A novel CRS interference cancellation algorithm for Heterogeneous network
Hua Luo, Wei Li, Yue Zhang, Li-ke Huang, John Cosmas, Qiang Ni
Heterogeneous network is introduced to improve the network capacity in LTE Release 9 and system beyond. The potential traffic congestion due to increased users can be alleviated by the cooperation between macro-cell and pico-cell. However, the inter-cell interference caused by RF signal from macro-cell will reduce the performance severely. Enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) is proposed in Rel. 10 to solve this problem using almost blank subframe (ABS). Yet, the cell specific reference signal (CRS) in ABS can still cause interference to the data resource element (RE) from the pico-cell inevitably for non-colliding scenario. In this letter, a novel interference cancellation (IC) algorithm is proposed to mitigate the interference. Firstly, the timing and carrier frequency offset of interference signal is estimated and compensated. Secondly, the interfering channel response is estimated by utilizing the channel statistics. Thirdly, the interference signal is reconstructed based on the channel estimation and cancelled in the received signal in time domain. The experiment results show that the performance of proposed IC algorithm is robust.
Introduction: Heterogeneous network (HetNet), first introduced in LTE Release 9, is a promising network topology for achieving high special efficiency. With the macro-cell providing basic coverage and the pico-cell serving as a complementary cell, pico-cell can increase the off-load data rate and network coverage of macro-cell. However, the user equipments (UEs), served by pico-cell, will suffer from the RF signal named inter-cell interference caused by the neighbour high power macro-cells. This issue will become even severer if the UEs are within the coverage of macro-cells. In order to solve this problem, enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) [1]-[2] was introduced in 3GPP Rel. 10 with two techniques. On the one hand, the signal strength is biased to pico-cell which can reduce the interference power. On the other hand, macro-cell keeps silent for certain periods called almost blank subframe (ABS). In ABS, the interference is alleviated because UEs will not receive the physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) from macro-cell. However, the cell specific reference signal (CRS), paging channel (PCH), physical broadcast channel (PBCH) and synchronization channels (PSS/SSS) can still be received and the performance will still be degraded. Therefore, in Release 11, further eICIC (FeICIC) was proposed to cancel the CRS interference problem.
There are few literatures about CRS interference cancellation (IC). In [3] and [4], the authors studied a traditional CRS IC which is realized by first estimating the interference channel and then cancelling the interference. A log-likelihood Ratio (LLR) muting/puncturing method was investigated in [5], [6]. A receiver algorithm that combines IC with direct decision channel estimation was proposed for non-colliding CRS in [7]. According to [8], a robust equalization technique was studied which is with similar performance to the traditional CRS IC but has lower complexity and latency. Nevertheless, timing and frequency offset will decrease the system performance severely for non-colliding CRS scenario. In this letter, a CRS interference cancellation algorithm, with timing offset (TO) and carrier frequency offset (CFO) taken into account, is studied for the non-colliding scenario. The interference signal is reconstructed and then mitigated by using TO and CFO obtained and the estimated interference channel response. The simulation results show that our algorithm can achieve significant performance in different channel conditions when the signal to interference and noise ratio (SINR) is within -3dB to 9dB.
The LTE receiver IC algorithm is briefly shown in Fig. 1. For LTE downlink, the received signal for the symbol can be modelled as:
1)
where and denote the desired and interference signal respectively; is the additive Gaussian noise.
The fast Fourier transform is first done in order to transfer the signal into OFDM symbols. After N-point FFT, the OFDM symbols with TO/CFO can be written as:
2)
where and represent the symbol at subcarrier for desired signal and interference respectively; and are the channel coefficients of the serving and interfering channel at subcarrier respectively; stands for the inter-carrier interference (ICI), which arises from CFO; and stands for the relative timing offset between the interfering cell and serving cell.
Fig. 1. Proposed IC algorithm
Proposed IC algorithm: The IC algorithm proposed mainly consists the following three steps. Firstly, the relative timing and frequency offset between the interfering cell and serving cell are estimated by using PSS/SSS generated in the interfering CRS modelling. Secondly, the interfering channel estimation is done based on the signal after TO/CFO compensation. Thirdly, the interfering signal is reconstructed according to previous interfering CE and then cancelled from the received LTE signal. The details of these three steps are shown below from step A to step C.
A. TO/CFO estimation: Most of the timing and frequency synchronization algorithms existed utilize the periodic nature of time domain signal by using cyclic prefix (CP) [12] or pilot data [13]. However, in ABS, the data REs of the macro-cell are zero which reduces the power of CP significantly. The low SNR of CP makes it hard for timing and frequency synchronization. Yet, the PSS/SSS signal, located at the last and second-last symbol in slot 0 and slot 10, can be used for synchronization as well. The TO/CFO can be estimate by utilizing the cross-correlation of PSS/SSS symbol in time domain [9]:
3)
where
4)
and are the received and locally generated symbol that contain PSS/SSS respectively, and the correlation length M could be multiple times of PSS/SSS symbols when SNR is low.
After TO/CFO estimation, the interference signal can be synchronized and the interference channel response can be estimated.
B. Interfering CE: In order to reconstruct interfering signal, it’s important to estimate the interfering channel response at first. For the sake of decreasing compute complexity, the Least Square (LS) channel estimation algorithm is chosen. According to , the interfering channel estimation can be written as:
5)
Here, the interference signal is replaced by the interfering CRS because we only care for interfering CRS signal from the macro-cell. According to , the data REs of serving cell become interference with relative higher power. Therefore, the estimation in is not accurate. Many studies, such as [10], show that the distribution of the interference signal is close to Gaussian for large size RB and non-Gaussian for small size RB. And the mean of the distribution converges to 0. So the expectation of can be derived as:
6)
The mean value of the interfering channel can be estimated by utilizing moving average window in time domain. Then can be approximated by when the moving average window length M is within the coherence time of the channel.
C. Interfering signal reconstruction and cancellation: After TO/CFO and interfering CE estimation, the interference signal can be reconstructed based on the local CRS in time domain. As the relative timing offset is larger than the duration of CP potentially which will cause intersymbol interference (ISI) within the OFDM window of desired signal, the interference signal is reconstructed in time domain and subtracted from the received signal directly:
7)
where is circular convolution and is the interference CRS reconstructed and
8)
Results: The performance of the proposed IC algorithm is evaluated via Monte Carlo simulation. With different modulation and coding schemes (MCS) to deliver the service, the serving cell is set to work with 10MHz bandwidth. The neighbour interfering cell transmits ABS with bandwidth of 5MHz. The CRS from the interfering cell overlaps the data REs of the serving cell. The signal with desired data and interference pass through a fading channel with a delay spread smaller than CP duration. In this simulation, the AWGN channel model is used. In addition, Different CFO and arriving time are applied to the interfering signal to evaluate its effect.
The effect of CFO and TO on BLER performance is shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 respectively. The performance without IC is shown as a comparison. It can be seen that our proposed IC achieves good performance both for CFO and TO.
Fig. 2. BLER Performance vs. Frequency Offset
Fig. 3. BLER Performance vs. Timing Offset
The BLER performance of the proposed IC algorithm for different Doppler frequency and SNR is shown Fig. 4 below. The system performance is significantly improved and therefore the robustness of this method can be proved.
Fig.4. BLER performance vs. different Doppler frequency and SNR
Conclusion: In this letter, a novel IC algorithm is proposed for HetNet receiver based on the interference signal reconstruction. First, the TO/CFO compensation and interfering channel estimation are applied for reconstructing the interfering CRS. Finally, the interference is cancelled in time domain after reconstruction by subtracting it from the received signal. The performance shown in the simulation results indicate that the IC algorithm can achieve very good performance in different channel conditions.
Hua Luo, Yue Zhang (Institute for Research in Applicable Computing, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, LU1 3JU, United Kingdom)
Wei Li (Received his PhD degree of University of Bedfordshire at June 2015)
Li-ke Huang (Cobham Wireless, Stevenage, SG1 2AN, United Kingdom)
John Cosmas (Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom)
Qiang Ni (Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, United Kingdom)
References
1. Heli, Z., et al.: ‘Interference management for heterogeneous networks with spectral efficiency improvement’, IEEE Wireless Comm. Mag., Apr. 2015, 22, pp. 101-107
2. S. Deb, P. Monogioudis, J. Miernik, J.P. Seymour: ‘Algorithms for Enhanced Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (eICIC) in LTE HetNets’, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, Feb. 2014, 22, pp. 137- 150
3. A. Tyrrell and H. Schoeneich: ‘Advanced receiver signal processing techniques: Evaluation and characterization’, ARTIST4G D2.2 Deliverable, June 2011
4. T. Yoo, et al: ‘Dynamic switching between common reference signal interference cancellation & resource element puncturing in a co-channel heteregoneous network’, Patent US2012/0087261 A1, Apr. 2012
5. Qualcomm Inc.: ‘Enabling communication in harsh interference scenarios’, R4-102350, 3GPP-RAN WG4 AH#10-03, Bratislava, July 2010.
6. Qualcomm Inc: ‘Link level simulations for FeICIC with 9dB cell range expansion’, R4-123313, 3GPP-RAN WG4 #63, Prague, May 2012.
7. M. Huang and W. Xu: ‘Macro-femto inter-cell interference mitigation for 3GPP LTE-A downlink’, IEEE Wireless Comm. and Net. Conf, Apr. 2012, pp. 75-80
8. B.E.Priyanto, S. Kant, F. Rusek, S. Hu, J. Chen. C. Wugenshi: ‘Robust UE Receiver with Interference Cancellation in LTE Advanced Heterogeneous Network’, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. , Las Vegas, Sept. 2013, pp. 1-7
9. Yao-Hsien Tsai and Tzu-Hsien Sang: ‘A new timing synchronization and cell search procedure resistant to carrier frequency offsets for 3GPP-LTE downlink’, IEEE International Conf. on Comm. in China (ICCC) , Beijing, Aug. 2012, pp. 334–338
10. Cheng Feng, Hongyu Cui, Meng Ma, Bingli Jiao, “On Statistical Properties of Co-channel Interference in OFDM Systems”, IEEE Comm. Letters, Oct. 2013, 17, pp. 2328–2331
11. 3GPP TS 36.101: ‘Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA), user equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception’, Jul. 2013
12. Scheme, Basic Transmission: ‘LTE: the evolution of mobile broadband’,IEEE Comm. Mag., Apr. 2009, 45
13. Filippi, A., Serbetli, S.: ‘OFDM symbol synchronization using frequency domain pilots in time domain’, IEEE Trans. on Wireless Comm., June 2009, 8, (6), pp.3240,3248
1