Culture, Tradition,Power and Sexuality:

The Difficulties in Understanding and Ending Female Circumcision

AalborgUniversity

Culture, Communication and Globalization

Master’s Thesis

Jennifer Watson

Culture, Tradition, Power and Sexuality:

The Difficulties in Understanding and Ending Female Circumcision

Supervisor: Mammo Muchie

Preface

The author of this project holds full rights and responsibility to the work. I acknowledge other scholar’s work through proper quotations and citations.

…………………………………………….

Jennifer Watson

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1

Problem Formulation……………………………………………………………...4

2. Methodology……………………………………………………………………….…..5

3. Theory……………………………………………………………………………….…6

3.1. Cultural Relativism…………………………………………………………...6

3.2. Power and Power Relationships……………………………………………..10

4. Female Circumcision……………………………………………………………...…13

4.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………….13

4.2. Consequences of Circumcision……………………………………………...16

4.3. Reasons for Performing Circumcision………………………………………18

4.3.1. Social Aspects…………………………………………………...... 18

4.3.2. Sexual Aspects…………………………………………………….19

5. Female Circumcision from those who practice and participate…………………..20

5.1. Nigeria……………………………………………………………………….20

5.2. Egypt………………………………………………………………………...21

5.3. Kenya………………………………………………………………………..26

5.4. Sudan……………………………………………………………………...…27

5.5. Sierra Leone…………………………………………………………………35

6. Movements against Female Circumcision………………………………………….39

6.1. National Laws and Regulations in Various African Countries……………...39

6.2. Historical Legal Movements against Female Circumcision………………...43

6.3. Response from International Organizations………………………………...45

6.4. Responses from Some African Countries…………………………………...49

7. Criticism of Anti-Female Circumcision Discussions………………………………57

8. Analysis……………………………………………………………………………….63

9. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………68

Bibliography

Abstract:

This project was written to look at the issue of female circumcision, also known as female genital mutilation, and why it has been difficult to stop. Using articles and interviews, the author looked at the causes and reasons behind the practice and why it continues despite so much opposition from various organizations and people.

After reading interviews conducted by other researchers as well as personal accounts from those who have been circumcised, it has been realized that circumcision is a far more complex issue than many will admit or discuss. Traditions that have been in place for hundreds of years have their hold on communities and affect how people identify themselves and others.

It is these traditions and the need to identify with a community that many times driveswomen to undergo circumcision. Gender relations can affect whether women are circumcised but men often have very little or no say in if it is done.

Stopping the practice of circumcision has been a long, difficult and largely unsuccessful process. Movements started as early as the 1920s by missionaries in Kenya and continue today involving international organizations such as the World Health Organization. Previous attempts to stop the practice have been met with nationalist resistance. Today’s efforts continue to be unsuccessful but local programs in some countries have had some success in convincing villages to stop circumcising girls.

Stopping female circumcision will be a long and difficult process. But it will never be fully eradicated until the full cooperation of those practice it is achieved.

Bibliography

Abusharaf, Rogaia Mustafa, “Virtuous Cuts: Female Genital Circumcision in an African

Ontology,” in Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2001, pp. 112-140. < (25 November 2007.)

Ahmadu, Fuambai, “Rites and Wrongs: An Insider/Outsider Reflects on Power and

Excision,” Female Circumcision in Africa: Culture, Controversy and Change. Colorado: Lynne Reinner Publishers, 2000.

Antonazzo, Monica, “Problems with Criminalizing Female Genital Cutting,” inPeace

Review, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2003, pp.471-477, < (31 July 2007.)

Assaad, Marie Bassili, “Female Circumcision in Egypt: Social Implications, Current

Research and Prospects for Change,” in Studies in Family Planning, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1980, pp. 3-16, < (24 November 2007.)

Businge, Gerald, “Female Genital Cutting/Mutilation Continues Despite Damaging

Health Repercussions.” < (6 May 2008.)

Cardenas, Amanda, “Female Circumcision: The Road to Change,” in Syracuse Journal of

International Law and Commerce, Vol. 26, Spring 1999, pp. 291-313, < (30 July 2007.)

“Classification of Female Genital Mutilation.” World Health Organization,

(2 May 2008.)

“Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women,” United

Nations, < (20 October 2007.)

“Convention on the Rights of the Child,” United Nations,

(20 October 2007.)

Cornell, Drucilla, At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex and Equality. Princeton:

PrincetonUniversity Press, 1998.

“The Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women,” United Nations,

(20 October 2007.)

“Female Genital Mutilation: A Joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA Statement,” The World

Health Organization, < (20 October 2007.)

“Female Genital Mutilation: Programs to Date: What Works and What Doesn’t,” World

Health Organization, < (20 October 2007)

Foucault, Michel. Power. New York: The New Press, 1994.

Gruenbaum, Ellen, “The Movement Against Clitoridectomy and Infibulation in Sudan:

Public Health Policy and the Women’s Movement,” in Medical Anthropology Newsletter, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1982, pp. 4-12, < (26 November 2007.)

Gwako, Edwins Laban Moogi, “Continuity and Change in the Practice of Clitoridectomy

in Kenya: A Case Study of the Abagusii,” in The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1995, pp. 333-337, < (24 November 2007.)

Hosken, Fran. The Hosken Report: Genital and Sexual Mutilation of Females.

Lexington: Women’s International Network News, 1993.

Lightfoot-Klein, Hanny, “The Sexual Experience and Marital Adjustment of Genitally

Circumcised and Infibulated Females in the Sudan,” in The Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1989, pp. 375-392, < (24 November 2007.)

“National Laws and Policies,” Stop FGM/C,

(11 December 2007.)

Njambi, Wairimu Ngaruiya, “Dualisms and Female Bodies in Representations of African

Female Circumcision,” in Feminist Theory, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2004, pp. 281-303. < (11 December 2007.)

Parker, Melissa, “Rethinking Female Circumcision,” in Africa: Journal of the

International African Institute, Vol. 65, No. 4, 1995, pp. 506-523, < (24 November 2007.)

Renteln, Alison Dundes. International Human Rights: Universalism Versus Relativism.

NewburyPark: Sage Publications, 1990.

Rowland, Debran. Boundaries of Her Body: The Troubling History of Women’s Rights in

America. Naperville, Sphinx Publishing, 2004.

Slack, Alison, “Female Circumcision: A Critical Appraisal,” in Human Rights Quarterly,

Vol. 10, No. 4, 1988, pp. 437-486, < (30 July 2007.)

“What’s Culture Got to Do With It? Excising the Harmful Tradition of Female

Circumcision,” in Harvard Law Review, Vol. 106, No. 8, 1993, pp. 1944-1961, < (31 July 2007.)