Corticosteroids – An Overview

12/8/10

EB Notes

OH

PHYSIOLOGY

- hormones

- two types: glucocorticoids (cortisol) and mineralocorticoids (aldosterone)

- both cholersterol based

Glucocorticoids

- cortisol

- produced from zona fasiculata in adrenal cortex

- produced in response to stress: hypoglycaemia, fear, pain, exercise, infection

- also there is circadian variation in cortisol release

- controlled via hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

- stress -> release of CRH from hypothalamus -> release of ACTH from anterior pituitary -> cortisol released from adrenal cortex

- normal secretion of cortisol = 15-30mg/day -> 5-7mg of prednisone or 20-30mg of hydrocortisone

CNS – behavioural changes

METABOLIC – increased plasma glucose (decreased gluconeogenesis, insulin antagonism, increased in protein catabolism, increased FFA oxidation), potentiate action of GH, catecholamines, glucagons, T3/T4

GASTROINTESTINAL – increased acid and pepsin secretion, decreased prostaglandin synthesis, increased rate of peptic ulceration.

HAEMATOLOGICAL – increased RBC, PLTs, neutrophils, decreased lymphocytes and eosinophils

CARDIOVASCULAR – increased reactivity of peripheral blood vessels to catecholamines

MUSCULO-SKELETAL – increased bone break down -> OP, muscle wasting

Mineralocorticoids

- aldosterone

- produced in the zonaglomerulosa

- daily output: 100-150mcg/day

- secreted in response to; Na+ deficiency -> elevated angiotensin II, elevated plasma K+

RENAL –

1. acts on collecting ducts -> increases production of the Na+/K+ ATPase in the basement membrane, increased Na+ and K+ channels in the apical membrane -> increase in Na+ reabsorption and K+ secretion -> ECF volume expansion.

2. increases excretion of H+ and NH4+

3. increases Cl- reabsorption

OTHER – increased Na+ reabsorption in sweat, salivary and distal colon glands.

ADRENAL INSUFFICIENCY (AI)

- types: primary, secondary and tertiary + acute/chronic

Primary = Addison’s

- destruction of > 90% of adrenal glands

- rare

- causes: autoimmune destruction, haemorrhage, tumour (breast and melanoma), infection (Tb, HIV, meningococcaemia, purpura fulminans) or inflammatory process

- loss of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid activity

Secondary

- insufficient production of ACTH

- rare

- mineralocorticoid function intact

- causes: destruction or dysfunction of the pituitary

Tertiary/Iatrogenic/Relative

- suppression of HPA axis over time

- most common

- cause: administration of exogenous glucortiocoids

- mechanism: chronic ACTH suppression -> adrenal atrophy

CONSEQUENCES

Crisis

- concurrent illness, surgery, failure to take medications

- GI: abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhoea

- CVS: dehydration, hypotension, refractory shock, poor response to inotropes/pressors

- fever

- confusion

Chronic

- GENERAL: weight loss, arthalgia, myalgia

- CNS: fatigue, anorexia, mood change

- CVS: postural hypotension, syncope, salt craving

- SKIN: pigmentation, vitiligo

- ELECTROLYTES: hypoglycaemia, hyponatraemia, hyperkalaemia, increased urea

MANAGEMENT

Diagnosis

- plasma cortisol level < 80mmol/L

- short synacthen test: 250mcg (normal response = cortisol > 525mmol/L)

Treatment

- fluid resuscitation

- reversal of electrolyte abnormalities

- high dose hydrocortisone (100mg IV Q6 hrly)
PERIOPERATIVE STEROID THERAPY

- glucocorticoids introduced into clinical practice in 1949

- soon after there were two deaths from withheld steroids in perioperative period -> “stress doses” in the perioperative period.

- for many years we overcooked these patients with large doses of steroids

- new guidelines:

- those on 5mg or less of prednisone OD -> don’t need supplementation

- minor operation -> normal dose + 25mg hydrocortisone in OT

- moderate operation -> normal dose + 25mg hydrocortisone Q6hourly for 24 hours

- high risk operation -> normal dose + 25mg hydrocortisone Q6 hours for 48-72 hours

Prednisone 1mg =

Hydrocortisone 4mg =

Dexamethasone 0.15mg =

Triamcinolone 0.8mg =

Methylprednisolone 0.8mg =

Betamethasone 0.15mg =

SEVERE SEPSIS + SEPTIC SHOCK

- basis: that patients with severe sepsis has relative adrenal insufficiency

- difficult to diagnose because of the questionable validity of using plasma cortisol and the synacthen test.

- benefit shown in meningitis

- 1970’s + 1980’s – massive doses of steroid (30mg/kg) -> no survival benefit + increase in secondary infections

AnnaneD,SbilleV,CharpentierC,et al:“Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock”.JAMA2002;288:862-871

- RCT in refractory septic shock

- low dose hydrocortisone + fludrocortisone VS placebo

- n = 300

-> non-responders to cosyntrophin test + given steroid -> significant decrease in mortality (P = 0.02)

-> duration of vasopressor therapy shorter

- problems: bad trial design, use of etomidate

SprungCL,AnnaneD,KehD,et al:“CORTICUS Study Group: Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock.”N Engl J Med2008;358:111-124.

- 2008 – CORTICUS - ANZICS

- MRCT

- low dose hydrocortisone vs placebo

-> no survival benefit

-> shock reversed more quickly

-> more superinfections, hyperglycaemia, hypernatraema

- weakness: patients were less sick than Annane’s study and was underpowered

The COIITSS Study Investigators (2010) “Corticosteroid Treatment and Intensive Insulin Therapy for Septic Shock in Adults: A Randomized Control Trial” JAMA 303 (4):341-348

- septic shock: corticosteroids VS insulin therapy VS both improved outcomes +/- mineralocorticoid

- MRCT

- inclusion criteria: adult, septic shock, MODS, hydrocortisone

- exclusion criteria: no consent, moribund, pregnant, co-enrolement

- primary end points = hospital mortality and 90 day mortality

- secondary end points = 28, 90 and 180 day mortality, ventilator free days, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, hypoglycaemia, infectious complications, weakness

- n = 509

- ITT analysis

Intensive Insulin Group

-> double hypoglycaemic rate

-> no increase in mortality

-> no difference in secondary outcomes

-> no difference in synth-ACTH-en responders

-> no difference in fludrocortisone patients

Fludrocoritisone Results

-> no increase in mortality

-> no difference in inotropes

-> excess superinfection rate -> don’t use in septic shock

Criticisms

- did not reach required recruitment levels

- not blinded

- tested multiple variables

SUMMARY

- steroids are not good in low risk patients with sepsis

- most people with refractory shock receive low dose steroids

- those in the middle – the literature is not clear

ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME (ARDS)

- mortality = 40-60%

- pathophysiology: excessive inflammation and vascular permeability with extravasation of plasma and leukocyte infiltration (fibroproliferative stage) -> steroids thought to reduce the extent of theses processes

Meduri study (JAMA)

- cross over trial

-> reduction in lung injury score

-> improved mortality

Meduri study

-> reduction in length of ICU stay

-> reduction in duration of IPPV

SteinbergKP,HudsonLD,GoodmanRB,et al:National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network: “Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome.”N Engl J Med2006;354:1671-1684.

- n = 180

- MRCT

- methylprednisolone for 14 days with taper VS placebo

-> reduced shock symptoms

-> reduced ventilator days

-> improved pulmonary compliance

-> increased mortality in patient who had had steroids > 14 days

-> increased neuromuscular weakness

-> NO improvement in survival

- outcomes in trials have varied -> two recent systematic reviews have reached opposite conclusions!

Agarwal R, Nath A, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D. “Do glucocorticoids decrease mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome? A meta- analysis.”Respirology 2007;12:585-90.

-> current evidence does not support the efficacy of steroids in ARDS

Meduri G, Marik P, Chrousos G, Pastores S, Arlt W, Beishuizen A, et al. Steroid treatment in ARDS: a critical appraisal of the ARDS network trial and the recent literature.Intensive Care Med 2007

-> prolonged glucocorticoid treatment substantially and significantly improves meaningful patient-centered outcome variable and has a distinct survival benefit

What about steroids for ARDS prophylaxis? - increase in ARDS and subsequent mortality (weak trend)

SUMMARY

- exact place of steroids in ARDS is unknown

- further investigation required

MENINGITIS

van de BeekD,de GansJ,McIntyreP,et al:Corticosteroids for acute bacterial meningitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007;1

de GansJ,van de BeekD:European Dexamethasone in Adulthood Bacterial Meningitis Study Investigators: Dexamethasone in adults with bacterial meningitis.N Engl J Med2002;347:1549-1556

- systematic reviews

- dexamethasone with first antibiotics in community acquired bacterial meningitis

-> reduces mortality

-> reduces severe hearing loss

-> reduces neurological sequelae

TBI

RobertsI,YatesD,SandercockP,et al:CRASH trial collaborators: Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10,008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): Randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet2004;364:1321-1328.

EdwardsP,ArangoM,BalicaL,et al:CRASH trial collaborators: Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury-outcomes at 6 months.Lancet2005;365:1957-1959.

- 48 hours of IV steroids vs placebo

-> increased mortality within 14 days

-> increases mortality @ 6 months

-> increased risk of severe disability

ACUTE SPINAL CORD INJURY

BrackenMB,ShepardMJ,CollinsWF,et al:A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study.N Engl J Med1990;322:1405-1411.

- high dose methylprednisolone within 8 hours in injury

-> evidence supported use

MillerSM:Methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury: A tarnished standard.J Neurosurg Anesthesiol2008;20:140-142.

GeorgeER,ScholtenPJ,BuechlerCM:Failure of methylprednisolone to improve the outcome of spinal cord injury.Am Surg1995;61:659-663.

PointillartV,PetitjeanME,WiartL:Pharmacotherapy of spinal cord injury during the acute phase.Spinal Cord2000;38:71-76.

- criticisms of NASCIS: study design flawed, statistical analysis flawed, conflicting evidence

BrackenMB:Steroids for acute spinal cord injury.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2002.CD001046

-> supports use of methylprednisolone

TsutsumiS,UetaT,ShibaK,et al:Effects of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study of high-dose methylprednisolone therapy on acute cervical spinal cord injuryresults in spinal injuries center.Spine2006;31:2992-2996.

-> supports use of methylprednisolone

LeypoldBG,FlandersAE,SchwartzED,et al:The impact of methylprednisolone on lesion severity following spinal cord injury.Spine2007;32:373-378.

-> patients who had methylprednisolone had significantly less intramedullary haemorrhage than those who were no treated.

EckJC,NachtigallD,HumphreysSC,et al:Questionnaire survey of spine surgeons on the use of methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury.Spine2006;31:E250-253.

- n = 305 spine surgeons

-> 90% would initiate methylprednisolone especially within the 8 hour window

-> reasons given: institutional protocol, medicolegal reasons

-> only 24% used steroids because of a belief in improved outcomes!

Summary

- controversial issue

- methylprednisolone may have role in neurological protection in early spinal cord injury

- a well designed RCT’s is required

SUMMARY OF PROVEN ROLES FOR STEROIDS

Airway

- croup

- decreased post-extubation stridor in those at risk

Breathing

- anaphylaxis

- asthma

- COPD

- PJP pneumonia

Nervous

- bacterial meningitis

- myasthenic crises

- myxoedema coma

- decreases cerebral oedema associated with brain tumour

Endocrine

- Addison’s

- hypercalcaemia

- myxoedema coma

- hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal insufficiency

- previous steroid use

Other

- purpura fulminans

- fulminant vasculitis

- organ transplantation

- various malignancy (lymphoma)

- anti-emetic

- palliative care

ACCEPTED BUT CONTROVERSIAL USES OF STEROIDS

- severe sepsis with resistant shock

- spinal injury

- early ARDS

CONTRAINDICATIONS TO USE OF STEROIDS

- Cushings disease

- traumatic brain injury

- late ARDS (after 2 weeks)

Jeremy Fernando (2011)