Grade K-5 Mathematics SLO Sample (2 Total SLOs)

·  Students will demonstrate growth in numeracy and/or achieve mastery.

Indicators (3-5 per SLO)

·  By June 2016, 90% of students will reach their growth target from the September to June Benchmark Assessment.

·  By June 2016, 75% of students will be proficient on 5 of the MAP Post Assessments from September to June

·  By June 2016, the number of students at below standard on the Problem Solving, Modeling, and Data Analysis will decrease by 30% on a curriculum or teacher generated assessments.

Baseline & Trend Data

·  In September 2015, 50% of students scored below grade level target.

·  In September MAP assessment, 40% of students scored below the target.

·  On SBAC in 2015, 80% of students scored below standard.

Student Population

·  20 students (15 EL Students, 2 Special Education Students, 3 New Arrivals)

Alignment

·  This goal is aligned to the CCSS, the district’s Strategic Plan School Improvement Plan, and Curriculum Maps.

Assessment

·  Benchmark, Unit Maps, Dipsticks

Instructional Support and Strategy

Implementing the Curriculum Maps Data Teams

Coaching Interactive Smart Board

Scaffolding techniques Academic vocabulary

Identify similarities and differences Provide prompt and relevant feedback

Professional Learning Needs

·  District-wide PD

Grade K-5 ELA SLO Sample (2 Total SLOs)

·  Students will demonstrate growth in reading comprehension and/or achieve mastery

Indicators (3-5 per SLO)

·  By June 2016, 80% of students will reach their Phonemic Awareness target from the September to June DIBELS Assessment

·  By June 2016, the number of students at below standard on the benchmark ELA assessment will decrease by 50% as measured from September to June

·  By June 2016, 75% of students will be proficient on 5 of the MAP Post Assessments from September to June

·  By June 2016, the number of students at below standard on analyzing a range of complex literary and informational text will decrease by 25% on Claim 1

Baseline & Trend Data

·  In 2015, 50% of students scored below standard on Claim 1

·  In September MAP assessment, 60% of students scored 4 out of 10 on MAP Assessment

·  In 2015-16, 45% of students did not meet the grade level target on DIBELS

·  In 2015, 60% of students did not meet target on HMH1

Student Population

·  20 students (8 EL Students, 2 SPED Students, 10 students with Lexile scores below grade level)

Alignment

·  This goal is aligned to CCSS, District Strategic Plan, School Improvement Plan, and Maps.

Assessment

·  Benchmark, Unit Maps, Dipsticks

Instructional Support and Strategy

Implementing the Curriculum Maps Data Teams Coaching

Interactive Smart Board Scaffolding techniques Academic vocabulary

Identify similarities and differences Provide prompt and relevant feedback

Professional Learning Needs

·  District-wide PD