS. FIBER BUNDLES AND CONNECTIONS. Table ... =>
> (25) ... of main plasma z= + 450mm z= ± 0mm z= - 450mm R= 750mm R= 900mm SNU SND fiber bundles camera lens R= 750 R= 900 TCV vessel (top view) *three 20Hz Nd:YAG
> =>
> (26) …and last, your old buddy Dr. "Ark" from the eGroups anti-grav clubs :
> =>
> Most of the search revealed OPTICAL "fiber bundles" and muscular (nerve) "fiber bundles".
> -- Mark
Hello Mark!
Way to go! What a veritable goldmine of information!! I forwarded it to Mike. It will take a while but I will check out all the URLs listed below. Will be great to gather all the latest info to do an informative film on our propulsion system to show the public.
Sincerely,
Larry Maurer
S-103. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding potentially GOOD NEWS concerning funding
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Fwd: Re: Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITEL
Date : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:04:59 -0800
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry Maurer" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:24 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITEL
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:22:32 -0800
> To: Paul Kirsh
> From: Larry Maurer <>
> Subject: Fwd: Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITEL
> Paul:
> Perhaps you could post a comment with your wonderful insight? We do have a goldmine of info here, Paul!
> Best,
> Larry
> From: "BluEyes" <>
> To: "Larry Maurer" <>
> Cc: "BluEyes" <>
> Subject: Re: Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITEL
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:34:15 -0800
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
> X-RCPT-TO: <>
> Larry and Team:
> Careful now. Yes, it does look like eyes are upon us~
> Thank you for your diligent work on the agreements for Doug B and Bryan W. All looks good from this end. Of course, we're in the makings of bringing everything that people can possibly imagine into Reality here and now. The shock-factor is something to ponder.
> Best regards,
Bryan Willoughby
>.UNITEL Team Corporate Council
> Founder - Affirm Technologies, Inc.
> Shared Technology Partners
>
S-104. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Jack Saratti's refusing to challenge Einstein on other topics
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Re: Fwd: Re: Motion Sciences Proposal
Date : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:20:49 -0800
Mark:
I'm still reeling from Sarfatti's statement about Einstein being the know-all, last and final word in physics! What about Minkowsky? Didn't he pick up where Uncle Albert left off (sort of speaking)? I think Einstein was right. But where does Minkowski space, Aharonov-Bohm, and others fit in? No room at the top? Man, that Jack is narrow-minded! A true flatlander in a 3-D holo-world!
Guess where Hal is raising money for ZPE experiments and where it will be applied? SSSssshhhhhh … Loose lips sink ships.
I am still pissed about Jack-ass writing Barrett and badmouthing us. Terence quietly told me to just not even deal with Jack. My, what an evil weird web he spins! Is he running for office? Boy oh boy! Lord, please let us be funded before shithead gets a leg up on the public!
Regards,
Larry Maurer
At 02:43 PM 11/27/01 -0500, you forwarded:
> From: Jack Sarfatti <>
> To: "Rees, Roderick A" <>
> Subject: Re: Motion Sciences Proposal
> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:30:28 -0800
>[Image]
>"Rees, Roderick A" wrote:
> You said: "Hal Puthoff, my old fellow student Daryl Leiter, Yilmaz, Schatzer, Eric Davis in and
, et-al must FIRST come up with a clear explanation of what the physical foundations of their new theory really are. "
> I could not agree more. I have been saying this for years about the approach of a great many players (John Baez, and so on) of mathematical fictions and games like n-dimensional strings, multiple universes, dark matterm and what not.
> Yes, that is so also. Baez is guilty of misrepresenting pure mathematics as theoretical physics. However, Baez's math is consistent and correct. Not so with Hal Puthoff's and Bernie Haisch's current formulation of the SED, ZPE, PV approach to physics at the core of current Dot.Com type vaporware efforts to raise money for zero point energy and UFO propulsion research.
> BTW dark matter is a fact for which I have an explanation
> However, I have to remark that this is also what STR and GTR are. In order > to get something tractable, Einstein simplified by neglecting almost everything real.
> No, you are acting like a crackpot. You can say that about all of theoretical physics.
> It's a perfectly honest and honorable thing to do as long as we remember that "curved space-time" and such like are just simplified descriptions created for the sake of mathematical tractability. Gravity is not just geometry but rather a geometrical form can be made to describe the geometrical effects of gravity - but this is at best a "covering theory". Remember too the "cosmological constant" - a barefaced frig factor revealing Einstein's philosophical attitude to his own theory. Again perfectly honorable as a device to let us step onward, provided we keep in mind that sooner or later it is going to have to be justified by physical explanation.
> Sorry, but you are very much like my well-meaning but misguided naive friend Joe Firmage. You show that a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing. The path to Hell is paved with good intentions.
>-- "What I cannot create, I do not understand." Richard Feynman
S-105. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding ideas for improving the UNITEL newsletter
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Re: the UNITEL newsletter
Date : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:44:29 -0800
At 07:57 AM 11/27/01 -0500, you wrote:
> Good morning, Mr. Maurer --
>The newsletter looked good. It portrayed UNITEL as a "rising star" rather than a "setting sun". I gather that you have 2 "prototypes" -- the superlattice laser lens and the smart skin (which was of interest to Rolls Royce). The revised "initial effort" would appear to be to market the smart skin and use those funds to build HOLO-1 and then down-the-line.