D42 Prepare and present evidence on disputes

D42.2 Present evidence to legally constituted adjudicating bodies

Performance Criteria - this involves being able to...
(a)make presentations relating to the dispute which are complete, accurate, clear, concise and objective, using a pace, style and manner which are appropriate to the level of formality of the hearing and maintain the goodwill and trust of all the people involved
(b)present the case clearly and concisely, identify the relevant points of the supporting argument and avoid any additional information and opinions which are not directly relevant to the case
(c)respond to presentations and asking questions which are designed to present and interpret the evidence in the best interests of the case
(d)respond to questions on presentations in a way which presents and interprets the evidence in the best interests of the case
(e)present final summaries which identify the relevant points of the supporting argument and the major weaknesses in the opposing submission
(f)assess the results following a formal case presentation, and identify key issues which are likely to be relevant in any further action
(g)recommend appropriate further action to settle the dispute where cases are unsuccessful / The Range...
[1]Presentations:
• written representations;
• hearings;
• inquiries;
• legal process
[2]Dispute - type:
• land;
• property;
• construction;
• contracts;
• agreements;
• third party claims
[3]Further action:
• appeals;
• legal action;
• evaluation and review

D42 Prepare and present evidence on disputes

D42.2 Present evidence to legally constituted adjudicating bodies

The Evidence - performance and process
Product Evidence:
(1)Record(s) of case presentation(s) (a,b) [1,2]
(2)Record(s) of responses and final summaries (c,d) [1,2]
(2)Assessment(s) of case results and recommendation(s) for further action (e,f) [3]
Process Evidence:
(1) Presentation(s) (a,b,c,d) [1] / The Evidence - knowledge and understanding
(1)How do you make presentations relating to the dispute? (application) (a) [1,2]
(2)How do you present the case and avoid presenting any additional information and opinions which are not directly relevant to the case? (application) (b) [1,2]
(3)How do you present final summaries which identify the supporting argument and weaknesses in the opposing argument? (application) (d) [1,2]
(4)How and why do you identify the relevant points of the supporting argument? (synthesis) (b) [1,2]
(5)How do you respond to presentations and ask questions which are designed to present and interpret the evidence in the best interests of the case? (application) (c) [2]
(6)How do your respond to questions on presentations?
(7)What do you identify as key issues which are likely to be relevant in any further action? (understanding) (e) [2,3]
(8)How and why do you assess the results following a formal case presentation? (analysis) (e) [2,3]
(9)How and why do you recommend appropriate further action to settle the dispute where cases are unsuccessful? (synthesis) (f) [2,3]