Writing Rubric for George Washington Precedent Assignment
21 0
Claim / Claim is thorough and relevant / Claim is stated. / No claim.Evidence #1 / Relevant evidence present. / Evidence attempted but is unrelated or weak. / No evidence presented.
Commentary #1X2 / Relevant Commentary present (details/explain). / Commentary is unrelated or weak (details/explain). / No commentary presented.
Evidence #2 / Relevant evidence present. / Evidence attempted but is unrelated or weak. / No evidence presented.
Commentary #2X2 / Relevant Commentary present (details/explain) / Commentary is unrelated or weak (details/explain) / No commentary presented.
Conclusion / Provides clear explanation of importance of ideas / Conclusion is present but lacks detail / No conclusion presented.
Text-Talkers orCommentary -Starters / Text-talkers and commentary-starters used effectively. / Some text-talker or commentary-starters attempted. / No text-talkers or commentary-starters.
Conventions / No or very few errors in: (Spelling, Punctuation, Capitalization, Grammar) / Some errors in:
(Spelling, Punctuation, Capitalization, Grammar) / Many errors in:
(Spelling, Punctuation, Capitalization, Grammar)
Total 20 pts
Writing Rubric for George Washington Precedent Assignment
21 0
Claim / Claim is thorough and relevant / Claim is stated. / No claim.Evidence #1 / Relevant evidence present. / Evidence attempted but is unrelated or weak. / No evidence presented.
Commentary #1X2 / Relevant Commentary present (details/explain). / Commentary is unrelated or weak (details/explain). / No commentary presented.
Evidence #2 / Relevant evidence present. / Evidence attempted but is unrelated or weak. / No evidence presented.
Commentary #2X2 / Relevant Commentary present (details/explain) / Commentary is unrelated or weak (details/explain) / No commentary presented.
Conclusion / Provides clear explanation of importance of ideas / Conclusion is present but lacks detail / No conclusion presented.
Text-Talkers orCommentary -Starters / Text-talkers and commentary-starters used effectively. / Some text-talker or commentary-starters attempted. / No text-talkers or commentary-starters.
Conventions / No or very few errors in: (Spelling, Punctuation, Capitalization, Grammar) / Some errors in:
(Spelling, Punctuation, Capitalization, Grammar) / Many errors in:
(Spelling, Punctuation, Capitalization, Grammar)
Total 20 pts
Writing Rubric for George Washington Precedent Assignment
21 0
Claim / Claim is thorough and relevant / Claim is stated. / No claim.Evidence #1 / Relevant evidence present. / Evidence attempted but is unrelated or weak. / No evidence presented.
Commentary #1X2 / Relevant Commentary present (details/explain). / Commentary is unrelated or weak (details/explain). / No commentary presented.
Evidence #2 / Relevant evidence present. / Evidence attempted but is unrelated or weak. / No evidence presented.
Commentary #2X2 / Relevant Commentary present (details/explain) / Commentary is unrelated or weak (details/explain) / No commentary presented.
Conclusion / Provides clear explanation of importance of ideas / Conclusion is present but lacks detail / No conclusion presented.
Text-Talkers orCommentary -Starters / Text-talkers and commentary-starters used effectively. / Some text-talker or commentary-starters attempted. / No text-talkers or commentary-starters.
Conventions / No or very few errors in: (Spelling, Punctuation, Capitalization, Grammar) / Some errors in:
(Spelling, Punctuation, Capitalization, Grammar) / Many errors in:
(Spelling, Punctuation, Capitalization, Grammar)
Total 20 pts