Model Annual Report

Statutory Authority
(Commercial)

For the year ended 30 June 2016

Model Annual Report
Statutory Authority (Commercial) – 30June2016

Foreword

This Model Annual Report has been prepared as a guide and includes the minimum annual reporting requirements of the Financial Management Act2006 and Treasurer’s instructions. However, a

Agencies should be aware that the Models are for general use and are not intended to cover every potential circumstance. Other methods of presenting financial statements may also beare suitable and agencies are encouraged to streamline their financial statements. Streamlining reduces the costs and burdens of preparing the annual report whilst improving the relevance and meaning for users.

Further reporting requirements are specified in the Public Sector Commission’s Annual Reporting Framework available at http://www.publicsector.wa.gov.au/

30.06.2016 Page 5 of 99

Model Annual Report
Statutory Authority (Commercial) – 30June2016

Table of Contents

Statement of Compliance 4

Overview 5

Executive Summary 5

Operational Structure 5

Performance Management Framework 8

Outcome Based Management Framework 8

Changes to Outcome Based Management Framework 8

Shared Responsibilities with Other Agencies 8

Agency Performance 9

Report on Operations 9

Actual Results versus Budget Targets 9

Significant Issues Impacting the Agency 12

Disclosures and Legal Compliance 13

Financial Statements 13

Certification of Financial Statements 13

Statement of Comprehensive Income 14

Statement of Financial Position 16

Statement of Changes in Equity 17

Statement of Cash Flows 18

Index of Notes to the Financial Statements 20

Notes to the Financial Statements 23

Additional Key Performance Indicator Information 93

Ministerial Directions 95

Other Financial Disclosures 96

Governance Disclosures 97

Other Legal Requirements 98

Government Policy Requirements 99

30.06.2016 Page 5 of 99

Model Annual Report
Statutory Authority (Commercial) – 30June2016

Reference

Statement of Compliance
FMAsec63
TI902 / For year ended 30 June 2016
HON MICHAEL JACKSON
MINISTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
In accordance with section63 of the Financial Management Act2006, we hereby submit for your information and presentation to Parliament, the Annual Report of the Model Statutory Authority for the financial year ended 30June2016.
The Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Management Act2006 and [any other relevant written law].
(Signature) / (Signature)
B. Gate / H. Norman
Chairman of Accountable Authority / Member of Accountable Authority
1August2016 / 1August2016
AASB101.138(a) / Contacts
Postal / Address / Electronic
PO Box 9999 / 1 William Street / Internet: www.authority.wa.gov.au
Perth WA 6000 / Perth WA 6000 / Email:
Telephone: 61 8 6551 0000
Facsimile: 61 8 6551 1111
Commentary:
AASB101 requires the following disclosures:
·  the domicile and legal form of the entity; and
·  its country of incorporation and the address of its registered office (or principal place of business, if different from the registered office).
TI903 / Overview
Executive Summary
Performance Highlights
·  The Authority received a commendation from the State Government for its services in providing assistance to public sector agencies to complement the corporate services reforms.
·  Customer surveys indicated that 95 per cent of agencies rated the services provided for the implementation of corporate services reforms as exceptional.
·  The Authority’s research and development project on software development for public sector accounting is on schedule and is expected to be completed in 2017.
TI903(5) / Commentary:
Include a statement from the accountable authority that includes performance highlights and/or other significant events impacting on the agency.
Operational Structure
The Model Statutory Authority delivers services through the following divisions:
·  Information Technology;
·  Customer Relations; and
·  Corporate Services.
TI903(6) / Commentary:
Under this section, agencies are required to disclose a summary of activities and responsibilities of each division or its equivalent.
Enabling Legislation
AASB101.138(a)
TI903(6)(ii) / The Model Statutory Authority was established under section5 of the Enabling Act1990, listed as a statutory authority on Schedule1 of the Financial Management Act2006 and is subject to the provisions of the Public Sector Management Act1994.
TI903(6) / Responsible Minister
The Hon. Michael Jackson, BCom MLA, Minister for Information Technology.
Organisational Structure
AASB101.138(b) / Mission
To provide leadership, support and services necessary to ensure that Western Australians have easy and affordable access to a diverse range of information technology.
TI903(6) / Organisational Chart

Board of the Authority
Board members are appointed for a three year period by the Minister for Information Technology. Members are appointed according to their expertise and experience in areas relevant to the Model Statutory Authority’s activities.
Board Profiles
Mr Bill Gate (Chairman)
Mr Gate was reappointed Chairman of the Model Statutory Authority for a second threeyear term in April2015. Mr Gate is currently a Director of Microsoft Corporation and a member of the Word for Windows Commission. He has had a long involvement with the computer manufacturing sector and is a past Chairman of the State Government’s Information Technology Advisory Committee. He is also a member or patron of a number of community organisations.
Mr Harvey Norman
Mr Norman was reappointed to the Board for a second three-year term in April2014. MrNorman, formerly managing director of IBM, is also a Board member of the April May Trust. In 2003 Mr Norman was awarded the Order of Australia for services to the Western Australian community.
Mrs Jessica Rabbit
Mrs Rabbit was reappointed to the Board for a second three-year term in April2014. MrsRabbit has a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Western Australia and is a Member of the Institute of Public Accountants (IPA). She has worked within the information technology industry for many years and has a high level of expertise at both operational and managerial levels.
Senior Officers
Dr Bill King PhD (Chief Executive Officer)
Mr King has extensive experience in corporate management and public sector information technology.
Elliot James BCom CA (Director Information Technology)
Mr James has 7years public sector management experience and 15years corporate advisory experience in the private sector.
Chris Fleming BCom FCPA (Director Corporate Services, Chief Finance Officer)
Mr Fleming has 17years’ experience in public sector finance, in addition to experience in the private sector.
Kevin Smith BA (Hons) (Director Customer Relations)
Mr Smith has 10years’ experience in public sector customer relations.
Administered Legislation
The Authority assists the Minister for Information Technology in administration the following Acts:
·  Information Technology Act1951-1983; and
·  Information Protection Act1959.
TI903(6)(v)-(vii) / Commentary:
Include the name of and authority for establishment of each subsidiary, related and affiliated body and information about the legislation administered pertaining to each subsidiary and related body.
Other Key Legislation Impacting on the Model Statutory Authority’s Activities
In the performance of its functions, the Model Statutory Authority complies with the following relevant written laws:
·  Auditor General Act2006;
·  Contaminated Sites Act2003;
·  Disability Services Act1993;
·  Equal Opportunity Act1984;
·  Financial Management Act2006;
·  Freedom of Information Act1992;
·  Industrial Relations Act1979;
·  Minimum Conditions of Employment Act1993;
·  Occupational Safety and Health Act1984;
·  Public Sector Management Act1994;
·  Salaries and Allowances Act1975;
·  State Records Act2000; and
·  State Supply Commission Act1991.
Commentary:
In addition to the abovementioned legislation, where applicable agencies may consider disclosing specialised legislation that impacts upon their area of operations. Although the above information is not mandatory, listing the key legislation impacting on the agency’s activities provides useful information to users.
TI904(2), 903(7) / Performance Management Framework
AASB101.138(b) / Outcome Based Management Framework

Commentary:
Include a description of the links between the relevant government goals, agency level government desired outcomes and services.
Changes to Outcome Based Management Framework
The Model Statutory Authority’s Outcome Based Management Framework did not change during 2015-16.
Commentary:
Include a discussion of any changes to agency level government desired outcomes, services and key performance indicators from the previous year. This segment should be included even if there is a nil return.
Shared Responsibilities with Other Agencies
The Model Statutory Authority did not share any responsibilities with other agencies in 2015-16.
Commentary:
Include a statement of which services are being delivered jointly with other agencies and how the agency is contributing to other agencies’ government desired outcomes. This segment should be included even if there is a nil return.
Agency Performance
Report on Operations
FMAsec61(1)(c)
TI903(8) / Commentary:
The Report on Operations must be prepared in accordance with section61(1)(c) of the FMA and TI903.
Include a brief discussion of agency performance, including references to key achievements and other key highlights about agency performance during the year.
A brief discussion of the reason(s) for any material variations between actual performance and the targets specified in the agency’s resource agreement, budget statements, statement of corporate intent or any equivalent document should also feature in this section, as well as the impact of any external factors.
Include any narrative necessary to explain the results and describe the agency’s performance, including any material variations and the impact of any external factors.
TI808(4) / Statutory authorities submitting resource agreements as part of the annual budget process are required to apply TI808 Resource Agreements and encouraged to use a format similar to that shown in the Guidelines. Agencies may modify the content in the tables below according to agency’s structure and reporting needs.
Actual Results versus Budget Targets
Financial Targets
2015-16 Target(1) $000 / 2015-16 Actual $000 / Variation(2)
$000
Total expenses
(sourced from Statement of Comprehensive Income) / 1,043,452 / 1,038,869 / 4,583(a)
Total Income [for illustrative purpose]
(sourced from Statement of Comprehensive Income) / 1,078,612 / 1,071,702 / 6,910(b
Total equity
(sourced from Statement of Financial Position) / 1,127,851 / 1,228,502 / 100,651(c)
Net increase / (decrease) in cash held
(sourced from Statement of Cash Flows) / (50) / (49) / 1
Approved full time equivalent (FTE) staff level / 423 / 420 / 3
Approved salary expense level / 525,276 / 523,033 / (2,243)(d)
Agreed borrowing limit (where applicable) / 2,805 / 3,275 / (470)(e)
(1)  As specified in the Budget Statements.
(2)  Further explanations are contained in Note43 ‘Explanatory statement’ to the financial statements.
(a)  The variation is mainly due to implementing tighter cost controls ($14,593,000), which was partially offset by additional costs ($11,220,000) in hiring consultants to deliver services.
(b)  In addition to the explanation above regarding expenses, the variation was mainly due to an increase in user charges and fees, and sales revenue ($2,050,000) as a result of better than expected demand.
(c)  The variation is mainly due to a greater than expected asset revaluation increments for land and buildings ($60,000,000) and infrastructure ($40,000,000).
(d)  The variation arose due to a number of vacancies occurring through secondment and attrition remaining unfilled through the second half of the financial year ($2,243,000).
(e)  The variation is mainly due to [insert narrative].
Commentary:
The agreed borrowing limit is the total borrowings authorised by the Treasurer during, or subsequent to the budget process, due to the impact on the State’s Net Debt. Accountable authorities should refer to TI822 to determine their borrowing limit.
Financial Targets
2015-16
Agreed
Limit
$000 / 2015-16
Target(1)/
Actual(2)
$000 / Variation(3)
$000
Agreed Working Cash Limit (at Budget) / 47,637 / 47,637 / N/A
Agreed Working Cash Limit (at Actuals) / 4,41645,891 / 49,2104,416 / (41,4756,910)(f)
(f)  The variation is mainly due to [insert narrative].
Commentary:
The Target Working Cash Limit at Budget is calculated by multiplying 5% by budgeted recurrent payments (total operating and financing).
The Agreed Limit for Working Cash Limit at Budget was deemed insufficient for the Department’s operations and a higher amount was agreed. This limit was subsequently revised at MidYear Review when predicted reductions in salary expenses resulted in a contraction of thise agreed limit.
Further information on the Working Cash Target may be found in the Cash Management Policy(2007) at:
http://www.treasury.wa.gov.au/uploadedFiles/_Treasury/Publications/Cash_Management_Policy.pdf
More detailed information on agency performance, including long term trends and supporting footnotes, may be disclosed either in this section or in the section ‘Disclosures and Legal Compliance’. If further information is disclosed elsewhere, a cross reference to the page number would be required.
Summary of Key Performance Indicators
2015-16 Target(1) / 2015-16 Actual / Variation(2)
Outcome 1: Sustainability of the provision of information technology
Key Effectiveness Indicator(s):
The proportion (%) of government agencies using sustainable information technology plans / 85% / 86% / 1%
Service 1: Information Technology
Key Efficiency Indicator(s):
Cost per sustainable IT plan / $22,700 / $21,950 / $750
Outcome 2: The improvement to the level of information technology for the public sector
Key Effectiveness Indicator(s):
The proportion (%) of government agencies upgrading their information technology / 75% / 76% / 1%
Service 2: Training and Assistance
Key Efficiency Indicator(s):
Clients assisted per staff member
Cost per hour of service delivered / 0.36
$5,000 / 0.39
$5,311 / 0.03
($311)
Outcome 3: Improvement to the competitiveness of the Western Australian technology industry
Key Effectiveness Indicator(s):
Gross value of goods and services produced
Uptake of new technology (%) / $200m
66% / $206m
68% / $6m
2%
Service 3: Competition Policy
Key Efficiency Indicator(s):
Cost per advisory program
Cost per hour of service delivered / $19,300
$5,000 / $18,900
$5,155 / $400
($155)
(1)  As specified in the Budget Statements.
(2)  Explanations for the variations between target and actual results are presented in Note43‘Explanatory statement’ to the financial statements.
Commentary:
More detailed information, including long term trends and supporting footnotes, may be disclosed either in this section or in the section ‘Disclosures and Legal Compliance’. The report on operations shall include any narrative necessary to explain the results and describe the agency’s performance, including any material variations and the impact of any external factors.
If further information is disclosed elsewhere, a cross reference to the page number would be required.
Where there is no resource agreement, the key performance indicators approved under TI904 are to be used in this reporting process by reporting, at a minimum, a summary assessment of actual performance relative to target performance as set in the budget statements, statement of corporate intent or any equivalent document in accordance with TI903(8).