PRAVNI VJESNIK

Journal ofLaw, Social Sciences and Humanities of the Faculty of Law of Josip JuraJ Strossmayer University in Osijek

S. Radića 13

31 000 OSIJEK

Instructions to reviewers:

The papers are subject to an anonymous double-blind peer review (i.e. identities of the reviewer and author remain undisclosed). The reviewers should not agree to review the paper if they consider themselves not competent to assess a particular topic or if they are in conflict of interest. The review should be submitted to the Editorial Board not later than 30 days upon the receipt of the paper.

I. Reviewer
Name /Surname:
Research title, area, field and branch:
Institution (address, phone/e-mail):
Address (personal):
Bank and account no:
II. Paper information
Title (author's name is indicated by the editor):
Number of pages: / Number of sections:
Number of footnotes:
Research field and branch:

Please mark your choice with +. You may comment your statements. A comment is required in case of a negative statement.

III. Review
1. / The title of the paper reflects the content. / YES / NO
Comment
2. / The paper structure is appropriate. / YES / NO
Comment
3. / The aim of the paper and anticipated research outcome contribution are clearly indicated in the introduction. / YES / NO
Comment
4. / Does the paper comprise the bibliography survey and assessment related to the main topic of the paper?
4.1. / Croatian language reference:
YES
NO
The reference has not been used since this is not required by the research topic.
Comment
4.2 / Foreign language reference:
YES
NO
The reference has not been used since this is not required by the research topic.
Comment
5. / Have Croatian sources of law relevant to the research contribution been used?
YES
NO
Croatian sources of law have not been used since this is not required by the research topic.
Comment
6. / Have international sources of law relevant to research contribution been used?
YES
NO
International sources of law have not been used since this is not required by the research topic.
Comment
7. / Have sources of European law relevant to research contribution been used?
YES
NO
Sources of European law have not been used since this is not required by the research topic.
Comment
8. / Appropriate research methods have been used in the paper. / YES / NO
Comment
9. / The research topic elaboration and results presentation sections are in accordance with: / YES / NO
Research methods
Conclusions.
Comment
10 / The conclusion section sets clearly stated and established / YES / NO
Hypotheses
Issues and recommendations for further research.
Comment
The paper: / YES / NO
Deals with an active contemporary topic
Contributes to the research area
Is in accordance with the theme of the journal
Comment
Suggestions for paper categorisation (Please, mark one of the choices with +)
Original scientific paper
Preliminary communication
Review article
Professional paper
Comment
Final recommendation by the reviewer for paper publication
(Please, mark one of the choices with +)
Accept the paper.
Accept the paper if modified in accordance with the reviewer's comments.
Suggest the author to considerably modify the paper and submit it for a revised review procedure.
Paper is not to be accepted.
Comments for the authors:
Comments for the editor (not accessible for the author):
Date:
Of receipt of the paper for the review:
Of the review completion:
Of the re-review:
Of the paper non-acceptance notification:
Reviewer's signature:

1