Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON

DIVISION OF SAN PABLO CITY

San Pablo City

ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ESIP) APPRAISAL TOOL

School ID: ______School Name: ______Date Submitted: ______

School Head: ______District: ______Contact No.: ______

Description / Criteria / Observed / Comment/Observation
Pre-Appraisal / Final Review
Endorsement Letter / Is there an organized School Planning Team composed of but not limited to the School Head, Teachers Representative, Parents Representative, Students and Brgy. or LGU Representatives indicating their signatures in the endorsement letter in a suggested format? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Approval Sheet / Is there an approval sheet in a suggested format? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive Summary / Is there an executive summary of the over-all conduct of the Planning Process, including the discussion of but not limited to the legal bases, its purpose and the planning process? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
INTRODUCTION
A. Vision, Mission and Core Values / Are the DepEd Vision, Mission and Core Values stated? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
B. School Situation / Is there a complete, logical and concise presentation of school situation based on the assessment of the following:
  1. current status of children
  2. status and trends in the realization of the school’scontributions to the achievement of the Division Goals and Objectives
  3. school systems and processesthat facilitate and hinder the attainment of school objectives and targets
/  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
K to 12 (PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT AREAS)(Only applicable learning stage(s) to the school should be included)
K to Grade 3
Grade 4 to 6
Grade 7 to 10
Grade 11 to 12
(discussion for each learning stage) / Is there a logical narrative discussion of the school’s prioritization of the most pressing needs or problemsthat surfaced in school and learners data that contributes to the school’s intermediate outcomes for Access and Quality? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Are the priority areas clearly stated with an evident linkage to with an evident linkage to the Department’s Vision, Mission and Core Values? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Are the priority areas directed towards improving school effectiveness?
GOVERNANCE
Governance / Is there a logical narrative discussion of the school’s prioritization of the most pressing needs or problems that are school governance-relatedand contribute to the organization’s governance intermediate outcomes? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Content / Is the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan comprehensive and complete? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Validity and Feasibility / Is the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan technically and managerially feasible? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (Year 1)
Content / Is the required detailed content (as suggested by the format)provided for the plan and is aligned withall otherrelated documents? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Validity and Feasibility / Is the plan technically, financially, and managerially feasible and sustainable? /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
ANNEXES
Are the following Annexes included with complete and concise data and used proper template? / School-Community Data Profile /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Child Mapping Tool /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Child-friendly School Survey /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Child Protection Policy Implementation Checklist /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Student-Led School Watching /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Gap Analysis /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Priority Improvement Areas /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Planning Worksheet /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
School Process /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Root Cause Analysis /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Project Work Plans and Budget Matrices /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
School Report Card (SRC) Summary of Information /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
School Report Card (SRC) /  YES
 NO /  YES
 NO
Action Taken:
(please check appropriate box) / Pre-Appraisal: Date: ______
 Forfinalreview
 Returntoproponentforenhancements based on comments/suggestions
Comments: ______
______/ Final Review: Date: ______
For recommending approval
 For recommending approval but need to incorporate suggestions to enhance the plan
 Return to proponent for enhancements
Comments: ______
______

PRE-APPRAISED BY:
______
Public Schools District Supervisor
REVIEWED BY:
______
Division Appraisal CommitteeMember

1 | Page:ESIP APPRAISAL TOOL