111028 LCSP_Simplified_Outline (03-09-12)
– ACAT
LIFE-CYCLE SUSTAINMENT PLAN
VERSION
SUPPORTING MILESTONE _
AND
***********************************************************************************
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (OSD) APPROVAL
______
Honorable Alan F. EstevezDate
Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Logistics & Materiel Readiness)
SUBMITTED BY
______Product Support Manager / ______
Date
REVIEW
______Program Contracting Officer / ______
Date / ______
Program Manager / ______
Date
______
Program Lead Engineer / ______
Date / ______
Program Financial Manager / ______
Date
concurrence
______Program Executive Officer / ______
Date / ______
Sustainment Organization / ______
Date
component approval (ACAT IC)
______
Date
Component Acquisition Executive
Table of Contents[NOTIONAL: Please update or replace contents and pagination with your own once document is filled out.]
1Introduction5
2Product Support Performance6
2.1Sustainment Performance Requirements6
2.2Demonstrated (tested) Sustainment Performance7
3Product Support Strategy8
3.1Sustainment Strategy Considerations9
3.2Sustainment Relationships9
4Product Support Arrangements10
4.1Contracts10
4.2Performance Based Agreements (PBA)10
5Product Support Package Status11
5.1Program Review Results11
5.2Product Support Package Assessment11
6Regulatory/Statutory Requirements That Influence Sustainment Performance12
7Integrated Schedule13
8Funding14
9Management15
9.1Organization15
9.1.1 Government Program Office Organization15
9.1.2Program Office Product Support Staffing Levels15
9.1.3Contractor(s) Program Office Organization15
9.1.4Product Support Team Organization16
9.2Management Approach18
9.2.1Product Support Manager Roles and Responsibilities18
9.2.2Sustainment Risk Management18
10Supportability Analysis19
10.1Design Interface19
10.1.1Design Analysis19 10.1.2Technical Reviews 21
10.2Product Support Element Determination22
10.3Sustaining Engineering22
11Additional Sustainment Planning Factors23
LCSP Annexes24
List of Tables[NOTIONAL: Please update or replace list of tables with your own once document is filled out.]
Table 2.1: Sustainment Performance Requirements6
Table 2.2: Sustainment Performance Metric Breakdown6
Table 2.3: Sustainment Performance Assessment/Test Results7
Table 3.1: Product Support Strategy8
Table 3.2: Sustainment Cost Drivers9
Table 4.1: Performance Based Arrangements Implemented in Contracts10
Table 4.2: Organic Performance Based Agreements10
Table 5.1: Program Review Results11
Table 5.2: Product Support Package Assessment11
Table 6.1: Sustainment Alignment of Regulatory/Statutory Requirements12
Table 8.1: Product Support Funding Summary14
Table 9.1: IPT Team Details17
Table 9.2: Risk Summary18
Table 10.1: FMECA Summary19
Table 10.2: Reliability Growth Plan Issues19
Table 10.3: Completed Supportability Trades20
Table 10.4: Planned Supportability Trades20
Table 10.5: Technical Reviews21
Table 10.6: Product Support Analytical Methods and Tools22
Table 10.7: Sustainment Performance Monitoring22
List of Figures[NOTIONAL: Please update or replace list of figures with your own once document is filled out.]
Figure 3.1: Product Support Reference Design Concept8
Figure 3.2: Sustainment Concept Performance9
Figure 3.3: Product Support Providers9
Figure 7 1: Product Support Schedule13
Figure 9 1: Program Office Organization15
Figure 9 2: Program Product Support Staffing15
1Introduction
This version of the LCSP focuses on
Table 11 lists the major LCSP revisions since the last ASD(L&MR) review.
LCSP Update RecordRevision Number / Date / Change and Rationale / Approved By
Table 11: LCSP Update Record
2Product Support Performance
2.1Sustainment Performance Requirements
Table21 lists the sustainment requirements integrated into the design process along with the corresponding performance expectations.
Sustainment Performance RequirementsRequirement
(KPP, KSA, Derived requirement) / Documentation / Threshold / Objective / RFP/
Contract / TES / TEMP / IOC / FOC / Full Fielding
Table21: Sustainment Performance Requirements
Table 22 breaks down the system-level metrics upon which the product support plan and product support package are based.
Supporting “Design-To” MetricsRequirement / Lower Level Metric / Documentation / Standard or Level
Table 22: Sustainment Performance Metric Breakdown
2.2Demonstrated (tested) Sustainment Performance
Table 23 identifies the current estimates based on the best engineering analysis and experience to date.
Demonstrated (tested) Sustainment PerformanceMetric /
Feature / Contractual Requirements / Demonstration
Schedule / Requirement /
PS Elements Impacted / Performance Objective /
PS Package Baseline Value / Estimated Value / IOC Estimate
Table 23: Sustainment Performance Assessment/Test Results
3Product Support Strategy
Figure 31 provide an overview of the product support design concept and major subsystem features.
Figure 31: Product Support Reference Design Concept
Table 31 lists the overarching elements of the sustainment strategy.
Table 31: Product Support Strategy
Figure 32 identifies the roles and responsibilities for product support providers along withthe planned supply chain performance metrics.
Figure 32: Sustainment Concept Performance
3.1Sustainment Strategy Considerations
Table 32 lists the major drivers impacting the Sustainment Strategyand its associated costs.
Sustainment Cost DriversConsideration / Core Documents / Cost Driver / Product Support Element Impact/ Control
CONOPS
DESIGN FEATURE
Table 32: Sustainment Cost Drivers
3.2Sustainment Relationships
Table 3-3 identifies theproduct support strategyrelationships.
Figure 33: Product Support Providers
4Product Support Arrangements
4.1Contracts
Table 41 identifies the sustainment related contract efforts, in place and planned.
Product Support Related ContractsName / Organizations / Products / Timeframe / Responsibilities/Authority and Functions / Metrics & Incentives
CLIN:
Type: / Products Covered:
Timeframe: / Responsibilities:
Functions: / Metrics:
CLIN:
Type: / Products Covered:
Time frame: / Responsibilities:
Functions: / Metrics:
Table 41: Performance Based Arrangements Implemented in Contracts
4.2Performance Based Agreements (PBA)
Table 42 identifies the current and planned PBAs.
Organic Performance Based AgreementsName / Organizations / Products / Schedule / Responsibilities/Authority and Functions / Performance Metrics
Table 42: Organic Performance Based Agreements
5Product Support Package Status
5.1Program ReviewIssues and Corrective Actions
Table 51identifies the open and in-work findings from the program reviews.
Program Review ResultsReview / Finding / Corrective Action/Planned Completion Date
Table 51: Program Review Results
5.2Product Support Package Assessment
Table 52 identifies the of assessment resultsfrom the most recent Logistics Assessment which was conducted between ___ and___ .
Product Support Package / Logistics AssessmentProduct Support Element / Assessment / Discussion/Issues / Corrective Action/ECD
Table 52: Product Support Package Assessment
6Regulatory/Statutory Requirements That Influence Sustainment Performance
Table 61lists thestatutory and regulatory requirements impacting sustainment and potentially affect sustainment performance.
Regulatory/Statutory RequirementsRequirement / Documentation / OPR / Start Date /
Implementation
Date / CLIN / Review Cycle / Affected Performance Metric
Core Logistics Analysis / 10 USC 2464
Source of Repair Analysis / Public Law 111-23
Public-Private Partnership / 10 USC 2474
Corrosion / DODI 5000.67 (Feb 2010)
IUID / DODI 5000.02 (Dec 08)
DODI 8320.04 (Jun 08)
CBM + / DODI 4151.22 (Dec 07)
Serialized Item Management / DOD 4140.1-R
DODI 4151.19 (Dec 06)
Supply Chain Risk Management / DEPSECDEF DTM 09-016, SCRM to Improve the Integrity of Components Used in DOD Systems
DODI 5200.39 (Jul 08)
Affordability / AT&L Better Buying Power Memo, Nov 3, 2010
Table 61: Sustainment Alignment of Regulatory/Statutory Requirements
7Integrated Schedule
Figure 71 illustrates the major sustainment related events relative to the integrated master schedule.
Figure 71: Product Support Schedule
8Funding
Table 8-1 identifies the program’s major sustainment funding requirements and funding availability,
Table 81: Product Support Funding Summary
9Management
9.1Organization
9.1.1Government Program Office Organization
Figure 9-1 illustrates the current and planned organization.
Figure 91: Program Office Organization
9.1.2Program Office Product Support Staffing Levels
Figure 92 identifies the program’s current and planned product support staffing levels.
Figure 92: Program Product Support Staffing
9.1.3Contractor(s) Program Office Organization
Figure 9-3 illustrates the current and planned organization and the corresponding staffing levels are identified Figure 9-4.
Figure 93: Contractor Program Office Organization
Figure 94: Program Product Support Staffing
9.1.4Product Support Team Organization
Figure 9-5illustrates the current and planned sustainment related Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) and working groups.
Figure 95: Integrated Product Team (IPT) Organization
IPT Details –Table 91 identifies details on the IPTs and Working Groups.
IPT Teams:Team Name / POC / Team Membership / Team Role, Responsibility, and Authority / Products & Metrics
Size: / Role:
Responsibilities:
Schedule and frequency / Products:
Metrics:
Size: / Role:
Responsibilities:
Schedule and frequency / Products:
Metrics:
Table 91: IPT Team Details
9.2Management Approach
9.2.1Product Support Manager (PSM) Roles and Responsibilities
9.2.2Sustainment Risk Management
Table 92 lists key sustainment risks identified in the program reviews.
Risk SummaryRisk / Rating / Driver / Mitigation Plan / Status
Table 92: Risk Summary
10Supportability Analysis
10.1Design Interface
10.1.1Design Analysis
Table 101 lists key sustainment related results from the Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) for the major and critical subsystems.
FMECA Results SummarySystem / Schedule / Issues/Likelihood / Impact / comments
Table 101: FMECA Summary
Reliability Growth Plan Issues–Table 102 lists the systems where the current Reliability Growth Plan estimate is reliability --%or more below target.
Reliability Growth Plan IssuesSystem / Planned/ De-rated Values(failures per operating hour) / Estimate at IOC / ConfidenceLevel / Mitigation efforts
Table 102: Reliability Growth Plan Issues
Completed Supportability Trades - Table 103lists the major supportability trade studies completed since the last LCSP update.
Completed Supportability TradesTrade
(Completed since -) / IPT / Options Analyzed / Results / Impact
Alternatives:
Criteria:
Table 103: Completed Supportability Trades
Planned Supportability Trades –Table 104 lists the major upcoming trades.
Planned Supportability TradesTrade / IPT / Options Analyzed / Expected Results/ Outcome / Impact
Projected Date: / Alternatives:
Criteria:
Post MS __ Supportability Trades
Trade / IPT / Options Analyzed / Expected Results/ Outcome / Impact
Projected Timeframe: / Alternatives:
Criteria:
Table 104: Planned Supportability Trades
10.1.2Technical Reviews
Table 105 identifies key sustainment related information from the Technical Reviews.
Technical ReviewsReview / Sustainment Participants / Sustainment Focus / Criteria
Entry
Exit:
Entry
Exit:
Table 105: Technical Reviews
10.2Product Support Element Determination
Table 106 identifies the supportability analysis methods and toolsto define the product support package.
Product Support Analytical Support Methods and ToolsProcess/Analyst / Schedule / Tool / Output Product / Update Timeframe
Table 106: Product Support Analytical Methods and Tools
10.3Sustaining Engineering
Table 107 list the tools that will be used to monitor the performance of the product support package.
Sustainment Performance Data Collection and ReportingTool / OPR/IPT / Metrics/Data Monitored / Feedback Mechanism / Review Timeframes
Table 107: Sustainment Performance Monitoring
11Additional Sustainment Planning Factors
LCSP Annexes
Blank Table 3-1
1