PRELIMINARY FIELD PLAN REVIEW INSPECTION REPORT: P.I. NO. 0007414

PAGE 1 CAMDEN COUNTY

FINAL FIELD PLAN REVIEW INSPECTION REPORT

PI No.: 0007414, Camden County
PROJECT NUMBER: CSSTP-0007-00(414)

Widening/Reconstruction – CR 90/Colerain Road from west of I-95 to east of Kings Bay Road

INSPECTION DATE:12/9/15

REPORT DATE: 12/11/15

RESPONSE ACCEPTED DATE: 2/29/16

This inspection was requested by Albert V. Shelby, III, State Program Delivery Engineer. The Project Manager is David Moyer.

The plans were prepared by Moreland Altobelli.

The report was prepared by John Kopotic, Design Engineer 2, and accepted by Lisa L. Myers, State Project Review Engineer, Office of Engineering Services.

The NEPA document was approved on 3/21/13.

This report is being distributed via E-mail.

The Inspection Plans were reviewed in Camden County Annex Building prior to the site inspection.

The PFPR was conducted 10/4/12 and responses received 3/25/13. The complete FFPR submittal package was received by the Office of Engineering Services on 11/12/15. This project is currently scheduled for the 7/22/16 Letting.

All comments marked with an arrow symbol () shall be addressed with a written response by the Project Manager. As per Plan Development Process, responses to all comments will be written in complete sentences and will clearly state the action taken to address the comment. If a comment requests a specific action and the Project Manager determines that no action or a different action will be taken, the response should clearly explain the Project Manager’s decision. All responses shall be submitted in Word format (a pdf of the document will not be accepted).

MAAI responses dated January 5, 2016 are in bold red italics.

Projects Let to construction after July 1, 2013 will require the use of the 2011 AASHTO “GREEN BOOK”, GDOT Design Manual, 2011 Roadside Design Guide, 2012 Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Projects Let to Construction after October 2013 will require the use of the 2013 Georgia Standard Specifications. Please revise all notes that make reference to previous GDOT Design Manuals and Specifications. Any substandard features that cannot be complied with due to project restraints will require the submission of a design exception/variance to the State Design Policy and Support Engineer.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed Colerain Road/ CR 90 typical section is two 12-foot lanes in each direction

separated by a 20-foot raised median. The purpose of this Revised Concept Report is to change

the urban shoulder section from 4-foot bike lanes and 5-foot sidewalks on both sides to a 10-foot

multi-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of proposed Colerain

Road as a cost savings measure while meeting Camden County's bike route system requirements

for Colerain Road. The rural shoulder section from 2664 feet west of I-95 to relocated Brazell

Road is changed to an urban section to eliminate the need for barrier separation between the

travel lanes and the multi-use path on the proposed bridge over I-95. The rural shoulder section

from 3800 feet west of Winding Road is changed to an urban section. Thesubstantial residential development planned for this area would use the sidewalks to the nearby

county high school. The rural shoulder section for 440 west of Winding Road to 1500 feet east of Kings Bay Road would remain but implementation of Value Engineering Study alternatives changed the typical section from 4-foot bike lanes and 10-foot shoulders (6’6” paved and 3’6” grass) to 10-foot shoulders consisting of a 4-foot bake lane and 6-foot grass strip in each direction.

DESIGN DATA

CURRENT TRAFFIC ADT:16,900(2019)

DESIGN TRAFFIC ADT:28,200(2039)

PERCENT TRUCKS:6.4%(24 HR = 7.5%)

CURRENT POSTED SPEED:45/55 MPH

SPEED DESIGN:45 MPH

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION:Urban Minor Arterial

The Concept Report was approved on 3/12/09.

ENVIRONMENTAL

GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS:

The Environmental Resources Impact Table (Environmental Resources Impact Table) will be coordinated with the project's Environmental Commitments Table and other plan notes to illustrate the restrictions associated with various environmental resources. The responsibility for inserting the table into the plans will rest with the designer, and its content and accuracy will be confirmed by the NEPA analyst who is responsible for environmentally certifying the project. The table shall be included in the General Notes section of all plans beginning with projects that have field plan reviews scheduled for September 1, 2010, and later and/or projects that are scheduled to be let in November 2010 or later. All Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) flags on plan sheets shall be changed to read "ESA - See Environmental Resources Impact Table in General Notes for construction restrictions." The ESA notes shall be placed on ALL plan sheets where an ESA exists.

RIGHT OF WAY

NUMBER OF PARCELS: 114APPRAISED: 103

ACQUIRED DEEDS:62 with 9 pending

ACQUISITION BY:LOC

TYPE ACCESS CONTROL: By permit/ Partial L/A

GENERAL RIGHT OF WAY COMMENTS:

District 5 Traffic Operations advises R/W will be required for the SW quadrant, see drawing 27-005.

MAAI will relocate the proposed signal strain pole in the southwest quadrant of Colerain

Rd/ Wildcat Dr to eliminate need for required R/W from Parcel 39 which has already been

closed.

DESIGN EXCEPTIONS

DESIGN EXCEPTIONS REQUIRED: Substandard SE Rate – Curve 9

DESIGN EXCEPTIONS REQUESTED:10/10/12

DESIGN EXCEPTIONS APPROVED:1/29/13

DESIGN VARIANCES

DESIGN VARIANCES REQUIRED:None

DESIGN VARIANCES REQUESTED:N/A

DESIGN VARIANCES APPROVED:N/A

SPECIAL PROVISIONS

PROJECT SPECIFIC SPECIAL PROVISIONS FURNISHED FOR THE INSPECTION:

Section 107.23.G. - Protection of Federally Protected Species

Section 108 – Prosecution and Progress

Section 150.11 – Traffic Control (Special Conditions)

Section 209 – Subgrade Construction

Section 520.3.05.B.– Piling (Drill Pilot Holes)

Section 615 – Jacking or Boring Pipe (Directional Boring)

Section 625 – Visual Barriers

Section 636 – Highway Signs

Section 881 – Fabrics

ADDITIONAL PROJECT SPECIFIC SPECIAL PROVISIONS REQUIRED:

Section 107.21 - Contractor’s Worksite Utility Coordination Supervisor

Section 639 – Strain Poles for Overhead Sign and Signal Assemblies

Section 647 - Traffic Signal Installation

Section 660 – Sanitary Sewer System

Section 670 – Water Distribution System

GENERAL SPECIAL PROVISION COMMENTS:

Contracts Administration should include the Special Provision adding the Fine Grader due to this being a widening project with at least on mile of continuous full width paving.

Restrictions to traffic interruptions are recommended.

The Contractor shall not install lane closure; perform flagging, or move equipment or materials on the travel way that interferes with traffic between the hours of 6:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday through Friday.

Interstate lane closures:

Single lane closures:

Single lane closures will be allowed between the hours of 9:00 P.M. to 5:00 A.M. Sunday through Saturday.

Double lane closures:

Double lane closures and pacing are allowed to be installed on I-95 between the hours of 12:00 A.M. to 5:00 A.M. Monday through Friday and 12:00 A.M. to 10:00 A.M. Saturday to Sunday.

The District 5 Construction Office requests the restrictions to traffic interruptions be revised to:

The Contractor shall not install lane closure; perform flagging, or move equipment or materials on the travel way that interferes with traffic between the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and 2:30 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday.

I-95 shall not have double lane closures installed or pace traffic between 7am and 7pm. Single lane closures on I095 are permitted 24 hrs a day.

Please submit the Section 108 and Section 150 Special Provisions to the Office of Construction for their review. This should be done after the Preliminary Field Plan Review, but prior to the assembly of the Final Plan Documents.

MAAI will revise Special Provision Section 150.11 to restrict traffic interruptions as requested:

The Contractor shall not install lane closure; perform flagging, or move equipment or materials on the travel way that interferes with traffic between the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and 2:30 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday.

I-95 shall not have double lane closures installed or pace traffic between 7am and 7pm. Single lane closures on I095 are permitted 24 hrs a day.

MAAI will submit the Section 108 and Section 150 Special Provisions to the Office of Construction prior to the assembly of the Final Plan Documents.

ESTIMATED CONTRACT TIME: The Inspection Team recommends 36 months.

VALUE ENGINEERING

Total Project Programmed Cost:$33,853,481.07

VE Study Date: 6/8/09 – 6/11/09

VE Implementation Approval Date: 9/30/19

VE Reversal 1 – 2/6/12

VE Reversal 2 – 2/10/12

VE Reversal 3 – 1/28/13

General VE Comments: None

CONSTRUCTION PLANS

01-XXX COVER SHEET

Revise the note Limit of Construction on Colerain Road to read Begin Construction and End Construction. Limit of Construction is used on side roads.

MAAI will revise the note Limit of Construction on Colerain Road to read Begin

Construction and End Construction.

Verify the Project Designation shown as Full Oversight. Current records show this project as Exempt.

MAAI will revise Project Designation from Full Oversight to Exempt.

Add the Location and Design approval date of 4/3/13.

MAAI will add the Location and Design approval date of 4/3/13.

02-XXX INDEX

Please ensure all applicable GA Standards and Details are included and the latest revision dates are shown.

Label CONCRETE SIDE BARRIER TYPES 2, 2A, 2B & 2C GDOT Construction Standard 4948b and move to Drawing 02-002 where the Standards are listed.

The CONCRETE SIDE BARRIER shown in the plans are “slant face” TYPES 2-S, 2-SA, 2-SB. Current GDOT drawings do not reference Std number. MAAI will move to and label drawings as GASTD 4948B.

Add GDOT Construction Detail D5 HEADWALLS SAFETY INLETS WITH GRATES.

MAAI will add GDOT Construction Detail D5 HEADWALLS SAFETY INLETS WITH GRATES,

6/95.

Add GDOT Construction Detail D6 FABRICATION DETAILS FOR SAFETY GRATES (ALL KINDS AND SIZES).

MAAI will add GDOT Construction Detail D6 FABRICATION DETAILS FOR SAFETY GRATES (ALL KINDS AND SIZES) 10/72.

Add GDOT Construction Standard 5001m DROP INLET TYPES M-1 & M-2 ADJACENT TO CONRETE BARRIER (SHEET 1 0F 2).

The FFPR plans do not call for these types of drop inlets. MAAI will verify use ofand add GDOT Construction Standard 5001m DROP INLET TYPES M-1 & M-2 ADJACENT TO CONRETE BARRIER (SHEET 1 0F 2) accordingly.

Add GDOT Construction Standard 5001mp DROP INLET TYPES M-1 & M-2 ADJACENT TO CONRETE BARRIER (SHEET 2 0F 2).

The FFPR plans do not call for these types of drop inlets. MAAI will verify use ofand add GDOT Construction Standard 5001m DROP INLET TYPES M-1 & M-2 ADJACENT TO CONRETE BARRIER (SHEET 2 0F 2) accordingly.

Add GDOT Construction Standard 4280 GUARDRAIL LOCATION ON ROADS WITH CURB & GUTTER, HEADER CURB OR INTEGRAL CURB.

The FFPR plans call for GADOT Std 4391 GUARDRAIL LOCATION ON ROADS WITH CURB & GUTTER, HEADER CURB OR INTEGRAL CURB 31 inch guardrail height and not STD 4380 which is for 27 inch height.

Add GDOT Construction STD4948a CONCRETE SIDE BARRIER TYPES 7-C, 7-R, 7-T, 7-W.

The CONCRETE SIDE BARRIER shown in the plans are “slant face” MAAI will add GDOT Construction modified STD 4948 Special Design CONCRETE SIDE BARRIER TYPES 2-S,6-S,7-CS, 7-RS, 7-TS, 7-WS 3/05.

04-XXX GENERAL NOTES

General Comments

Add General Note: All WCR’s located within the radii shall be 8” thick, paid as CONC SIDEWALK, 8 IN.

MAAI will add General Note: All WCR’s located within the radii shall be 8” thick, paid as CONC SIDEWALK, 8 IN. MAAI will add pay item 441-0108 accordingly.

Add a General Note that any utilities or signal operations damaged by the Contractor will be replaced in kind at no additional expense to the department.

MAAI will add a General Note that “Any utilities or signal operations damaged by the Contractor will be replaced in kind at no additional expense to the department.”

Drawing 04-001

Revise Note 1 “these projects” to “this project”.

MAAI will revise Note 1 “these projects” to “this project”.

Note 2: Use full pay item descriptions for the driveway pavement layers. Use Recycled Asphaltic Concrete.

MAAI will label Recycled Asphaltic Concrete and full pay item descriptions for the driveway pavement layers.

Note 2: The Mainline Plan and Summary of Quantities drawings have valley gutter with asphalt driveways which this note does not specify for asphalt driveways.

The PFPR Report page 6, general note 3rd comment requested to delete concrete valley gutter reference from asphalt drive info. MAAI will relabel such info.

Replace Note 5 with the following revised General Note: All borrow and waste sites for this project shall be environmentally approved prior to construction activities occurring in them. All common fill or excess material disposed outside the project right of way shall be placed in either a permitted solid waste facility, a permitted inert waste landfill or in an engineered fill. : See Section 201 of the Standard Specification and Supplements thereto for additional information.

MAAI will replace Note 5 with the following revised General Note: All borrow and waste sites for this project shall be environmentally approved prior to construction activities occurring in them. All common fill or excess material disposed outside the project right of way shall be placed in either a permitted solid waste facility, a permitted inert waste landfill or in an engineered fill. : See Section 201 of the Standard Specification and Supplements thereto for additional information.”

Drawing 04-002

Ensure all notes provided in the Approved Soil Survey for the Filter Fabric Placement Detail are provided.

MAAI will add alltext provided in the Approved Soil Survey Section 9 Groundwater to the Filter Fabric Placement Detail shown.

Drawing 04-003

The detail description and graphics refers to a footing which is not applicable to an MSE wall which is shown.

MAAI will revise “Footing” to “End of Strips or Mesh” which is applicable to an MSE wall

shown.

Based on Earthwork Cross Sections Drawing No. 23-052 thru 23-059 the section where the undercut is required has either a Type 2 side barrier, Type 2 side Barrier with ground mounted visual Barrier or MSE wall. Details are needed to reflect all three of these configurations.

MAAI will add Details and applicable station range to reflect Type 2-S, 2-SA and 2-SB side barrier with and without ground mounted visual Barrierwall.

The undercut section specifies 3 feet minimum thickness which implies there are sections where more than feet of undercut is required but no guidance is provided for any variation of the undercut thickness.

MAAI will add WFI Report Section 5 Recommendations last sentence which states “This

work should be done at the direction of the Engineer for actual undercut limits and

depths.”

Drawing 04-004

Revise the ERIT to include USTs.

MAAI will add info for UST sites 1, 2, 7, & 14 being Parcels 9, 10, 14 and 44 respectively.

Drawing 04-005

Replace the General Notes – Standard Signs with current Standard & Overhead sign General Notes dated 1 October 2015.

MAAI will replace the General Notes with the Standard Signs with current Standard & Overhead sign General Notes dated 1 October 2015.

05-XXX TYPICAL SECTIONS

General Comments

GDOT has defined the Safety Edge as the standard treatment for the outside edge of all uncurbed pavements whether edge of travel lane or shoulder (excluding pavement behind guardrail). If it is not practical to provide the Safety Edge, then a decision to omit shall require a comprehensive study by an engineer and the prior approval of a Design Variance from the GDOT Chief Engineer. The Safety Edge placement should be noted on the construction plan typical sections, with reference to GDOT Construction Detail P-7 for details and method of quantity calculation. Verify that Safety Edge treatment is referenced throughout Typical Sections accordingly.

MAAI will verify that Safety Edge treatment is referenced throughout Typical Sections. MAAI will label both sides of applicable typical section and delete the label “Typ”.

Remove the R/W information as it is shown as varies and does not convey any useful information.

MAAI will remove all R/W information from typical sections.

Flag/note what material is to be placed between the curb & gutter and sidewalk.

MAAI will Flag and add to Required Pavement Depths Legend what material to be placed between the curb & gutter and sidewalk. FFPR plans call for grassing.

Provide left turn detail.

MAAI will provide left turn detail(s).

Why is a 3:1 front slope specified on the right side of the typical section and a 4:1 is specified on the left side or vice versa even though the Revise Concept Report specifies 4:1 will be used. For example see Typical section No.3 and 4 on Drawing No. 05-002.

As the proposed roadside ditch depth increases the 4:1 slope(s) are steepened to 3:1 to minimize the impacts to the properties.

Per the GDOT Pavement Design Manual, if paving material is supplied from Florida or soil cement, top soil or other soil bases are used, then showa Square Yard measure for payment if weighing is inconvenient. IfSquare Yard measurement is specified, the typical section shall beclearly dimensioned along the top finished surface and dimensionsnoted as the “Width of Payment.” Show the GAB Pay Limits for each applicable Typical Section.

Per the GDOT Pavement Design Manual, MAAI will showa Square Yard measure for paving material, soil cement, top soil and other soil bases used. The typical section shall beclearly dimensioned along the top finished surface, dimensionsnoted as the “Width of Payment.” and GAB Pay Limits labeled for each applicable Typical Section.

Drawing 05-001

Label P7 the left side shoulder for consistency since both sides have the proposed pavement labeled.

MAAI will label both sides of applicable typical section and delete the label “Typ”.

Graphically Typical Section No. 2 is shown as superelevated section but on the Mainline Plan Drawing No. 13-001 is specified as normal crown. See Curve Data No. 1.

MAAI will verify typical section line work represents a normal crown roadway section and revise if necessary.

Drawing 05-002

Revise Typical Section No. 3 to end and begin at the Begin Bridge/End Bridge not approach slabs (STA 41+77.19 not STA 41+47.19 & STA 44+70.19 not STA 45+00.09).

MAAI will revise Typical Section No. 3 to end and begin at the Begin Bridge/End Bridge not approach slabs (STA 41+77.19 not STA 41+47.19 & STA 44+70.19 not STA 45+00.09).