PART ONE / ITEM NO.
REPORT OF THE CITY TREASURER
TO THE:AUDIT & ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE
ON:Wednesday25thJanuary2012
TITLE: INTERNAL AUDIT PROGRESS REPORT APRILTO DECEMBER 2011/12
RECOMMENDATION:
Members are requested to consider the contents of the report.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this report is to inform Members of the resources utilised by Internal Audit during 2011/12, the activities undertaken in the reporting period, and the status of work currently being undertaken, and of that proposed during the fourth quarter of 2011/12.
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS:
(Available for public inspection)
Quarterly Committee reports, Audit Management Information System.
KEY DECISION: NO
DETAILS: See report attached.
KEY COUNCIL POLICIES: N/A
EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND IMPLICATIONS: N/A
ASSESSMENT OF RISK:
Internal Audit projects are managed within the Unit’s risk based audit protocols aimed at giving assurance regarding the management of the City Council’s key business risks.
SOURCE OF FUNDING:Existing revenue budget.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS Supplied by: N/A
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Supplied by: N/A
OTHER DIRECTORATES CONSULTED:N/A
CONTACT OFFICER:Andrew Waine TEL. NO.0161 607 6969
WARD(S) TO WHICH REPORT RELATE(S): N/A

INTRODUCTION

This report provides Members of the Audit & Accounts Committee with details of the resources utilised by Internal Audit since the commencement of Internal Audit’s 2011/12 plan, the activities reported upon since the last sitting of this Committee in November2011, the work currently being undertaken and that proposed for the quarter ending March 2012.

RESOURCES UTILISED

The planned chargeable days, that is those which can be directly attributable to audit work, for the financial year 2011/12are1661.Internal Audit has a target to achieve 100% of these days for the year. We can report that for the period April to December 2011, 85% of the overall plan has been delivered compared to a target of 75% for that period.

Internal Audit continues to respond to the need to undertake special investigations, and has incurred 126% of its planned activity in this regard. Investigations concluded are reported separately under Part Two of this Committee.

TableA - Internal Audit Progress ReportApriltoDecember2011

Directorate / Actual Days (Total to date) / Annual Plan (Total to date) / % Plan Achieved
Chief Executive's / 57 / 39 / 148
Children's Services / 352 / 365 / 96
Community Health & Social Care / 67 / 181 / 37
Customer & Support Services / 392 / 449 / 87
Environment & Community Safety / 60 / 65 / 92
Sustainable Regeneration / 66 / 107 / 62
Contingency / 0 / 114 / 0
Total / 993 / 1318 / 75
Irregularity / 271 / 215 / 126
Management and Planning / 149 / 128 / 116
Total / 419 / 343 / 122
Combined Total / 1413 / 1661 / 85

REPORTING

During the period from the 1stSeptember 2011 to 31stOctober2011, a total of11 audit reports have been finalised and issued to various client directorates across the Council.

Table B below shows the audits that have been undertaken and the recommendations that have been put forward for management consideration.

A total of83recommendationshave been made and classified over four categories of critical, high, medium, andefficiency(See TableEon Page 25 for explanations of the different categories).

Our recommendations are designed to improve the control environment within the auditee’s area of responsibility and it is pleasing to note that all but one of the recommendations made have been accepted by management. The exception to this related to a recommendation we put forward regarding the counting of cash at one of the outlets administered by Citywide Commercial Catering; management felt that this would not be beneficial due to the large volume of cash collected and the vulnerability of staff at late evening events. Our audit reports include an action plan that records the detail of our findings, the related recommendations and the action management intend to take to implement our recommendations. This provides a record that progress can be monitored against when we undertake our Post Implementation Reviews.

The level of assurance given to each audit is a balanced judgement based upon the subjects’ established system of controls, the subjects’ approach to risk management, and the nature of any recommendations made(See TableFon Page 25for explanations of the different levels of assurance).

TableB - Recommendation Priorities

Audit / Recommendations / Assurance Level
Critical / High / Medium / Efficiency / Number Agreed
Bank Accounts / 0 / 7 / 3 / 2 / 12 / Limited
Broughton Jewish CasselFoxPrimary School / 0 / 2 / 9 / 0 / 11 / Limited
Carbon Reduction Commitment 2010/11 / 0 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 5 / Limited
Citywide Commercial Catering Income Collection / 0 / 0 / 3 / 1 / 3 / Moderate
FiddlersLanePrimary School / 0 / 8 / 7 / 0 / 15 / Limited
Future Jobs Fund / 0 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 1 / High
Income Collection - PrincesParkGarden Centre / 0 / 0 / 7 / 5 / 12 / Moderate
Lone Working / 0 / 1 / 2 / 0 / 3 / Moderate
Showpeople Sites / 0 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 2 / Limited
St Paul's Church of England (New Windsor / Cross Lane) Primary School / 0 / 6 / 4 / 0 / 10 / Limited
Vehicle Management Services Income Collection / 0 / 2 / 4 / 2 / 8 / Limited

POST IMPLEMENTATION REVIEWS

Internal Audit undertakes Post Implementation Reviews (PIRs) of all the services that have been subject to an audit. The timing of a PIR is determined by the agreed implementation dates, detailed within the original audit report, and is generally undertaken within six months of the audit.

The PIR normally takes the form of an actual site visit to verify the implementation of agreed recommendations. However,the PIR may be undertaken by a process of self-assessment and formal notification to Internal Audit of implementation of the recommendations.

During November and December2011,a total of 28post implementation reviews have been reported. Table C below provides details of the progress made by Directorates/schools in implementing the agreed recommendations.

In respect of the 28PIRs undertaken during this period there are a total of 11outstanding high priority recommendations and 23outstanding medium priority recommendations.Revised implementation dates have been agreed with management to implement the recommendations as soon as possible.

TableC - Results of Post Implementation Reviews

Post Implementation Review / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Community Health & Social Care -
Direct Payments
Original report issued 1st July 2010 / Critical: / 0 / 0 / 0
High: / 4 / 3 / 1
Medium: / 3 / 2 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / o / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matter refers to:
  • The type of monitoring information required from a third party organisation and to ensure it is regularly obtained. This is being considered as part of a wider review within the directorate and should be completed by December 2011
  • Utilising CareFirst as a payment method of making Direct Payments.

Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Customer & Support Services -
Accounts Receivable
Original report issued 4th October 2010 / Critical: / 0 / 0 / 0
High: / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 2 / 1 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matter refers to:
  • Implementing a data cleansing exercise. Progress regarding this recommendation has been delayed due to other work priorities and a lack of resources within ICT Services. A revised implementation date of September 2012 has been agreed.

Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Customer & Support Services – Main Accounting System
Original report issued16thMay 2011 / Critical: / 0 / 0 / 0
High: / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 0 / 1 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matter refers to:
  • Taking action to ensure that changes to SAP access levels are managed effectively and on a timely basis to ensure employees have the appropriate level of access. This will be considered as part of the 2012 audit review.

Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Sustainable Regeneration - Urban Vision Client Side PIR2
FirstPIR report issued 8thJuly 2011 / Critical: / 0 / 0 / 0
High: / 5 / 3 / 2
Medium: / 3 / 2 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The following matters have been identified as remaining outstanding since the original Post Implementation Review:
  • Annual business plans should be shared with UV to ensure works are corporately co-ordinated; this would improve planning, help identify any potential savings and gaps.
  • Performance data should be collated, and / or reviewed to include customer satisfaction surveys for feedback and to develop specific and relevant performance indicators
  • A risk register will be compiled concentrating on financial risks for 2012/13.

Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Sustainable Regeneration – Carbon Reduction Commitment
Original report issued 11thOctober 2010 / Critical: / 0 / 0 / 0
High: / 3 / 3 / 0
Medium: / 0 / 0 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Office of the Chief Executive – SOLAR
Original report issued 25thMay 2011 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 2 / 2 / 0
Medium: / 4 / 0 / 4
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The issue of the lack of control regarding access to Part 2 documents is now well controlled within the current interim system, and the project to move reports to Documentum is progressing and it is likely that the original December 2011 deadline will be met. This encompasses all of the outstanding recommendations.
Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Children’s Services– Moorside Primary School
Original report issued 10thDecember 2010 / Critical: / 0 / 0 / 0
High: / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 2 / 2 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Children’s Services– St Mark’s C.E. Primary School
Original report issued 22ndNovember 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 7 / 6 / 1
Medium: / 2 / 2 / 0
Efficiency: / 1 / 1 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding recommendation will be implemented by September 2011; this refers to undertaking independent spot checks of the income prepared for banking. The checks should be evidenced by signing and dating the paying-in slip or relevant schedules.
Children’s Services– St Mark’s RC Primary School
Original report issued 15thDecember 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 2 / 2 / 0
Efficiency: / 1 / 1 / 0
Children’s Services– St Pauls Peel CE Primary School
Original report issued 8th March 2011 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 2 / 2 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Children’s Services– Case File Auditing Process
Original report issued 4th May 2011 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 2 / 1 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding recommendation is due to be completed by the end of January 2012. Since completion of the internal audit review, the volume of case files has substantially increased. All remedial actions identified as part of the audit process are rated as red, amber or green, dependent on the severity of the actions required. Monitoring of remedial action will be completed on a risk based approach. A review of remedial actions has suggested there is a low level of compliance, reducing the effectiveness of the auditing process. New controls to enable effective monitoring of remedial actions have been developed.
Children’s Services – Broadoak Primary School
Original report issued 9thFebruary 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 4 / 2 / 2
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The School is in the process of completing its record of inventory items and the risk register.
Children’s Services – St Paul’s CE (Crompton Street) Primary School
Original report issued 27thJanuary 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 1 / 1 / 0
Medium: / 2 / 2 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Children’s Services – ChristChurch CE Primary School
Original report issued 27thNovember 2009 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 2 / 2 / 0
Medium: / 12 / 12 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Children’s Services – CliftonPrimary School
Original report issued 2nd March 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 7 / 6 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding recommendation relates to the compilation of a risk register.
Children’s Services – GodfreyErmenMemorialPrimary School
Original report issued 29thApril 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 2 / 1 / 1
Medium: / 9 / 8 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matters refer to:
  • The controls around the voluntary fund for the foundation unit have been aligned with the official fund and school fund accounts; however, the audited statement has not been presented to the Governing Body for approval.
  • The School is in the process of compiling a risk register.

Children’s Services – New StEdmundsRCPrimary School
Original report issued 31st March 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 5 / 3 / 2
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matters refer to:
  • The School’s Publication Scheme which has not yet been suitably published, and
  • The School is in the process of compiling a risk register.

Children’s Services – St Paul's CE (Nevile Road)
Original report issued 1stApril 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 1 / 1 / 0
High / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 6 / 6 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Children’s Services – St Peters CE Primary School
Original report issued 21 st January 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 6 / 5 / 1
Medium: / 4 / 4 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding recommendation relates to the School’s Publication Scheme which has not yet been completed.
Children’s Services – St Sebastian's Primary School
Original report issued 10th May 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 5 / 3 / 2
Medium: / 3 / 3 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matters refer to:
  • Risk assessments in relation to public access to the ICT suite have not been completed, and
  • There is no signed rental agreement in place between the School and the School Improvement Service regarding the ICT suite.

Children’s Services – St Mary's RC Primary School
Original report issued 23rd March 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 1 / 1 / 0
Medium: / 2 / 2 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Children’s Services – MesneLeaPrimary School
Original report issued 21stJanuary 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 5 / 4 / 1
Medium: / 3 / 2 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matters refer to:
  • The completion of a risk register, and
  • Formalising the lettings arrangement with the After School Club based in the School.

Children’s Services – St Andrew’s CE Eccles Primary School
Original report issued 30thApril 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 3 / 3 / 0
Medium: / 5 / 3 / 2
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matters refer to:
  • Documenting and having approval of a risk register, and
  • Publicising the School’s Publication Scheme on the Internet.

Children’s Services – MossfieldPrimary School
Original report issued 15thDecember 2009 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 3 / 2 / 1
Medium: / 8 / 7 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matters refer to:
  • Introducing appropriate segregation of duties to negate the risks associated with Internet banking, and
  • Documenting a risk register and its presentation to the Governing Body.

Children’s Services – St CharlesRCPrimary School
Original report issued 29thApril 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 4 / 3 / 1
Medium: / 8 / 6 / 2
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding matters refer to:
  • Formalising the contractual arrangements with the out-of-school club
  • Completing a Publication Scheme, and
  • Documenting a formal lettings policy and charging schedule.

Children’s Services – CharlestownPrimary School
Original report issued 2ndAugust 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 3 / 3 / 0
Medium: / 4 / 3 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding recommendation relates to the completion of a risk register and obtaining Governing Body approval.
Children’s Services – NorthGrecianStreetPrimary School
Original report issued 27thJuly 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 2 / 2 / 0
Medium: / 5 / 5 / 0
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Children’s Services – WardleyPrimary School
Original report issued 21stJuly 2010 / Recommendations
Made / Implemented: / Outstanding:
Critical / 0 / 0 / 0
High / 0 / 0 / 0
Medium: / 3 / 2 / 1
Efficiency: / 0 / 0 / 0
Audit Comment:
The outstanding recommendation relates to the approval of the School’s risk register.

WORK IN PROGRESSQUARTER 4 (2011/12)

Members have stated that they would welcome an indication of the planned workload of Internal Audit for the ensuing period of account.Table D below provides an indication of the key areas currently being reported upon, and those we intend to cover during this period.

Members need to be aware that these subject matters have arisen as a result of the annual audit planning process, and that these are only indicative subject matters due to our flexible planning methodology, and which could be subject to amendment.Committee summary reports will be issued to Members at the conclusion of each review.

Page 1 of 25

Table D

SALFORD INTERNAL AUDIT – WORK IN PROGRESS

Review Title / Terms of Reference (TOR) Issued / Draft Report date due on TOR / Status / Comments
Safer Recruitment / 2nd June 2011 / 15th July 2011 revised to 31stJanuary 2012 / Testing / Delays due to other priorities within Section, and with the client.
The scope of the audit includes a review of the following key processes:
  • Recruiting permanent staff, including vetting references and qualifications, verifying identity and asylum and immigration status.
  • Recruitment of agency and temporary employees
  • Internal transfers of employees
  • Compliance with the Criminal Records Bureau Code of Practice; including checks carried out in respect of client groups within the Licensing section of the Environment and Community Safety Directorate, and the Fostering and Adoption Service within the Children's Services Directorate.

Processing of Committee Papers / 28th October 2011 / 27th January revised to 15thFebruary 2012 / Testing / Delays due to other priorities within Section.
The scope of the audit review includes, and is limited to, the following processes:
  • Reviewing the use of the Forward Look for completeness and in line with the timeliness of report preparation
  • Examining reports in order to assess their style, presentation, use of consultees and overall quality
  • Procedures in place to ensure appropriate confidentiality of information
  • Reviewing timescales in relation to obtaining responses from consultees for the report being consulted upon and the timely submission of the reports to Democratic Services.

Residential Care (contractual arrangements) / 3rd October 2011 / 18th November 2011 / Reporting / 1st draft report issued.
The scope of the audit involves a review of the following processes:
  • Compliance with the contract by providers
  • Impact of a reduction in scrutiny on Salford City Council residential care service as a direct result of a reduction in Care Quality Commission service provision
  • Salford City Council client side monitoring and reviewing of the contract.

Extended Schools / 4th April 2011 / 1st June 2011
Revised to 21st December 2011 / Reporting / Draft report prepared.
The scope of the audit includes a review of the following key processes:
  • Goverance arrangements in place in schools with respect to the extended schools provision
  • Policies, contracts, and service level agreements in place at schools with respect to the extended schools provision
  • Arrangements for collection, receipting and banking of income generated from extended schools provision, (either rental income or income from charges to parents)
  • Monitoring arrangements of all the schools that provide extended schools services in place within Children’s Services.

Bereavement Services Income Collection / 26th July 2011 / 31st August 2011 / Reporting / Extension of scope and expansion of testing. 2nd draft report issued.
The City Council collects income across all Directorates and a number of different processes and procedures are in place. Income can be collected in a variety of methods, these include:
  • Cash and cheque collection
  • Electronic point of sale (EPOS)
  • Chip and pin terminal for credit or debit card transactions.
The diversity of operational practice and procedures across two sites, large total income value and number of transactions, means that potentially there is a high risk of income being incorrectly collected and accounted for within Bereavement Services who are part of the Environment and Community Safety Directorate. At the time of our audit, a Bereavement Services Manager was not in post and there have also been other staffing reductions at each Cemetery site.
Provider Services Income Collection / 26th July 2011 / 31st August 2011 / Reporting / Extension of scope and expansion of testing. 2nd draft report issued.
The City Council collects income across all Directorates and a number of different processes and procedures are in place. Income can be collected in a variety of methods, these include:
  • Cash and cheque collection
  • Electronic point of sale (EPOS)
  • Chip and pin terminal for credit or debit card transactions.
Within the Community, Health and Social Care Directorate, Provider Services were identified in an initial risk assessment as having a large total income value and number of transactions. Provider Services has six Day Centres for persons with learning difficulties or mental health needs and a specialist resource centre for people with Alzheimer's Disease. Our review covered a sample of establishments each providing slightly different services. Income was found to be collected from users and their families for the sale of meals, drinks, photocopying and various fundraising activities. Takings included cash, cheques and meal vouchers, with no sites having facilities for electronic payment.
Council Tax / 26th October 2011 / 9th December 2011 / Reporting / Delay due to extension of testing.
The scope of the audit will include a review of the following:
  • Policies and Procedures
  • Valuation of properties
  • Determining Council Tax liability and billing
  • Collection/refunds of Council Tax
  • Recovery and enforcements of Council Tax.

Remuneration of Elections Staff / 12th October 2011 / 28th October 2011 / Reporting / Delay due to extension of scope.1st draft report issued.
The scope of the audit review includes the following:
  • The maintenance and reliability of suitable records in relation to staff and others performing electoral duties
  • The processing and authorising of payments due including accounting for statutory deductions
  • The administration of the supporting paperwork and returns
  • The reconciliation of payments made to bank records
  • Retention of required financial records.

SAP ESS/MSS Portal (employee/manager self service) / 5th December 2011 / 27th January 2012 / Testing
The scope of the audit review includes the following:
  • That the SAP Employee Self Service Portal is being utilised as intended,
  • That the benefits of implementing the SAP Employee Self Service Portal are being realised.

Housing & Council Tax Benefits / 25th November 2011 / 13th January 2012 / Testing
The scope of the audit review includes the following:
  • The administration of Benefit claims
  • The assessment and processing of Benefit claims subject to eligibility confirmation
  • The payment of Benefit claims and action for any overpayments arising
  • The detection and prevention of Benefit fraud
  • The Benefit subsidy grant claim
  • Monitoring the section’s performance.

The Deans Primary School PIR / N/A / Reporting
Fostering & Adoption PIR / N/A / Reporting
St George’s CE Primary School / N/A / Reporting
GrosvenorRoadPrimary School / N/A / Reporting
St Joseph the WorkerPrimary School / N/A / Reporting
HiltonLanePrimary School (Change of Head teacher) / N/A / Reporting
WalkdenHigh School / N/A / Reporting
HarropFoldHigh School / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Mental Health SCC & PCT Arrangements / Not Yet Issued / Scoping TOR
National Non-domestic Rates / Not Yet Issued / Scoping TOR
School Closures - Summer Term 2010 PIR / N/A / Reporting
Attendance Management PIR 2 / N/A / Testing
Payroll / Not Yet Issued / Scoping TOR
Clarendon Road Primary School PIR / N/A / Reporting
St Paul’s CE (Heathside) Primary School / N/A / Reporting
Care Package Guidance Levels / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Emergency Planning (Sustainable Regeneration) / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Carbon Reduction Reporting PIR / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Facilities Management / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Accounts Payable / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Income Receipting PIR / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Creditor Payments (IDEA) / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Residential Care (Personal Money) / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Treasury Management / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Governance Arrangements of PCT - Consortium & Health Board / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Postal Services Value For Money / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Barton Moss Primary School PIR / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Cathedral School of St Peter & St John PIR / Not Yet Issued / Planning
Chatsworth Primary School PIR / Not Yet Issued / Planning
St John’s CE Primary School PIR / Not Yet Issued / Planning
St Mary's CE Primary School (Cadishead) PIR / Not Yet Issued / Reporting
St Teresa’s RC Primary School PIR / Not Yet Issued / Planning
St Thomas of Canterbury RC Primary School / Not Yet Issued / Planning
WillowTreePrimary School / Not Yet Issued / Planning
MontonGreenPrimary School / Not Yet Issued / Planning
MoorfieldPrimary School / Not Yet Issued / Planning
St Augustine’s CE Primary School / Not Yet Issued / Planning

Page 1 of 25