Notes for Chapter 1, Cox

Page 4

7 principal areas of study in EC

3 themes:

  1. Human communication is a form of symbolic action;
  1. Our beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors relating to nature and environmental problems are mediated or influenced by communication; and
  1. The public sphere (or spheres) emerges as a discursive space for communication about the environment.

Diverse voices – see list

Page 5

“rhetoric of campaigns” (to save Yosemite Valley) – cf. Wild by Law (PBS video)

Pages 7 – 11

Environmental rhetoric and discourse

Media and environmental journalism

Public participation in environmental decision making

Advocacy campaigns

Environmental collaboration and conflict resolution

Stakeholders / Collaboration

Risk communication

3 areas (page 10)

Representations of nature in popular culture and green marketing

Examples? Medicine Man (1992) // chapter 10 in Cox

Pages 11 – 13

A Definition of Environmental Communication

Kenneth Burke – symbolic action

Shannon-Weaver model of communication

Language and symbols “actively shape our understanding, create meaning, and orient us to a wider world.” (p12)

“Burke went so far as to claim that ‘much that we take as observations about “reality” may be but the spinning out of possibilities implicit in our particular choice of terms.” (12)

Cox’s definition: (p12)

the pragmatic and constitutive vehicle for our understanding of the environment as well as our relationships to the natural world; it is the symbolic medium that we use in constructing environmental problems and negotiating society’s different responses to them.”

Pragmatic? Constitutive?

Three core principles (p13)

“. . . as we engage others, our communication mediates, or shapes, our own and others’ perceptions, beliefs, and behavior toward the environment.” (13)

Page 15

“Human communication therefore is symbolic action because we draw upon language and other symbols to construct a framework for understanding and valuing and to bring the wider world to others’ attention.”

Page 16

Nature? Environment? – Just ‘ideas’? J

Pages 16-17

Aldo Leopold? Who was he? If you don’t know, FIND OUT.

Page 18

Public Sphere – Habermas

“. . . the realm of influence that is created when individuals engage others in communication – through conversation, argument, debate, or questioning – about subjects of shared concern or topics that affect a wider community.” (p18)

Thomas Goodnight – personal vs. technical spheres // intersection (collision?) of these 3 spheres?

Page 19

·  Public sphere not an official ‘space’

o  What was the Greek ‘agora’? (p19)

·  Public sphere not monolithic nor uniform

·  Public sphere a “space for popular or democratic communication meant as a counter”? Discuss

Pages 20 – 28

6 major ‘voices’ or points of view

Citizens and community groups

Environmental groups

Scientists and scientific discourse

Corporations and business lobbyists

Anti-environmentalist groups

Media and environmental journalism