Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Al Atuwi / Ahmad / Eid / 200715150
Report's Title / Workshop & Laboratory Buildings
Advisor's Name / Dr. Ahmad Saad Al-Gahtani
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
1.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
2.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
3.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
4.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
5.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Al-Ofi / Abdullah / Khalaf / 200724650
Report's Title / Construction Management and Civil Application in Aircraft Maintenance Hangars
Advisor's Name / Dr. Mohammed Al-Sughaiyer
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
1.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
2.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
3.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
4.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
5.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Al Madah / Fares / Mohammed / 200773750
Report's Title / Design and Supervision of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
Advisor's Name / Dr. Alfarabi M. Sharif
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
1.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
2.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
3.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
4.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
5.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Al-Tasan / Abdul-Ilah / Ibrahim / 200818080
Report's Title / Design and Construction the Communication Facilities of ARAMCO
Advisor's Name / Dr. Mohamed Arifuzzaman
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
1.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
2.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
3.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
4.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
5.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
AlMoudadi / Abdulaziz / Ali / 200809620
Report's Title / Training on Constrcution Work under the Kowledge Park Project
Advisor's Name / Dr. Shamshad Ahmad
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
1.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
2.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
3.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
4.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
5.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Al-Kadhem / Ibrahim / Hussain / 200781430
Report's Title / Construction Works Experience in King Abdullah Financial District
Advisor's Name / Dr. Mohammed Al-Suwaiyan
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
1.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
2.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
3.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
4.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
5.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Al-Harbi / Ahmed / Sanad / 200828960
Report's Title / Column design and Site Preparation of Neuroscience Center at King Fahad Medical City in Riyadh
Advisor's Name / Dr. Hamad Abdul Wahhab
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
1.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
2.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
3.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
4.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
5.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Alkorbi / Nawaf / Ali / 200838680
Report's Title / Analysis and Design ofAircraft Maintenance shops
Advisor's Name / Dr.Alfarabi Sharif
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
6.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
7.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
8.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
9.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
10.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Al-Ghamdi / Abdulaziz / Saeed / 200853420
Report's Title / MA ‘Aden Projects : MA ‘Aden Aluminum Project Mine and Refinery
Advisor's Name / Dr. Husain Al-Gahtani
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
6.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
7.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
8.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
9.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
10.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Al-Muhanna / Mohammed / Abdul-Hamid / 200863520
Report's Title / Construction and Work Experience in Expansion of King Fahd Medical city
Advisor's Name / Dr.Omar Al-Attas
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
6.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
7.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
8.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
9.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
10.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Bu-Khamseen / Abdul-Mohsin / Ali / 200865040
Report's Title / Design& construction of zone-5 in abqiq hospital
Advisor's Name / Dr. Salah Al-Dulijan
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
6.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
7.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
8.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
9.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
10.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Bin Hamdan / Turki / Abdulaziz / 200639560
Report's Title / SUPERVISION AND INVESTIGATION OF PIER P5A OF KING ABDUL-AZIZ OVERPASS BRIDGE PROJECT
Advisor's Name / Dr. Ali Algadhib
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
6.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
7.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
8.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
9.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
10.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CEE Cooperative Training Program - CE 351

Student's Performance Evaluation (Scores Distribution & Final Grade)

Academic term / 131
Student's Name & KFUPM ID / Family / First / Middle / KFUPM-ID
Al-Muwalad / Sultan / Ateeq / 200715230
Report's Title / ------
Advisor's Name / Dr. Naser Al-Shayea
COOP Works Field-Evaluation: / Scores
[out of 100 points] / Earned Score / Max. Score
6.Status on: Training Plan/Continuity & Progress Reports ( evaluated by coordinator) / 10
7.Second Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
8.Fourth Progress Report (by:ExaminersAdvisor "content & timing") / Examiners / Advisor / 5
9.Two Confidential Reports & One Rubric Scoring-Table ([by Coordinator] Based on Evaluation by Field Mentor) / First Confidential Report / 5
Second Confidential Report / 5
Rubric Evaluation (Scoring) / 5
Final Examination Evaluation: / Advisor (Over-all) / 15
10.Final Report & Presentation(by Examiners) / Report / 30
Presentation / 20
Total Score* / 100

*Note: A grading-curve for a particular academic term may be used to assign students' final letter grades for a group of COOP students. Otherwise, the following scalesare used:

A+: GT. 95; A: 90 – LT. 95 ; B+: 85 – LT. 90; B: 80 – LT. 85 ; C+: 75 – LT. 80; C: 70 – LT. 75; D+: 65 – LT. 70; D: GT. 60 –LT. 65 ; F: LT. 60 ;

IC (granted only based on written request from COOP-Report Advisor supplemented with clear justification and future plan to complete the work).

Assigned Letter Grade: …………………………………...

Remarks/Justification (if any):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. .

Coordinator's Name:Dr. Saeid A. Alghamdi

Signature: ------Date: ------