ARCH-4351/6351Spring, 2009

Light SourcesPROJECT EVALUATION FORM

Team Member Names: ______

Completeness (40%):

Y(10)N(0)

  • Are all required components included? x2=
  • Is the analysis clearly self-explanatory? x2=

Completeness Score: _____

Accuracy (30%):

  • Is the analysis correct? x2=
  • Are the spelling and grammar correct?

Accuracy Score: _____

Graphics (20%):

  • Are the graphics readily legible?
  • Is the analysis graphically
    strong (format, content, design)?

Graphics Score: _____

Total:_____

Comments:

Grading Key and Explanation

The projects are graded with a relative scale in which components are measured according to a Yes (Y) or No (N) result. The closer the notation is to being correct, the more it will align with the Y portion of the grading field.

Completeness

Are all required components included complete?

The requested project elements are all included.

Is the analysis fully self-explanatory?

The analysis presents all information needed to understand how conclusions were made.The graphics correctly include all standard elements (e.g., north arrows, scales, captions, labels, titles, etc.) that provide for a complete and professional appearance. Data is listed in tabular as well as graphic format.

Accuracy

Is the analysis correct?

The analysis is concise and legible in terms of concepts presented and arguments made to support findings. The findings are correct.

Are the spelling and grammar correct?

The spelling and grammar are correct. Text has been proofread and spelling has been checked before printing.There are no misspelled words.

Graphics

Are the graphics readily legible?

The presentation is logically presented and can be read in a conventional manner. The graphics correctly include all standard elements (e.g., north arrows, scales, captions, labels, titles, etc.) that provide for a complete and professional appearance.

Is the analysis graphically strong (format, content, design)?

The graphics are well composed and appropriately laid out to permit easy review of the materials presented. There is no clutter. Graphics are visually dynamic.There is no mixture of computer and free hand lettering. Lettering is not sloppy.The lettering and text are clearly and uniformly presented at a professional level.

Comments

This section includes specific comments by the TA or the instructor.