AUN-QA ASSESSMENT REPORT (PROGRAMMELEVEL)

AppendixD

AUN-QAAssessmentNo.: / Dateof Assessment:
Nameof ProgrammeAssessed:
Nameof University:
Nameof Faculty/School:
Nameof ManagementRepresentative/Designation: / Email:
Nameof Assessors:

Report Summary

Thisreportisbased ontheinformation providedintheself-assessmentreport(SAR), evidences,sitetour andinterviewswith selectedstakeholders including academicandsupportstaff,students,alumniandemployers.Itshouldbereadtogetherwiththe preliminaryfindings presentedattheclosingceremonywherethekeystrengths and areasfor improvementwere highlighted.

TheAUN-QAassessmentatprogrammelevelcovers11criteriaandeachcriterionisassessedbasedona7-pointscale.The summaryofthe assessmentresultsis asfollows:

Criteria / Score
1. ExpectedLearningOutcomes
2. Programme Specification
3. Programme StructureandContent
4. Teaching andLearningApproach
5. StudentAssessment
6. Academic StaffQuality
7. Support StaffQuality
8. StudentQualityandSupport
9. Facilities andInfrastructure
10.QualityEnhancement
11.Output
Overall Verdict

Basedonthe assessmentresults,theBachelor ofXXXProgrammefulfilledthe AUN-QArequirements.Overall thequality assuranceimplementedfor theprogrammeis“ ”.

Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
1.Expected
Learning
Outcomes / 1.1Theexpected
learningoutcomes havebeenclearly formulatedand alignedwiththe visionandmission
of theuniversity[1,2]
1.Expected
Learning
Outcomes / 1.2Theexpected
learningoutcomes coverbothsubject specificandgeneric (i.e.transferable) learningoutcomes [3]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
1.Expected
Learning
Outcomes / 1.3Theexpected
learningoutcomes clearlyreflectthe requirementsof the stakeholders[4]
2.Programme
Specification / 2.1Theinformation
intheprogrammespecificationis comprehensiveand up-to-date[1,2]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
2.Programme
Specification / 2.2Theinformation
inthecourse specificationis comprehensiveand up-to-date[1,2]
2.Programme
Specification / 2.3Theprogramme
andcourse specificationsare communicatedand madeavailableto thestakeholders[1,
2]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
3.Programme
Structureand
Content / 3.1Thecurriculum
is designedbased onconstructive alignmentwiththe expectedlearning outcomes[1]
3.Programme
Structureand
Content / 3.2Thecontribution
madebyeach coursetoachieve theexpected
learningoutcomesis clear[2]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
3.Programme
Structureand
Content / 3.3Thecurriculum
is logically structured, sequenced, integratedandup- to-date[3, 4,5,6]
4.Teachingand
LearningApproach / 4.1Theeducational
philosophyiswell articulatedand communicatedtoall stakeholders[1]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
4.Teachingand
LearningApproach / 4.2Teachingand
learningactivities areconstructively alignedto the achievementof the expectedlearning outcomes[2,3,4]
4.Teachingand
LearningApproach / 4.3Teachingand learningactivities
enhancelife-long learning[5]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
5.Student
Assessment / 5.1Thestudent
assessmentis constructively alignedto the achievementof the expectedlearning outcomes[1,2]
5.Student
Assessment / 5.2Thestudent
assessments includingtimelines, methods, regulations,weight distribution,rubrics andgradingare explicitand communicatedto students[4,5]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
5.Student
Assessment / 5.3Methods
including assessmentrubrics andmarking schemesareused toensurevalidity, reliabilityand fairnessof student assessment[6,7]
5.Student
Assessment / 5.4Feedbackof studentassessment
is timelyandhelps toimprovelearning [3]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
5.Student
Assessment / 5.5 Studentshave
readyaccessto appealprocedure[8]
6.AcademicStaff
Quality / 6.1 Academicstaff
planning (considering succession, promotion,re- deployment, termination,and retirement)is carried outtofulfiltheneeds foreducation, researchand
service[1]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
6.AcademicStaff
Quality / 6.2 Staff-to-student
ratioandworkload aremeasuredand monitoredto improvethequality of education, researchand service[2]
6.AcademicStaff
Quality / 6.3Recruitmentand selectioncriteria
includingethicsand academicfreedom forappointment, deploymentand
promotionare
determinedand communicated[4,5,
6,7]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
6.AcademicStaff
Quality / 6.4Competencesof
academicstaffare identifiedand evaluated[3]
6.AcademicStaff
Quality / 6.5Trainingand
developmental needsof academic staffareidentified andactivitiesare implementedtofulfilthem [8]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
6.AcademicStaff
Quality / 6.6 Performance
management includingrewards andrecognitionis implementedto motivateand supporteducation, researchand service[9]
6.AcademicStaff
Quality / 6.7Thetypesand quantityof research
activitiesby academicstaffare established, monitoredand
benchmarkedfor
improvement[10]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
7.SupportStaff
Quality / 7.1 Supportstaff
planning(atthe library,laboratory,IT facilityandstudent services)is carried outtofulfiltheneeds foreducation, researchand
service[1]
7.SupportStaff
Quality / 7.2Recruitmentand selectioncriteriafor
appointment, deploymentand promotionare determinedand
communicated[2]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
7.SupportStaff
Quality / 7.3Competencesof
supportstaffare identifiedand evaluated[3]
7.SupportStaff
Quality / 7.4Trainingand
developmental needsof support staffareidentified andactivitiesare implementedtofulfilthem [4]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
7.SupportStaff
Quality / 7.5 Performance
management includingrewards andrecognitionis implementedto motivateand supporteducation, researchand service[5]
8.StudentQuality and Support / 8.1Thestudent intakepolicyand
admissioncriteria aredefined, communicated, published,andup-
to-date[1]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
8.StudentQuality
and Support / 8.2Themethods
andcriteriaforthe selectionof students aredeterminedand evaluated[2]
8.StudentQuality
and Support / 8.3Thereisan
adequatemonitoring systemforstudent progress,academic performance,and workload[3]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
8.StudentQuality
and Support / 8.4 Academic
advice,co-curricular activities,student competition,and otherstudent
supportservicesare availabletoimprove learningand employability[4]
8.StudentQuality
and Support / 8.5Thephysical,
socialand psychological environmentis conducivefor educationand researchaswellas personalwell-being [5]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
9.Facilitiesand
Infrastructure / 9.1Theteachingand
learningfacilities andequipment (lecturehalls, classrooms,project rooms,etc.)are adequateand updatedtosupport educationand research[1]
9.Facilitiesand
Infrastructure / 9.2Thelibraryand
itsresourcesare adequateand updatedtosupport educationand research[3, 4]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
9.Facilitiesand
Infrastructure / 9.3Thelaboratories
andequipmentare adequateand updatedtosupport educationand research[1, 2]
9.Facilitiesand
Infrastructure / 9.4TheITfacilities
includinge-learning infrastructureare adequateand updatedtosupport educationand research[1, 5,6]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
9.Facilitiesand
Infrastructure / 9.5Thestandards
forenvironment, healthandsafety; andaccessfor peoplewithspecial needsaredefined and implemented[7]
10.Quality
Enhancement / 10.1Stakeholders’
needsandfeedback serveasinputto curriculumdesign anddevelopment[1]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
10.Quality
Enhancement / 10.2Thecurriculum
designand development processis establishedand subjectedto evaluationand enhancement[2]
10.Quality
Enhancement / 10.3Theteaching
and learning processesand studentassessment arecontinuously reviewedand evaluatedto ensure theirrelevanceand alignment[3]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
10.Quality
Enhancement / 10.4Research
outputisusedto enhanceteaching and learning[4]
10.Quality
Enhancement / 10.5Qualityof
supportservicesand facilities(atthe library,laboratory,IT facilityandstudent services)is
subjectedto evaluationand enhancement[5]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
10.Quality
Enhancement / 10.6The
stakeholder’s feedback mechanismsare systematicand subjectedto evaluationand enhancement[6]
11.Output / 11.1Thepassrates
anddropoutrates areestablished, monitoredand benchmarkedfor improvement[1]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
11.Output / 11.2Theaverage
timetograduateis established, monitoredand benchmarkedfor improvement[1]
11.Output / 11.3Employabilityof
graduatesis established, monitoredand benchmarkedfor improvement[1]
Criteria / Strengths / Areasfor Improvement / Score
(1– 7) / Overall
Score
11.Output / 11.4Thetypesand
quantityof research activitiesbystudents areestablished, monitoredand benchmarkedfor improvement[2]
12.Output / 11.5Thesatisfaction
levelsof stakeholdersare established, monitoredand benchmarkedfor improvement[3]
OverallVerdict