1
HSP 154H Great Issues in Social Science:
Negotiation and Dispute Resolution
Spring 2012
Professor Greg Saltzman
Office: Room 101 Robinson, tel. 0422, E-mail
Home telephone: (734) 971-7596 (not after 9:30 PM, please)
Office hours: TuTh 2:00 – 4:00 PM
Please feel free to stop by my office without an appointment, though you can make an appointment if you wish. I am frequently in my Albion office at the following times:
Mondays / 9:40-10:20 AM and 11:30-11:50 AMTuesdays / 9:45-10:20 AM, 11:30-11:50 AM, and 2-4 PM
Wednesdays / 9:40-10:20 AM and 11:30-11:50 AM
Thursdays / 9:45-10:20 AM, 11:30-11:50 AM, and 2-4 PM
Fridays / Almost never (usually in Ann Arbor)
If you make prior arrangements with me, then I am also happy to meet with you in my office most Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays from 11:50 AM to 12:50 PM.
Classes Mondays and Wednesdays, 2:15 – 4:05, Norris 100.
Course web:
An introductory study of the theories and concepts related to negotiation and dispute resolution developed in such fields as microeconomics, psychology, labor relations, and international relations. Includes many role-playing exercises to provide students with practice in negotiation.
Negotiation is the art and science of securing agreements between two or more interdependent parties. In recent years, society has given increased attention to negotiation as a technique to resolve many different kinds of disputes, including legal, managerial, environmental, community, and family disputes. At the same time, the scholarly literature on negotiation and dispute resolution has expanded rapidly.
The role-playing exercises in this course will put you in new and potentially uncomfortable situations so that you will have the opportunity, in the relatively safe environment of the classroom, to try out new behaviors and skills. Think of this course as a social skills laboratory to develop a crucial leadership skill: negotiation and dispute resolution.
Learning objectives:
After completing this course, students will be able to:
- Apply concepts from microeconomics (e.g., game theory, Pareto efficiency), psychology (e.g., cognitive biases), and labor relations (e.g., integrative bargaining) to analyze negotiations
- Recognize how others perceive their negotiation behaviors and style of interaction
- Communicate more effectively, both orally and in writing
- Negotiate and resolve disputes with greater confidence and skill than before they enrolled in this course.
Class attendance and participation can also substantially affect your grade.
REQUIRED READINGS
Required textbook: Leigh Thompson, The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator,5th edition (2012). Some journal articles and book chapters will be available on the course web.
In addition, each student will be required to pay a total of approximately $30 in copyright fees for use of negotiation exercises sold by Northwestern University or Harvard University. I will distribute paper copies of these exercises throughout the semester.
NEGOTIATION JOURNAL
You are required to maintain a journal as a vehicle for continuing reflection on your negotiation experiences over the semester. The journal should have one entry for each role-playing class exercise prior to April 4. Although there is no set minimum or maximum length for the journal entries, 1-2 pages typed double-spaced per entry would be typical.
The journal entries are not a permanent record of each detail of what happened. I am only interested in enough detail to understand the situation. The main purpose of each entry should be to analyze the process and the outcome of the negotiation. Among the questions that you might address are:
- How did the actual process and outcome compare to the predictions of various writings on negotiation? For example, the reading by Greenhalgh and Gilkey, “Our Game, Your Rules,” asserts that men and women begin negotiation with very different cognitive frames. Did the assertions in this article apply to the men and/or women in this negotiation?
- What did you learn about negotiation from the experience and your reflection on it?
- What surprised you about your behavior and that of the other party or parties?
- Did you and the other party or parties make full use of opportunities for mutual gains? If not, why not?
- How did the history of the situation, the communication process, the distribution of power, coalitions between parties, time pressures, etc. shape the outcome of the negotiation? Did you achieve a less favorable outcome for yourself than you might have? If so, why?
- What did you learn about your values, assumptions, perceptions, methods of coping with stress, and style of interaction? What did you learn about the other party or parties?
- If you had the chance to do this negotiation over, what would you do differently?
My focus in grading will be on the quality of insight and reflective thinking embodied in the journal entries. I also expect correct grammar and spelling. Use concepts and theories from the readings or lectures when appropriate to analyze what happened in your negotiation.
I will separately distribute two very good journal entries from previous semesters. These samples should give you a better idea of what I want in your journals.
The journal will be a very personal document. In order to gain full value from the writing, it is important that you be honest with yourself. To facilitate this, I will keep your journal writing confidential. In my comments, I may ask if you would be willing to share a particular set of reflections with the class, but this will be strictly voluntary.
1
I recommend saving each entry as a separate computer file (e.g. Polynesian.docx or Disarmament.docx). I also recommend printing out a paper copy of each journal entry as soon as you finish writing it. That way, you will not lose your previous work if you make some grievous computer error as you are writing a subsequent entry.
I urge you to write each journal entry soon after the exercise concludes, while you still remember what happened.
Each journal entry for a role-playing exercise from class should begin with the following information:
--name of the exercise
--your role in the exercise (for exercises with assigned roles, e.g., “buyer” for The Used
Car)
--name of your teammate or teammates, if any
--names of the persons with whom you (and your teammates, if any) negotiated
--roles of the persons with whom you negotiated
Example of information at the beginning of a journal entry:
Twin Lakes Mining Company
Town council: Bob, Jane, Dave Harris, Mary, and me
Mining company: Ellen, Joe, Dave Manski, Susan, and Vikram
(Note that last names are needed when there are two students in the class with the same first name.)
The journal will be due in three parts. Part 1 covers the exercises through January 25. Part 2 covers the exercises from February 1-20. Part 3 covers the exercises from February 29 through April 2.
REFLECTIONS PAPER
This is a short paper (about 5 pages, typed double spaced), reflecting back on your experiences during the semester and identifying the key themes and lessons that have emerged. This reflections paper should be based on three sources of data:
(a) Your journal. Examine your entire journal for the semester as though you were a dispassionate social scientist who has just come across this curious document. Try to codify the material in your journal, using specific examples from the journal to illustrate general tendencies.
(b) Your self-assessment responses. On Monday in the second week of class, you will complete a negotiation self-assessment. Save your response. Then, in mid-April, complete this self-assessment again, without looking at the answers that you gave in January. After you have written down your April answers, compare your April answers to your January answers. Did your answers change? If so, why?
(c) Feedback from your classmates with whom you negotiated. I encourage, but do not require, you to provide feedback to your classmates with whom you negotiate in class. I will set aside class time at least twice during the semester for you to provide written anonymous comments to your classmates, with the hope that this feedback will help your classmates improve their negotiation skills. You should also feel free to provide your classmates with oral comments on an ongoing basis or to give them written copies of journal entries concerning your negotiations with them. Identify specific behaviors by your fellow students, and tell them how their behaviors influenced your behaviors or your feelings. If you are the recipient of such feedback, try to listen to it graciously and accept it in the constructive spirit in which it was, I hope, intended.
CLASS ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION
Because of the highly experiential nature of the course, near perfect attendance is required for the class sessions on which we have role playing exercises. Each student may miss one role-playing exercise without penalty. Save this for the day that you get the flu, that you have to attend your grandmother's funeral, or that you have a crucial job interview in Detroit. Students who miss more than one role-playing exercise will have their grades reduced by 1/3 grade (e.g., from a 3.7 to a 3.3) for each exercise beyond the first that they miss. You have been warned.
If possible, please give me advance notice that you will be absent for a role-playing exercise; this notice will help me when I organize the exercise at the beginning of the class.
It is sometimes possible to make arrangements for students to make up a missed exercise outside of class, doing the exercise with another student who also had to miss class that day. It is impossible, however, to make up exercises in which the whole class is one group (e.g., Bennett, Strang & Farris). Finally, even when it is possible to make up a missed exercise outside of class, you will learn less because you will miss much of the analysis from the debriefing. Both to avoid the possibility of a grade penalty and to maximize your learning, you should make every effort to attend all of the role-playing sessions.
After any adjustment is made on the basis of attendance, I will retain the option of a further (subjective) adjustment on the basis of the quality of participation. Students who are poorly prepared for a role playing exercise, who do not take their roles seriously, or who are not actively involved in the exercise may diminish the potential learning from that exercise not only for themselves, but also for the other person or persons in their group. (Fortunately, I have had few such students in my negotiation course in past years.) On the other hand, students with particularly keen insights may make the exercises more valuable both for themselves and for the others in their group. The subjective adjustment can be as much as 1/3 of a grade either up or down (e.g., the difference between a 3.3 and a 3.7.) In a large majority of cases, I will make no subjective grade adjustment.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
Albion College has adopted the following statement on academic integrity: “As an academic community, Albion College is firmly committed to honor and integrity in the pursuit of knowledge. Therefore, as a member of this academic community, each student acknowledges responsibility for his or her actions and commits to the highest standards of integrity. In doing so, each student makes a covenant with the college not to engage in any form of academic dishonesty, fraud, cheating, or theft.”
As noted above, you may not consult other students in this class or anyone else about the take-home exam. Furthermore, I expect you to refrain from making any effort to see the confidential role-play instructions of students playing other roles in the negotiation exercises.
I leave it to each of you to decide whether to lie to another student with whom you are negotiating, but you should consider very seriously both your personal ethics and the potential damage to your ability to win the trust of others in the future.
DISABILITY STATEMENT
If you have a disability and may require accommodations or modifications in class instruction or course-related activities, please contact the Learning Support Center (LSC) staff who can arrange for reasonable accommodations for students who provide documentation of their disability/condition. If you are presently registered with the LSC and have requested accommodations through the LSC for this semester, please plan to meet with me as early as possible to discuss the best way to implement these accommodations in this class. The LSC is located on the third floor of the Seeley Mudd library or call 517-629-0825.
Tentative Schedule
Week ofDayTopic and Reading Assignment
Jan 16WedIntroduction
Role Play: “Polynesian Coconuts”
The ABC's of Game Theory and the Prisoner's Dilemma
Reading: text, chapter 1
Jan 23MonCompetition and Cooperation
Role Play: “The Disarmament Exercise”
Reading: Avinash Dixit and Barry Nalebuff, Thinking Strategically (New York: W.W. Norton, 1991), “Ten Tales of Strategy,” pages 7-30.
WedMultiparty Prisoner’s Dilemma
Role Play: “Win As Much As You Can”
Readings:
Text, chapter 11
“Game Theory in Practice,” The Economist, September 3, 2011, Technology Quarterly, pp. 13-14.
Jan 30MonDistributive Bargaining, BATNA’s and Reservation Points
Reading: text, chapters2-3
Theories of Negotiation
Readings:
Richard Walton and Robert McKersie, A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965), “Introduction and Theoretical Framework,” pages 1-10.
Howard Raiffa, The Art and Science of Negotiation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), “Prologue,”“Some Organizing Questions,” and “Research Perspectives,” pages 1-25.
H. Peyton Young, “Dividing the Indivisible,” in Richard Zeckhauser, et al. (eds.), Wise Choices: Decisions, Games, and Negotiations (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996).
James Sebenius, “Sequencing to Build Coalitions: With Whom Should I Talk First?” in Zeckhauser, Wise Choices.
WedDistributive Bargaining
Reading: text, appendix 4
Role Play: “Summer Internship”
Second Role Play: “The Used Car”
Journal part 1 due in class Wednesday, February 1
Week ofDayTopic and Reading Assignment
Feb 6MonGreg Saltzman Buys a Minivan
WedIntegrative Bargaining, Pareto Efficiency, and Negotiation Style
Role Play: “El Tek”
Reading: text, chapters 4-5
Feb 13MonTrust, Ethics, and Power
Reading: text, chapters 6-7, Appendix 2
A Brief Introduction to Expected Value Calculations (needed for Jessie Jumpshotrole play next week)
Reading: Greg Saltzman, “Expected Value Calculations and the Jesse Jumpshot Exercise”
WedUnequal Power
Role Play: “Viking Investments”
Readings:
Robert Mnookin, Scott Peppet, and Andrew Tulumello, “The Tension between Empathy and Assertiveness,” Negotiation Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3, July 1996, pp. 217-230.
Natalie Angier, “Thirst for Fairness May Have Helped Us Survive,” The New York Times, July 5, 2011, p. B2.
Feb 20Mon(1) Use of Agents; (2) Contingent Contracts
Role Play: “Jessie Jumpshot”
Note: At the end of Monday’s class, you will be given some questions about the Jessie Jumpshot negotiation to analyze prior to Wednesday’s class.
WedDiscussion of Jessie Jumpshot questions; discussion of Jessie Jumpshot video
Cognitive Biases
Readings:
Text, chapter 8
NassimTaleb, “Scaring Us Senseless,” The New York Times, July 24, 2005, Section 4, p. 13.
Week ofDayTopic and Reading Assignment
Feb 27MonGender Issues in Negotiations
Readings:
Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Men and Women of the Corporation (New York: Basic Books, 1977), “Numbers: Minorities and Majorities,” pages 206-242.
Leonard Greenhalgh and Roderick Gilkey, “Our Game, Your Rules: Developing Effective Negotiation Approaches,” in Linda Moore, ed., Not as Far as You Think (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1986).
Deborah Tannen, “The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why,”Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, September-October 1995, pp. 138-148.
Journal part 2 due in class Monday, February 27
WedEnvironmental Disputes
Role Play: “Twin Lakes Mining Company”
Mar 5No classes (spring break)
Mar 12MonMultiple Party Negotiations
Role Play: “Towers Market”
Reading: text, chapter 9
WedStructured Multi-PartyNegotiations
Role Play: “Harborco”
Mar 19MonUnstructured Multi-Party Negotiations
Role Play: “Flooding”
Reading (not specifically related to today’s role-play exercise): Leonard Greenhalgh, “Managing Conflict,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 4, Summer 1986, pp. 45-51.
WedUnstructured Multi-Party Negotiations
Role Play: “Bennett, Strang & Farris”
Mar 26MonMediation and Arbitration
Reading: text, Appendix 3
WedCompetition and Cooperation in Groups
Role Play: “Strategic Decisions at Jaguar”
Apr2MonCommunity Conflict: Race and Class Divisions
Role Play: “Elmwood Hospital Dispute”
WedLabor-Management Negotiations
Video: “Final Offer”
Journal part 3 due in class, Wednesday, April 4
Week ofDayTopic and Reading Assignment
Apr9MonLabor Negotiations
Role Play: “Happy Valley Consolidated School District”
WedCross-Cultural Issues in International Negotiations
Role Play: “Alpha-Beta”
Readings:
Text, chapter 10
Hannah Seligson, “For American Workers in China, A Culture Clash,” The New York Times, Dec. 24, 2009, pp. B1 and B2.
Apr 16MonDecision Analysis in an International Business Negotiation
Role Play: “Cementownia Odra”
WedVive la France
Role Play: “Mouse”
Apr 23MonInternational Negotiation: The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict
Readings:
GhassanKhatib, “The Fateh-Hamas Reconciliation Process and the Conflict: Israel Plays a Role,” BitterLemons.org, January 16, 2012.
Scott Atran and Robert Axelrod, “Reframing Sacred Values,” Negotiation Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, July 2008, pp. 221-246.
Daniel Levy, David Makovsky, and Gideon Lichtfield, “Middle East peace: Statements,” The Economist, posted online October 17, 2011.
Reflections essay due in class, Monday, April 23
WedInternational Negotiation: The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict