Tim:

i am chipping away at the questions. I am combining in one survey the questions from the values survey (taken from previous research) and our questions on bs. I did this in Xcel and saved it to a pdf so it is odd looking and doesn't show the 4 point choices for the values questions: strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree.

The bs questions vary in type of response. I am attaching what i have so you can look it over and comment, question, whatever. I still need to firm up my intuition that the values survey (with its 2 dimensions) is related to one's perceptions of bs. Do you have any thoughts on the connection, if any. One way i think of it is that people who are more extreme on the 2 dimensions will see more bs in their world.

From the Fredal paper, here is one quote that suggests that those with the most extreme ideology will see the most bs:
"This makes the charge of bullshit highly subjective or, as Postman says, “One man’s bullshit is another man’s catechism.” Any text by any speaker can (and will) be perceived as bullshit by someone, from celebrity apologies to declarations of global warming, from French post-structuralism to Barack Obama’s campaign language of “hope” and “change” (satirized by Sarah Palin in her Tea Party speech of February 6, 2010). And, because of his understanding of the situatedness of bullshit and its sensitivity to an audience’s value system, Postman recognizes that we all, at some point or another, produce what will be seen by someone else as bullshit, especially those of us most confident in the rightness of our beliefs: we have, in the words of Pogo, met the enemy and he is us." (p. 253)

HYPOTHESIS 2:

If “one man’s bullshit is another man’s catechism,” it may be there is no difference in how people on the extremes of these dimensions think about bullshit, only a difference in what they think is bullshit, and then we should find no difference in the relationship between their beliefs in bs and values.

Lenny

Hypothesis 3:

Based on K. Taylor’s chapter in Bullshit and Philosophy, “Bullshit and the Foibles of the Human Mind ………

SS on the extremes of the values dimensions should relate differently to bs than subjects in the middle. Hence, SS at the extremes will be more like one another in their responses to bs questions than the Ss in the middle.