Studies in population genetics

(modified from: Morgan, J.G., and M.E.B. Carter, Investigating Biology (4th edition), San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings, 2002.

Objectives:

1. To explain the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in terms of allelic and genotypic frequencies and relate these to the expression (p + q)2= p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1.

2. To describe the conditions necessary to maintain this equilibrium

3. To use the bead model to demonstrate conditions for evolution.

Background:

Charles Darwin proposed a mechanism for evolutionary change- natural selection, the differential survival and reproduction of individuals in a population. In On the Origin of Species (1859), Darwin described natural selection and provided abundant evidence in support of evolution, the change in populations over time. Evolution was accepted as a theory with great explanatory power supported by a substantial body of evidence. However, at the turn of the century, geneticists and naturalists disagreed about the role of natural selection and the importance of small variations in populations. How could these variations provide a selective advantage that would result in evolutionary change? It was not until evolution and genetics became incorporated into population genetics that natural selection became widely accepted.

A population is defined as a group of organisms of the same species that share a common gene pool, all the alleles at all gene loci of all individuals in the population. The population is considered the basic unit of evolution. Populations evolve, not individuals. How is this explained in terms of natural selection?

In 1908, English mathematician G.H. Hardy and German physician W. Weinberg independently developed models of population genetics that showed that the process of heredity itself did not affect the genetic structure of a population. The Hardy-Weinberg theorem states that the frequency of alleles in the population will remain the same regardless of the starting frequencies. The equilibrium genotypic frequencies will be established after one generation of random mating. This theorem applies only if:

1. The population is very large;

2. Matings are random;

3. There is no net change in the gene pool due to mutation;

4. There is no migration of individuals into or out of the population;

5. There is no selection; all genotypes are equal in reproductive success.

Basically, the Hardy-Weinberg theorem provides a baseline model in which gene frequencies do not change and evolution does not occur. By testing the fundamental hypothesis of the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, evolutionists have investigated the roles of mutation, migration, population size, nonrandom mating, and natural selection in effecting evolutionary change in natural populations. Although some populations maintain genetic equilibrium, the exceptions are intriguing.

Use of the Hardy-Weinberg theorem

The theorem provides a mathematical formula for calculating the frequencies of alleles and genotypes in populations. If we begin with a population with two alleles at a single gene locus- a dominant allele, A, and a recessive allele, a- then the frequency of the dominant allele is p, and the frequency of the recessive allele is q. Therefore, p + q =1. If the frequency of one allele, p, is known, then the frequency of the other allele, q, can be determined by using the formula q = 1- p.

During sexual reproduction, the frequency of each type of gametes produced is equal to the frequency of the alleles in the population. If the gametes combine at random, then the probability of AA in the next generation is p2, and the probability of aa is q2. The heterozygote can be obtained two ways, with either parent providing the dominant allele, so the probability is 2pq. These genotypic frequencies can be obtained by multiplying p+q by p+q. This can also be expressed as p2 + 2pq + q2 =1.

To summarize:

p2 = frequency of AA

2pq = frequency of Aa

q2 = frequency of aa

Example:

If alternative alleles of a gene, A and a, occur at equal frequencies, p and q, then during sexual reproduction, half (0.5) of all gametes will carry A and half will carry a.

What is the frequency of p? ______What is the frequency of q? ______

Recall the formula for calculating the genotypic frequencies with respect to p and q.

What is the predicted frequency of AA? ______of Aa? ______of aa? ______

Do the allelic frequencies change? ______

In actual populations the frequencies of the alleles are NOT usually equal. Recessive traits are often rare. For example, 4% of the populations might be albino, which is a recessive trait. The frequency of the albino genotype (homozygous recessive, or q2) is 0.04. What is the frequency of the albino ALLELE?

What is the frequency of the allele for normal pigmentation? ______

Under Hardy-Weinberg conditions, we have now established the equilibrium frequencies of the p and q alleles. Thus, in each succeeding generation, what is the frequency of the following genotypes:

AA? ______Aa? ______aa? ______

This equilibrium will continue indefinitely if the conditions of the Hardy-Weinberg theory are met. Although this generally does not occur in nature, this equilibrium provides a valuable model from which we can predict genetic changes in populations as a result of natural selection or other factors. This allows a quantitative approach to the study of evolution at the population level.

PART I. Testing the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using a bead model

Materials

Bag containing 100 beads of two colors

Introduction

Work in pairs. You will simulate a population using a collection of colored beads, which represents the gene pool of a population. Each bead should be regarded as a single gamete, and the two colors represent the two alleles of a single gene. Each bag will contain 100 beads, in preset proportions. Record in the space below the colors of the beads and the initial frequencies for your gene pool.

A= ______color ______allelic frequency

a= ______color ______allelic frequency

1. How many diploid individuals does this represent? ______

2. What colors of beads are seen in a homozygous dominant individual? ______

3. What colors of beads are seen in a homozygous recessive individual? ______

4. What would be seen in a heterozygous individual? ______

Hypothesis

State the Hardy-Weinberg theory in your own words.

Prediction:

Predict the genotypic frequencies of the population in future generations.

Procedure:

1. Without looking, remove two beads from the bag. These two beads represent one individual in the next generation. Record the diploid genotype (AA, Aa or aa) of the individual thus formed.

2. Return the beads to the bag and shake to mix the beads. By replacing the beads each time, the size of the gene pool remains constant and the probability of selecting any allele should remain equal to its frequency. This technique is called sampling with replacement.

3. Repeat steps 1 and 2, recording each result, until you have recorded genotypes for 50 individuals who will form the next generation of the population.

Results:

1. First, calculate the expected frequencies of frequencies of genotypes and alleles for the population. Use the original allelic frequencies for the population that was provided. Record the numbers in the spaces provided (the top set).

Parent populations New populations

Allelic frequency Genotypic number and frequency Allelic frequency

A a AA Aa aa A a

______

______

2. Next, calculate the observed frequencies, using the genotypes of your 50 individuals. Fill in the results in the second set of spaces provided.

Discussion

Compare your results with those of other teams. How variable are the results for other teams?

What would you expect to happen if you continued the simulation for 25 more generations?

Is this population evolving? Why or why not?


Simulation of Evolutionary Change Using the Bead Model

Under the conditions specified by the Hardy-Weinberg model, the genetic frequencies should not change, and evolution should not occur. In this exercise, we will modify the conditions and determine the effect of genetic frequencies on future generations. We will simulate the changes that occur when the Hardy-Weinberg conditions are not met.

You will simulate two of the experimental scenarios and, using the bead model, determine the changes in genetic frequencies over several generations. These include the migration of individuals between two populations, also called gene flow; the effect of small population size, called genetic drift; and examples of natural selection.

The experiments will be carried out with the procedures described below.

1.  Sampling with replacement

The gene pool size will be 100 beads. The frequency of each allele (i.e., the number of beads representing A and the number representing a, will be preset.) Each new generation will be formed by randomly choosing 50 diploid individuals formed by pairs of beads. After removing each pair of beads (and recording the genotype) Replace the pair, shake the bag of beads to mix, and THEN remove the next set (sampling with replacement).

2.  Reestablishing a population with new genetic frequencies

In some cases, the number of individuals will decrease as a result of the simulation. In those cases, return the population to 100 beads but with the new allelic frequencies. For example, if you form a population as previously described and eliminate all homozygous recessive individuals (aa) by selection, then the resulting frequencies would be:

Number of individuals: 14 AA, 24 Aa, 0 aa

Number of beads (alleles) 28 A + 24 A (=52); 24 a

Total number of alleles: 76

Frequency of A: 52/76 = 0.68

Frequency of a: 24/76 = 0.32

To reestablish a population of 100 alleles, add beads in the new proportions: 68 beads representing the A allele, and 32 representing the a allele.

Part 1: simulation of genetic drift

Introduction

Genetic drift is the change in allelic frequencies in a small population due to chance alone. Combinations of gametes may not be random, due to sampling error. If you toss a coin 500 times, you will probably get a 50:50 ratio of heads: tails. If you toss the coin only 10 times, the ratio may deviate substantially by chance alone. Genetic fixation, the loss of all but one possible allele at a gene locus in a population, is a common result of genetic drift in small natural populations. Genetic drift is a significant evolutionary force in situations known as the bottleneck effect and the founder effect.

Bottleneck Effect

The bottleneck effect occurs when a population undergoes a drastic reduction in size as a result of chance events, such as natural disasters. This is often simulated as beads passing through a bottleneck, which results in an unpredictable combination of beads that pass through. These beads (alleles) constitute the beginning of the next generation.

Procedure

1.  Establish a starting population of 50 individuals with a frequency of 0.5 for each allele (how many beads of each color?). Thus is generation 0.

2.  Without replacement, randomly select 5 individuals (how many pairs of alleles. Record the genotypes of these individuals. Determine the genotypic frequencies of AA, Aa and aa and determine the new allelic frequencies, p and q. Record these values in the table. (observed frequencies)

3.  Using the new observed frequencies, calculate the expected genotypic frequencies (p2, 2pq, q2) and record these values under generation 1, observed frequencies.

4.  Reestablish the population to 50 individuals using the new allelic frequencies. Repeat steps 2 and 3. Record the calculations and observed results for each generation.

5.  Keep repeating until one of the alleles becomes fixed in the population for at least two generations. (Be sure to establish each generation with the new frequencies.)

How many generations were simulated?

Graph the change in p and q over time. Did one allele go to fixation? If so, which one? How do your results compare with others?

Generation / AA
observed / Aa
Observed / aa
observed / A (p)
observed / a (q)
observed / p2 expected / 2pq expected / q2 expected
0 / 0.5 / 0.5 / 0.25 / 0.50 / 0.25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Analysis:

Do you see a consistent trend in allelic frequency and change? Why or why not?

If you were to repeat the experiment 100 times, starting with allelic frequencies of p=q=0.5, how frequently would you expect allele A to go to fixation? Allele q? What if the allelic frequencies were p=0.2 and q=0.8?

Other simulations- abbreviated instructions are given, since the procedures have already been described in detail. You will be assigned one of these, in addition to the bottleneck effect simulation. We will discuss your results as a group upon completion.

Founder effect

When a small group of individuals becomes separated from the larger parent population, the allelic frequencies in this small gene pool may be different from those of the original population by chance alone. This occurs when a group of migrants becomes established in a new area- such as the colonization of an island-

1.  Establish a population of 50 individuals with your choice of allelic frequencies. Record this information in the table provided. (generation 0)

2.  Without replacement, randomly select 5 individuals and record their genotypes and allelic frequencies. This is the founder population. Calculate the new allelic and genotypic frequencies for this population.