PCT/MIA/7/2 Add.3

page 1

WIPO / / E
PCT/MIA/7/2 Add.3
ORIGINAL: English
DATE: February 10, 2003
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
GENEVA

INTERNATIONAL PATENT COOPERATION UNION
(PCT UNION)

MEETING OF INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES
UNDER THE pCT

Seventh Session

Geneva, February 10 to 14, 2003

Draft PCT International Search and
Preliminary Examination Guidelines:
Proposals by the European Patent Office (EPO)

Document prepared by the International Bureau

1.The Annexes to this document contain proposals by the EPO for two chapters, designated X and Y, to replace chapter 12 of the draft PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines as set out in document PCT/MIA/7/2.

2.The Meeting of International Authorities is invited to consider the proposals set out in the Annexes to this document.

[Annex I follows]

PCT/MIA/7/2 Add.3

Annex I, page 1

[chapter to be added at the end of part 2]

Chapter X - Content of the Written Opinions issued by the International Search Authority

Introduction

X.01 12.01This chapter covers the content of any written opinion, whether established by the International Searching Authority or the International Preliminary Examining Authority. It also covers the content of the international preliminary examination report, which follows a very similar format to a written opinion. The content and the format of the written opinion whether established by the International Searching Authority or by the International Preliminary Examining Authority should be identical. The only exceptions relate to the difference of timing in which the written opinions will be established by the corresponding Authority during the International procedure, e.g. the written opinion by the ISA will be based exclusively on the application documents as originally filed while amendments will have to be considered in most of the written opinions established by the IPEA, there is therefore no need to consider amendments when drafting a WO at search stage.

Article 33(1), 34(2)(c); Rule 43bis.1, 66

X.02 12.02The purpose of a written opinion issued by the ISA is to give a primary indication to the applicant of the defects which the examiner considers to exist in the application so that the applicant can determine the most appropriate course of action, including the possibilities of submitting comments or amendments, before any final report is drawn up having to decide to start the national/regional phase or to file a demand for International Preliminary Examination. Its primary role is to identify whether or not the claimed invention appears to be novel, involve an inventive step (be non-obvious) and be industrially applicable. It will also include opinions on certain other substantive defects, which may be in the applicationinsofar as checked by the authority (Rule 66.2.a (v)), mainly where these affect the ability to determine the novelty, inventive step or industrial application of the invention accurately, and on certain defects in the form of the international application.

12.03The international preliminary examination report follows the same format as a written opinion and, assuming that international preliminary examination is demanded, is established taking into account any amendments or observations filed in response to the written opinions (either of the International Searching Authority or of the International Preliminary Examining Authority) which precede it.

Article 33(1), 34(2)(c); Rule43bis.1, 66

Different Types of Opinion and Report Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority

Rule43bis, 66.1bis

X.0312.04A written opinion will be issued by the International Searching Authority together with the international search report. This will normally be treated as the first written opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority under Article 34(2) in the event that international preliminary examination is demanded and, as such, the opinion will include an invitation to submit a response, together with a time limit for that response, if the applicant wishes to demand international preliminary examination. However International Preliminary Examining Authorities may notify the International Bureau that this will not be the case for written opinions issued by specified International Searching Authorities other than themselves. Such notifications are published by the International Bureau in the Gazette.

X.04 12.05Many of the Rules that are referred to in this chapter are stated to apply to the International Preliminary Examining Authority conducting an international preliminary examination under Chapter II of the Treaty. However, while this is not explicitly stated in the references, they also apply to the International Searching Authority by virtue of Rule 43bis.1(b).

Written Opinion(s) of the International Preliminary Examining Authority

Rule 66.4, 66.4, 66.6

12.06Written opinions may also be issued by the International Preliminary Examining Authority where international preliminary examination is demanded. The written opinion of the International Searching Authority is usually treated as the first written opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority. Although not required, the IPEA may establish further written opinions taking into account arguments or amendments made by the applicant in response to the written opinion issued by the International Searching Authority. Such written opinions will normally offer the applicant a further opportunity to submit amendments or arguments before the international preliminary examination report is established. The International Preliminary Examining Authority may also communicate informally with the applicant over the telephone, in writing, or by personal interview.

12.07For international applications where the written opinion of the International Searching Authority is not treated as the first written opinion under Article 34(2), the International Preliminary Examining Authority should:

(a)notify the applicant accordingly in writing (see Chapter 9 [XR]); and

(b)establish a first written opinion as defined in 12.02 , which should take into account the content of the written opinion established by the ISA.

The International Preliminary Examination Report

12.08Assuming that international preliminary examination is demanded, an international preliminary examination report (titled “international preliminary report on patentability (Chapter II of the Patent Cooperation Treaty)”) is drawn up at the end of the process of examination, taking into account amendments or observations that the applicant has made during the process.

Content of the Written Opinion by ISA

Overview of Content

Rule 43bis, 66.1bis, 66.2(a), 70.2(c) and (d)

X.05 12.09[E-VI-5.10] A Any written opinion of the ISA should usuallycover all matters referred to in Rule 66.2 at the exception of Rule 66.2(iv) as no amendment can be filed at this stage of the procedure. Such matters may be:

(i)whether any of the situations referred to in Article 34(4) (subject matter of the application not required to be examined by the International Preliminary Examining Authority or meaningful opinion on novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability not possible because of lack of clarity or because the claims are not adequately supported by the description),

(ii)an apparent failure to meet the criteria of novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability,

(iii)defects in the form or contents of the international application (for example, failure to comply with one or more of the requirements specified in Rules 5 to 11),

(iv)amendments which appear to go beyond the disclosure of the international application as filed,

(viv)an apparent lack of clarity in the claims, the description or the drawings or of support for the claims in the description such as would require some observations to be made in this respect in the international preliminary examination report should such report be established on the basis of the international application without further amendment,

(viv)that a claim is directed to an invention on which no international search report has been established, and

(viivi)nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence listings not being available in such a form that a meaningful international preliminary examination can be carried out.

Form of Opinion

X.06 12.10The Wwritten opinions are of ISA is established in a standard format using form PCT/ISA/xxx [need a new form for this] (for the opinion of an International Searching Authority) or PCT/IPEA/408 (for an opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority). International Preliminary Examination Reports (given the title “international preliminary report on patentability (Chapter II of the Patent Cooperation Treaty)”) are established using PCT/IPEA/409. Apart from the cover sheet, containing generally bibliographic details and any notification of action that the applicant may be invited to take; this these follows the same format as PCT/IPEA/408 (written opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority) and PCT/IPEA/409 (International Preliminary Examination Report), includingwhichever of the following partsare appropriate to the particular international application:

(i)Basis of the opinion or report;

(ii)Priority;

(iii)Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability;

(iv)Lack of unity of invention;

(v)Reasoned statement under Rule 66.2(a)(ii) or Article 35(2) with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability and citations supporting such statement;

(vi)Certain documents cited;

(vii)Certain defects in the international application;

(viii)Certain observations on the international application.

Data

Section 109

12.11[E-VI-8.3] The following data (insofar as set out on the front page of the form) should first be included in accordance with Rules 70.3, 70.4, 70.5 and with the relevant Sections of the Administrative Instructions under the PCT:

(i)the international application number;

(ii)the name of the applicant;

(iii)the name of the International Preliminary Examining Authority;

(iv)the international filing date;

(v)the classification of the subject matter, at least according to the International Patent Classification (IPC);

(vi) the claimed priority date;

(vii)the applicant’s or agent’s file reference (composed either of letters or numbers or both, but not exceeding 12 characters).

Section 504

12.12The indication of the classification of the subject matter referred to in item (e), above, shall repeat the classification of the subject matter by the International Searching Authority given under Rule 43.3 if the examiner agrees with such classification, or, if the examiner does not agree with that classification, should set forth the classification which the examiner considers to be correct (see Chapter V, “Classification of International Applications,” of the PCT International Search Guidelines).

Box I - Basis of the Written Opinion

Rule 66.2(a)(iv), 70.2(a) and (c)

X.07 12.13[replacing E-VI-5.12] Since the written opinion of the International Searching Authority is drawn up at the same time as the international search report, it will almost always be established on the basis of the application as filed. However, any written opinion drawn up after allowable amendments or corrections have been properly filed (for example a sequence listing complying with the required standards has been furnished on the request of the International Searching Authority or, where the written opinion is established by the International Preliminary Examining Authority, amendments have been filed under Article19 or 34(2)(b)) should take these into account and note.

12.14 Any amendment submitted must not add subject matter which goes beyond the disclosure of the international application as originally filed (see paragraph 11.04 [XR]),

Examination on Basis of International Application as Filed

12.15[AU-E-8.2.1] Where all documents examined are as originally filed, only the first check box (i.e. “the international application as originally filed”) in Item 1 of Box I should be marked.

Substitute Sheets Deemed to Be Part of the Application as Originally Filed

X.08 12.16[AU-E-8.2.2] Substitute pages or sheets, filed in response to an invitation by the RO to correct defects in the international application, are deemed to be part of the international application “as originally filed”. If the applicant responds to the invitation to correct defects by substituting sheets of the application, these sheets are identified with “ SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)” stamped on them. Also, substitute pages or sheets for rectification of obvious errors under Rule 91 are deemed to be part of the international application “as originally filed”. These sheets are identified with “ RECTIFIED SHEET (RULE 91.1)” and “ENTERED DURING CHAPTER I” stamped on them.

Examination on Basis of Amended International Application

12.17[AU-E-8.2.3] In response to an opinion, an applicant may file amendments with a cover letter. On receipt of these amendments, the IPEA will indicate on the top right hand corner of the substitute sheets the application number and the date of receipt. Note that the date stated by the applicant on the cover letter may differ from the date of receipt of the amendment.

12.18Where proper amendments have been made under Article 19, they should be referred to in Box I Item 1 as “Claim(s) pages....as amended under Art 19”. Note that under Article 19 only claims may be amended. These sheets are usually identified by “ AMENDED SHEET (ARTICLE 19)”.

12.19Where proper amendments have been made under Article 34, these should also be referred to in Box I Item 1 as either “claims pages....filed with Demand” or “claims pages....received on....with the letter of ....”.

12.20The amendments under Article 34 should indicate the dates on the amendments as the “received on” dates and the applicant’s correspondence date as the “with the letter of” date. Superseded amendments should not be included.

Language Considerations

Rules 23.1 (b), 48.3(b), 55.2 and 55.3

X.0912.21With regard to the language, Item 2 of Box I need not be filled if all the elements of the application (originally filed sheets and amended sheets, if any) were available or furnished to the ISA/IPEA in the language in which the international application was filed. Otherwise, an appropriate indication must me checked as to whether the elements were available or furnished to the ISA/IPEA in the language which is: (i) the language of a translation furnished for the purposes of international search (under Rule 23.1(b)); (ii) the language of publication of the international application (under Rule 48.3(b)); (iii) the language of the translation furnished for the purposes of international preliminary examination (under Rules 55.2 and/or 55.3). For further discussions of language, refer to Chapter 9. [XR]

Nucleotide and/or Amino Acid Sequence Listings

X.10 12.22 With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence listings, an appropriate indication(s) must beme checked as to the examination being drawn on the basis of the sequence listing: (i) contained in the international application in printed form; (ii) filed together with the international application in computer readable form; (iii) furnished subsequently to ISA/IPEA in written form; (iv) furnished subsequently to ISA/IPEA in computer readable form; (v) the statement that the subsequently furnished written sequence listing does not go beyond the disclosure in the international application as filed has been furnished; (vi) the statement that the information recorded in computer readable form is identical to the written sequence listing has been furnished. For further discussions of the nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence listings, refer to Chapter 9. [XR]

Amendments Resulting in Gaps in Numbering

12.23Where amendments under Article 19 or 34 have been made which result in cancellation or gaps in the numbering sequence of the description pages, claim numbers, and/or drawing sheets, these must be referred to in Item 4 of Box I of the written opinion and/or report. (Annex C.2 shows a completed example.)

Amendments Going Beyond Original Disclosure

Rule 70.2(c)

12.24Where amendments have been made which go beyond the original disclosure, this is indicated in Box I at Item 5. The particular amendments are identified and brief reasons given in a Supplemental Box sheet(s).

12.25Refer to Chapter 11 [XR] for further Article 19/34 considerations.

[AU-E-8.3]Box II Priority;

X.1112.26This part of the opinion or report is not relevant if the international application does not claim priority. Furthermore, where priority is claimed, but the citations in the international search report were all published before the earliest priority date, it is not necessary to consider whether the priority claim is valid.

X.1212.27Where one or more citations of the international search report were published after the earliest priority date, the validity of that earliest priority date requires checking.

a) where the priority document is one which is in the records of the ISAIPEA, it should be obtained from those records.

Rule 66.7

Ad Inst 421

b) where the priority document is a foreign document and it is not already in the file, the Authority may request a copy of the document from the IB and, if necessary, a translation from the applicant. In the meantime, if the outcome of the examination requires the issuing of an opinion, that opinion should be issued without waiting to obtain the priority document. An appropriate comment should be made under the heading “Additional observations, if necessary:” in Box II of the Written Opinion. IfIt should be born in mind, however that such a copy mayis not be available because the time limit for filing the priority document under Rule 17.1 has not expired or because of non-compliance with this said rule 17.1 by the applicant,. the IPER may be established as if the priority had not been claimed and this is to be indicated in the report. In such cases the fact that the validity of the priority claim may not be able to be established should be taken into consideration by the examiner when drafting the WO of the ISA.

Rule 64.1

X.1312.28[AU-E-8.3.2] Where the right to priority is invalid, Box II of the Written Opinion or IPER must be completed.

X.1412.29“Additional observations” relate to Priority considerations only and not to clarity, descriptive support, defects or any other consideration relevant to Box VIII.

Box III - Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability; [AU-E-8.4]

Art 17(2)(a)(i)

Rule 67

X.1512.30This part of the written opinion of the ISAor report explains why an opinion as regards novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability may not have been established for some or all of the subject matter of the international application. For example, Rule 67.1, which applies also to the ISA according to Rule 43bis.1(b), establishes that no International AuthorityIPEA shall be required to examine certain subject matter within an international application, such as mathematical theories, plant or animal varieties and methods for treatment of the human or animal body. The agreement between WIPO and the International AuthoritiesIPEAs further qualifies this by excepting from exclusion any subject matter, which is examined under national grant procedures. See Chapter [XR] for details of excluded matter.

Subject Matter Excluded Under Rule 67.1

X.16 12.31Where some or all claims are not examined for novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability because they contain excluded subject matter, this observation must be indicated in Item 1 of Box III of the written opinion or examination report of the ISA.

Clarity or Support

Rule 66.2(a)

X.17 12.32[AU-E-8.4.2] Where the description, the claims, or the drawings are so unclear, or the claims are so inadequately supported by the description that no meaningful opinion can be formed on the questions of novelty, inventive step, or industrial applicability of the claimed invention, then the examination may be restricted to those claims that are sufficiently clear and supported by the description to enable an opinion or report to be prepared (see Box III, Item 1, 4th and 5th checkboxes).